Recommended Posts

^ Pornography is not always sexual.

por?nog?ra?phy

? ?[pawr-nog-ruh-fee]

noun

obscene writings, drawings, photographs, or the like, especially those having little or no artistic merit.

ob?scene

? ?[uhb-seen]

adjective

1.

offensive to morality or decency; indecent; depraved: obscene language.

3.

abominable; disgusting; repulsive.

Art is subjective i could spend hours talking about porn the same way some guy can talk for hours about some daisies in a cracked jug.

congratulations to the Bank of Canada for telling everyone, including counterfeiters, the security measures embedded in our new

These measures aren't exactly easy to copy and they tell about them so we can distinguish the fake ones from the real.

Vimy Memorial looks beautiful and reminds me Isildur and Anarion statues from LOTR :p; i cant see anything 'pornographic' or 'provocative' and its Canada own business what they want put on their banknotes.

The World does not spins exclusively for USA.

And you brought the US into this thread why?

These measures aren't exactly easy to copy and they tell about them so we can distinguish the fake ones from the real.

the same was said about the previous notes. and the ones prior to them.

it's only a matter of time before the polymers are duplicated and fakes begin circulating

the same was said about the previous notes. and the ones prior to them.

it's only a matter of time before the polymers are duplicated and fakes begin circulating

duh... every time they release new versions, they make the public aware of the changes. All the central banks in all the countries do this.

To prevent the counterfeiters from making fake bills, you have to deny them the access to the technology which is used to produce the real ones (the means of production). And in our world, the crooks will eventually catch up on techy stuff as they become cheaper.

And if you don't inform the public of the changes, you'd only be assisting the crooks coz the people would not be able to tell the difference. We wouldn't know what to look for to be certain we have real money in our hands.

If you look at the wiki article all the propposed memorials looked like towers but thats irrelevent as most war memorial have some sort of pinacle.

To me the image is a poor rendition of the memorial given those viewable on google images and the image on the left with HRs head on it looks rather oddly shaped.

Anyway C$20 woud be worth about UK ?1 so whats the problem? :D

The bills as a whole aren't that bad

My question is, these polymer bills, do they fold like the old paper currency? If not it's a major hassle to carry if you always need a wallet

It's my assumption that they do indeed act just like paper currency. I havent seen one in person yet though.

the same was said about the previous notes. and the ones prior to them.

it's only a matter of time before the polymers are duplicated and fakes begin circulating

And just like today, there are ways to spot real and fake bills.

Check the American dollar bills in a light, there's supposed to be a visible face in the bill that can only be seen in the light. Fake bills cannot do this. That is why they tell you to check for the face.

Or the current Canadian bills, which can be checked for their special markings. These technologies are far more advanced than the counterfeiters can do today. They might get close, but they'll never replicate it fully.

The bills as a whole aren't that bad

My question is, these polymer bills, do they fold like the old paper currency? If not it's a major hassle to carry if you always need a wallet

They don't crease as easily as cotton-paper bills, but they can still fold. They are quite slippery though.

  • 8 months later...

Old thread I know, but I have just seen the most anal report on BBC news, the Canadians are complaining that the maple leaf image on their bank note is the wrong type of maple leaf.....apparently it is VERY important as a symbol of Canada..

Who gives a f*** ?

If the UK had the face of a turtle in place of the queen I 'couldn't care less' - its money, you spend it...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!