The direction Microsoft took with Windows 8  

855 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you like the direction Microsoft took with Windows 8?

    • Yes I love it, i'll be upgrading
    • No I hate it, i'll stick with Windows 7
    • It doesn't bother me
    • I will use Windows 8 with a start menu hack program


Recommended Posts

Don't get me wrong, I enjoy Windows 8. And actually I don't use the Windows 8 Start Screen but rarely because I have no touch screens, so I prefer to use the task bar as my app launching scheme. But when I need to use an app that I rarely use, and it is not pinned yet to the Start screen, I then have to right click and choose "All Apps" from the start screen to locate and Pin to the Start screen. It takes 1 extra click to get there. I actually prefer to pin my most frequent programs to the taskbar (Just 1 click to get the app started vs. tapping the windows key to locate the app (if it was pinned), then clicking the app to get it started (1 extra click if it was not pinned). There is no difference in clicks If an App has been pinned to the start screen when compared to Win 7 Start Menu. But there is 1 extra click when the app is not pinned when compared to Win 7 Start Menu. Oh and BTW you can pin apps to the win 7 Start menu. Also there is allot more mouse movements in Windows 8.

You could do one of the two ways,

1. Add a taskbar toolbar for start menu folder

2. Pin the start menu folder to taskbar and keep the "File Explorer" as first icon in the taskbar

You could do one of the two ways,

1. Add a taskbar toolbar for start menu folder

2. Pin the start menu folder to taskbar and keep the "File Explorer" as first icon in the taskbar

Thanks, that really helped. If anyone needs that path to all apps folder then here is it. You have to unhide the folder.

C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu

People who want "all programs" back obviously can't either type or don't have a keyboard. Some have even complained that they can't remember all the programs names they installed. That is just ridiculous. Perhaps some mnemonic training would help? :rolleyes:

[Threads merged]

Which threads got merged?

People who want "all programs" back obviously can't either type or don't have a keyboard. Some have even complained that they can't remember all the programs names they installed. That is just ridiculous. Perhaps some mnemonic training would help? :rolleyes:

I don't understand this. I know all the names of the apps I have installed, and it's not too difficult to remember the names of the default apps and tools that have been present in Windows for years.

To get to "All Programs" you have to open the start screen, then "Right Click" the start screen then choose "All Programs". I would like a direct link to "All Programs" because not all programs are pinned to the Start Screen. Is there a shortcut to this?

Win+Q, or clicking the search charm, will take you there from Start or the desktop.

Also from Start you can use Ctrl+TAB to cycle between the two views.

Win+Q, or clicking the search charm, will take you there from Start or the desktop.

Also from Start you can use Ctrl+TAB to cycle between the two views.

Thanks for the info. You can also create a Toolbar and direct it to the "All Apps" folder. The only thing is it works like the Win2k start menu. I've included the folder path to the All Apps Start menu.

C:\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\

Choose "Start Menu"

I was planning on installing W8 when it hit Technet in a couple of days. In the meantime I got a hold of W8 Pro RTM and installed it after making a disk Image of W7. I wanted to see what worked and what didn't. The install went OK and nearly everything worked for me. However Metro, or whatever it's now called, is a POS IMO.

It's a chore to find the simplest of things. I dislike it's Jekyll & Hyde UI personality, Metro or Desktop. As a person who likes to be on the bleeding edge and always has I can honestly say I will probably wait on W8. Form what I've read there are some nice performance boosts under the hood which I would like to have. I can't imagine the Corporate world beating a path to W8's door.

I suppose I would get used to it after awhile like any other new thing but I have to ask; What the heck was MS thinking when it came up with the Metro UI?

People who want "all programs" back obviously can't either type or don't have a keyboard. Some have even complained that they can't remember all the programs names they installed. That is just ridiculous. Perhaps some mnemonic training would help? :rolleyes:

This is what puzzles me as well O.o

I was planning on installing W8 when it hit Technet in a couple of days. In the meantime I got a hold of W8 Pro RTM and installed it after making a disk Image of W7. I wanted to see what worked and what didn't. The install went OK and nearly everything worked for me. However Metro, or whatever it's now called, is a POS IMO.

It's a chore to find the simplest of things. I dislike it's Jekyll & Hyde UI personality, Metro or Desktop. As a person who likes to be on the bleeding edge and always has I can honestly say I will probably wait on W8. Form what I've read there are some nice performance boosts under the hood which I would like to have. I can't imagine the Corporate world beating a path to W8's door.

