Recommended Posts

I heard, that Everest was one of the most dangerous places in the world and that some people even died there. But I was shocked, that there are over 200 dead bodies on the mount as of now. No, seriously, they even do not take the dead bodies off the mountain and they stay there in snow, and that happens in our modern world. I would never think that such thing can take place now, seriously, I am shocked. http://www.everestian.com/mt-everest-en.html

31 minutes ago, Olivia Puckett said:

I heard, that Everest was one of the most dangerous places in the world and that some people even died there. But I was shocked, that there are over 200 dead bodies on the mount as of now. No, seriously, they even do not take the dead bodies off the mountain and they stay there in snow, and that happens in our modern world. I would never think that such thing can take place now, seriously, I am shocked. http://www.everestian.com/mt-everest-en.html

I'm not shocked.  You know the risks when you decide to climb that death trap.

 

and HOLY Thread Resurrection Batman! :D

  • Like 2

If it's dangerous just to climb, recovering dead bodies is going to be next to impossible. Yep, it sucks for the families, but if you choose to take that kind of risk knowing what the consequences could be, it's on your head if something goes wrong.

  • Like 2

Pretty much. It's official Sherpa policy that if getting you medical attention or rescuing you would endanger an entire expedition (which it almost certain will) then you will be left to die. It's in the contract.

 

At least hypothermia isn't a violent, excruciating death.

 

'murica...oh wait....wait, WHAT? How come this wasn't locked like 3 years ago? (I have free time, if you need forum admins for stuff like this, I've been an admin on a forum before, so I know how to keep stuff like this from crawling out of an unmarked grave....j/s, I'll even volunteer!) LOCK THIS PLEASE!!! Before the trolls get in the holes in the fence......

6 minutes ago, Obi-Wan Kenobi said:

'murica...oh wait....wait, WHAT? How come this wasn't locked like 3 years ago? (I have free time, if you need forum admins for stuff like this, I've been an admin on a forum before, so I know how to keep stuff like this from crawling out of an unmarked grave....j/s, I'll even volunteer!) LOCK THIS PLEASE!!! Before the trolls get in the holes in the fence......

What are you rambling about?  Last time I checked, Everest was not in America. 

1 minute ago, techbeck said:

What are you rambling about?  Last time I checked, Everest was not in America. 

Yeah, makes about as much sense as this thread being open after all this time, huh? None. Not that you care (read under your name).

8 minutes ago, Obi-Wan Kenobi said:

'murica...oh wait....wait, WHAT? How come this wasn't locked like 3 years ago? (I have free time, if you need forum admins for stuff like this, I've been an admin on a forum before, so I know how to keep stuff like this from crawling out of an unmarked grave....j/s, I'll even volunteer!) LOCK THIS PLEASE!!! Before the trolls get in the holes in the fence......

Why lock it?  It's an interesting discussion.  Oh wait, I thought you left anyway? And now you're wanting to dictate what should and shouldn't be discussed?

 

As for the Sherpa policy of "If you endanger us" - I think it's very valid!

  • Like 2
3 minutes ago, Obi-Wan Kenobi said:

Yeah, makes about as much sense as this thread being open after all this time, huh? None. Not that you care (read under your name).

Old threads are not locked in most cases.  Figured you would have known that since you have been registered since 2002.  And the quote under my name is something I thought was funny from a movie.  But, whatever.

 

Anywho, I saw Everest, the movie, in the theater.   I wont be doing any mountain climbing anytime soon.  People who do this kind of thing are just looking for the thrill/challenge of it.  Does not make sense to me...to each their own.

Just now, Nik L said:

Why lock it?  It's an interesting discussion.  Oh wait, I thought you left anyway? And now you're wanting to dictate what should and shouldn't be discussed?

 

As for the Sherpa policy of "If you endanger us" - I think it's very valid!

Let's be men, and not drag this into public (you know what i mean). Interesting? Really? How many people has this happened to? Over how many hundreds and hundreds of years? I'm not dictating anything, I was just throwing an emphasis on what someone else had thought..."HOLY THREAD RESURRECTION, BATMAN!!!!" <speaks for itself>  This should've been locked long ago, as per date.  PM me, +Nik L. There's something you don't know, that I haven't stated publically, that I'm not happy about.

