Recommended Posts

Some Facebook members in Germany have been greeted with this pop-up asking them 'to help improve Facebook':

db344c25e5.jpg-a0dbf2dcf80c9346.jpeg

The question translates as follows: 'Please help us understand how members use Facebook. Your answer remains anonymous and isn't going to affect your friend's account. Is this the real name of your friend?'

The possible answers are 'Yes'/'No'/'I don't know this person'/'I don't want to answer.'

Some German bloggers are upset by this and comparing it to Stasi1 methods.

Personally I have yet to encounter the pop-up. The method behind it is questionable imho though. What do you think? Discuss.

Image source: heise online News

1Stasi = secret police in the former German Democratic Republic

So Facebook makes a change, possibly for the better (who knows), and people are outraged? Surprise, surprise.

There are users who use a pseudonym or slightly modified version of their name for privacy reasons. Asking other users to identify them with their real name reeks of Big Brother methods to me and deserves to be questioned.

  • Like 1

There are users who use a pseudonym or slightly modified version of their name for privacy reasons. Asking other users to identify them with their real name reeks of Big Brother methods to me and deserves to be questioned.

It's Facebook's rules. If you want to be on there, follow their rules.

People who want to be "hidden" shouldn't be on Facebook in the first place.

The only thing I wish is that there was also a comment box, so I could use a new way to say "f*** off" every time I answered it with "I don't want to answer".

I can't wait for more people to get sick of this and leave FB. I would laugh myself sick at seeing them finally get what they deserve after all their shady privacy-invading methods.

Could they not just be interested in understanding how many people are using pseudonyms. Which strikes me as perfectly reasonable, since you cannot get that data automatically.

There's no indication of any action to be taken here (in fact, it is expressly denied!).

Seriously, how does this imply elimination? And likening it to the Stasi? Lovely bit of pseudo-Godwin there.

  • Like 2

I am happy Facebook is doing this.

People should be using their real names on there.

I have a few friends that don't use their real names and I don't blame them. If they don't want to be found by other people or have their name directly tagged on photos that is their business and non of mine.

A lot of people in Germany means that Facebook is very very bad, but on the other side they have a FB account with a pseudonym. strange...

Another strange point is that I play FB games, and because of this I have many friends from many different countries. What is the only country with many pseudonym friends? Yes, exactly...

And someone here knows the good old usenet? (Not the fileshareing part of it ;) ) Everyone used it with the real name, because it was a rite to do this. What happens after more and more people use a pseudonym in usenet? The quality of the posts decrease or increase? It's the same on Facebook, more pseudonyms, more bullsh**.

I'm ok with this if it'll help remove people with names like "John CRAZYAWESOME Doe" or "Stephanie l0vepowerpedals" or whatever stupid "nicknames" people use.

Says the guy that has "Tha Bloo Monkee" nickname.

I use a pseudonym as I changed my name years back but just never made it official - it is just a regular name that I choose to use instead of my birth name. All my friends know me by it and my employers didn't have have a problem with it. I shouldn't have to change my name by deed poll just to be able to use a social networking site with my chosen name, especially not when this move is designed simply to protect advertising revenue by ensuring users are using their legal name.

If I have to change it officially then I will but I will resent Facebook if I have to do it.

I know a lot of people that have very valid reasons for hiding their true identity on Facebook. If Facebook are asking for my help on this matter they can forget it, as long as people's pseudonyms aren't being used to troll or harass it doesn't harm anybody.

Some Facebook members in Germany have been greeted with this pop-up asking them 'to help improve Facebook':

db344c25e5.jpg-a0dbf2dcf80c9346.jpeg

The question translates as follows: 'Please help us understand how members use Facebook. Your answer remains anonymous and isn't going to affect your friend's account. Is this the real name of your friend?'

The possible answers are 'Yes'/'No'/'I don't know this person'/'I don't want to answer.'

Some German bloggers are upset by this and comparing it to Stasi1 methods.

Personally I have yet to encounter the pop-up. The method behind it is questionable imho though. What do you think? Discuss.

Image source: heise online News

1Stasi = secret police in the former German Democratic Republic

Apparently the youths in Germany today don't have a clue what stasi was....

Erm most forums I use have thousands of members enroling under differing and sometimes humerous [or not] nick names.Why should faceache be any different after all its just another media market place?

Well for one, they don't really care. they just wan to know how many use it like this, possibly to consider adding an official pseudonym function. That's also why ti says it will NOT affect your friend in any way.

BUT however, facebook is not a simple webforum, and using a pseudonym kind of defeats the whole purpose of facebook to start with. It also defeats their purpose as a log in function to new site comment sections with real names to avoid childish spam and arguments from users.

BUT however, facebook is not a simple webforum

In what way its just a meeting place with a posh front end to post opinion the same as here, nothing more.If anything its more populated by buisness advertising than a forum ?

using a pseudonym kind of defeats the whole purpose of facebook to start with

Nope my friends will know my page and I have a second for buisnesses that just want me to like them just to view their content

It also defeats their purpose as a log in function to new site comment sections with real names to avoid childish spam and arguments from users.

Putting "real" names will never remove either spam or arguments, so theres no benefit except for Faceache marketting purposes

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • BTW DXVK is also available on Windows and offers similar benefits like on Linux when it comes to performance, at least in some titles. The Raceroom racing sim for example even offers DXVK as one of its officially supported options and it can achieve ridiculous improvements in certain situations, like quite literally doubling (or more) the framerates
    • Nvidia GeForce NOW to support 18 more games in June, including Gothic 1 Remake by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The start of a new month means Nvidia is also preparing a whole month of additions to its GeForce NOW supported games list. The cloud gaming platform received its first update of June today, revealing games like Jurassic World Evolution 3 and Gothic 1 Remake for the service, while at the same time revealing what's incoming in the next few weeks too. Here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: Jurassic World Evolution 3 (New release on Xbox, available on Game Pass) Fatekeeper (New release on Steam, available June 2) House Flipper Remastered Collection (New release on Steam, available June 4) Pro Cycling Manager 26 (New release on Steam, available June 4) GOALS (New release on Steam, available June 4) Gothic 1 Remake (New release on Steam, available June 5) NTE: Neverness to Everness (Launcher) The Outer Worlds: Spacer's Choice Edition (Steam and Xbox, available on Game Pass) Tomb Raider I-III Remastered (Epic Games Store) XCOM: Enemy Unknown (Steam) Nvidia also plans to add support for these games during the rest of June, though more titles will probably land as weeks go by too: STARSEEKER: Astroneer Expeditions (New release on Steam, June 11) SpaceCraft (New release on Steam, June 11) Denshattack! (New release on Steam and Xbox, available on Game Pass, June 17) The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales (New release on Steam, June 18) Dark Scrolls (New release on Steam, June 22) Monopoly: Star Wars Heroes vs. Villains (New release on Steam and Ubisoft, June 30) Farever (Steam) FATAL FURY: City of the Wolves (Steam) Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month.
    • The useful lapdogs  
    • Nobody is buying a PS5 only for playing Until Dawn 2. Their loss.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      482
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      231
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      68
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      58
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!