Recommended Posts

One big problem with the final for me was that if the Observers never existed then who pulled Walter and Peter from the lake after Walter took Peter from the other side when he was a child. It was September who saved them so now that he is gone so should Peter and Walter.

One big problem with the final for me was that if the Observers never existed then who pulled Walter and Peter from the lake after Walter took Peter from the other side when he was a child. It was September who saved them so now that he is gone so should Peter and Walter.

Peter would never have needed saving because the observer would never have distracted Walternate from seeing the cure.

Anyway, FINALLY a something by JJ Abrams that has a good ending! :D

Peter would never have needed saving because the observer would never have distracted Walternate from seeing the cure.

Anyway, FINALLY a something by JJ Abrams that has a good ending! :D

True but then he wouldn't be on our side he would still be in his own universe.

Just watched this, and... damn, so emotional. The best (worst?) part was when Walter and Astrid were talking and he was just like: "That's a lovely name." Made me tear right up. :cry:

I think the ONLY thing I might've changed is at the very end, having the Fringe team remember everything that'd happened. That just might've been a little hard to explain, story-wise.

I would have liked to have seen what effect Walter and Michael had on the future but I understand why they didn't. I was crying like a baby when September got shot and Walter had to go through anyway.

Really loved this show, there have been hits and misses but there has been more hits for me and John Noble just made the show.

Loved the ending, shame we didn't see Windmark die, only got to see his blood spatter before he disappeared.

If they tried to explain everything they'd just end up making it all too complicated for everyone. Some things we'll just have to take as is and some other things we can try to explain ourselves.

The fact Walter vanished is because as he said the universe hates paradoxes. Since he went into the future to stop the invasion from happening then in order to not have a paradox from going on hi vanishes from that timeline/universe. As far as that goes I think it fits. Now the whole thing with Peter is that, as has been said he's not really in his original timeline. The one we are at by the end of the show is not the one where September saves him and Walter in the lake. That timeline was lost once Peter used the machine. All in all I don't see any plot holes with the ending as long as you remember that at the end we're in a altogether different timeline.

One last thing, older red head Olivia is still hawt.

Such an emotional finale. I shed manly tears every 5 minutes or so.. :cry:

I really didn't have any emotional connection with the finale. And that's not because I don't get emotional, as I bawled my eyes out during Les Mis?rables. I think it's because Fringe became a bit too formulaic and I just didn't believe in the characters by the end of it. The series went downhill during Season 3 and because incredibly convoluted. While the final season had its moments I really don't think they could have carried it on any further.

It's quite similar to what happened to Battlestar Galactica, actually. The first two seasons were really strong but then the show started to get bogged down in dull plots and ever more unbelievable storylines. There were still good episodes every now and then that reminded you why you still watched it but not enough to get you to really engage.

I enjoyed the finale but it didn't have the magic or intrigue of the earlier seasons.

I think the natural ending for the show would have been end of Season 4 (without the stupid flashes to the future). Obviously would have left a lot of questions about why the observers were ever involved in the first place, but would have been better than this.

I've only just seen that Season 5 was planned to have 13 episodes (to end on 100), the way it played out. I felt like it started off SO slow, and was kind of going nowhere until all of a sudden it was nearing towards the finale and it was all over. It felt as if the series started and fox told them, "this is $h27, wrap it up and get it over with".

I've only just seen that Season 5 was planned to have 13 episodes (to end on 100), the way it played out. I felt like it started off SO slow, and was kind of going nowhere until all of a sudden it was nearing towards the finale and it was all over. It felt as if the series started and fox told them, "this is $h27, wrap it up and get it over with".

The show was basically scrapped because of low ratings and expensive production costs but rather than take it to another network - which was actually considered - they managed to agree upon a half-season to allow it to wrap up properly. To be fair, they're very lucky to have got that.

The final season didn't really go anywhere and the future setting - which was about the only interesting part - was barely touched up. It was nice for the observers and their implants to be explained, especially with the Peter sub-plot, but too much time was wasted on unimportant themes, like the dull 'find another tape' malarkey. And the finale brought back characters and settings - like the alternative universe - that had barely been touched upon.

It was also implausible that the future of the genetics of the human race rested upon the boy that couldn't talk or communicate in any meaningful way.

It had a great ending. I didn't get emotional but one scene had an effect on me. It was the scene where Olivia was tossed through the air by Windmark. She looked at the ground and saw her bullet necklace (the same one that belonged to Etta).

I was hoping they'd show Walter and Michael in 2167 but I guess it wasn't really necessary.

It was a good ending but since they were going to use the time thing, I was hoping they were going to have every version of Walter teaming together, like Walternate and Walter from the 60's as well as the modern day equivalents and they could've phased through the seasons and had them showing up at key moments during the previous episodes to change events.

bsolutely loved all the observers getting all the various effects they had discovered though and I admit I too had a lump in my throat when Walter said "It's a lovely name...Astrid".

Also keeping everyone alive leaves a movie version, if it ever happened, wide open.

