Recommended Posts

AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson has been talking a lot the last week. He first blamed wireless price hikes (increases he says he would have imposed anyway) on the blocked T-Mobile deal, then informed the public he wished he'd never offered unlimited data in the first place. Now Stephenson has found himself in a little PR hot water by blaming Google on slow Android updates, and in the process illustrating that he's either not really sure how his own products work -- or he's just not particularly honest.

"Google determines what platform gets the newest releases and when," Stephenson stated this week in response to a conference question about why some devices don't get timely updates. "A lot of times, that?s a negotiated arrangement and that?s something we work at hard." That statement rather confused Google, who issued a statement saying that Stephenson was apparently confused:

?Mr. Stephenson?s carefully worded quote caught our attention and frankly we don?t understand what he is referring to. Google does not have any agreements in place that require a negotiation before a handset launches. Google has always made the latest release of Android available as open source at source.android.com as soon as the first device based on it has launched. This way, we know the software runs error-free on hardware that has been accepted and approved by manufacturers, operators and regulatory agencies such as the FCC. We then release it to the world."

Again, you start to wonder if after the T-Mobile fiasco AT&T executives should just stop talking for a while. Quite often it's the carriers -- and their fear of change and layers of device bloatware -- that are to blame for update delays. Consider also while Stephenson's busy blaming Google for problems, AT&T is busy crippling the bootloaders of the latest and greatest Android devices like the HTC One X.

Source: http://www.dslreport...-Updates-119373

It's obviously not Google's fault, given how quickly the Nexus devices generally receive their updates. My experience with Android updates is that it's either the manufacturer holding up the update while they test the update on their own mods (i.e. Sense, Touchwiz, etc), or the carrier testing it and/or adding in their own bloat (my first HTC One X update was delayed by 2 weeks before T-Mobile approved it).

Problem with that is they come out with updates for the "International" devices looong before one comes out for AT&T (and yes Verizon and the rest of the US carriers). The Nexus S from AT&T still hasn't received an ICS update while the T-Mobile one got it in December. There's only a small difference between the 2 (3G radio) so shouldn't be that long of an update. Sprint being a different beast with the addition of extra radios got theirs last month, still late but I guess. AT&T is the only one left here.

There are a few other examples of such madness that AT&T is behind. This is coming from an AT&T user but I have a internation SGS2 - GT-I9100 instead of the SGH-i777 version. Another device that should technically already have ICS as it's basically the same as the international one, just added NFC.

It's Google's platform so it seems reasonable to blame them for the fact that the Android update process is broken. Whether source code is available quickly on some website is irrelevant if users can't get there hands on an update for their phone. It's not as if the problem is restricted to AT&T either.

It's Google's platform so it seems reasonable to blame them for the fact that the Android update process is broken. Whether source code is available quickly on some website is irrelevant if users can't get there hands on an update for their phone. It's not as if the problem is restricted to AT&T either.

I'd go back on what the others are saying to some extent, the carriers have to spend 2-3 months minimum trying to update their bloat ware and add more 3rd party apps in prior to release. This holds things up.

  • Like 1

I'm with others, I don't think it's google limiting what devices can get what, I'm thinking its the manufactures of the phones. Got to get people to upgrade somehow

It's Google's platform so it seems reasonable to blame them for the fact that the Android update process is broken. Whether source code is available quickly on some website is irrelevant if users can't get there hands on an update for their phone. It's not as if the problem is restricted to AT&T either.

As expected!!! there will be some fanboy to just bash...

Its like blaming Linus Travolta because no update was released for Ubuntu.

I'd go back on what the others are saying to some extent, the carriers have to spend 2-3 months minimum trying to update their bloat ware and add more 3rd party apps in prior to release. This holds things up.

It's not just the carriers though is it (the OEMs need to ensure that their skins are compatible too) and it's not just a 2-3 month wait. 6 months after its release ICS still isn't available for all phones. I agree that this holds things up but Google created an OS that allows /needs this customisation and hasn't done anything to control it. That's why I think they're ultimately to blame.

I don't think AT&T are blameless as they've proven with WP7 that they're more than capable of holding up an update. But the wait for Android updates clearly occurs around the world.

The AT&T CEO is full of crap. Everybody knows how irresponsible AT&T is when it comes to updating their Android phones. How long has ICS been out? Over 6 months. Has AT&T updated any of their ICS-Capable phones? No.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I think you meant the "ntfs3" driver, but yes there have been a lot of fixes for it in this release and previous releases, not 100% sure if the issue you mentioned is fixed though. In any case, the new "ntfs" driver in 7.1 doesn't have that issue (at least, no reports of such have come thru), but your kernel needs to explicitly enable support for the new driver first (like how CachyOS kernel has it), and you need to edit your mount points in /etc/fstab to use "ntfs" instead of the other drivers.
    • Epic Games says Unreal Engine 6 will help developers "build content faster" using AI models by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Epic Games is rolling out the latest major update to Unreal Engine 5 today, and at the same time, the company also dropped some information on the next-generation version of the product, Unreal Engine 6. This was already revealed a few weeks ago alongside the new Rocket League upgrade reveal. The company says it is combining the features of Unreal Engine and Unreal Editor for Fortnite to create this new version of its popular media creation tool. On top of creating entire games, the new engine will also focus on letting developers operate large-scale live service titles more easily, whether by shipping content into their own ecosystems or into Fortnite. The use of large language models is also mentioned here, with Epic saying it will be a core part of the engine. "We see LLMs, generative AI models, and tools like Claude and Codex playing a central role in helping you build content faster while maintaining the creative control you need," adds the company. Here is the rundown of what's new about version 6 of Unreal Engine: With all these changes to the programming model, portability upgrades, and generative AI integration, Epic says the new version of the engine will "change a lot about how games are made." The company aims to ship Unreal Engine 6 into early access in late 2027, with a full release planned for 12-18 months later. Epic Games also dropped a lengthy blog post about the new Unreal Engine 5.8 update for game developers over here. The release is focused on delivering better performance, customization, and streamlined workflows for development teams. This will be the final major update for this version of the engine before Epic switches to focus fully on Unreal Engine 6's early access launch.
    • Watch Louis Rossmann's recent experience on YouTube about trying to get a warranty replacement from Samsung. It's crazy.
    • That is the thing, how many of these people don't realise they are using AI? If they use Google Search they have no choice but to use AI. So yes, maybe half of American adults do use and I expect a lot of Uk adults do to, but I bet most of them don't realise it. Myself, i avoid the rubbish.
    • They use FREE AI. They aren't paying for this meme-generating slopware...
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      suprememobiles48 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Prasann earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      500
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!