Recommended Posts

Well the show did end kind of satisfactorily, even though it ain't quite a memorable one. Unlike Lost where they focussed so much on the "character" of the island that we ceased to care who Kate ended up with or even who survived and who died, here the dynamics amongst the Bishop family and Astrid (and Broyles and Nina) was always centrestage. Even when the show jump plot devices (first it was about the pattern and that terrorist faction that used Walter's books, then when the alt universe came the previous plot devce was conveniently forgotten, then when the observers came alt universe was forgotten. Well they were mentioned here and there, but I believe the shout-outs were put in just so they could say it was planned all along, rather than serving any other purpose). So when they ended with a resolution to just those characters (while leaving most other things unresolved), it does not in any way rouse dissatisfaction in me.

I thought he was mute because they stopped his development etc. Either way I don't think everyone will be mute as well in the future.

Regardless. Sending Michael to 2167 wasn't to let Davros create more exactly like him, it was to show Davros that you could have both emotions and higher intelligence, not just higher intelligence.

Regardless. Sending Michael to 2167 wasn't to let Davros create more exactly like him, it was to show Davros that you could have both emotions and higher intelligence, not just higher intelligence.

I'm good on the reasons and all that, I don't question the plan. I was just saying why I think he's mute.

Was there an explanation for the lack of Observers in the alternate universe? I know September visited the alternate universe first when he accidentally prevented Walternate from finding a cure for his son. After that, the Observers seemed to focus solely on the prime universe. It seemed like they didn't know whether or not the alternate universe was invaded (when they came up with the idea of Olivia travelling between universes to rescue Michael).

  • Like 1

I realized today that my favorite show won't be on and then had a thought. Walter went to 2167 to fix the timeline and in the process created a paradox that removed him from the timeline. Now the Peter that we know was from the alternate universe because the true Peter died from an illness as a kid. If Water was removed from the timeline, he would not have been able to create the universe window and then the portal, thus he would not have been able to bring the alternate Peter back. So, the original Peter had died and the whole premise of the show: Fringe division, etc... shouldn't exist and he and Olivia wouldn't have a child. Bam...5 seasons of the show gone.

Am I wrong or is this a huge hole in the series finale and a big ass paradox?

I realized today that my favorite show won't be on and then had a thought. Walter went to 2167 to fix the timeline and in the process created a paradox that removed him from the timeline. Now the Peter that we know was from the alternate universe because the true Peter died from an illness as a kid. If Water was removed from the timeline, he would not have been able to create the universe window and then the portal, thus he would not have been able to bring the alternate Peter back. So, the original Peter had died and the whole premise of the show: Fringe division, etc... shouldn't exist and he and Olivia wouldn't have a child. Bam...5 seasons of the show gone.

Am I wrong or is this a huge hole in the series finale and a big ass paradox?

I thought Walter said he wouldn't have existed beyond 2015, not that he wouldn't have existed at all. Someone had to have sent that Tulip drawing to Peter, plus, remember the tape that Walter left Peter to explain where he, Walter, had gone. So that stays intact without wiping 5 seasons out.

I realized today that my favorite show won't be on and then had a thought. Walter went to 2167 to fix the timeline and in the process created a paradox that removed him from the timeline. Now the Peter that we know was from the alternate universe because the true Peter died from an illness as a kid. If Water was removed from the timeline, he would not have been able to create the universe window and then the portal, thus he would not have been able to bring the alternate Peter back. So, the original Peter had died and the whole premise of the show: Fringe division, etc... shouldn't exist and he and Olivia wouldn't have a child. Bam...5 seasons of the show gone.

Am I wrong or is this a huge hole in the series finale and a big ass paradox?

I don't know if the original Peter died, being September prevented Walter from finding the cure for his illness. So it's possible that Walter did cure the original Peter.

Now for Peter meeting Olivia without Walter and Fringe is a head scratcher.

I need to watch the last episodes again and see what Walter said to Peter about the letter. I know when Peter opened the letter at the end it had a picture of a Tulip. Now Michael towards the end kept putting his finger to his too lips (Tulip), not sure if there is significance here or just reading too much into it.

