Recommended Posts

I can understand why would the gpu drivers crash, but the network drivers? Just doesn't makes sense and you're the only one that reporting that.

 

And if you are (not talking to you HawkMan) looking for a job in the PR business, it might be a good time to apply to Ubisoft.

Someone might be fired, because they're terrible at their job: https://twitter.com/UbiTessa/status/478622295662297088 :no:

 

wasn't so much the network drivers as it was the display driver still crashing.

Watch_Dogs is interesting in that I've seen people simultaneously claim the game was dumbed down to run on consoles, and also that it's too intensive on PCs and should have been toned down. Turns out that whole unified memory setup on current gen consoles is actually a huge boost over what PCs can do.

 

...

You shouldn't explain if this is a mod, or not. You should write about why Ubisoft downgraded the graphics intentionally, without any boosts in performance at all (the mod proves it).

A hint to that answer can be found in "deferredambient.inc.fx":

http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showthread.php?p=116853350#post116853350

yGCQWdT.jpg

...

And this picture is misleading as hell, it shows an IF statement but not what the actual variables are, they're defined in a separate file that nobody likes to show.

Edit: Oh yeah, this doesn't mean anything either.

 

...

Now people are mad that Ubisoft crippled the PC version intentionally and the gaming media downplays it as just another mod like with Skyrim. Doesn't care at all that the code was only slightly modified from the original unpacked game's code:

1402943413586ngopq.jpg

...

And this picture is misleading as hell, it shows an IF statement but not what the actual variables are, they're defined in a separate file that nobody likes to show.

Edit: Oh yeah, this doesn't mean anything either.

Who cares what the variables are? The important part that you missed in the first picture, is the bolded comment; which shows the developer's attitude towards one of the platforms.

 

And doesn't mean anything to who?

I tried the 0.7 patch and have to say - WOW - on Ultra, it all plays smoother for me and looks stunning!

Had any crashing troubles like HawkMan?

I tried this mod out last night.

 

Whilst I agree that there is a marked improvement in the games appearance, you can also see why they're not in the official product. They're randomly glitchy and generally would not be acceptable in a release product.  There'd have been a huge poopstorm if it went out like that.

 

I suspect what happened is they were working on better visuals for PC, but then somewhere in the chain of command a decision was made to unify the game across all platforms, which meant playing to the lowest common denominator. So they stopped working on the enhanced visuals before they were completely done.

Who cares what the variables are? The important part that you missed in the first picture, is the bolded comment; which shows the developer's attitude towards one of the platforms.

 

And doesn't mean anything to who?

...

Well the problem is that the full source code for the shader shows the "PC Only" branch is actually shared with the Xbone and PS4, so instead of "Who cares about the PC" it's more "It's a PC so who cares about doing console optimisations", so it's quite probable the "PC only" branch is actually the higher quality option. (Which we can't know for sure unless we see what the variables are set to)

And the other picture is a bunch of graphical presents for scenes, so pointing out that there was a "E3" setting is about as useful as pointing out there's different lighting settings for indoor areas vs. outdoor areas.

  • Like 1

It runs fine at 1080p at high on my PC except when I'm in the middle of some high speed driving, then it does drop frames.  Though my system isn't anything new, I'm still rocking on i7 920 and a HD7870 2GB vid card.  I could probably tweak a few things to make driving smoother but meh, not important atm.

 

The game is fine, nothing great but it has some good elements to it.  People knock it because they're comparing it to GTA of course.    I'm still playing, 49% done, lots of stuff to do which is what I expect in a Ubisoft game which is why I play them.  I don't want something that's over in 8-12hrs and then forces me to play MP matches to try and get my moneys worth.

Wait, there's a Watch Dogs movie in the works?  Is that for real or just rumor BS?   I honestly don't think they screwed up from a dev point of view, the game was delayed ffs, more then enough time to work out bugs.   I don't know what they gained by taking out these options specially when they pretty much work and again with the delay they could've worked out the bugs and performance issues.

 

I really think, hate this all you want, that the idea that it has to do with the consoles, PS4 mostly, comes into play.  That exclusivity deal, though nothing new, could actually have something going on we don't know about.  Who really knows, Ubisoft makes money with every PC version they sold anyways, so the idea that they're trying to gimp the PC to get you to buy a PS4 or XB1 version instead makes little sense.  Also, even with these changes the PC version on high or very high settings still looks better than the XB1 and PS4 version, it's not like the changes they made to it made them the same.

 

If this had come out last year like it was suppose to I could have said that they rushed it and needed more time but it was delayed.  oh well, who knows what's going on outside of Ubisoft.

