Recommended Posts

Literally regardless of what they say it will be deemed a Cover up by conspiracy people. Even if it's nothing more then A outcropping of an under sea metal vein

It's not just "conspiracy people" that should call it a coverup. They're trying to prevent ships from getting to it, they're making no effort to inform the public about progress. It may be something alien, it may just be a military experiment that went wrong but it's clear that somebody doesn't really want the public to know exactly what it is.

why would Religions?

Of the whole ideologies that most religions are based on, particularly the 3 abrahamic faiths, one point that is central to them is that mankind is the central creation of their Gods. Whilst other intelligent life doesn't necessary disprove God, if there were other life just as advanced as us in the universe it would undercut the idea of mankind being the centerpiece of God's creation to the point that it would practically destroy the credibility of those religions. And if people don't consider them to be credible the methods they use to impose their control on people would be largely ineffective.

Literally, it's nothing, or something coverd up resulting in nothing again.

Literally regardless of what they say it will be deemed a Cover up by conspiracy people. Even if it's nothing more then A outcropping of an under sea metal vein

Why don't they just tell us that, if it was something like that?

And I just take everything any government says as BS anyway, because they've never once given me a reason to trust or believe them.

They can't announce it is something, the panic it would cause would bring all kinds of chaos. People in general are dumb as doornails.

Yeah, they'd be like, "holy ****! I don't think the government is lying for once! The **** must've really hit the fan for them to do that!"

If it's not a natural formation, it could be some structure made at the end of last ice age when the sea level was lower, it was 120m lower at the peak of last ice age and then started to rise when glacier melted.

I agree, I think something natural is the most likely explanation but I still have some nagging doubts based on the lengths they're doing to stop the public getting any useful information.

I agree, I think something natural is the most likely explanation but I still have some nagging doubts based on the lengths they're doing to stop the public getting any useful information.

Agreed. There's definitely something they're hiding. But f** it, hiding or not, I got other stuff to worry about.

^ Thanks for your post ecko.

... The object appeared more as a huge mushroom, rising 3-4 meters/10-13 feet from the seabed ...

The object had an egg-shaped hole leading into it from the top, as an opening.

On top of the object they also found strange stone circle formations, almost looking like small fireplaces. The stones were covered in something resembling soot.

First we thought this was only stone, but this is something else.

post-37120-0-25496500-1339813370.png

I'll leave this report up to your judgement ... I tweeted the guy asking what this is based on.

It looks like the military got their hands of the Baltic Sea UFO before the slow @$$ divers did. The object was discovered on many months ago leaving the military to plenty of time to bring it up and take it a secret military base. The formation we saw on radar months ago is gone! Meaning it was taken away or flew away on its own. So the real question is?which lucky country got their hands on it first?

http://www.ufosighti...s-military.html

I'll leave this report up to your judgement ... I tweeted the guy asking what this is based on.

It looks like the military got their hands of the Baltic Sea UFO before the slow @$$ divers did. The object was discovered on many months ago leaving the military to plenty of time to bring it up and take it a secret military base. The formation we saw on radar months ago is gone! Meaning it was taken away or flew away on its own. So the real question is?which lucky country got their hands on it first?

Ah, that solves everything.

I'll leave this report up to your judgement ... I tweeted the guy asking what this is based on.

It looks like the military got their hands of the Baltic Sea UFO before the slow @$$ divers did. The object was discovered on many months ago leaving the military to plenty of time to bring it up and take it a secret military base. The formation we saw on radar months ago is gone! Meaning it was taken away or flew away on its own. So the real question is?which lucky country got their hands on it first?

http://www.ufosighti...s-military.html

Of course. They found something, most likely an ancient ruin of some sort, and since that doesn't fit into 'UFO', someone creates a conspiracy theory.

Swedish scientists reveal findings

Swedish explorers have put to rest speculation of a spaceship at the bottom of the Baltic -- but they're adding fuel to the ?what is it? mystery of this deep-sea object anyway.

Digital pictures FoxNews.com has obtained from the team show that the object, located beneath the waves of the Baltic between Sweden and Finland, is some sort of ?natural, geological formation,? Peter Lindberg, the leader of the Ocean Explorer team, told FoxNews.com.

?It?s not obviously an alien spacecraft. It?s not made of metal,? the scientist said. Lindberg concedes that it could be an alien space ship -- if the aliens decided to make their vessels out of meteor-like rocks. ?Who says they had to use metal?? he joked. ?This trip has raised a lot of questions.?

The odd thing about the discovery is that there is no silt on the rock, for example; it would ordinarily be covered with silt on the bottom of the sea, Lindberg said.

Even more odd for a seemingly natural formation, the main object is disc-shaped and ?appears to have construction lines and boxes drawn on it,? Lindberg said. ?There are also straight edges.?

?The surface has cracks on it,? said Lindberg. ?There is some black material in the cracks, but we don?t know what it is.?

Adding to the mystery, there appears to be a pillar which is holding up the 200 foot wide object, said Lindberg. ?The pillar is eight meters high,? he added.

A lot of people are already writing this off... jeeez.

Just because this doesn't scream ALIEN doesn't mean it's not interesting anymore.

Even these people said the formation is unusual, so to me, until there are experts say it looks normal and they have anything like this elsewhere I am gonna keep looking for updates on what exactly the hell this is.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!