I don't know if the original Peter died, being September prevented Walter from finding the cure for his illness. So it's possible that Walter did cure the original Peter.

Now for Peter meeting Olivia without Walter and Fringe is a head scratcher.

I need to watch the last episodes again and see what Walter said to Peter about the letter. I know when Peter opened the letter at the end it had a picture of a Tulip. Now Michael towards the end kept putting his finger to his too lips (Tulip), not sure if there is significance here or just reading too much into it.

I would have to go back and watch season 3 (?) but I thought alternate Peter went and saw his grave site? If I remember when Walter brought alternate Peter back they were in a car that sunk to the bottom of a lake and September saved them.

Here is an even bigger headache....if we go and assume that Walter created a paradox and removed himself from the whole timeline then not only would the 5 seasons not have happened but Peter wouldn't have existed in the first place as Walter didn't exist and thus Peter was never born. Thus a completely different timeline was created both in the original one and probably in the alternate one as well.

I would have to go back and watch season 3 (?) but I thought alternate Peter went and saw his grave site? If I remember when Walter brought alternate Peter back they were in a car that sunk to the bottom of a lake and September saved them.

Here is an even bigger headache....if we go and assume that Walter created a paradox and removed himself from the whole timeline then not only would the 5 seasons not have happened but Peter wouldn't have existed in the first place as Walter didn't exist and thus Peter was never born. Thus a completely different timeline was created both in the original one and probably in the alternate one as well.

The paradox occurred at the exact moment the observer invasion started. It's not like Peter's erasure from history and people's memory. Walter was simply removed at a certain point in time and everything he's ever done after that time was erased. It doesn't affect what Walter did in the previous seasons. Do you remember the scene where Walter said Peter would receive a letter, call Walter, and head over to the lab when Walter doesn't answer? There, he'd find a video that Walter left for him.

