Spec me a DSLR for


Recommended Posts

I've had a few point 'n' shoot and a few bridge cameras before now and I've been disappointed with the picture quality, I am going on holiday in September and I have decided to spend some money on a decent entry level camera so I can play with the settings before I go.

I have no brand loyalty and am looking to spend ?400~, one that can take cheap zoom lenses would be ideal if I decided to buy one in the future, 720p HD capture is also preferable but its not a deal breaker if the camera doesn't have it.

I don't know you can get 'small' DSLRs (I don't mean the Micro 4/3rds) but I really don't want a big bulky camera.

If the camera is worth it I would consider spending up to ?500 but not a penny more.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1078287-spec-me-a-dslr-for/
Share on other sites

Does your budget include a lens? If not, just look for basic 18-135 bundles, which I think are good starting points. You can't really expect a non-bulky SLR :/ but I'd say this, it's not as bad as it looks.

Start on Canon or Nikon's product page and price them out at your favorite retailer.

I usually suggest Canon and think T3i or T3 is a good option (Two people who took my recommendation are happy with theirs). I think Nikon is a bit better if you want to shoot video but that is one aspect I don't really care about (and mine doesn't have it)

I was talking about a kit, around ?400. I don't want to spend too much on a camera as I know I wont get too serious into photography but I just want something that has the settings and features I can play with to get better pics than a point and shoot.

I was considering the T3 (1100D in the UK).

If size is a concern, you can try out the mirrorless cameras, like Sony NEX series. They come with APS-C sized sensors, like the Canon/Nikon DSLRs but are much smaller and quite a bit lighter. I own one and am very satisfied with the image quality, and prefer tham much over DSLRs when I have to carry it around the whole day.

As for the downsides of the setup, the kit lens (18-55mm) is not exactly of high quality, and not very fast either. When I was a beginner, it didn't matter much. But once I gained some experience, the limitations started looking more and more severe. With lenses like the 50mm F/1.8 lens, it became very good. But the native E-mount lenses are costlier than comparable ones for Nikon/Canon.

The lack of optical viewfinder is an issue in low light. The electronic viewfinder is hard to see (and noisy) in very low light (I mean extremely low light, like night cityscapes from high up, regular night shots even outdoor night shots are not problemmatic). And auto-focus is fiddly in low light with the kit lens. Manual focus works fine and is pretty easy too.

Whatever you do, invest in good lenses. They make a more pronounced difference than the camera.

I was talking about a kit, around ?400. I don't want to spend too much on a camera as I know I wont get too serious into photography but I just want something that has the settings and features I can play with to get better pics than a point and shoot.

I was considering the T3 (1100D in the UK).

Well I would like to share my story then for the part I bolded above. Forever I wanted a nicer camera, and in high school and college I actually dabbled with a photography thanks to a friend who was a photography major and set up his own darkroom (yes, was still the days one had to develop their own pictures LOL). Well 3 Christmases ago my wife had no clue what to get me, so she got her parents to chip in and my parents as well and got me a kick ass Nikon. With additional equipment like another Flash, another lens, etc. (my father in law also happens to be into photography), so I was all excited. Flash forward 3 years later and I have only used it a handful of times. Truth #1 is it gets annoying having to grab so many things to get a good picture, at least IMO. Truth #2 is there is a whole lot to learn to get good digital photos. It is not only a money investment, but a time investment as well. You can get decent enough photos without knowing all that much, but to really get to the next level, you need to put in a good amount of time.

So just wanted to share this all as it is a decent size investment. Not trying to dissuade you by any means, just saying make sure it is really something you want to get into before taking the plunge.

If size is a concern, you can try out the mirrorless cameras, like Sony NEX series. They come with APS-C sized sensors, like the Canon/Nikon DSLRs but are much smaller and quite a bit lighter. I own one and am very satisfied with the image quality, and prefer tham much over DSLRs when I have to carry it around the whole day.

As for the downsides of the setup, the kit lens (18-55mm) is not exactly of high quality, and not very fast either. When I was a beginner, it didn't matter much. But once I gained some experience, the limitations started looking more and more severe. With lenses like the 50mm F/1.8 lens, it became very good. But the native E-mount lenses are costlier than comparable ones for Nikon/Canon.

The lack of optical viewfinder is an issue in low light. The electronic viewfinder is hard to see (and noisy) in very low light (I mean extremely low light, like night cityscapes from high up, regular night shots even outdoor night shots are not problemmatic). And auto-focus is fiddly in low light with the kit lens. Manual focus works fine and is pretty easy too.

Whatever you do, invest in good lenses. They make a more pronounced difference than the camera.

Thanks I did look at the NEX cameras but the cost of the lenses are really prohibitive, a telephoto lense for the NEX camera costs DOUBLE what it does on a Canon/Nikon.

Well I would like to share my story then for the part I bolded above. Forever I wanted a nicer camera, and in high school and college I actually dabbled with a photography thanks to a friend who was a photography major and set up his own darkroom (yes, was still the days one had to develop their own pictures LOL). Well 3 Christmases ago my wife had no clue what to get me, so she got her parents to chip in and my parents as well and got me a kick ass Nikon. With additional equipment like another Flash, another lens, etc. (my father in law also happens to be into photography), so I was all excited. Flash forward 3 years later and I have only used it a handful of times. Truth #1 is it gets annoying having to grab so many things to get a good picture, at least IMO. Truth #2 is there is a whole lot to learn to get good digital photos. It is not only a money investment, but a time investment as well. You can get decent enough photos without knowing all that much, but to really get to the next level, you need to put in a good amount of time.

So just wanted to share this all as it is a decent size investment. Not trying to dissuade you by any means, just saying make sure it is really something you want to get into before taking the plunge.

That's my main concern, I am very fickle with gadgets and electronics I get bored very easily and things just sit collecting dust.

Looking at some pictures from my last few holidays the picture quality is really awful even on a bridge camera which made me look at the mirrorless cameras like the Sony NEX, Samsung NX, Olympus PEN etc, I don't know if I would ever use a zoom lense but the option would be nice, but the cost of lenses for the mirrorless is ridiculous, which then lead me to look at DSLRs.

I really want a NEX but I don't want to get one and then be stuck with paying what the camera cost again just for a telephoto lense and regret that I didn't go for a DSLR.

Decisions, decisions.

Decided to get a Nikon D3100, it was going to be a toss up between the Sony NEX5, Canon 1100D and the D3100. Ill just be using the kit lense for now.

Has everything I wanted from the NEX like the Guide mode which has automated settings, i.e. I can pick 'soft background' and it will set it up for shallow DoF, 'freeze moving vehicle or person' , etc.. until I learn how to do it manually, it also does 1080p video and has all round better specs than the 1100D.

Thanks for the information/advice all.

Decided to get a Nikon D3100, it was going to be a toss up between the Sony NEX5, Canon 1100D and the D3100. Ill just be using the kit lense for now.

Has everything I wanted from the NEX like the Guide mode which has automated settings, i.e. I can pick 'soft background' and it will set it up for shallow DoF, 'freeze moving vehicle or person' , etc.. until I learn how to do it manually, it also does 1080p video and has all round better specs than the 1100D.

Thanks for the information/advice all.

One last tip: Stay off the automated modes if you want to learn. I personally suggest starting with aperture priority, which is not very difficult to pick up.

  • 3 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!