Geoff Keighley confirms Wii U won


Recommended Posts

It's expected to be released a year before, yes. But, the WiiU has 2gb of ram, Durango has 8gb of ram...

Durango oh you mean the so called Dev kit that got sold on ebay well we dont know that is for sure what it was and if so it is a Development kit they always have more ram then the retail models because of debugging stuff so 8gb of ram is meaninglessness. The xbox 360s first Dev kits were just off the shelf Apple Dual CPU based G5s running @ 2ghz far below the real xbox 360 specs and it has a GPU with 512 ram and system ram of 4gbs i think at the time so this Durango Dev kit means nothing right now

In WHAT world did Nintendo come in third this generation?

http://en.wikipedia....sales_figures_6

They came in 3rd with the GameCube, hence, again.

true still tho the Wii is one of Nintendos most successful systems and i think the Wii U will as well. i do feel that there will be some people who may just buy it just for Nintendo TVii assuming Nintendo properly adverts it

Not even a miniscule chance that the Wii U will be as successful as the Wii. Too many Wii owners feel burned by the purchase, and too many non-Wii owners know how many Wii owners feel burned, and will likely have the same reason for not buying the Wii U as they did for not buying the Wii (gimmicky/not powerful enough). They'll be lucky to sell 60 million.

They came in 3rd with the GameCube, hence, again.

Not even a miniscule chance that the Wii U will be as successful as the Wii. Too many Wii owners feel burned by the purchase, and too many non-Wii owners know how many Wii owners feel burned, and will likely have the same reason for not buying the Wii U as they did for not buying the Wii (gimmicky/not powerful enough). They'll be lucky to sell 60 million.

Is that why Wii-U preorders are selling out?

It's kinda funny

Announcement: WiiU won't support UE4

Response: disaster

Announcement: WIinRT will support full UE3

Response: Eh, the limited mobile version of UE3 on iPad and android tablets are just as good.

While ue4 is scalable, pc and console is two different worlds, and assuming ue4 will scale down that far is an assumption. It also means you have to turn of everything that makes ue4 ue4.

Is that why Wii-U preorders are selling out?

Ouya also "sold out", it's still only 50k. Without real numbers, sold out is a useless reference. And Nintendo is well know to do the same tactic as apple. Low release volumes so it always appears to be sold out, making it seem desirable.

It was already well known that the Wii U would support UE4. In fact there was some concern over whether the next-gen consoles from Microsoft and Sony would be powerful enough, as Epic really wanted to push technology to its limits.

The Wii U will be a decent casual console but it's not designed for core gamers - many publishers and developers have stated openly they won't be developing for it (that includes the Crysis and GTA franchises). Few are interested in paying full price for a console that technologically is little better than the X360/PS3 and has a dramatically more limited catalogue, especially with Microsoft's next-gen console coming out next year. The question is whether the Wii U's asymmetric gameplay / budget tablet interface gimmick will hold up. The tablet controller is very much inferior to current tablets and that will become more pronounced 2-3yrs down the line when the console is in its prime.

Nintendo is releasing a budget console because it's profitable to do so but the next consoles from Microsoft and Sony will offer a much better experience for core gamers.

They came in 3rd with the GameCube, hence, again.

Not even a miniscule chance that the Wii U will be as successful as the Wii. Too many Wii owners feel burned by the purchase, and too many non-Wii owners know how many Wii owners feel burned, and will likely have the same reason for not buying the Wii U as they did for not buying the Wii (gimmicky/not powerful enough). They'll be lucky to sell 60 million.

That is why the Pre-orders are through the rough and reaching the far reaches of the universe and Selling out Not even life on Melmak can get one it is that good

And how many are those pre orders. Again, outsold means NOTHING.

even if they are not in stock do to supply shortage which i doubt cause no word has come across stating otherwise i just think you wanting to hope it is another Wii supply thing all over again you know . Nintendo has next generation system Now Sony and Microsoft dont they will be late in the game so by that time the Wii U will have a dominent place in the eyes of Gamers and that is already happening with the Pre-orders

They're not getting 65 million pre-orders. Almost anything like this will sell out pre-orders because of the hardcore crowd.

