Recommended Posts

Okay so have read many posts since last year that Start screen is not what a desktop user would visit every now and then.

So umm , i was trying this out :

post-293012-0-00368300-1338757601.png

And pressed start button , to see this :

post-293012-0-76104300-1338757899_thumb.

So my point is , is there any way we can make every darn win32 application to be at top ? This way we can get a start screen as a wallpaper and (if possible) taskbar to be at top of it.

I don't know if it is not doable , but i guess it is...

PS : Yes , Vice City in 2012 :)

My point is to use Start Screen just the way umm we use Rainmeter themes and stuff. Seriously desktop users should always stay in desktop app and metro should come inside desktop , if MS really wants desktop users to use Metro. What's the point of having Facebook and Twitter apps on your desktop when you can have them as tabs in any browser with ease? Also , the time it takes to load those apps just makes them not good for Desktop. Only benefits desktop ppl get are live tiles and notifications.

To be honest, I'm really surprised that Task Manager has that behaviour. It looks like it might be a bug.

I can't imagine why you would want your task launcher sitting on the desktop but this just doesn't look like a workable solution to me.

It used to stay on top of Metro by default in the DP, likely so you can view Metro processes directly without having to go back to the desktop.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It is silly there is no simple way to check whether this profile has been activated. CFRs are normal, but trying to even hide the fact if it's on / off seems silly, especially for something so user-facing. Surely Microsoft is "proud" of their engineering efforts on this one and ought to display it somwhere in the GUI.
    • Many Linux distros are not known for excellent battery life, so I'm not sure that is the best example. A more apt example may be Apple, but Apple's CPUs are simply far more efficient than Intel & AMD at single-threaded tasks like these, so "boosting" is not as power-hungry and less heat-inducing. Not to mention Apple will hardly engage P-cores for basic UI tasks; they use a pretty complicated QoS scheme to only activate P-cores for more serious workloads like HTML / JS execution or decompression or application launch. Microsoft is (smartly) doing it for launch, but also for UI tasks, which is the more nonsensical part: why ... do Windows 11's UIs need modern CPUs to boost? It should load so quickly that there's not even time for the CPU to boost.
    • I've not seen any controlled testing and, judging by Microsoft's mentality, within a year, they'll have added so much more bloat, it'll undo any perceptible latency benefit and we'll have boosted the CPU clocks for nothing.
    • It depends: heat soak is a thing. Initially on cold boot-up, the heatsinks & heatpipes are at ambient temp. After heatsinks & heatpipes warm up (through normal usage), they don't immediately cool to ambient temp when the load goes away. So their baseline is higher and the trigger point for fans is much less stress. Add a few more CPU spikes → it's too hot to stay at the same fan RPM → fans get triggered to start up up much sooner / get triggered to ramp much more quickly.
    • Can LibreOffice just shut up and worry about themselves and stop comparing themselves? Do we see Microsoft complaining about euro office?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      slackerzz earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      highriskpaym earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      198
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!