The REAL reason conservatives are against gay marriage.


Recommended Posts

http://www.newscient...-the-world.html

Over the past few years, psychological research has begun to offer answers to this question, and a surprising number of them boil down to disgust.

In 2008, a team led by Simone Schnall of the University of Plymouth, UK, found that inducing feelings of disgust - by a flatulent smell, dirty surroundings or a movie clip of a filthy toilet - increased the severity of people's judgements about a range of morally suspect actions, from pilfering cash from a found wallet to eating a dead dog (
).

This effect has since been confirmed and extended. A group led by Kendall Eskine at the City University of New York found that the effects of disgust on moral judgements were particularly strong for those on the political right (
). And several studies led by Yoel Inbar of Tilburg University in the Netherlands have found that conservatives are more easily disgusted (
).

This year, Inbar's team found that exposure to disgusting smells can amplify negative attitudes toward gay men in both liberals and conservatives (
). Interestingly, it had no effect on attitudes towards other social minorities such as lesbians, African-Americans or the elderly.

So there seems to be an intuitive link between disgust and moral judgement, and this link seems to be much stronger for conservatives than for liberals.

This, we believe, explains some of the differences in opinion on gay marriage. In short, conservatives are more likely to find homosexuality disgusting and therefore morally unacceptable; liberals might feel some disgust at the idea of gay sex but consciously reject it as a basis for moral opinion.

So, according to this, and as I have suspected all along, it seems that these objections are not grounded in morality per se, they are merely defense mechanisms against a perceived assault on their prudish sensibilities.

http://www.newscient...-the-world.html

Over the past few years, psychological research has begun to offer answers to this question, and a surprising number of them boil down to disgust.

In 2008, a team led by Simone Schnall of the University of Plymouth, UK, found that inducing feelings of disgust - by a flatulent smell, dirty surroundings or a movie clip of a filthy toilet - increased the severity of people's judgements about a range of morally suspect actions, from pilfering cash from a found wallet to eating a dead dog (
).

This effect has since been confirmed and extended. A group led by Kendall Eskine at the City University of New York found that the effects of disgust on moral judgements were particularly strong for those on the political right (
). And several studies led by Yoel Inbar of Tilburg University in the Netherlands have found that conservatives are more easily disgusted (
).

This year, Inbar's team found that exposure to disgusting smells can amplify negative attitudes toward gay men in both liberals and conservatives (
). Interestingly, it had no effect on attitudes towards other social minorities such as lesbians, African-Americans or the elderly.

So there seems to be an intuitive link between disgust and moral judgement, and this link seems to be much stronger for conservatives than for liberals.

This, we believe, explains some of the differences in opinion on gay marriage. In short, conservatives are more likely to find homosexuality disgusting and therefore morally unacceptable; liberals might feel some disgust at the idea of gay sex but consciously reject it as a basis for moral opinion.

So, according to this, and as I have suspected all along, it seems that these objections are not grounded in morality per se, they are merely
defense mechanisms against a perceived assault on their prudish sensibilities.

That's the true definition of morality.

That makes sense for many different sorts of blind intolerance, from any individual or social group. The world's not going to smell like roses when one's head is stuck up a certain aft portion of one's anatomy...

The social conservatives do not hold a monopoly on this "morality." A similar argument could be made for socialists (or modern "liberals"). They both want to trample individual rights by utilizing government sources under the guise of morality. To think that the monopoly of violence is the source of moral behaviour is sickening, to say the least.

So, according to this, and as I have suspected all along, it seems that these objections are not grounded in morality per se, they are merely defense mechanisms against a perceived assault on their prudish sensibilities.

You are saying the same thing. Morals are learned behaviors. Their 'prudish sensibilities' are defined by their morals. If something violates either, it can lead to this feeling of disgust.

I am not against gay marriage. But I am disgusted by the thought of gay sex. I don't give a **** what people do with their lives but the thought of it bothers me. So where does that put me?

I am not against gay marriage. But I am disgusted by the thought of gay sex. I don't give a **** what people do with their lives but the thought of it bothers me. So where does that put me?

My sentiments exactly except:

I am not bothered by lesbian sex. I find it a serious turn-on.

So...

