Google's Got Microsoft In A Headlock: Pay $4 Billion A Year Or Sto


Recommended Posts

[/left][/size][/font][/color]

:D

Epic !

Sounds pretty much like something you'd hear from a 4-year-old. Not to mention they're out to prove how mature they are by trying to take revenge on Microsoft by abusing FRAND patents when Motorola broke the law in the first place.

Google keeps messing with MS until they'll pull the patents on Android. Good luck with that.

Google is big, yes, but they are going against a giant, that won't end well for them.

MS never claimed almost 60$ per device, not even be tenth. Their patents have also not been FRAND patents.

As far as HTC goes, MS got 5 bucks or so on each device, I'm guessing around the same on Samsung?

Sounds pretty much like something you'd hear from a 4-year-old. Not to mention they're out to prove how mature they are by trying to take revenge on Microsoft by abusing FRAND patents when Motorola broke the law in the first place.

Well in that case, i don't even think any professionalism needed !

Since, the fight is not for money but to pressurise for patents !

Google keeps messing with MS until they'll pull the patents on Android. Good luck with that.

Google is big, yes, but they are going against a giant, that won't end well for them.

As far as HTC goes, MS got 5 bucks or so on each device, I'm guessing around the same on Samsung?

Which is less than one tenth, and actually I believe HTC got a special deal to pay less than that.

I know what the general user base is like -- they'll call Microsoft out if they disagree with them

Great, please point me to the Neowin where they call out Microsoft on when they're ****ing on others, trolling with their patents or threatening Linux users - not to mention where the users haven't had years of free reign in trolling every single Apple thread ever made. Because apparently me and quite a few other people have been browsing this alternate Neowin.

Better take those shades off sometime and take another glance.

No disrespect, but you guys aren't even explaining your viewpoint, you're just arguing the hypothetical situation of "if the sides were reversed." It's a straw man, basically.

Yes, Microsoft definitely doesn't have a history of abusing their size to crush competition with frivolous law suits and practically forcing PC manufacturers do their will thanks to Windows being practically a monopoly.

Great, please point me to the Neowin where they call out Microsoft on when they're ****ing on others, trolling with their patents or threatening Linux users - not to mention where the users haven't had years of free reign in trolling every single Apple thread ever made. Because apparently me and quite a few other people have been browsing this alternate Neowin.

Better take those shades off sometime and take another glance.

Yes, Microsoft definitely doesn't have a history of abusing their size to crush competition with frivolous law suits and practically forcing PC manufacturers do their will thanks to Windows being practically a monopoly.

So you're basically admitting that the your whole motivation to support Motorola/Google in abusing its FRAND patents is because Google/Motorola are basically doing exactly what you claim to hate Microsoft for, instead of any logical reason?

I'm not sure which is more ridiculous, your sheer hypocrisy or your ignorant belligerence. I'm not surprised that people like you would see "pro-Microsoft trolls" around every corner.

  • Like 2

This insanity has to stop, it really does. The whole thing is just a goddamn mess. Lawsuits over patents hidden behind NDA's, ridiculous licencing terms, patents on standard components, bans on product imports, copyright on lines of code. The whole tech industry is drowning in lawsuits, and the only winners are the lawyers.

I do agree with this. It's getting out of hand. But you have to remember Microsoft did start this lawsuit in the first place. Not only that, but Microsoft is also trying to charge extortionate fees on each Android device sold. Could you imagine Motorola/Google demanding 15$ on every copy of Windows and Xbox being sold? That's what Microsoft is currently doing with Android. I can't say I feel sorry for them at this point. They had this coming for a long time.

I think this ruling could have absolutely massive ramifications on the patent system and patent litigation. If Motorola wins and Microsoft doesn't get a favorable appeal, the patent system is going to be even more messed up than it currently is, which seems impossible.

The patent system is already a shambles given the amount of lawsuits Microsoft has filed to kill its competitors. It can only get better at this point. Hopefully a win for Motorola will teach Microsoft not to abuse the patent system in the future.

Hopefully a win for Motorola will teach Microsoft not to abuse the patent system in the future.

I don't think you understand the meaning of abuse. Every corporation uses patents to their advantage, it's pathetic, but abusing them is an entirely different thing altogether. For example, trying to "seek revenge" by using FRAND patents to request extortionate amounts of money.

but abusing them is an entirely different thing altogether.

Trying to frighten off OEM's from making your competitors products with patents is abuse of its original intention - to promote innovation. At least in my opinion. Microsoft isn't the only culprit. Apple is doing the same as well, and it looks like Nokia is following suit.

For example, trying to "seek revenge" by using FRAND patents to request extortionate amounts of money.

