Native or Opensource back up the has these traits?


Recommended Posts

Scenario, lets say you want to back up remote servers to a data center or a central location.

You want to utilize some sort of daily backup for the server, possibly an image that works with incremental backups

Also database support, you want to back up databases.

Here is the kicker, this is what makes this difficult. You want to back up the changes each night, and the software on the recieving end should take the incremental changes and add them to the image file.

Just curious some of your best practices, I know there are alot of paid software solutions out there, however I am curious if anyone has completed these tasks with windows NT backup and a ftp type software.

It sounds like you want something that does deduplication. That will maximize the use out of your avail bandwidth and do what you want. I only know of paid software that does this and some even have it as a separate purchasable option. It is a newer technology that compares and backs up on the bit level, backing up only the bits that change vs the entire file. Most pay solutions have this option. I don't know what your budget looks like, but look at unitrends, barracuda backup appliance, backup exec (might as well purchase one of the other solutions), arc serve, and acronis.

Thanks SC302..

I am trying not to purchase multiple licenses for my remote locations, I am also looking at the built in feature that Labtech offers in its backup solution. Many of these locations are seperate domains and I am trying to avoid VPN connections to each location as well. I think this is obtainable via Symantec Backup exec however I am not sure. I am just wondering how many MSPs offer back up solutions to their numerous clients.

we use a barracuda backup appliance that we sell to our clients. it costs them around 100 a month for backup, we purchase the appliance and it sits at their site. With our discount, In around 10 months the appliance pays for itself, after that it is paying us. This is for the little backup 190 unit, anything bigger they need to fork up the cash. It is web based so we can monitor it for the clients very easily, we can also restore very easily from anywhere in the world. Most are willing to do this, no tapes to swap out, and it gets duplicated to 2 barracuda datacenters. And it does dedup.

here is what the web interface looks like

everything under main is a backup server for a client

post-118098-0-96802300-1337823931_thumb.

This appliance is stored on the client site, do you have a "master" device at your site to manage all of them? Say you have 30 locations you really dont want to have to login to 30 devices, a centralized control panel would be ideal that shows you daily backup status of each location correct?

Would this device back up to my specified data center and not necessarily to the cloud?

Each device sits at the client site, every one of those devices you see there is at each client site. You can see by the interface that I can get a health status at a quick glance. Anything with a red square is an issue, anything with a yellow triangle should be looked at and anything with green circle is good to go. I logon once to the main console there, if I see problems I have to treat them individually as you would any other backup scenerio.

You could either use the barracuda cloud or if you have a large backup appliance at your datacenter, it can be replicated there. The benefit to the cloud is if the appliance dies, barracuda sends you a unit with all of your backup data on it to be able to restore provided you purchased the instant replacement option. But the option is there to use another appliance vs the cloud.

In this scenerio, you buy one appliance for each site, that is what it is for the entire site. Doesn't matter if they have a hundred pc's 10 mail servers, 20 sql servers, 100 AD servers, 10,000 file print servers. It gets licensed by size, not by what you are backing up. Another solution to look at is unitrends, it is very similar and can take a full backup and make it a vmware guest on the appliance itself. This can make disaster recovery almost instantaneous and put the client in a very quick uptime scenerio. Just another option to look at. Barracuda does offer baremetal if you backup the entire servers, but you need to size the backup units accordingly in either case. Both recommend 2x the size of what you have now in used drive space. If you purchase instant replacement with barracuda you are now entitled to a hardware refresh every 4 years (bigger backup size and faster equipment)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Everyone else has said it. I'm gonna say it - you don't know what you're talking about. I do. I have two laptops. One work, one personal. I have access to two more laptops - both personal. At home I manually update my personal laptop when I see on Neowin that there is an update - I carry on and only apply the updates when I am ready. My work one only updates when my workplace decides to send it - I carry on and only apply the updates (when they actually arrive, which is usually days after the release) when I switch off the laptop at the end of the day as usual. The two other personal laptops only get updated when I get to it which is rarely - the people who own them carry on using them until I get to it and update them. All of the browsers on all laptops are configured to restore the tabs when launched. Google and Microsoft have changed from 6 weeks to 4, and it looks like it's going to move to 2. None of these changes affect how any of these browsers on the laptops are used. Not one jot. My advice to you is stop panicking whenever you see an update. Just carry on with what you're doing. This even benefits you in a way - from your comment you sound like you don't like the changes or the frivolous new features - great - then carry on as before!
    • AMAZON needs to take total accountability for this.
    • Server Summit had a heap of announcements, ADCS changes are baller.
    • Nice, hope they *finally* fixed the issue with the NTFS driver where the system would completely brick during large file copies using the built in driver. It's been broken for years requiring me to use the older, slower, NTFS-3G FUSE driver.
    • Windows 11 KB5094126 BSODing, freezing, forcing BitLocker lockout, breaks OneDrive, and more by Sayan Sen Microsoft released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 last week as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. While Microsoft has so far not acknowledged any major problems with the release, some users online are running into problems. These range from OneDrive and Dropbox access issues, BitLocker recovery lockouts, to blue screens and BSODs. The most common one seems to be happening with HP systems wherein affected users say they hit 0xc0430001 BSOD (blue screen of death) error code after the KB5094126 update. We wonder if this could be related to the recent bug we covered on HP devices wherein the ongoing Secure Boot certificate updates are leading to similar issues. While we are not certain, users affected by this issue likely need to ensure that the boot.stl file is included on the installation media (such as a USB installer or ISO), if the above-mentioned dynamic updates are deployed. If this file is missing, computers may fail to boot from the installation media and could display the error 0xc0430001. This STL file is used by Secure Boot to verify that the boot files are trusted, so it must match the same Windows version and system architecture. To ensure the file is included, Microsoft recommends using the Update WinPE script, which automatically updates the image and handles the required files. Alternatively, you can manually copy the boot.stl file from the Windows\Boot\EFI folder on a Windows device and place it in the matching folder on your installation media before deploying the updated image. Aside from blue screening some users also note their systems have been freezing following the update. This could be happening to Lenovo PCs specifically. In the case of the OneDrive and Dropbox access issues, a user figured out that there could be a conflict with UAC. He explained: "Okay, so I did some digging, and in our environment KB5094126 breaks OneDrive and Dropbox in Explorer. I went through all our GPOs and found out that the combination of disabling UAC and having my user being a local admin breaks OneDrive in Explorer. ... If I enable UAC again, then it works, even with KB5094126 still installed." Hopefully, Microsoft will look into these issues. Source: Microsoft forum (link1, link2, link3, link4), Reddit (link1, link2, link3, link4)
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      197
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!