Your only reasoning for the thread being locked is that it's old. And that rationale doesn't add up, because this is something that's still happening. It's interesting. Some people still talk about things that happened centuries ago. Why stop interesting discussions because they're old? If adults want to have a chat about something that interests them and they're not doing anything harmful, why stop it?

  • Like 2
6 minutes ago, Obi-Wan Kenobi said:

Let's be men, and not drag this into public (you know what i mean). Interesting? Really? How many people has this happened to? Over how many hundreds and hundreds of years? I'm not dictating anything, I was just throwing an emphasis on what someone else had thought..."HOLY THREAD RESURRECTION, BATMAN!!!!" <speaks for itself>  This should've been locked long ago, as per date.  PM me, +Nik L. There's something you don't know, that I haven't stated publically, that I'm not happy about.

Pretty sure you're the one dragging into public. What a weird post. 

17 minutes ago, Obi-Wan Kenobi said:

Let's be men, and not drag this into public (you know what i mean). Interesting? Really? How many people has this happened to? Over how many hundreds and hundreds of years? I'm not dictating anything, I was just throwing an emphasis on what someone else had thought..."HOLY THREAD RESURRECTION, BATMAN!!!!" <speaks for itself>  This should've been locked long ago, as per date.  PM me, +Nik L. There's something you don't know, that I haven't stated publically, that I'm not happy about.

I have no idea what you mean, but suggesting things not be made public after your public tantrum is a bit ironic.

So you define "interesting" as "how many people have died"... Curious.  I personally find a thread about the dangers of climbing the worlds tallest mountain very interesting, and the stories that come from that.  However old the thread - it's not gone out of date, it's still relevant to peoples interests.

As for what you are or are not happy about - I genuinely have no interest in that.

  • Like 2
46 minutes ago, Obi-Wan Kenobi said:

'murica...oh wait....wait, WHAT? How come this wasn't locked like 3 years ago? (I have free time, if you need forum admins for stuff like this, I've been an admin on a forum before, so I know how to keep stuff like this from crawling out of an unmarked grave....j/s, I'll even volunteer!) LOCK THIS PLEASE!!! Before the trolls get in the holes in the fence......

i don't understand the locking of threads.  If locked, why not just delete it? Why would mods want to prevent people from commenting? A reason is probably out there, but I don't know what it would be.

16 minutes ago, Thomas the Tank Engine said:

Only 5 Canadians have died on Everest.

It would be wrong to litter another country, Canadians are too polite ;)

 

  • Like 3

I had a friend die in New Zealand last week.  She loved the mountains and loved hiking.   Then one day she turned to talk to her hiking partner, lost her footing, and fell to her death.  Unfortunately it comes with the territory.  Doing what you love sometimes involves risks.  I risk my life every time I get on my motorcycle, hell my job (which I love) is inherently risky.  If you're not going to do things that incur risk, don't ever leave your house...but that's dangerous because what if it burns down? 

  • Like 2

Exactly.  I adore skydiving, and am itching to do it again - but I understand that I am jumping out of a plane, which is inherently a risky thing to do.  Sure we can mitigate those risks, but life without risk is bland.

2 hours ago, Nik L said:

I have no idea what you mean, but suggesting things not be made public after your public tantrum is a bit ironic.

So you define "interesting" as "how many people have died"... Curious.  I personally find a thread about the dangers of climbing the worlds tallest mountain very interesting, and the stories that come from that.  However old the thread - it's not gone out of date, it's still relevant to peoples interests.

As for what you are or are not happy about - I genuinely have no interest in that.

Personally I don't find the deaths themselves fascinating, but reading up on the mistakes made, and the situations that led to them does interest me. Good climbing requires strategy and strategy does interest me.

 

I climbed mount Snowdon with a group when I was 11. Obviously not even in the same league as Everest, but it was fun and really enjoyable. I'm unfortunately, due to health issues no longer able to do that kind of thing myself but I admire people that battle the elements to climb. It would, no doubt be a breathtaking experience.

3 hours ago, Javik said:

If it's dangerous just to climb, recovering dead bodies is going to be next to impossible. Yep, it sucks for the families, but if you choose to take that kind of risk knowing what the consequences could be, it's on your head if something goes wrong.