My sentiments exactly except:

I am not bothered by lesbian sex. I find it a serious turn-on.

There's a difference between lesbian sex and dyke sex. Lesbians are hot. :woot:

...jk...

But, in all fairness, I should amend my statement to say the idea of male, gay sex disgusts me. And, no, I'm not a latent homosexual.

"I don't see why Rosa Parks made such a stink about where she was sitting. It's just a seat after all!"

If it weren't for people taking a stand against popular opinion, the guy in your avatar would be picking cotton instead of having had a ****ty rap career.

Regular rebellion against convention is necessary, if only to prevent the possibility of oppression.

i could have told you that. The basis for me wanting gays to keep PDA out of site is that PDA already makes me uncomfortable but when it's gays I feel a revolting feeling like i'm going to throw up.

Gays having sex is not the social issue that hits the headlines, so your reason falls as short as a midget in a sink.

Lots of conservatives have (had) the same reaction with whites marrying blacks. Conservatives are obsessed with what they think is morally wrong with other people and completely oblivious about themselves. They should read the Bible more:

"You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye."

"Judge not, less thee be judged"

"May he who has no sin cast the first stone"

These people from the Bible belt need to learn how to read.

These people from the Bible belt need to learn how to read.

They do read it. They are just experts at cherry-picking what suits their views, and saying that the rest is taken "out of context" by their detractors.

If it weren't for people taking a stand against popular opinion, the guy in your avatar would be picking cotton instead of having had a ****ty rap career.

Regular rebellion against convention is necessary, if only to prevent the possibility of oppression.

Just as you have the right to be terribly racist as you are, I have the right to be spitting my opinion on the pro-gay propaganda shoved into media now.

It's called freedom of speech.

Just as you have the right to be terribly racist as you are, I have the right to be spitting my opinion on the pro-gay propaganda shoved into media now.

It's called freedom of speech.

Freedom of speech does not justify a lack of common sense.

Oh, I don't think he's being racist. Read his post. He was actually defending the rights of Blacks to protest, in order to escape the tyranny of institutionalised racism.

Matter of fact, you are the one who comes across as a little intolerant.

EDIT: This is in response to sickx's previous post.

Oh, I don't think he's being racist. Read his post. He was actually defending the rights of Blacks to protest, in order to escape the tyranny of institutionalised racism.

Matter of fact, you are the one who comes across as a little intolerant.

I believe both him and myself should be allowed to speak our minds equally. He was elegantly racist, but the message came across just fine.

Lots of conservatives have (had) the same reaction with whites marrying blacks. Conservatives are obsessed with what they think is morally wrong with other people and completely oblivious about themselves. They should read the Bible more:

"You hypocrite, first take the plank out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to remove the speck from your brother's eye."

"Judge not, less thee be judged"

"May he who has no sin cast the first stone"

These people from the Bible belt need to learn how to read.

Agreed. I'm Catholic and don't agree with gay marriage, but ultimately, it doesn't affect me, so why should I care how they live their lives or who they love? It's their choice and their lives. I've got enough on my hands living my own life and trying to be a good person; I have no time (or right) to tell others how to live theirs.

Elegantly racist? How is it racist when it's a matter of fact? Black people were forcefully brought over from Africa and forced to pick cotton. Less G-Unit, more American history.

This nation has a terrible past of repeatedly oppressing anyone who isn't a straight, white male up to the point of murder. Anyone being against equality who isn't part of the historically privileged group should strongly reconsider their views or risk looking extremely short-sighted.

i could have told you that. The basis for me wanting gays to keep PDA out of site is that PDA already makes me uncomfortable but when it's gays I feel a revolting feeling like i'm going to throw up.

Strange, because reading ignorant and hateful comments like this makes *ME* want to throw up. Maybe the best action is not to segregate gay people from society, but to separate decent society from bigoted homophobes.

The other problem is that so many of those people who have such strong convictions also think that the law should mirror their personal moralities. It's one thing to have negatives feelings about something someone does and another thing to enact laws which serve no purpose other than to appeal to those emotions.

I am not against gay marriage. But I am disgusted by the thought of gay sex. I don't give a **** what people do with their lives but the thought of it bothers me. So where does that put me?

I think it just makes you heterosexual :)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!