And im sure people like you said the same thing about the Wii as well.

Obviously they aren't getting 65 million pre-orders. That would be preposterous to think. Come back in 5-6 years time when they're ready for the next generation and see how much they've sold.

Nintendo has never followed up an incredibly successful run with one console with an equally successful run with the subsequent console.

In 5-6 years, they won't have sold anywhere near 90 million.

So you're a time traveller?

GameCube - Wii would be the exception. Although some would not classify the GameCube a success

even if they are not in stock do to supply shortage which i doubt cause no word has come across stating otherwise i just think you wanting to hope it is another Wii supply thing all over again you know . Nintendo has next generation system Now Sony and Microsoft dont they will be late in the game so by that time the Wii U will have a dominent place in the eyes of Gamers and that is already happening with the Pre-orders

Again, Nintendo has a history of low release numbers just to heighten desirability. They always do it, here doing it again. Being sold out means nothing, hard numbers of how many pre orders there are means something.

As for next gen.... Mmmmyeah well. I'll probably end up buying one, mostly for old wii Zelda and new mario games( long as they're not Mario 64 3d crap). But when compared to the true next gen. I think you'll find that Nintendo isn't early. They are in fact late with a mid generation console.

Also I think you'll find that while the WiiU will sell well, it may very well sell way below the Wii. All those millions of people who have their Wiis collecting dust somewhere is hardly likely to buy another Wii. They're not going to get the old and middle aged gamers again, or the super casuals. They'll get the ones who still play their Wii every once in a while. Casuals and nostalgic core gamers with a Nintendo fetish.

Again, Nintendo has a history of low release numbers just to heighten desirability. They always do it, here doing it again. Being sold out means nothing, hard numbers of how many pre orders there are means something.

As for next gen.... Mmmmyeah well. I'll probably end up buying one, mostly for old wii Zelda and new mario games( long as they're not Mario 64 3d crap). But when compared to the true next gen. I think you'll find that Nintendo isn't early. They are in fact late with a mid generation console.

Also I think you'll find that while the WiiU will sell well, it may very well sell way below the Wii. All those millions of people who have their Wiis collecting dust somewhere is hardly likely to buy another Wii. They're not going to get the old and middle aged gamers again, or the super casuals. They'll get the ones who still play their Wii every once in a while. Casuals and nostalgic core gamers with a Nintendo fetish.

How is it they are late.

IBM Power 7 multi-core CPU confirmed by IBM Xbox 360 uses a Power 4/5 custom chip as it was IBMs first Multi-core chip even before they had Server CPUs a with multi-core per chip

AMD R700 series GPU all rumors led to 48870 and as of right now nothing says otherwise so we will say 4870 the Xbox 360 is running a First of a kind GPU architecture if we was to compare it to a desktop version GPU If we was it be around a X1900 series card and by my count that be 4 generations and 60 GPUs older then the 4870 Developers have said this thing is a beast and far greater more powerful then what is in the 360

the system has 2gb of ram 1gb of games 1gb for everything else Xbox 360 has 512mb shared 32mb to 48mb of that for OS

has 8gb or 32gb flash storage expandable via up to 32gb SD card or any size USB drive up to 4 USB drives 4 USB ports so if someone wanted 4x 3TB storage external of course

Wii U gamepad changes thing further and Microsoft even confimred Nintendo is going the right direction at there E3 showing of Smart glass they started working on a day after E3 2011 Nintendo showing of the Wii U very similar idea using a Tablet and internet with less 2nd screen functions as the Wii U MS went to Developers who was excited with MS going that direction and told them all the stuff they could end up doing with a 2nd screen but the issue is tho it is requiring users to buy a 360 and a Tablet and possible Live premium subscription While the Wii U gamepad comes with the Wii U and all the extra features anfd services Nintendo has showed off and game developers have showed off come to the system For FREE even online stuff and Nintendo TVii stuff

http://twitter.com/I...241146213842944

http://twitter.com/I...473693843562498

So i say No to Nintendo being late in the game and i dont think with these specs really says it is a Mid generation console it is next generation