Wait, there's a Watch Dogs movie in the works?  Is that for real or just rumor BS?   I honestly don't think they screwed up from a dev point of view, the game was delayed ffs, more then enough time to work out bugs.   I don't know what they gained by taking out these options specially when they pretty much work and again with the delay they could've worked out the bugs and performance issues.

 

I really think, hate this all you want, that the idea that it has to do with the consoles, PS4 mostly, comes into play.  That exclusivity deal, though nothing new, could actually have something going on we don't know about.  Who really knows, Ubisoft makes money with every PC version they sold anyways, so the idea that they're trying to gimp the PC to get you to buy a PS4 or XB1 version instead makes little sense.  Also, even with these changes the PC version on high or very high settings still looks better than the XB1 and PS4 version, it's not like the changes they made to it made them the same.

 

If this had come out last year like it was suppose to I could have said that they rushed it and needed more time but it was delayed.  oh well, who knows what's going on outside of Ubisoft.

 

Yes, and Marky Mark will play Aiden apparently.

 

As for the graphics debate, am consigning myself to gaming at medium settings on my next build, which will be for 4K. As i plan on doing it around Nov or so, i don't expect any graphics cards will be available that i can afford and are also capable of high/ultra 4K. So i don't mind sacrificing effects for resolution at this stage, just to help push us to the next threshold. Sometimes you just have to let the better lighting and shadows go for a while until GPUs come down in price :D

Yes, and Marky Mark will play Aiden apparently.

 

As for the graphics debate, am consigning myself to gaming at medium settings on my next build, which will be for 4K. As i plan on doing it around Nov or so, i don't expect any graphics cards will be available that i can afford and are also capable of high/ultra 4K. So i don't mind sacrificing effects for resolution at this stage, just to help push us to the next threshold. Sometimes you just have to let the better lighting and shadows go for a while until GPUs come down in price :D

You're going to build before Skylake and DDR4?

  • Like 1

You're going to build before Skylake and DDR4?

 

At this point looks like a yes...already sent for the monitor and the card :|

I know, good points - Skylake, DDR4 and PCIe 4, not to mention HDMI 2.0...those are all true requirements for 4K. You think better to call it off and just wait till mid next year? But who knows what the money situation will be like then :cry:

At this point looks like a yes...already sent for the monitor and the card :|

I know, good points - Skylake, DDR4 and PCIe 4, not to mention HDMI 2.0...those are all true requirements for 4K. You think better to call it off and just wait till mid next year? But who knows what the money situation will be like then :cry:

I suppose you have to purchase when the funds are available. But without a compelling reason, I'd wait. Upgrade maybe your GPU and CPU. I don't think GPUs saturate PCI3 so PCI4 isn't that big, but the new CPUs will be. Much more than now. If you have an i7 there's really no need to upgrade for the past 3 generations. Supposedly the iGPU in skylake will support 4k, but ... I'm not an iGPU fan. Thunderbolt 2, the next SATA, and DDR4 will definitely be worth the wait as well as WiGig.

I suppose you have to purchase when the funds are available. But without a compelling reason, I'd wait. Upgrade maybe your GPU and CPU. I don't think GPUs saturate PCI3 so PCI4 isn't that big, but the new CPUs will be. Much more than now. If you have an i7 there's really no need to upgrade for the past 3 generations. Supposedly the iGPU in skylake will support 4k, but ... I'm not an iGPU fan. Thunderbolt 2, the next SATA, and DDR4 will definitely be worth the wait as well as WiGig.

 

Thanks for the advice, there's definitely a big part of me that thinks waiting is the right thing to do. Honestly the new build is to satisfy the usual craving and for the sheer joy of it. On a more practical level, won't DDR4 be crazy expensive though well after Skylake launches?

Thanks for the advice, there's definitely a big part of me that thinks waiting is the right thing to do. Honestly the new build is to satisfy the usual craving and for the sheer joy of it. On a more practical level, won't DDR4 be crazy expensive though well after Skylake launches?

Hard to say. It will definitely be expensive initially, particularly the more dense modules (16GB).

Hard to say. It will definitely be expensive initially, particularly the more dense modules (16GB).

 

This is the thing, when DDR4 launches it will be very pricey, but 16GB will be VERY advisable. The items i ordered haven't shipped yet so i can still cancel :/

But that Samsung screen is really nice for under $700, and i want to play Watch Dogs 2 in 4K :rofl: (to keep things more or less on topic)

And the 280X with 6GB sounds so much sexier than my 7950...and i can currently afford a DIY project, while by my original plan (Oct-Nov) things may be different.

 

I don't know. Let these be our problems in life, though! Sorry for rambling!

Where is the INI file located for watch_dogs' settings ?