He wasn't created, he was a mutated anomaly that showed that you could have emotions AND intelligence instead of Intelligence at the cost of emotions. Taking him to the scientists that made that discovery means they would have been able to figure out how to guide human evolution in that direction without making the clones mute.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • AI is the beginning, wait until real robots replace more jobs, specifically jobs that require physical work.
    • AI is indeed eliminating jobs, and Oracle just proved it by Hamid Ganji There’s no question that AI has become the hottest trend in workplaces, and every company is trying to adopt AI-driven solutions across its operations. While some industry leaders repeatedly say AI won’t lead to massive layoffs, recent data suggest that AI is actually one of the main reasons some companies are reducing their workforce. According to Oracle’s annual regulatory filing, the company has laid off about 21,000 employees, or 13% of its workforce, amid increasing AI adoption. “The adoption and deployment of AI technologies across our operations have resulted, and may continue to result, in reductions to our workforce,” Oracle said in the filing. The software giant now has approximately 141,000 full-time employees, a notable decrease from 162,000 during the same period last year. Restructuring expenses, including severance payments, cost Oracle $1.84 billion in fiscal 2026. Additionally, around 49,000 Oracle employees were based in the U.S., while approximately 92,000 were employed internationally. Like many other companies, Oracle has fully embraced AI and concentrated much of its efforts on the technology. The company is also a key participant in the United States’ $500 billion Stargate Project, which aims to build multiple AI data centers across the country. When it comes to AI adoption and its impact on the workforce, opinions remain divided. NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang, whose company has been one of the biggest beneficiaries of the AI boom, recently said in an interview that attributing job cuts to AI is a “lazy” narrative. “The narrative that connects AI to job loss, for many of the CEOs that are doing it – it is just too lazy. AI has just arrived, how is it possible they're already losing jobs?” Huang said. However, statistics and recent reports tell a different story. According to Layoffs.fyi, 196 tech companies have laid off about 119,800 employees so far this year. Reducing staff and replacing roles with AI agents could become one of the most significant trends in the job market in the years ahead.
    • Zoom Workplace 7.1.0.41345 by Razvan Serea Zoom Workplace for Windows is a reliable video conferencing tool that makes it easy to connect and collaborate. With features like messaging, file sharing, and app integrations, it’s designed to streamline teamwork. You’ll get high-quality audio and video, strong security with end-to-end encryption, and an intuitive interface—all of which help remote teams and businesses stay productive and connected. Zoom Workplace key features: High-Definition Video & Audio: Provides clear, reliable communication for virtual meetings. End-to-End Encryption: Ensures secure communication with strong data protection. Multi-Factor Authentication: Adds an extra layer of security for user accounts. Integration with Productivity Apps: Supports seamless integration with Microsoft Office, Google Workspace, and more. File Sharing: Easily share files during meetings for efficient collaboration. Real-Time Messaging: Enables team chat for ongoing communication. Collaborative Whiteboarding: Allows teams to brainstorm and collaborate visually. Webinar Support: Host large webinars with interactive features. Administrative Controls: Manage user permissions, meeting settings, and security features. Cloud Storage: Automatically stores meetings and files in the cloud for easy access. Cross-Platform Support: Available on Windows, macOS, and mobile devices. Meeting features: Virtual Backgrounds: Customize your background for meetings to maintain privacy or enhance professionalism. Touch Up My Appearance: Automatically smoothens skin tone for a more polished video appearance. Breakout Rooms: Divide meetings into smaller sessions for group discussions or workshops. Live Transcription: Automatically generate real-time captions during meetings for accessibility. Zoom Apps: Integrate third-party applications directly into Zoom for enhanced functionality. Meeting Reactions: Participants can use emojis for quick, non-verbal feedback during meetings. Polling: Conduct live polls during meetings to gather instant feedback from participants. Attention Tracking: Monitors participant attention during meetings to ensure engagement. Closed Captioning: Enable manual or automatic captions for a more inclusive experience. Webinar Replay: Record and share webinars with analytics for audience engagement. Download: Zoom 64-bit | 145.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: Zoom Website | Zoom ARM64 | Zoom Installers | Release Notes Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • UK funds £60M AI labs to challenge US tech dominance with open-source models by Paul Hill The UK government has awarded £60 million to Oxford University and University College London to help keep the country in the AI race by focusing on open-source, low-hardware alternatives. This is in stark contrast to the expensive, closed-source, and high-hardware-requirement models being created in the United States and elsewhere. The money will be shared among two new academic research labs over six years to help them redesign the fundamental mathematics and architectures of AI to help the UK reduce its reliance on a handful of US tech firms. Commenting on the development, AI Minister Kanishka Narayan said: Initially, the government planned to fund just one lab with a £40 million investment, but with this update, two labs will now get access to a larger pool of funds. The labs are expected to invest in the top AI researchers at every career stage, with £2 million per lab being set aside for hiring at least ten doctoral students. The government hopes that this will grow the UK’s talent in the field of AI. The labs are also expected to work closely with the leaders in British AI research, such as the Alan Turing Institute and UKRI’s AI research hubs. This will allow the various teams to collaborate and create new solutions faster than they could alone. This development is pretty interesting for a number of reasons, chiefly that it could create a long-term challenge for US tech firms if these labs successfully scale these open-source architectures that bypass the proprietary ecosystems. It could also give British businesses and public sector organizations access to AI features without paying high licensing fees to foreign providers or needing to invest in specialized server infrastructure.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      464
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      97
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      89
    5. 5
      neufuse
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!