Geoff Keighley confirms Wii U won


Recommended Posts

The Xbox to Xbox 360 graphical leap in 2005 wasn't as massive as some seem to think. Here are some examples: http://www.gamespot....eed-hd-6140621/

Why are we acting like the tech demos is the best it's going to get? The Wii-U will obviously be capable of far more than has been shown so far. To Xbox 360's advantage it had the help of the HD jump that made the most difference in graphical quality at least in 2005/2006 until developers figured out how to program for it. I can't see the Xbox 360 to it's successor being a big of a jump as we are used to consoles in the past, due to the quality (and expense) of the graphics now. I hope I am wrong though and Microsoft can surprise me, but I am worried that costs will go up and with it - the games.

While I know the Wii-U will be less capable than Sony/Microsoft's offerings, Nintendo doesn't have the luxury of having additional income from other sides of their business, so they can't afford to follow the business model of to take a huge loss on each system sold for several years and hope eventually they make some profit on them. They have to make profits on their system's sold as it's their main source of income. I can't really fault them for that.

Regardless at the end of the day, I could really care less what numbers each system can process or how many polygons they can spit out in optimal situations, as long as they have games I want to play. The Wii had some truly awesome games, and some real stinkers I will probably have more fond memories of those than most of the Xbox 360 games I currently own.

Of course it is far more than slightly faster. BUT it's using most of those resources running at 1080p. And so far none of the demo's we've been show is givign any indication that it's giving us 1080p graphics and a xbox to xbox 360 graphics jump style jump from the 360. Which it won't since the WiiU isn't a generational shift. or rather it is, FROM the Wii. But not from the 360 and PS3. And they don't want it to be. Look at the WiiU, it's a tiny box with no real fans. It's designed to be small and cheap. it's not designed to be an expensive Core gamer console. it's a cheap casual gamer console.

YEs it will be better than the 360, no it won't be anywhere near the PS4/Xbox8

You keep going in a circular argument where you pretend everyone's telling you the Wii U is just a pretty new Xbox 360. when in fact NOONE has said this. and you're going to keep doing this circle, I know it.

YEs of course the Wii U is a powerful device as the Devs say, it's being compared to 7 year old stuff. but it doesn't matter if it's more powerful than those, when it's real competition is next gen, and compared to next gen, the Wii U is not.

you do realize how little resources now days it takes to run anything in 1080p good example while poorly optimized game going from 720p resolution to 1080p in GTA 4 it takes no more then 3mb to 5mb of video ram more on my system so it be real hard to buy that it takes most of the system resources on a 7 year newer platform running far much greater hardware all of its resources just to run 1080p

Vandalsquad

So it has the power of the 360 and PS3.. Nothing shocking there.

+Xerxes

How is this a surprise? it's been known for ages the Wii U is on par with the Xbox 360/PS3

Wakers

So the Wii U is about level with the 360 and PS3 which are already many years out of date, tech wise - and the new Xbox is rumoured to be based on an ATI 6670 chip...

Don't think I'll be dropping PC for console again.

Just an example of some of the user on this forum


Where is all this info on the Wii U's specs? I haven't seen Nintendo's E3 presentation yet...how was it? Because apparently everyone here seems to know that it's on par with a PS3 and that it sucks (or it 50% stronger than a PS3 and the most amazing console ever). They must have insider information that I don't. :(

I'm also interested in Microsoft and Sony's next offerings. Where can I find information on them?

Some people are saying that they are not surprised... but I'm surprised that the U4 Engine wasn't built to be scaled in a way that it'd work on the Wii-U. Surely they knew that Nintendos console wouldn't be on par with the rest of the players power wise. :s

Why should they water down their gaming engine to satisfy a company that's too cheap to put decent hardware in their console?

This is actually the first time that I've seen a video of the Wii-U in action and the Zelda demo. That looks impressive for Nintendo but damn that controller looks like it would be uncomfortable to use.

From what i've read from last E3, it's actually pretty decent.

you do realize how little resources now days it takes to run anything in 1080p good example while poorly optimized game going from 720p resolution to 1080p in GTA 4 it takes no more then 3mb to 5mb of video ram more on my system so it be real hard to buy that it takes most of the system resources on a 7 year newer platform running far much greater hardware all of its resources just to run 1080p

:facepalm:

You really have NO idea what you're talking about at all do you. what exactly do you think video ram has to do with going from 720 to 1080 anyway... seriously...

:facepalm:

You really have NO idea what you're talking about at all do you. what exactly do you think video ram has to do with going from 720 to 1080 anyway... seriously...

Well it is simple on the PC anyways when ya turn up the resolution it takes more video ram GTA 4 as an example has a Vram usage meter and the more resolution ya bump up the more vram it takes same thing in windows itself just install GPU Z and ya can monitor Vram usage

Well it is simple on the PC anyways when ya turn up the resolution it takes more video ram GTA 4 as an example has a Vram usage meter and the more resolution ya bump up the more vram it takes same thing in windows itself just install GPU Z and ya can monitor Vram usage

RAM just stores information, it has nothing to do with processing. The higher the resolution the more powerful the GPU needs to be.

RAM just stores information, it has nothing to do with processing. The higher the resolution the more powerful the GPU needs to be.

That's where you're wrong...

In short, VRAM usually stores the framebuffer, and to quote Wikipedia (too lazy to look up a true source but I know it to be true and better worded than I could come up with):

The total amount of the memory required to drive the framebuffer depends on the resolution of the output signal, and on the color depth and palette size.