The Wii U will be a decent casual console but it's not designed for core gamers -

Eh, no, no, no, no, no. Nintendo have explicitly stated they're trying to target core gamers with this console - and it shows with their launch plans that their not including something universally appealing like they did with Wii Sports. In fact, there's nothing like that in their first party line up bar a Wii Fit sequel, and that's at some point into next year. They're going out of their way to try and cater for core gamers, even if they're not releasing a the most powerful console.

And calling the tablet controller inferior to current tablets is pretty silly given it's a dumb slave unit and not an actual tablet per s? - I can pretty much assure you there'll be far better graphics, and far better gameplay on the WiiU controller than any tablet in the market at the moment.

Wii U has a good launch window line up of 50 day Launch window from launch day to March of next year and there is plenty of M rated games on the list and FPS games Zombie U being one of them . The Wii U is not targeted solo for Casual gamers it is Targeted for core gamers and well now with Nintendo TVii the living room for media buffs

http://www.nintendo.com/wiiu/videos/#/wii-u-preview on the jump to area click on Wii TV this will show a side of Nintendo no one was expecting at all fully integrated TV services to interact with your DVR and more

Eh, no, no, no, no, no. Nintendo have explicitly stated they're trying to target core gamers with this console - and it shows with their launch plans that their not including something universally appealing like they did with Wii Sports.

They stated the same thing with the Gamecube and Wii, yet we all know that wasn't true.

In fact, there's nothing like that in their first party line up bar a Wii Fit sequel, and that's at some point into next year.

You're kidding, right? The Nintendo line up is nothing but casual/kiddie games. There's Nintendo Land, New Super Mario Bros. U, Lego City: Undercover, Game & Wario, Pikmin 3 and The Wonderful 101. In fact Nintendo isn't publishing a single mature title themselves. That's very different to Microsoft's line-up (franchises like Halo, Gears Of War) or Sony's (Killzone, Metal Gear Solid) - they weren't launch titles but they are the brands most associated with each console. It seems like every time Nintendo releases a new console there are people claiming this will be their return to core gaming and every time there is plenty of evidence to point to the contrary but people just ignore it.

And calling the tablet controller inferior to current tablets is pretty silly given it's a dumb slave unit and not an actual tablet per s? - I can pretty much assure you there'll be far better graphics, and far better gameplay on the WiiU controller than any tablet in the market at the moment.

The problem is the Wii U tablet doesn't even feature multi-touch and the pixel density is half that of the current iPad and way less than tablets like the Nexus 7 or Surface Pro. Considering that it's outdated now it's going to be looking really poor several years in, let alone the six years it will take before Nintendo releases another console (if they do).

The Wii U has slightly better third-party support (after the surprise success of the Wii) but that's current gen titles simply being ported across to play off the launch hype. Once the next-gen console cycle kicks in the difference will become very much more noticeable.

Not even a miniscule chance that the Wii U will be as successful as the Wii. Too many Wii owners feel burned by the purchase, and too many non-Wii owners know how many Wii owners feel burned, and will likely have the same reason for not buying the Wii U as they did for not buying the Wii (gimmicky/not powerful enough). They'll be lucky to sell 60 million.

WTF? You don't consider selling 60 million of something a success?? What ****ing planet are you from.

Are you feeling a little butt hurt, by chance?

WTF? You don't consider selling 60 million of something a success?? What ****ing planet are you from.

It's all relative. If Nintendo's last console sold 1bn, then obviously 60m for a sequel is a disaster. But I'm sure you knew that already, which begs the question - why are you trying to make a big deal out of that comment?

It's all relative. If Nintendo's last console sold 1bn, then obviously 60m for a sequel is a disaster. But I'm sure you knew that already, which begs the question - why are you trying to make a big deal out of that comment?