 

And where can I locate the Mod, to upgrade this crippled game ??

 

There is no ini file. Its settings inside the encoded game files where they could enable unfinished and somewhat buggy effects and shaders. The flickering headlights is particularly annoying.

  • Like 2

Completed the main story, now onto wrapping up the criminal convoys and skill tree. Good game, too bad about the locale, and while the story and acting were good, they were also not special - and compared to the AC games this was quite humorless, which was a letdown compared to Black Flag which I found quite witty and loaded with references. Let's see if Watch Dogs shows up at the summer Steam sale for those still on the fence :D

Bit the bullet and purchased Watch Dogs... Applied the path before i played it so i didn't get to see the capped graphics therefore i'm not sure how big the improvement is but i must say i am absolutely blown away by it. Performance was great and the graphics are insanely detailed and crisp... during the first police chase i pretty much smashed my car up and it was smoking bad, the lighting in and around the smoke particularly the blue police light were stunning, unfortunately didn't get to play much longer but so far very impressed.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
    • Windows 11 gets new audio improvements in the latest builds by Taras Buria Today's Experimental builds (26H1 and Future Platforms, formerly Canary) pack several audio-related improvements. If your device is enrolled in the Experimental Channel (26H1), you can download build 28120.2315, while those in the Future Platforms version have build 29613.1000 to try. Here is what is new in build 29613.1000: [Audio] Following up on our previous improvements, we’re making some more adjustments to Settings > System > Sounds based on your feedback. Namely, we’ve updated the “All sound devices” page so: You now have the ability to change default devices from this page. Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. We’ve adjusted the page design slightly so now you can filter whether you’re viewing input or output devices. We’ve added toggles so you can choose if you want to hide or show disabled, disconnected, and unplugged devices on this page. We’ve also updated the input and output audio properties page for devices in Settings to now include jack information for those that need it. And here is the changelog for build 28120.2315: This update includes a small number of minor bug fixes and improvements. [Accessibility] This update improves caption style responsiveness by redrawing captions immediately for caption style changes. If no current caption is visible, a sample caption string is displayed. [Audio] This update improves the reliability of the inbox HD Audio driver. You can find the official release notes for build 28120.2315 here and for build 29613.1000 here.
    • I agree with what I think you are saying, just not in the way you are saying it. Like any tool, the amount it represents your work is perorational to the effort you put into it. It is similar to why 2nd grade math students learning to add and subtract are not allowed to use calculators, but a high-school calculous student is. For the 2nd grader, that tool would completely replace the work they are doing, for the calculous student the same tool allows them to work far more effectively while in no way replacing their effort or knowable. If you spend 30 seconds writing a prompt, then the image that comes out is no more "yours" than if you found the same image with a Google Image search. However, many of these generative tools also support highly iterative processes that allow back and forth, and merging generated images with photos or human created images. I am sure you would agree that a human spending hours of time working on a project, even if AI was involved in the process, still reflects that human's work.
    • Windows 11 version 26H2 is now available for testing in the latest preview build by Taras Buria Friday Windows 11 preview builds are here. Insiders in the Experimental (formerly Dev) and Beta Channel can download builds 26300.8697 and 26220.8690. There are no new features, but Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2. In addition, Microsoft is improving the copy dialog in File Explorer, the Start menu reliability, and fixing virtualization issues. Here is the changelog: [General] With today’s build, Windows Insiders in the Experimental channel will see the versioning updated under Settings > System > About (and winver) to version 26H2. For more information, see the Windows Insiders blog. [File Explorer] We’ve improved the visual consistency and reliability of the Copy dialog in Dark mode, including its launch experience and the expanded progress view. [Start menu] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Start menu reflecting newly installed or removed apps without requiring sign-out or restart. [Taskbar] Fixed an issue for Insiders using the new smaller taskbar option, where the system tray might get cut off or pushed off screen. [Settings] - Also available in Beta Improved reliability of Settings > Apps > Startup. [Virtualization] - Also available in Beta This update addresses an issue that could result in bugchecks citing HYPERVISOR_ERROR (0x20001) and KMODE_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED (0x1E) errors after installing the latest flights on some devices during system restarts, virtual machine operations, or while running some gaming applications. You can find the official changelog for the Experimental build here and for the Beta build here.
    • I've always preferred this possibility. There is something that feels good about the idea that all matter in the universe will eventually come back together and maybe even result in another big bang. The idea that the universe would fizzle out over the eons and forever drift apart is a little depressing. I realize it is not logical to let a basic human desire for life to have a grand everlasting meaning change the way I feel about a scientific theory, but I am human, so that is how I feel :-).
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      574
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      77
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      76
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!