Hold on. Microsoft initiated this lawsuit, not Motorola. And if by "revenge" you mean defending Android against an onslaught of anti-competitive lawsuits/NDA's designed to bleed Android manufacturer profit margins and force them to make Microsoft phones, then I say good on Motorola. Microsoft can't have it both ways. It can't sue all of its competitors demanding extortionate licensing fees, then bemoan the injustice of it all when one of them fights back.

Trying to frighten off OEM's from making your competitors products with patents is abuse of it's original intention - to promote innovation. At least in my opinion. Microsoft isn't the only culprit. Apple is doing the same as well.

You actually think paying $4 per device is "frightening them off"? These aren't FRAND patents MS is using, they could charge a hell of a lot more than that if they wanted to "frighten" them. It's quite obvious MS has only one thing in mind, like every other corporation: money. If they "frighten them off" then the money doesn't come in, does it?

It can't sue all of its competitors demanding extortionate licensing fees, then bemoan the injustice of it all when one of them fights back.

Last I checked there is nothing "extortionate" about them.

I have no issues with corporations (children) "fighting back", it's the weapons they use to do so that speaks words for their credibility. "fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory".

Hold on. Microsoft initiated this lawsuit, not Motorola.

Read the judge's comments. No one is a saint here. Microsoft went sue happy when Motorola apparently threatened them.

1. What Microsoft offered motorola was a license for patents they had, when they didn't Microsoft sued

2. Motorola then asked insane royalties from Microsoft for H.264 FRAND patents that Microsoft already had a license and asked for royalty based on PC price NOT Windows price (which is ridiculous no matter what koolaid you drink)

3. Microsoft sued in return

Googarola is acting like crazy asking for royalty based on PC price which Microsoft has no control over. If they really need Microsoft to license their FRAND patents, it should be based on price of Windows. Think about it, why should an expensive LCD on a laptop should increase Moto royalty?

As I said, if Microsoft asks Google/Motorola say $50/phone for their EAS usage, they will go down the toilet unless they pay.

The patent system is already a shambles given the amount of lawsuits Microsoft has filed to kill its competitors. It can only get better at this point. Hopefully a win for Motorola will teach Microsoft not to abuse the patent system in the future.

Microsoft has not tried to kill its competitors through patent litigation when it wasn't justified, for the most part. Microsoft has, however, tried to ignore the patents of others at times (such as the XML in Word lawsuit) and generally they've gotten what was coming to them. If you're referring to Microsoft suing Android manufacturers: then Google shouldn't have ignored patents and knowingly violated the law. Microsoft has not ignored Motorola's patents, and they're not seeking to stop their patents from being valid. They're arguing that Motorola is using unethical and questionable business practices.

A win for Motorola wouldn't teach anyone not to abuse the patent system. I think it would do the exact opposite of that.

(Although the issue of far too broad patents being awarded isn't going to be resolved either way.)

Great, please point me to the Neowin where they call out Microsoft on when they're ****ing on others, trolling with their patents or threatening Linux users - not to mention where the users haven't had years of free reign in trolling every single Apple thread ever made. Because apparently me and quite a few other people have been browsing this alternate Neowin.

Better take those shades off sometime and take another glance.

Yes, Microsoft definitely doesn't have a history of abusing their size to crush competition with frivolous law suits and practically forcing PC manufacturers do their will thanks to Windows being practically a monopoly.

You're not even being remotely reasonable at this point. You're saying 'this is how Neowin is because that's what I see.' Yet you don't provide any examples of what you see and then ask other people to give you examples? If you want to go down that road, at least make it a two-way street, because there's no sense in having an argument you've already determined is one-sided no matter what.

And I never argued Microsoft hasn't been involved in frivolous lawsuits in the past. But, again, you're missing out on the whole standards aspect of this lawsuit.

There is a huge difference between saying "Hey, you're using our (allegedly) infringing patents (that have never been tested in court) without a license on this thing that someone else gives away for free. We want to strike a licensing agreement and make you pay us for every device sold" and "Hey, we bought this company that has these patents that were licensed to you at a reasonable rate, and so you incorporated these technologies into your products based on those reasonable rates, and now were going to raise these rates extraordinarily (even though we promised we wouldn't do that when we licensed these patents and when we bought the company)"

the more i read about this patent wars the more i realize the lack of business ethics this companies have; in this battle of giants whoever wins, the consumer loses.

The only way there's going to be a win-win is if Motorola keeps the minimal price and Microsoft allows Google to license its patents for Android. That would likely require Google to start charging manufacturers for Android, though.

  • 2 weeks later...

All the companies should just pay whatever is demanded from one another.

Then up the price per unit to cover the cost (including lawyers etc.) and add a new packaging label:

eg. Microsoft Xbox labelled as "Xbox now $20 more! - thanks to the... Google Tax :)"

If they all did this I'm sure they would start negotiating so their stickers weren't on others packaging, or very low figures.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!