As "notuptome" said, resolution directly increases VRAM requirements (in terms of size), because it increases the amount of data the framebuffer needs to store. It doesn't have much to do with actual processing, but if resolution gets too large, VRAM won't have enough room to store the framebuffer.

Well it is simple on the PC anyways when ya turn up the resolution it takes more video ram GTA 4 as an example has a Vram usage meter and the more resolution ya bump up the more vram it takes same thing in windows itself just install GPU Z and ya can monitor Vram usage

Not it doesn't. higher resolution requires more GPU power and shader power and all that, RAM not so much. on some cards it might as in your case take 3-5 MB more, on others that use a output buffer thing like the xbox360, it won't use any more VRAM at all since all the output resolution is handled elsewhere.

VRAM is for textures and geometry/geometry deformation data and temp data for shaders and effects and such.

Not it doesn't. higher resolution requires more GPU power and shader power and all that, RAM not so much. on some cards it might as in your case take 3-5 MB more, on others that use a output buffer thing like the xbox360, it won't use any more VRAM at all since all the output resolution is handled elsewhere.

VRAM is for textures and geometry/geometry deformation data and temp data for shaders and effects and such.

Due to how modern hardware handles the frame buffer, it doesn't take very much ram at all, 3-5 would be enough, unless the card has the framebuffer as a separate unit in which case it won't affect the vram at all. the 360 I believe has a 3 MB frame buffer unit (it might be slightly larger, but I seem to recall it was 3). and is able to output 1080p just fine by doing some trickery and shifting the picture around in blocks.

In any case resolution will not have a noticeable effect on Vram, Large texture data will, complex models will, complex shaders and effects will, but not as much, Complex animations will. Resolution will however have a big impact onhow much available GPU power you have left.

That's where you're wrong...

How am I wrong? You just repeated what I already said. RAM is used for storing data, it does not process it. That is what the GPU and CPU are for. I never said VRAM wasn't important; yes higher resolutions need a bit more RAM but not all that much. The important thing is having a powerful enough CPU/GPU to process that data at that resolution. Putting 4 GB of RAM on a 3Dfx Voodoo II won't make it a more powerful card able to run high resolution games or HD content.

I didn't really think anyone expected it to be on par with the next Microsoft or Sony consoles. It's been pretty much agreed that its more powerful than the 360 and PS3, but not by a massive amount. Nintendo's never really been known for pushing the technological boundaries -- they've always either been behind or roughly on-par, for the most part.

I might agree with that if not for the NES and the SNES. :)

Nintendo did almost no updates to the SNES, unlike Sega, which was constantly updating its hardware. The NES didn't really have any major competition when it launched -- Atari was already on a downward spiral.

This doesn't come as a surprise to me because Unreal Engine 4 is fairly new. From what I've read, the upcoming demo will use a single GeForce GTX 680 which is much more powerful than the Wii U's custom AMD Radeon GPU. It's possible that the next gen Xbox and PlayStation consoles won't have the power to run it with high details at 60 FPS. Epic Games feels that they have a responsibility to push Microsoft and Sony for more capable hardware.

With that said, I'm sure the Wii U will have some great looking Unreal Engine 3 titles.

Nintendo did almost no updates to the SNES, unlike Sega, which was constantly updating its hardware. The NES didn't really have any major competition when it launched -- Atari was already on a downward spiral.

Competition or not I don't think anyone can say that the NES wasn't technologically innovative in 1985 (the Famicom actually came out in 1983 in Japan). The SNES was close but still superior to the Genesis in both graphics in sound. The only updates for the Genesis were a couple of overpriced addons that both flopped in the market. In any case Nintendo weren't lagging behind anyone during that era.

Competition or not I don't think anyone can say that the NES wasn't technologically innovative in 1985 (the Famicom actually came out in 1983 in Japan). The SNES was close but still superior to the Genesis in both graphics in sound. The only updates for the Genesis were a couple of overpriced addons that both flopped in the market. In any case Nintendo weren't lagging behind anyone during that era.

The same is also true of the N64 and the Gamecube, almost. Both were very powerful and rivalled (if not topped, in some cases) the other consoles out there. It's only since the Wii that they've taken a back foot to horsepower, really.

Nintendo is and always will be the casual gamer with a cheaper devices.

No. Just no. The vast majority of first party Nintendo titles aren't geared towards casual gamers.

Nintendo's never really been known for pushing the technological boundaries -- they've always either been behind or roughly on-par, for the most part.

And let's not forget the Gamecube was the most powerful machine at it's time (and would have staed that way if Microsoft hadn't jumped into the fray)

the only first party title that isnt would be metroid, and even thats not entirely true anymore

You're seriously saying Metroid Prime 3, Xenoblade Chronicles and Skyward Sword have as much casual appeal as Carnival Games, Just Dance and Wii Sports?

Or are you just having a laugh?

And let's not forget the Gamecube was the most powerful machine at it's time (and would have staed that way if Microsoft hadn't jumped into the fray)

The GameCube was released at the same time as the Xbox, thus it was roughly on-par with that generation.

You're seriously saying Metroid Prime 3, Xenoblade Chronicles and Skyward Sword have as much casual appeal as Carnival Games, Just Dance and Wii Sports?

Or are you just having a laugh?

Not being as casual as kids games and party games doesn't make them core games. There are degrees of casual, and you can't call a game not casual because it isn't wii sports.

That's like saying an FPS game isn't a core game unless it's ARMA./Flashpoint.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!