Recommended Posts

99% of the people here have zero understanding of the stock market. And I suggest those people keep their noses out of it unless they intend on investing or considering investing into stock in the foreseeable future. But even then, stop posting no-news posts before you have researched and understood how things work.

So according to this logic... One could only discuss a movie if they went to film school... Could only discuss sports if they were a star athlete... Can only talk about a buggy program if they are a programmer... Can only provide an opinion on graphic design if they have a degree in art... Can only discuss politics if they were on the student council in high school... And I can keep going on and on.

Point being just because it is something you are obviously into, that does not give you the right to tell other people what they can and cannot discuss, especially on a website whose very existence hinges on the fact that people more often than not discuss things that they are not experts at, but that interest them in some way.

I worked for Merrill Lynch's trading desk and I said yesterday (comments on the IPO) that Facebook was going for a deep fall. So I'm the 1%.

This company is based on illusions and sells ads while people are hypnotized. It won't ever live up to the hype in the real world.

Google is a successful company because it promotes ads when people are actually searching for something, not necessarily having fun with those features that turn people into social zombies, the ones promoted on Facebook.

I'm sorry, but this is just the beginning.

If you lost money on Facebook, that's because you ignored your stock market homework and ignored basic principles... Fortunately, a lot of other people didn't.

  • Like 3

As I said before, people judging Facebook's future based on two days of trading are plain stupid.

Give it a month and then check again in 6 months, that will be a clearer picture (note that I think Facebook will tank, but not tomorrow as some people in this thread think it will).

It's not a misfortune, it's a gamble... if you don't know the risks of investing and go into it thinking "I'M GOINA BE RICH$$$$$$$" then you have a problem

It's still misfortune. Losing money as a result of ignorance is misfortune. Yes, they may have a problem, and they may be silly, but laughing at these people is wrong. They haven't done anything to harm you, but you believe it's fine to ridicule their worse-off position.

It's still misfortune. Losing money as a result of ignorance is misfortune. Yes, they may have a problem, and they may be silly, but laughing at these people is wrong. They haven't done anything to harm you, but you believe it's fine to ridicule their worse-off position.

So anytime you celebrate the fact you won something and someone else lost like in a sports event, its wrong and horrible? its basically the same thing, someone wins someone loses..

So anytime you celebrate the fact you won something and someone else lost like in a sports event, its wrong and horrible? its basically the same thing, someone wins someone loses..

No because I'm not celebrating their loss, I'm only celebrating the fact I won. Even when I win something over someone else, I sympathise with those who didn't win. Your question isn't even related because you're talking about winning something and celebrating that win; however I picked up on your post for something completely different: laughing at people who are now suffering (even if they're only suffering to a very minor degree, they've suffered a loss of some sort; however, it could be a major loss, which could mean they're suffering greatly).

No because I'm not celebrating their loss, I'm only celebrating the fact I won. Even when I win something over someone else, I sympathise with those who didn't win. Your question isn't even related because you're talking about winning something and celebrating that win; however I picked up on your post for something completely different: laughing at people who are now suffering (even if they're only suffering to a very minor degree, they've suffered a loss of some sort; however, it could be a major loss, which could mean they're suffering greatly).

Someone still won, someone sold them that stock and at the IPO price someone really won if someone else got stuck with it at a loss... stocks are just that a big game, and if they have a major loss they shouldn't of been in the market to start with, that is why they ALWAYS say "read the prospectus" first before investing in a stock... you can't say someone was nieve if they would of just done that understood what the company was about and comprehending it before throwing tons of cash at it

Someone still won, someone sold them that stock and at the IPO price someone really won if someone else got stuck with it at a loss... stocks are just that a big game, and if they have a major loss they shouldn't of been in the market to start with, that is why they ALWAYS say "read the prospectus" first before investing in a stock... you can't say someone was nieve if they would of just done that understood what the company was about and comprehending it before throwing tons of cash at it

I understand all of that, but that isn't my point. My point is that even though someone won, laughing at those who didn't win is a horrible thing to do :/, even if they were naive, ignorant, or stupid :)

That's what happens when reality hits Zucky in the face.

It is silly to think that Facebook is worth $100 bill. For god's sake they are a social media website, a FUD, that seems to be going down the Myspace route... plagued with adds and other crap... oopps sorry, they are not adds but "sponsored stories"

Realistically, considering the large user base they have, I would rate them at $10 per share.. although, even then I wouldn't put my money there.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/how-facebook-could-destroy-the-us-economy-2012-05-22 - Facebook could destory the US Economy.

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/facebooks-zuckerberg-thiel-sell-shares-2012-05-22 - Mark Zuckerberg sells some of his shares

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/05/22/us-usa-markets-facebook-idUSBRE84L0PE20120522 - Morgan Stanley, NASDAQ in trouble

Realistically Facebook would have to grow 41% for 5 years to maintain its 100 billion dollar value and that is not realistic growth in my eyes. The fact that it has such high value , if it does continue to taken what happens then. Is the Marketwatch article correct that it truely can bring about another economic drop? I have to say it is highly plausable.

True. Only rookies to the stock market expects otherwise.

it doesnt take a "rookie" to the market to know that facebook shouldnt be worth more than $100 billion. Its one thing for google to make money from their ads, but their ads reach out much father than their search result pages, facebook on the other hand is all containted within facebook.com, and is not diverse when it comes to making money at all.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Christian Maas' XVI32 is a nice (and very small) hex editor. Speaking of hex editors, many years ago a colleague and I who both worked at Tribal Voice managed to edit a copy of the company's PowWow instant messaging client to make it behave better now that all of its lookup servers and other server-side tech was gone.  The program didn't support NAT (RFC-3022 was introduced in January 2001, the same time Tribal Voice was shuttered), but it still worked okay if you manually set up port-forwarding on your router.  The server at http://powwow.jazy.net/ hosts a copy (usual warnings about downloading and running untrusted code from random internet servers apply). I occasionally use some tools like Funduc Software's Search and Replace and Application Mover when I need to make mass-edits to text-based files or move programs with a hard-coded installation directories, respectively.  When I need to figure out the exact LCD panel inside of a laptop, EnTech Taiwan's Monitor Asset Manager is my go-to tool for that purpose. JD Design's website (now hosted on github.io) has a number of interesting freeware and shareware utilities.  I used to use their TouchPro utility to set the file timestamps on software I was mastering to match its version number (e.g., version 3.00 of a program had all of its files dates set to 3:00AM, and so forth). Karenware has a number of interesting freeware utilities, too. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • I still use HexChat! Not really as ancient as the 1994 AutoCAD above my post, but I have never found anything better to replace it. Yes we still operate an IRC server https://www.neowin.net/irc/ 😛 
    • At work we still have a couple of people that use a version of AutoCAD LT purchased in 1994. This predates Windows 95 and works fine on versions of Windows up to XP. Its long since run in an locked down isolated XP VM, accessible via RDP. I did install LibreCAD for them, however they said it was just too different to get to grips with. In all fairness one of them is now 75 and the other is almost 60.
    • On my music making (non internet) PC Sony Acid Pro 7.0 Adobe Audition 2015 Korg Legacy Collection Windows 7 SP1
    • Anyway to download these versions without being on the Experimental builds?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      509
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      82
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!