You need to work on your embellishment. You haven't quite grasped it yet.

Well, if you would quit making up bull****, people like me wouldn't have to call you on it.

The Wii-U will sell well.

They stated the same thing with the Gamecube and Wii, yet we all know that wasn't true.

You're kidding, right? The Nintendo line up is nothing but casual/kiddie games. There's Nintendo Land, New Super Mario Bros. U, Lego City: Undercover, Game & Wario, Pikmin 3 and The Wonderful 101. In fact Nintendo isn't publishing a single mature title themselves. That's very different to Microsoft's line-up (franchises like Halo, Gears Of War) or Sony's (Killzone, Metal Gear Solid) - they weren't launch titles but they are the brands most associated with each console. It seems like every time Nintendo releases a new console there are people claiming this will be their return to core gaming and every time there is plenty of evidence to point to the contrary but people just ignore it.

The problem is the Wii U tablet doesn't even feature multi-touch and the pixel density is half that of the current iPad and way less than tablets like the Nexus 7 or Surface Pro. Considering that it's outdated now it's going to be looking really poor several years in, let alone the six years it will take before Nintendo releases another console (if they do).

The Wii U has slightly better third-party support (after the surprise success of the Wii) but that's current gen titles simply being ported across to play off the launch hype. Once the next-gen console cycle kicks in the difference will become very much more noticeable.

The Wii U gamepad looks great have you seen it in action and the LCD screen quality is rather damn good also it dont need Multi-touch it has no use for it. the screen specs tho on the Wii U GP are 6.2 inch (15.7 cm) 854?480 16:9 @ 158 ppi

You're kidding, right? The Nintendo line up is nothing but casual/kiddie games. There's Nintendo Land, New Super Mario Bros. U, Lego City: Undercover, Game & Wario, Pikmin 3 and The Wonderful 101. In fact Nintendo isn't publishing a single mature title themselves. That's very different to Microsoft's line-up (franchises like Halo, Gears Of War) or Sony's (Killzone, Metal Gear Solid) - they weren't launch titles but they are the brands most associated with each console. It seems like every time Nintendo releases a new console there are people claiming this will be their return to core gaming and every time there is plenty of evidence to point to the contrary but people just ignore it.

The only explicitly casual / kiddie titles Nintendo actually make are either the "Wii [Name]" branded games, touch generation branded games and Animal Crossing. Outside of that, and few odd spin offs - their games are catered towards core gamers, especially in terms of depth. I must have missed the point when gamers decided what makes a game cater towards them is no longer the gameplay, but how realistic and violent the game is.

Calling New Super Mario Bros, Pikmin 3 and The Wonderful 101 casual / kiddie titles is ridiculous - and to a certain extent Lego City & Nintendo Land. Just because there's no realistic graphics, gracious violence or gun play, and that their age rating allows it doesn't means it's a kids title. And none of them are in anyway easy enough or shallow enough for a casual player to get far in. Nintendo designs their first party games to be fun games first and foremost and have good gameplay, the sort of gameplay that makes them not casual or kiddie titles. They're not explicitly mature, but they're not casual / kiddie titles. That's almost as insulting as calling Little Big Planet a casual / kiddie title. It doesn't limit it's appeal to a single market, but it can only be fully appreciated by gamers.

You might see a casual player complete the first few levels in Super Mario Bros for instance, but you'll barely ever see anyone even make it halfway by themselves, let alone touch anywhere near any of the secrets. Pikmin? I'm going to assume that because you even mentioned it as a casual title you've never actually played it, otherwise it'd be nowhere near that list.

