Free development tools to be Metro-only


Recommended Posts

So basically, because it's new and because Microsoft want to push it, devs and users should put up and shut up whether they like it or not? Again this sounds disturbingly similar to the paradigms used by a certain fruit related company. I use Windows because of the freedom it provides me to install the applications that I want to use, and because of the freedom of developers to code applications in their own way. If they do cut that freedom it may make Windows a bit easier on the lowest common denominator but it will also put a lot of users also at a serious disadvantage,

You have to put up with nothing. They provide a free IDE for you to develop Win32 apps and they provide another free IDE to develop the new Metro apps.

If you don't like that, you can always use a text editor to write your code, the compilers are still free, or if you feel you can make money with the software you build, you could actually buy Visual Studio.

Said it before here, people bitch about FREE stuff way to much!!!

I use Windows because of the freedom it provides me to install the applications that I want to use, and because of the freedom of developers to code applications in their own way

If you imagine any _desktop_ OS forces you to program in a certain way or restricts your applications, you're severely deluded.

No, I'm not.

But that's just because they're keeping the old version around?which lacks features such as the new c++ compiler or version 4.5 of the .NET framework ?!

I'm not sure what you thought needed to be cleared up?! Correct me if I'm wrong, but VS 2011 seems to bring along many improvements and its $500 professional version supports both Metro-style apps as well as regular desktop apps. The Express version doesn't. It only allows you to create Metro-style apps. You're forced to pick the old version to develop a regular Desktop app. That doesn't bode well for the future.

That's just it - the professional version costs $500 normally.

The professional version of VS 11 (which supports all that you complain about VS 10's own professional version lacking - namely, the WinRT stuff) will cost no more. Right now, because it's still in beta itself, it costs nothing.

VS 2010 Professional *also* costs $500. How much does VS 2010 Ultimate cost?

Instead of comparing apples to oranges (fee vs. free - which is exactly what the OP is trying to do), compare VS 11 with the version it supersedes (namely VS 2010).

Hm... This is rather interesting... I have a Pro license, but I can see this being an issue for people getting into development.

Why, because they have to download 2 free programs in stead of just one?

I'm honestly starting to think that Microsoft's been trying to say, "I'm sick & tired of everyone complaining about Metro! You know what; the more you say that we should have an option to use the Desktop the more that option goes away!"

For those who are complaining, how many of your are actual serious developers? If you were a developer, I'm pretty sure you have nothing to really complain about because you know what you can and can't use and see that there isn't a real problem. Otherwise, you're just b****ing to b****.

I'm honestly starting to think that Microsoft's been trying to say, "I'm sick & tired of everyone complaining about Metro! You know what; the more you say that we should have an option to use the Desktop the more that option goes away!"

That option hasn't gone away in the slightest.

For those who are complaining, how many of your are actual serious developers? If you were a developer, I'm pretty sure you have nothing to really complain about because you know what you can and can't use and see that there isn't a real problem. Otherwise, you're just b****ing to b****.

Agreed. I'm sitting here with Visual Studio 2010 for Windows Phone and Visual C# 2010 Express open right now. And Notepad++ and MinGW for the g++ compiler. All on Windows 8. No complaints from me here.

This sounds like it will be the death of Windows if Microsoft are stupid enough to follow through on this. Windows success has been based on developers being able to get their products to market on a platform which is easiest to get their products to their customers. If there are going to be barriers, the standard advice from the developer to their customer will be 'stay away from Windows 8' (as was the standard advice to stay away from Windows ME or Windows Vista). If there is no sign that Microsoft are going to come around on that, developers will start thinking about jumping ship than to stay on a Windows 7 platform which is not going to be around forever.

I don't see this happening, Windows was fine before MS decided to introduce a free version of VS (The free version started with VS 2005)

I don't really see any problems with this. Express was always targeted to the hobbyist developer so forcing them to target Metro only on VS11 is really not that tragic.

Correct me if I'm wrong, VS2010 Express (I know Pro/Ultimate does) supports multi-targeting, both for .NET and Native C++. Any new features or runtime will surely be included in VS2010, just like installing Windows SDK adds a new target to the multi-targeting list.

Instead of comparing apples to oranges (fee vs. free - which is exactly what the OP is trying to do), compare VS 11 with the version it supersedes (namely VS 2010).

VS 2010 Express (free): Allows you to build desktop apps.

VS 11 Express (free): Doesn't allow you to build desktop apps anymore.

How much more straightforward could the comparison be?!

VS 2010 Express (free): Allows you to build desktop apps.

