Recommended Posts

Then you're reading some different benchmarks than everyone else.

Try harder. Actually, don't.

http://www.hardwaresecrets.com/article/AMD-FX-8150-vs-Core-i5-2500K-and-Core-i7-2600K-CPU-Review/1402/18

I'm starting to think you're delusional...

I'll quote the first sentence from the conclusion from the above review:

We can summarize the AMD FX-8150 in one word: "disappointment".

Every other review out there says exactly the same thing, so obviously you have no idea what you are talking about.

You can try to convince yourself all you want, but the proof shows otherwise. There's nothing else that has to be said.

And you've obviously not applied common sense to the review.. which is comparing the processor against competitors in a general and overall way. The OP has a singular requirement, which just happens to be the singular good use for the FX range. Again, try and get that through your uncommonly dense lobes.

But then again, you seem incapable of applying common sense to anything. There's a lack of basic knowledge, specifically relating to the OP, that you seem unwilling to fill on your own behalf. If you're going to be that ignorant and lazy, then I'm not going to help you.

Instead, please feel free to keep making stupid posts here.

And you've obviously not applied common sense to the review.. which is comparing the processor against competitors in a general and overall way. The OP has a singular requirement, which just happens to be the singular good use for the FX range. Again, try and get that through your uncommonly dense lobes.

But then again, you seem incapable of applying common sense to anything. There's a lack of basic knowledge, specifically relating to the OP, that you seem unwilling to fill on your own behalf. If you're going to be that ignorant and lazy, then I'm not going to help you.

Instead, please feel free to keep making stupid posts here.

I'm not sure if you simply fail at reading comprehension, or just don't know the first thing about processor dynamics. Or maybe you just like to put up an arguement even if you don't have the slightest bit of intelligence on the topic. Your pick...

If YOU actually read the OP, he specifically states Ableton Live will be used. If you do some background research on that program, you'll notice that it is clearly not optimized for multi-core support. And if you had any common sense in your "lobes", you'd at least know that, LIKE I SAID, programs need to be specifically programmed to take advantage of the extra cores. Adding more common sense on top of that, 99% of the CPUs on the market are 4 cores and under. So what incentive does any company have to program support for more than 4 cores at the moment? Please do answer that... Off the top of my head, I know that virtualization programs will kind of take advantage of more than 4 cores (e.g hyper threads on the i7). And like I've said over and over, the difference those extra cores makes is slim to none. I've yet to see any proof from you that the FX has any major benefit over the i5. I've showed you my discreet proof, and yet you are still too dumb to comprehend it...

It's quite sad how dense you are with such a lack of common sense. And you come here and attack me and show absolutely no proof of the crap you are spewing. Now, go outside, get some fresh air, and calm down. You clearly don't have anything intelligent to add and your childish anger is flaring up. It's best you leave and let the adults converse...

If your friend is able to do all the work you said on his 'ancient' PC, then you can go for something like this

2nd Gen CORE i5 2320 3.0Ghz (very little of a different between 2nd and 3rd gen, considering the end user tasks)

Keep the Gigabyte MB

8GB of RAM

Same Casing

Same PSU

Thrash the SDD (if this is a budget computer why add SSD?)

Total: ~?350

depending on what you need and want to spend you can get a i3-2120 CPU which i think is pretty much the sweet spot especially if your on a budget PC and are trying to keep costs down but performance solid. in USA it only costs $115-125 for it and i am sure it's performance will be plenty for most general uses especially if his PC is old as i upgraded to that from a 6 year old setup (AMD Athlon 3500+ dual core 2.0ghz overclocked to 2.4ghz) almost 2 months ago now and my CPU performance has AT LEAST tripled as maybe as high as 5 times or so based on encoding video with x264.exe etc.

plus the money you save there on CPU could be put towards a SSD etc as it would give you overall better performance going with a i3-2120 CPU paired with a SSD drive than getting a i5 quad core with a regular hard drive.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Mp3tag 3.35 by Razvan Serea Mp3tag is a powerful and yet easy-to-use tool to edit metadata (ID3, Vorbis Comments and APE) of common audio formats. It can rename files based on the tag information, replace characters or words from tags and filenames, import/export tag information, create playlists and more. The program supports online freedb database lookups for selected files, allowing you to automatically gather proper tag information for select files or CDs. Mp3tag supports the following audio formats: Advanced Audio Coding (aac) Free Lossless Audio Codec (flac) Monkeys Audio (ape) Mpeg Layer 3 (mp3) MPEG-4 (mp4 / m4a / m4b / iTunes compatible) Musepack (mpc) Ogg Vorbis (ogg) OptimFROG (ofr) OptimFROG DualStream (ofs) Speex (spx) Toms Audio Kompressor (tak) True Audio (tta) Windows Media Audio (wma) WavPack (wv) Mp3tag 3.35 changelog: This version introduces a new Files options page, enhanced toolbar customization, support for RF64 WAV files, improved Discogs and MusicBrainz tag sources, and many other improvements and fixes. See the Release Notes for more details. Download: Mp3tag 64-bit | 5.7 MB (Freeware) Download: Mp3tag 32-bit | 5.2 MB Link: Mp3tag Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The FIFA World Cup is not US centric.
    • It’s amusing how Microsoft is pushing IT admins as if this was a major, game-changing update. In reality, it’s just an enablement package that bumps the build number, which is disappointing compared to the more substantial 22H2 and 24H2 releases. Technically, 25H2, 26H1, and the upcoming 26H2 are essentially the same, differing only in support schedules. They could have included the Windows K2 improvements here, but chose not to. The era of Windows being in the backburner continues, and this 26H2 release feels like an afterthought. Shame, Nadella, shame.
    • Microsoft, totally not confusing /s 25H2 - Current for non-Arm based Windows 26H1 - Current for Arm based Windows 26H2 - Only for non Arm Windows
    • After I installed those, my older but capable Win 11 laptop (16GB RAM) reported it as 26H2 26300.8697. Then I installed it on my big laptop (128GB RAM! Hehe sorry), it reported it as 25H2 26220.8690. Ugh. Do I have to switch Insiders channels from Release to Beta?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      174
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!