Recommended Posts

It's been a while since I specced out a PC, this one is for a friend of the family.

He does live performances, singing and a bit of comedy, and uses the PC for recording and editing backing tracks, which he creates with a keyboard and software like Ableton Live.

He has zero interest in games so he doesn't need a power house, or any extra gpu performance.

He said he wanted to spend around ?400 to replace his million year old PC, but was willing to go a little higher if needed.

He already has a monitor, speakers, kb/mouse, and hdd's for storage.

I've gone a bit over budget here, so I'd like to know if you guys think it's a good value build, or could I reduce the cost, without effecting the performance/quality toooo much.

post-18738-0-69068500-1340368540_thumb.j

Thanks :)

After saving the list, the price has gone up to ?500.27 :/ Fixed. It had removed the case/psu bundle deal. :rolleyes:

Also, sorry for the ****ty pic

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1086141-budget-build-advice/
Share on other sites

looks great to me. is he in need of an optical drive though?

Sweet :) Pretty sure his old Dell has a DVD drive, so no worries there.

Great build. No need to change anything.

For a price of an iPhone 4S, see what all things we can get :D

Unexpected, but cool :) Thought I'd have at least 10 people telling me it was crap, and that I am an idiot for one reason or another lol

Yeah, it's amazing what you can get today, compared to 5 years ago. My ?2000+ PC is looking kinda pathetic. :'(

Just noticed that the front USB ports ports on the Antec Three Hundred are USB 2, meaning I can't take advantage of the USB 3 headers on the mobo.

The Antec Three Hundred Two has USB 3 ports on the front, but it's ?54.79 compared to ?46.01, and I loose the ?19.20 discount on the PSU deal, but gain an unwanted DVD burner :/

Any ideas? Trying to get the price down a bit, not up lol

I got NZXT H2 last week when I built my new PC. The case looks sex. I got the black one but there's a white one as well. It's got top USB3 as well as top hard disk hot swap slot. This case if (Version 2) also has internal USB 3 header cable to connect to top USB3 port. But you waste 1 USB 3 port that way. My model has a back USB3 cable which connects to motherboards USB port

http://www.amazon.co.uk/NZXT-Classic-Series-H2-supply/dp/B004ULYPVK

The case is elegant and I chose it because I don't want Paul Walker in my case. Thank you.

I would go for a Kingston 120GB V+200 as you can currently buy it for ?69.99 use 'Rooney' as a code at checkout. http://www.ebuyer.com/341349-kingston-120gb-v-200-ssd-svp200s3-120g

Or for a little more Samsung 128GB 830 Series SATA 6Gb/s 2.5" SSD Laptop Kit + FREE Norton Ghost 15 for ?77.98 http://www.dabs.com/products/samsung-128gb-830-series-sata-6gb-s-2-5--ssd-laptop-kit---free-norton-ghost-15-7SR9.html?ReferrerID=tb&utm_source=td&utm_medium=affiliates&utm_content=TB00

I got NZXT H2 last week when I built my new PC. The case looks sex. I got the black one but there's a white one as well. It's got top USB3 as well as top hard disk hot swap slot. This case if (Version 2) also has internal USB 3 header cable to connect to top USB3 port. But you waste 1 USB 3 port that way. My model has a back USB3 cable which connects to motherboards USB port

http://www.amazon.co...y/dp/B004ULYPVK

The case is elegant and I chose it because I don't want Paul Walker in my case. Thank you.

Down mate, I want to get the price down. lol

"Paul Walker" meaning you don't want your case looking like something out of The Fast and the Furious? :rofl:

The Vertex 4 is better, so he should stick with it.

This is a budget build so i disagree and those other SSD's are top drives and the owner of the pc won't notice any difference.

Budget build remember even though they're not budget SSD's, it is all about saving money and ?40 is alot. :)

I agree that the owner probably wouldn't notice the difference, and will more than likely be blown away by the speed of his new system, even with one of those "lesser" drives.

I think reliability is more of a concern at this point.

If the build was for myself, I think I'd be sticking with the Vertex 4.

This is one of the few cases where I would suggest an AMD FX over an i5 - the AMD will do better with multi-threaded operations like audio editing, whereas the single core grunt of the i5 will be somewhat wasted.

Whoa, where do you get your information from? The i5 is a quad core and puts the FX to shame in every way and form.

Whoa, where do you get your information from? The i5 is a quad core and puts the FX to shame in every way and form.

AMD FX is best in applications that can use more than 4 cores - audio editing, video editing etc. This is where the platform can outperform Intel.