VS 11 Express (free): Doesn't allow you to build desktop apps anymore.

How much more straightforward could the comparison be?!

You can still use VS2010 on Win8 to build desktop apps.

So what is the problem????

Ms moved on to newer technology, maybe you should too

  • Like 2

"Even your mom" is just as terribly misinformed as many people, then.

Well the point is not whether she's right or not, the point is that even though she knows nothing about computers at all, she will avoid Windows Vista. I won't avoid Vista, I know Vista is perfectly fine. But my mom thinks it's not, and whether she's right or not, many people think Vista is bad.

If Windows 8 gets a bad reputation (justified or not), people will keep thinking it's bad. And when people think it's bad, they aren't easily conviced of the opposite.

I personally think that, aside very specialist software (office suites, photo and video editing, development software, ...) there isn't too much of a future in desktop software. Even with my usage now almost everything is shifting to websites and web apps. I use Facebook for Chat, Gmail (web) for mail, Cloud9 IDE for most development, we have a webapp for our file server at school, ...

Desktop apps? Document editing (Word 2010 and a LaTeX editor), music (Foobar/Spotify), FTP client, SSH client. That is about it really. Eclipse sometimes when coding for Android. But that's about it. Chrome is something that is always opened on my PC.

You might want to actually read the article I linked to in the original post.

Yes he read it - his point is right though, VS Express 2010 is still there to built desktop apps. It hasn't been pulled or replaced. VS 11 Express will go up along side it for Metro development, but VS 2010 Express will still be there - the same thing many developers have been using to create desktop apps for many years now.

  • Like 2

You might want to actually read the article I linked to in the original post.

My point still stands. If you really need all the fancy new stuff that bad, you must be a professional developer, that means you can afford the $500 for VS 11 Pro

Why do people complain so much about the free stuff they get??

Why do people complain so much about the free stuff they get??

As I just wrote in the other thread, development tools aren't just any software. Developers are giving back value to the platform by writing programs for it. Therefore the platform vendor should do everything in their power to make it more attractive to target their platform. That includes the availability and pricing scheme of development tools. Apparently Microsoft feels they can get away with restricting the free version of their latest development environment in the way that is being discussed here, and MS may just be right, but other platforms are looking more and more attractive in the light of such decisions.

As I just wrote in the other thread, development tools aren't just any software. Developers are giving back value to the platform by writing programs for it. Therefore the platform vendor should do everything in their power to make it more attractive to target their platform. That includes the availability and pricing scheme of development tools. Apparently Microsoft feels they can get away with restricting the free version of their latest development environment in the way that is being discussed here, and MS may just be right, but other platforms are looking more and more attractive in the light of such decisions.

Microsoft have always restricted the features available in their free development tools though. It might be a strange decision that they've taken but I don't think you've explained how anyone is worse off. You can still develop desktop apps for Windows 8 using free tools from MS and now you can develop Metro apps using free tools so why would this drive someone away from Windows development?.

Microsoft have always restricted the features available in their free development tools though. It might be a strange decision that they've taken but I don't think you've explained how anyone is worse off. You can still develop desktop apps for Windows 8 using free tools from MS and now you can develop Metro apps using free tools so why would this drive someone away from Windows development?.

Because there is no free version of the latest set of development tools that supports writing desktop applications. This is in contrast to development tools on the Apple or Linux side.

And I don't quite see what the way forward is supposed to be here? Will there at some point be a new free version of MS's development tools that allow for writing desktop applications, or is this it if you're not willing to pay $500 ?!

That option hasn't gone away in the slightest.

While the option remains, they're slowly forcing you out of it. I mean 1st they got rid of the start button, then Aero, & now this, eventually the Desktop will be gone altogether... BTW, personally, I love Metro, but I'm just trying to say that I think they're so ****ed off at everyone's complaining that they're doing the exact opposite of whatever everyone wants because they can.

Because there is no free version of the latest set of development tools that supports writing desktop applications. This is in contrast to development tools on the Apple or Linux side.

And I don't quite see what the way forward is supposed to be here? Will there at some point be a new free version of MS's development tools that allow for writing desktop applications, or is this it if you're not willing to pay $500 ?!

The Apple and Linux side? You're talking about second rate development tools (in comparison to Visual Studio) on platforms that attract a small number of users and an even smaller number of developers. They're not competition, and the number of people that would switch platform altogether over something like this would be vanishingly small.