As an FYI, the Gamecube did a lovely job of catering towards core gamers. And the Wii was always, from inception, designed to get people playing games who had never played them before, which is why the controller was designed as such, and why they included Wii Sports in the box. (Though they still made sure there were plenty of games to cater towards gamers - which were somewhat ignored not because the games were bad, but because the people wanted HD graphics / Xbox Live clone)

Regarding the controller needing multi touch - why does it need it? It's not trying to be a tablet. It's trying to be an accurate, durable, affordable gaming controller. Not your next iPad - it's designed explicitly for it's purpose. You can't install anything on it, you can't use it away from the console, you can't attempt to write your next dissertation on it. You play games with it, along side your TV, and the stylus offers better precision in that regard (as well as making the screen more durable as it doesn't need to be glass). As long as the screen is sensitive enough to also be used with a finger when needed, which everyone says it is, I don't see the problem. Or, let's put it this way. How many times have you seen multitouch being a definitive, integral part for improving gaming control, vs the precision given with a stylus. In the majority of games, all it does is zoom a view in and out, and for that you lose the proper stylus control.

Calling New Super Mario Bros, Pikmin 3 and The Wonderful 101 casual / kiddie titles is ridiculous - and to a certain extent Lego City & Nintendo Land. Just because there's no realistic graphics, gracious violence or gun play, and that their age rating allows it doesn't means it's a kids title.

They are all casual titles, designed to appeal to children as much as to adults. They have bright and colourful graphics, with little narrative depth, simple and easily understandable gameplay mechanics, cutesy characters and no realism. That doesn't mean a core game can't have any of those traits but they're just very much less likely to. Core games would be titles like Far Cry 3, Borderlands 2, Forza, Metal Gear Solid, Crysis 3, Halo 4, XCOM: Enemy Unknown, F1 2012, Civilization V, Skyrim, Max Payne 3, etc. Now the Wii U will have some core games but not to the same degree as consoles from Microsoft or Sony, or the PC. More importantly, Nintendo itself doesn't make core games - the only game that would class as that is Metroid Prime.

That's almost as insulting as calling Little Big Planet a casual / kiddie title.

It is a casual title! It just happens to be a very good game that also appeals to adults and core gamers. My point isn't that casual games are bad, just that Nintendo isn't catering to core games to even close to the same degree as Microsoft or Sony.

You might see a casual player complete the first few levels in Super Mario Bros for instance, but you'll barely ever see anyone even make it halfway by themselves, let alone touch anywhere near any of the secrets. Pikmin? I'm going to assume that because you even mentioned it as a casual title you've never actually played it, otherwise it'd be nowhere near that list.

That's irrelevant. The majority of people don't complete games. Core games like Call Of Duty are incredibly easy to complete but that doesn't mean they're not core games.

As an FYI, the Gamecube did a lovely job of catering towards core gamers.

:argh: The Xbox launched with Halo, Project Gotham Racing and Dead Or Alive 3; the Playstation 2 launched with Ridge Racer V, Tekken: Tag Tournament and Unreal Tournament; the Gamecube launched with Luigi's Mansion, Wave Race, Super Monkey Ball and Crazy Taxi.

Regarding the controller need multi touch - why does it need it? It's not trying to be a tablet.

Firstly, it doesn't "need" it but it's a rather noticeable omission given that Nintendo is clearly trying to head off the threat of tablet gaming.

It's trying to be an accurate, durable, affordable gaming controller. Not your next iPad - it's designed explicitly for it's purpose. You can't install anything on it, you can't use it away from the console, you can't attempt to write your next dissertation on it. You play games with it, along side your TV, and the stylus offers better precision in that regard (as well as making the screen more durable as it doesn't need to be glass). As long as the screen is sensitive enough to also be used with a finger when needed, which everyone says it is, I don't see the problem.

The point is people will be comparing it to tablets, especially when tablets will offer better functionality, better displays and better graphics (if not initially then within a year or two).

You seem to have a very different idea of what constitutes core gaming. Do you at least accept that the Wii U is more aimed at kids than consoles from Microsoft and Sony?

Microsoft and Sony will offer a much better experience for core gamers.

As long as they work for more than 1 year without breaking.

After 2 XBox 360 (RRoD and HDMI port) i simply gave up on it. Next gen i'm waiting at least 1 year to see if it's reliable enough.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!