Yes, if you're only using programs that can't make use of more than 4 cores, there's no point in getting an FX over an i5.

This is why Totalbiscuit, for instance, doesn't have an Intel processor in his rig.

AMD FX is best in applications that can use more than 4 cores - audio editing, video editing etc. This is where the platform can outperform Intel.

Yes, if you're only using programs that can't make use of more than 4 cores, there's no point in getting an FX over an i5.

This is why Totalbiscuit, for instance, doesn't have an Intel processor in his rig.

But this is for a budget build, which we can assume won't be used with expensive multi-threaded software.

The i5 kills the FX is every benchmark except the rare application that will utilize the "extra" 4 cores.

The FX was a huge flop and even the hardcore AMD fans know it. Windows 7 had huge problems with the processor when it first came out, and I'm not so sure those ever got fully resolved. There are tons of discussion threads out there with people asking about the FX vs Intel i5 or i7 and 99% of the people recommend the Intel.

But this is for a budget build, which we can assume won't be used with expensive multi-threaded software.

The i5 kills the FX is every benchmark except the rare application that will utilize the "extra" 4 cores.

The FX was a huge flop and even the hardcore AMD fans know it. Windows 7 had huge problems with the processor when it first came out, and I'm not so sure those ever got fully resolved. There are tons of discussion threads out there with people asking about the FX vs Intel i5 or i7 and 99% of the people recommend the Intel.

You would be assuming incorrectly then, as it is obvious you haven't read the OP at all. It's in the second line that he uses audio editing software extensively, hence the recommendation of AMD. Stop trying to be SuperIntel Fanboy without reading in context, it makes you look silly.

This is about the only situation I would recommend AMD in, and you've come and plonked your foot squarely in your own mouth with your "99% bla bla bla" - this is the 1%!

You would be assuming incorrectly then, as it is obvious you haven't read the OP at all. It's in the second line that he uses audio editing software extensively, hence the recommendation of AMD. Stop trying to be SuperIntel Fanboy without reading in context, it makes you look silly.

This is about the only situation I would recommend AMD in, and you've come and plonked your foot squarely in your own mouth with your "99% bla bla bla" - this is the 1%!

Please show me a list of apps that would actually use more than 4 cores and have a performance benefit? I'm willing to bet there is very very few of them out there that have been optimized for that purpose, and even more unlikely that this person will be using those said apps. Even so, the difference would be so small, it wouldn't be noticeable. I'll say it again, this is a budget build. He's not looking to break speed records with top-notch components. There's no reason why he should spend likely more money for a CPU that is far superior in every way except for maybe a slight (emphasis on slight) disadvantage because it doesn't have 8 cores. Overall, the i5 is much much better CPU, period.

And enough with the "fanboy" stabs... It makes you look immature. I obviously read the OP, so have some respect...

Well you didn't, because the audio editing software would actually be one that benefits from having extra physical cores - which you can get at a budget, by the way.

Yes, the i5 is a much better CPU overall - but not in this instance. Again, I emplore you to read the OP and stop being IntelDefender Man.

Well you didn't, because the audio editing software would actually be one that benefits from having extra physical cores - which you can get at a budget, by the way.

Yes, the i5 is a much better CPU overall - but not in this instance. Again, I emplore you to read the OP and stop being IntelDefender Man.

Show some proof... You simply don't understand that programs don't magically utilize cores. They have to be coded and optimized to do so. And very very very few of them even take into consideration 4 cores, much less 8. I'll say it again, the advantage of the extra cores would be slim to none in those applications (if any), so it's not worth it. You're in the extreme minority that believes that CPU is good for anything. Benchmarks and discussions all over the net will prove you otherwise.

Show some proof... You simply don't understand that programs don't magically utilize cores. They have to be coded and optimized to do so. And very very very few of them even take into consideration 4 cores, much less 8. I'll say it again, the advantage of the extra cores would be slim to none in those applications (if any), so it's not worth it. You're in the extreme minority that believes that CPU is good for anything. Benchmarks and discussions all over the net will prove you otherwise.

Then you're reading some different benchmarks than everyone else.

Try harder. Actually, don't.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Hopefully this will fix the issue of no sound I have since last months stupid, and non-removable, Microsoft Corporation AudioProcessingObject Driver Update (1.0.3.56670)
    • It IS confusing! What channel are you in on each device? I'm guessing your 16GB device is on Experimental (formerly known as Dev) and your 128GB is on Beta.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!