I suppose I would get used to it after awhile like any other new thing but I have to ask; What the heck was MS thinking when it came up with the Metro UI?

Is this the first time you are using Windows 8?

As far as corp./enterprise market is considered, they'd have skipped Windows 8 irrespective of metro because most of them have either recently finished deploying 7 or are in the process of doing it.

It's settled when Microsoft puts back the start menu and provides a way to turn off Metro.

well I meant it is settled for osuwildlifer because he won't be buying (and using) Windows 8. I am sure you and others will have your own reasons to not make that clear decision yet.

It's settled when Microsoft puts back the start menu and provides a way to turn off Metro.

I would be fine with a Start Screen Lite for when you are on the desktop. But I agree about Metro. Right now Windows 8 is just very inconsistant.

For example: Volume control is the aero control we are familiar with in Windows 7, but the Network Connections is metro. Inconsistant.

Windows Vista and 7 do this amazing technology that aparently everyone seems to forget: resizing windows! If I have one connection available, I get a small popup. When I have more connections, the popup gets bigger. Why in the hell do I need 100% height what appears to be 20% width metro bar for one wireless connection?

If I am on the desktop, I should only see aero. If I am on Metro, I should only see metro. All of this back and forth...aero this....metro that is just frustrating.

Two control panels, what controls what? inconsistant.

Remember I am talking about the desktop here. I know the metro control panel is for tablets. But why does the desktop version need two separate control panels?

The vast majority of PCs today are mobile (i.e. laptops, and increasingly, tablet). It is very rare for anyone to shutdown mobile machines. Most of them you just close and let them go to sleep.

Even desktops, by and large, are rarely shutdown. Obviously some people do it, but not enough that 2-3 clicks is too difficult.

We're going to have to agree to disagree on this, I think. I don't know anyone who isn't a geek, who does that. ALL my family and friends (barring the geeks), turn their laptops OFF when they're done using them.

I dunno, maybe we're more concious of energy waste in the UK? Either way, MS shouldn't be encouraging wasteful practices. Turn your stuff off when you're not using it, folks!

That reasoning has been discussed in depth on the B8 blog.

For most people (all but the few who moved their taskbars), the Start button still works exactly the same as before. You throw your mouse into the lower-left corner and click. Having it appear only on the desktop (the way it did in early builds) made the system inconsistent and harder to learn. A lot of usability studies went into the new model, and found that having a consistent way to get to Start from anywhere in the system was much more important than having a visual affordance that's only there some of the time (which makes you think you can only use it some of the time).

Personally, I also thought that having it there made it feel like Start was "anchored" on the taskbar which was a weird inversion of the model. Desktop is anchored in Start via the desktop tile, just as apps are. This felt a lot more coherent, in my opinion, when the pearl was removed.

Again, I disagree, but less wholeheartedly than the first part. My wife's had a play with W8. Overall, she likes it, but she just could NOT figure out how to get back to the Start screen from the desktop; nor could my dad. Neither of them are computer literate and they don't use keyboard shortcuts, so don't suggest any! Once I showed them how, they managed it, but both said it'd be a lot easier if there was a button there rather than having to remember "useless crap" as they put it. They just want to do their thing and be done, not prat around figuring stuff out or bother to remember things they just don't care about.

I question the results of the usability studies, and wonder what age groups and computer experience they covered. People barely interested in computers rarely volunteer for such things...

We're going to have to agree to disagree on this, I think. I don't know anyone who isn't a geek, who does that. ALL my family and friends (barring the geeks), turn their laptops OFF when they're done using them.

I think the other issue is that power savings settings and features like hibernate have been so hit and miss in the past they many average users go with the simple 'it just works' solution of a power off (even though as you say, geeks have been telling them to hibernate for years). Even with Vista and Win7 the default power settings are setup for off, not sleep/hibernate.

I hate the use of usability studies (though has MS actually released them for Win8 yet?) Tell that to the asshat test audiences that have been watering down and ruining film for decades. Has MS actually released them? The only study I've generally seen on this is their ode to Fitt's Law, nothing specific to this behavior though. Did MS's studies take into account how they have 'trained' their users over the years?

I literally watched my neighbor try and click the whack a mole Start 'button' in Win8 over and over, even after telling him just to move into the corner and stay there on click. They have been trained to (double) click 'on' things. Single clicking a hidden target, ha.