As for the white tulip, I'm almost certain we've seen it before. I think it was the episode that involved time travel. If I remember correctly, the tulip had a religious or spiritual significance to Walter.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • GitHub removes manual model selection from Copilot free and student plans by Karthik Mudaliar GitHub is removing the ability to manually select an AI model from its Copilot Free and Student plans, making its automatic routing system the default and only way to choose a model. This means users on these tiers will no longer be able to deliberately select a particular OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, or Microsoft model for a task. In its announcement, GitHub said Copilot Auto will dynamically choose what it considers the best model for each request. Free and Student accounts will retain access to models from multiple families, although the available selection will continue to depend on the restrictions attached to each plan. GitHub did not identify a fixed pool of models that Auto will always use, and its documentation warns that model availability can change over time. GitHub describes Auto as more than a random fallback system. On supported surfaces, its task-optimization technology evaluates the complexity of a request alongside real-time information about model health and availability. Straightforward prompts can be routed to faster and less expensive models, while more demanding coding tasks may be sent to higher-cost reasoning models. The company says this approach should reduce rate limiting, latency, and failed requests. Auto generally selects one model along natural prompt-caching boundaries rather than repeatedly switching models during a session, as GitHub found that mid-session changes increased costs without producing sufficient improvements in output quality. Users can still check which model generated a response. In Copilot Chat, the information appears when hovering over an answer, while Copilot CLI and the Copilot cloud agent display the selected model alongside their output. Auto is available in Copilot Chat, Copilot CLI, and the cloud agent, with the exact implementation and release status varying between supported development environments. The latest restriction follows several months of adjustments to Copilot’s individual plans. GitHub temporarily halted new Pro, Pro+, and Student subscriptions in April as it sought to manage demand and service reliability. It later introduced token-based billing and began gradually reopening individual-plan registrations on June 17. Alongside the picker change, GitHub is retiring the “Preview” label from Microsoft-developed models. It argues that the label is no longer necessary because Auto handles model routing and models are continuously updated behind the scenes.
    • Look up 'inflation' kid. Ask an AI for the numbers between both games.
    • Google reportedly set to lose two key Gemini and DeepMind researchers to Anthropic by Karthik Mudaliar Google is reportedly preparing to lose two more prominent artificial intelligence researchers, with Gemini contributors Jonas Adler and Alexander Pritzel planning to join rival AI developer Anthropic. According to a report from Bloomberg, both researchers are viewed internally as important contributors to Google’s flagship Gemini model family. Adler worked on Google’s AI coding efforts, while Pritzel was involved in the process used to train AI systems. Neither company has publicly confirmed the moves. The report also does not say when the researchers will formally leave Google or what positions they will hold at Anthropic. Training a large AI model requires decisions covering its architecture, data preparation, distributed computing infrastructure, and post-training methods that shape how the finished system behaves. Researchers with experience operating at the scale of Gemini are consequently difficult to replace quickly. Both Adler and Pritzel have previously contributed to Google DeepMind’s scientific research as well. They are listed among the authors of the company’s work on expanding AlphaFold protein-structure predictions across entire proteomes, alongside AlphaFold researchers including John Jumper. The reported departures arrive shortly after another important change within Google’s Gemini organization. Gemini co-lead Noam Shazeer is leaving Google for OpenAI, after returning to the search company in 2024 through its deal with Character.AI. Shazeer is particularly well known as one of the authors of the Transformer paper, whose architecture became the foundation for most modern large language models. Anthropic, meanwhile, has been recruiting recognizable figures from other leading laboratories. OpenAI co-founder and former Tesla AI director Andrej Karpathy joined Anthropic’s pre-training team in May. His move, followed by the reported recruitment of several Google researchers, suggests Anthropic is strengthening the research teams responsible for the core capabilities of future Claude models rather than concentrating solely on product and enterprise sales. The competition is complicated by the companies’ extensive commercial relationships. Anthropic competes directly with Google’s Gemini models, but it also relies on Google as an infrastructure partner. In April, Anthropic announced an expanded agreement with Google and Broadcom covering multiple gigawatts of next-generation Tensor Processing Unit capacity. TPUs are Google-designed accelerators used to train and run large AI models. via Bloomberg
    • This article makes my head hurt. Lots of confusing words
    • Google adds built-in computer control to Gemini 3.5 flash by Karthik Mudaliar Google has added Computer Use as a built-in tool in Gemini 3.5 Flash, giving developers a single model that can reason about a task and operate graphical interfaces across browsers, mobile devices, and desktop environments. The feature is available through the Gemini API and Google’s Gemini Enterprise Agent Platform, although it remains a preview feature for now. Computer Use enables an AI agent to examine screenshots and return actions such as mouse clicks, scrolling, and keyboard input. A developer’s application must execute those actions, capture the resulting screen, and send it back to Gemini, creating a continuous loop until the task is completed. Google says the integration can be used for activities including repetitive form filling, application testing, research across multiple websites, and longer enterprise workflows. Gemini 3.5 Flash can work with browser, mobile, and desktop environments, whereas Google’s earlier standalone Computer Use model was primarily positioned around browser interaction. The main change is consolidation. Computer control was previously offered through the separate Gemini 2.5 Computer Use preview model. As Neowin reported when that model was introduced, it was designed to interpret a visual interface and generate actions without requiring a website-specific API. Google later brought Computer Use to preview versions of Gemini 3 Pro and Gemini 3 Flash in January 2026. The latest release now incorporates the tool into the stable Gemini 3.5 Flash model rather than requiring developers to select a specialized model solely for interface automation. Gemini 3.5 Flash itself was announced in May as Google’s latest fast model for coding and multi-step agent workflows. It supports a one-million-token input context window and up to 65,000 output tokens, along with adjustable thinking levels that let developers trade additional reasoning for lower latency and cost. Google also added that Gemini 3.5 Flash received targeted adversarial training for computer-use scenarios. The company is also offering safeguards that can require user confirmation before sensitive or irreversible actions and automatically stop a workflow when suspected prompt injection is detected. Its developer documentation describes configurable protections for areas such as financial transactions and changes to sensitive records. Google isn't the first to bring Computer Use to its platform. Anthropic has made computer control available through Claude, while OpenAI has continued improving computer-use performance in its recent models. Microsoft has also applied the concept to business workflows, including a Computer Use capability for the Researcher agent in Microsoft 365 Copilot.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      463
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!