It might even be an honor to be left up there (or an embarrassment). How many people get to climb Everest or experience such thrills? Unfortunately such activities have a great chance of death.

 

I'm glad to see Warwagon posting again!

  • Jason S. locked this topic
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • My ice blue precision 3550 laptop
    • A coalition of publishers sued OpenAI and Microsoft over scraping content without consent by Hamid Ganji Image via Depositphotos.com AI companies often rely on readily available internet content to train their chatbots and provide users with instant answers. This method of AI training is fast and relatively inexpensive, but using a website’s content without permission or compensation is not something publishers like to see, and this is exactly why Microsoft and OpenAI are now being sued. As reported by Bloomberg, a group of publishers that collectively own nearly 400 newspapers has filed a lawsuit against OpenAI and Microsoft. The coalition argues that the two companies scraped their content to build AI chatbots like ChatGPT and Copilot without paying any compensation. The complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, argues that while AI products have generated billions of dollars in market value using publishers’ work, none of that value has been shared with the publishers. The plaintiffs are seeking statutory damages and injunctive relief for alleged copyright infringement and violations of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. “Defendants systematically and secretly crawled the Publishers’ websites—including content behind paywalls and other access restrictions—and copied the Publishers’ articles, stories, and other original works onto their own servers without authorization,” the complaint states. The publishers also described the AI boom as a “death knell for local journalism” if AI companies that scrape content for free are not held accountable. Former New Jersey Attorney General Matthew Platkin and his law firm, Platkin LLP, are representing the publishers. “Our models empower innovation, are trained on publicly available data, and are grounded in fair use,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri told Bloomberg. This is not the first lawsuit involving the unauthorized use of publishers’ content by AI firms, but it is one of the largest coalitions ever formed against the free use of content by AI chatbots. In 2024, OpenAI and Microsoft also faced a similar lawsuit from eight newspapers that claimed AI products were benefiting from their content without permission.
    • Rufus alternative Ventoy now supports Windows 11's mandatory update, fixes major boot bug by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has its own official Media Creation Tool used for making bootable USB media, there are some popular third-party utilities as well which offer additional options like bypassing system requirements, Microsoft Account creation, and more. One of these is Ventoy, and the software has received its latest update today. In fact, the app actually got a slew of updates over the last couple of days, three version releases in total, to be specific. The first release, version 1.1.13, was pulled as there was some unspecified error in the update, and as such, the corrected version 1.1.14 was pushed out. Following that on very short notice, 1.1.15 was published as well. For those unfamiliar, Ventoy is an open-source utility that lets users create a bootable USB drive once and then simply copy ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD, or EFI files onto it without repeatedly formatting the drive. It supports both legacy BIOS and UEFI boot modes, Secure Boot, and a wide range of operating systems, making it one of the most versatile tools in the category. The biggest change in version 1.1.14 is an updated Secure Boot shim file aimed at resolving the UEFI CA 2023 issue, which is basically a compatibility problem that has affected Secure Boot environments on some systems. If you recall, we reported about severe boot issues on HP devices following the release of updated Secure Boot 2023 keys. For anyone who may not be aware, back in early 2024, Microsoft announced that it was updating Secure Boot keys as they were going to become 15 years old in 2026, which is also when they are set to expire. As such, the new 2023 certificates have been rolling out with the newest Windows 11 updates. Updated boot manager and Secure Boot certificates are crucial for protection against malware like bootkits. These are mandatory updates. Alongside that, the VentoyPlugson graphical plugin configurator was updated in sync with the release. The update also introduces a new VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option within the Global Control plugin, giving users more flexibility in managing Secure Boot behavior. Ventoy has also received a fix for a startup issue when Secure Boot was disabled. Microsoft does officially allow users to boot systems without Secure Boot as long as the PC is Secure Boot capable. The full changelog is given below: Update secure boot shim file to solve the UEFI CA 2023 issue. The new release use a new CA, so you need to enroll the new key for the first boot time. VentoyPlugson update synchronously. Global control plugin add a VTOY_SECURE_BOOT_POLICY option. Fix the boot issue when Secure Boot is disabled in the UEFI firmware. You can download the latest version of the app here on Ventoy's official GitHub repo or from Neowin software stories.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      441
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!