Windows Vista and 7 do this amazing technology that aparently everyone seems to forget: resizing windows! If I have one connection available, I get a small popup. When I have more connections, the popup gets bigger. Why in the hell do I need 100% height what appears to be 20% width metro bar for one wireless connection?

If I am on the desktop, I should only see aero. If I am on Metro, I should only see metro. All of this back and forth...aero this....metro that is just frustrating.

Two control panels, what controls what? inconsistant.

So you don't like the unified thing (network flyout), and you don't like the not-unified things ("two control panels," by which I assume you mean PC Settings and the desktop Control Panel). I sense it would be difficult to please you :-)

Remember I am talking about the desktop here. I know the metro control panel is for tablets. But why does the desktop version need two separate control panels?

Wait now I'm really confused. The desktop only has one control panel.

We're going to have to agree to disagree on this, I think. I don't know anyone who isn't a geek, who does that. ALL my family and friends (barring the geeks), turn their laptops OFF when they're done using them.

I dunno, maybe we're more concious of energy waste in the UK? Either way, MS shouldn't be encouraging wasteful practices. Turn your stuff off when you're not using it, folks!

Laptops use zero energy in hibernate (which it will doze to when not in use). I do not think I've witnessed a person actually "shut down" a laptop in normal usage in at least 5 years. Obviously I'm not counting things like when you're about to replace the battery or something.

Again, I disagree, but less wholeheartedly than the first part. My wife's had a play with W8. Overall, she likes it, but she just could NOT figure out how to get back to the Start screen from the desktop; nor could my dad. Neither of them are computer literate and they don't use keyboard shortcuts, so don't suggest any! Once I showed them how, they managed it, but both said it'd be a lot easier if there was a button there rather than having to remember "useless crap" as they put it. They just want to do their thing and be done, not prat around figuring stuff out or bother to remember things they just don't care about.

Had they logged in with a new user account and seen the intro screen? That's there to help people upgrading on their own and who don't have you or something else to tell them that they need to put the mouse in corners to control the system.

I question the results of the usability studies, and wonder what age groups and computer experience they covered. People barely interested in computers rarely volunteer for such things...

You'd be surprised. They recruit participants for all different ages, walks of life, and computing backgrounds. Obviously it's no easy task to build something that suits them all. And usability studies aren't everything. But they are very valuable, and our user research organization is the best in the business.

Laptops use zero energy in hibernate (which it will doze to when not in use). I do not think I've witnessed a person actually "shut down" a laptop in normal usage in at least 5 years. Obviously I'm not counting things like when you're about to replace the battery or something.

Not really relevant. I don't know anyone, outside of techies, that use hibernate mode or anything like that. They turn them OFF.

Had they logged in with a new user account and seen the intro screen? That's there to help people upgrading on their own and who don't have you or something else to tell them that they need to put the mouse in corners to control the system.

RP version here still, no demo. I'm no thief. ;)

You'd be surprised. They recruit participants for all different ages, walks of life, and computing backgrounds. Obviously it's no easy task to build something that suits them all. And usability studies aren't everything. But they are very valuable, and our user research organization is the best in the business.

I don't doubt your team, I doubt the people in the study.

Not really relevant. I don't know anyone, outside of techies, that use hibernate mode or anything like that. They turn them OFF.

I said that every person I've ever seen use a laptop just closes the lid when they're done, or in some cases presses the power button first. You said this wastes power, to which I said no, it doesn't, since it puts the laptop to sleep (very little power) and it then dozes to hibernate (no power). I didn't say that anyone knows or cares what sleep or hibernate is. They just know that when they shut the lid, or press the power button, it's "off." And when they need it, it's back "on."

RP version here still, no demo. I'm no thief. ;)

Oh right, forgot it wasn't there, whoops. But yeah, that is the idea though. There's really one key thing you need to know when first using Windows 8. For mouse, it's throw the cursor into the corners. For touch, it's swipe in from the edges. Once you have that, it shouldn't be hard to figure out how to get around.

I don't doubt your team, I doubt the people in the study.