I don't see the point of speculating about the future. At this point all that matters is that hobbyists are no worse off. Microsoft might change their mind in the future or they might be vindicated and nobody will use a desktop OS in 10 years time - who knows, it doesn't matter at the moment.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Sysinternals Suite 2026.17.06 by Razvan Serea The Sysinternals Suite is a comprehensive package of advanced Windows utilities created by Mark Russinovich, who launched the Sysinternals website in 1996 to share his system tools and technical resources. This suite combines a wide range of troubleshooting and diagnostic tools, including Process Explorer, Process Monitor, Sysmon, Autoruns, ProcDump, the PsTools collection, and many others. It provides everything IT professionals and developers need to manage, monitor, and troubleshoot Windows systems and applications. The Suite bundles all of the core troubleshooting utilities along with their help files. Non-troubleshooting extras—such as the BSOD Screen Saver or NotMyFault—are excluded. In addition to the well-known tools, it also includes AccessChk, Autologon, Ctrl2Cap, DiskView, Disk Usage (DU), LogonSessions, PageDefrag, PsLogList, PsPasswd, RegMon, RootkitRevealer, TCPView, VMMap, ZoomIt, and more. Sysinternals Suite 2026.17.06 changelog: Autoruns v14.3 - This update to Autoruns, a utility for monitoring startup items, adds bug fixes and improves the command-line application autorunsc. ZoomIt v12.1 - This update to ZoomIt, a screen magnification and annotation tool, adds image backgrounds, webcam background blur and microphone noise cancellation support. Coreinfo v4.01 - This update to Coreinfo, a tool that reports processor, socket, NUMA memory, and cache topology of a system, as well as processor features supported, adds support for new processor features. DebugView v5.02 - This update to DebugView, a tool for displaying both kernel-mode and Win32 debug output, adds Ctrl-Shift-A support for selecting all output, and agent skills support for the CLI utility. LiveKd v5.64 - This update to LiveKd, a utility that allows running the kernel debugger on a live system, fixes a debugging privileges issue. ProcDump 3.5.2 for Linux - This update to ProcDump for Linux, a tool for capturing process dumps, adds .NET counters and a custom core dumper. Process Monitor v4.04 - This update to Process Monitor, a utility for observing real-time file system, Registry, and process or thread activity, adds some bug fixes Sysmon v15.21 - This update to Sysmon, an advanced host security monitoring tool, adds some bug fixes. Download: Sysinternals Suite 2026.17.06 | 168.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Sysinternals Suite for ARM64 | 15.4 MB Link: Sysinternals Suite Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Given only Volume license customers and specific resellers can obtain the LTSC versions legitimately it seems likely that this has been tinkered with quite a lot!
    • Apple CEO Tim Cook confirms looming price hikes due to memory shortages by Hamid Ganji Image via Apple Memory and chip shortages have led to significant price increases for electronics over the past year, and it seems that more hikes are on the way for upcoming smartphones and computers. Apple CEO Tim Cook has confirmed that the company is planning to increase the prices of some of its products due to the ongoing memory and storage shortages. In an interview with The Wall Street Journal, Cook confirmed the looming price hikes for Apple’s future products, adding that “Unfortunately, price increases are unavoidable.” He also said the company is doing its best to “mitigate the huge increases that are being passed to us, and we’ve been trying to shield our customers from the increases, but the situation has become unsustainable.” The Apple CEO also noted that the allocation of a large portion of memory chips to AI companies has contributed to shortages in the market, resulting in lower supply at a time when demand for devices remains high. “We definitely need memory pricing and supply to return to reasonable levels for consumer products. That’s the bottom line,” Cook said. Cook also added that Apple is ready to use its vast cash reserves to help boost supply in the market because additional production capacity is needed. While he declined to specify how Apple plans to do that, he said the company will not build its own memory and storage factories despite its financial resources and silicon expertise. Cook did not provide further details on the scale of the price increases or which Apple products would be affected, though iPads and Macs could see higher prices sooner than other products. Apple’s next product launch event is scheduled for September, when the company is expected to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro, iPhone 18 Pro Max, and its first foldable iPhone. It remains unclear whether the upcoming iPhones will be affected by the price increases, but given the current memory shortage, higher prices seem increasingly likely. There is currently no clear timeline for the end of the memory shortage. Samsung, one of the world’s three largest memory chip manufacturers, recently said the shortage could persist for several more years.
    • Downloads does not equal actual usage, even less when the app is pre-installed in some Galaxy phones.
    • +1000 to this, don't understand why they added that margin around the top bar, even the close button is a PITA to click without aiming. Ofc, this is just preview and hopefully they will revert such odd UX decision before hitting final version.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Vincian earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      Jocimo earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      542
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      167
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      85
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      64
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!