I wish we could share some of the videos from them (I'm actually surprised Channel 9 never has, or at least if they did I couldn't easily find it).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • It's amazing that anyone still uses this bloated trash.
    • @Sayan...I have defended you at various points as I hope you know. This headline however is utter trash...shame on you sir!
    • An actual cosmic "Eye of Sauron" had been looking straight at us all along by Sayan Sen Image by Kovin P. Vasquez via Pexels | Not representative An international team of researchers has solved a long-standing mystery surrounding a distant blazar known as PKS 1424+240, helping explain why it produces some of the brightest high-energy gamma rays and cosmic neutrinos ever observed despite appearing to have a relatively slow-moving jet. The findings were published on June 6 in Astronomy & Astrophysics Letters. The study addresses a broader challenge in astrophysics: understanding how extreme cosmic objects accelerate particles to very high energies and produce very high-energy (VHE) photons and neutrinos. PKS 1424+240 is located billions of light-years from Earth. It has attracted attention for years because it is both a powerful source of VHE gamma rays and the brightest known neutrino-emitting blazar in the sky, according to observations by the IceCube Neutrino Observatory. It is also associated with one of the strongest peaks in IceCube's nine-year neutrino sky map A blazar is a type of active galactic nucleus powered by a supermassive black hole that pulls in surrounding matter and launches jets of plasma moving close to the speed of light. What makes blazars unique is their orientation. One of their jets points almost directly toward Earth, making them appear exceptionally bright across the electromagnetic spectrum and allowing scientists to study some of the most extreme physical processes in the Universe. The scientists exclaimed it's like the 'Eye of Sauron' in deep space. Usually, the brightest gamma-ray-emitting blazars are expected to have jets that appear to move very quickly. However, radio observations of PKS 1424+240 suggested that its jet was moving much more slowly, creating a contradiction that became part of a long-running problem known as the "Doppler factor crisis." To investigate, researchers analyzed 15 years of observations from the Very Long Baseline Array (VLBA), a network of 10 radio antennas spread across the continental United States, Hawaii and St. Croix. Using a technique called Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI), astronomers combine signals from widely separated radio telescopes to create a virtual Earth-sized telescope capable of revealing extremely fine details. The team combined 42 polarization-sensitive radio images collected between 2009 and 2025, creating a much deeper and more detailed view of the jet than had previously been possible. The observations were carried out as part of MOJAVE (Monitoring Of Jets in Active galactic nuclei with VLBA Experiments), a long-running program that studies the brightness, polarization and magnetic field structures of jets produced by active galaxies. The project aims to better understand how activity near supermassive black holes is linked to high-energy radiation and neutrino emission. “When we reconstructed the image, it looked absolutely stunning,” said Yuri Kovalev, lead author of the study and Principal Investigator of the European Research Council-funded MuSES project at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “We have never seen anything quite like it — a near-perfect toroidal magnetic field with a jet, pointing straight at us.” The image revealed an unusual geometry. The researchers found that Earth lies almost directly in line with the jet, with a viewing angle of less than 0.6 degrees. In simple terms, astronomers are looking almost straight down the jet. This turned out to be the key to the mystery. Because the jet is aimed almost directly at Earth, a relativistic effect called Doppler boosting dramatically increases its apparent brightness. The study found that this effect boosts the emission by a factor of about 30 while also making the jet appear slower than it actually is. “This alignment causes a boost in brightness by a factor of 30 or more,” said Jack Livingston, a co-author at the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy. “At the same time, the jet appears to move slowly due to projection effects — a classic optical illusion.” The nearly head-on view also gave scientists a rare look at the jet's magnetic field. Using polarized radio signals, they detected a clear toroidal, or doughnut-shaped, magnetic field component. The observations suggest the jet carries an electric current and that its magnetic field helps launch, shape and stabilize the flow of plasma. Researchers believe this magnetic structure may also play a key role in accelerating particles to energies high enough to produce both gamma rays and neutrinos. “Solving this puzzle confirms that active galactic nuclei with supermassive black holes are not only powerful accelerators of electrons, but also of protons — the origin of the observed high-energy neutrinos,” Kovalev said. The research was conducted under the MuSES (Multi-messenger Studies of Energetic Sources) project, which investigates how active galactic nuclei accelerate particles and generate different cosmic signals, including light and neutrinos. Scientists say understanding how protons are accelerated and linked to neutrino production remains one of the major unanswered questions in astrophysics. The findings help explain why some blazars can appear to have slow jets while still producing extremely bright high-energy emissions. More broadly, the study strengthens the link between relativistic jets, magnetic fields, gamma rays and high-energy neutrinos. Researchers say the results provide new clues about how some of the Universe's most powerful natural particle accelerators work and offer important insights for multimessenger astronomy, which combines different types of cosmic signals to study extreme events in space. Source: European Research Council, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Gotenks98 is right... Outlook (new) is absolute trash. Doesn't Mozilla have an Enterprise Version of Firebird?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      510
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      273
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!