Recommended Posts

Some Facebook members in Germany have been greeted with this pop-up asking them 'to help improve Facebook':

db344c25e5.jpg-a0dbf2dcf80c9346.jpeg

The question translates as follows: 'Please help us understand how members use Facebook. Your answer remains anonymous and isn't going to affect your friend's account. Is this the real name of your friend?'

The possible answers are 'Yes'/'No'/'I don't know this person'/'I don't want to answer.'

Some German bloggers are upset by this and comparing it to Stasi1 methods.

Personally I have yet to encounter the pop-up. The method behind it is questionable imho though. What do you think? Discuss.

Image source: heise online News

1Stasi = secret police in the former German Democratic Republic

So Facebook makes a change, possibly for the better (who knows), and people are outraged? Surprise, surprise.

There are users who use a pseudonym or slightly modified version of their name for privacy reasons. Asking other users to identify them with their real name reeks of Big Brother methods to me and deserves to be questioned.

  • Like 1

There are users who use a pseudonym or slightly modified version of their name for privacy reasons. Asking other users to identify them with their real name reeks of Big Brother methods to me and deserves to be questioned.

It's Facebook's rules. If you want to be on there, follow their rules.

People who want to be "hidden" shouldn't be on Facebook in the first place.

The only thing I wish is that there was also a comment box, so I could use a new way to say "f*** off" every time I answered it with "I don't want to answer".

I can't wait for more people to get sick of this and leave FB. I would laugh myself sick at seeing them finally get what they deserve after all their shady privacy-invading methods.

Could they not just be interested in understanding how many people are using pseudonyms. Which strikes me as perfectly reasonable, since you cannot get that data automatically.

There's no indication of any action to be taken here (in fact, it is expressly denied!).

Seriously, how does this imply elimination? And likening it to the Stasi? Lovely bit of pseudo-Godwin there.

  • Like 2

I am happy Facebook is doing this.

People should be using their real names on there.

I have a few friends that don't use their real names and I don't blame them. If they don't want to be found by other people or have their name directly tagged on photos that is their business and non of mine.

A lot of people in Germany means that Facebook is very very bad, but on the other side they have a FB account with a pseudonym. strange...

Another strange point is that I play FB games, and because of this I have many friends from many different countries. What is the only country with many pseudonym friends? Yes, exactly...

And someone here knows the good old usenet? (Not the fileshareing part of it ;) ) Everyone used it with the real name, because it was a rite to do this. What happens after more and more people use a pseudonym in usenet? The quality of the posts decrease or increase? It's the same on Facebook, more pseudonyms, more bullsh**.

I'm ok with this if it'll help remove people with names like "John CRAZYAWESOME Doe" or "Stephanie l0vepowerpedals" or whatever stupid "nicknames" people use.

Says the guy that has "Tha Bloo Monkee" nickname.

I use a pseudonym as I changed my name years back but just never made it official - it is just a regular name that I choose to use instead of my birth name. All my friends know me by it and my employers didn't have have a problem with it. I shouldn't have to change my name by deed poll just to be able to use a social networking site with my chosen name, especially not when this move is designed simply to protect advertising revenue by ensuring users are using their legal name.

If I have to change it officially then I will but I will resent Facebook if I have to do it.

I know a lot of people that have very valid reasons for hiding their true identity on Facebook. If Facebook are asking for my help on this matter they can forget it, as long as people's pseudonyms aren't being used to troll or harass it doesn't harm anybody.

Some Facebook members in Germany have been greeted with this pop-up asking them 'to help improve Facebook':

db344c25e5.jpg-a0dbf2dcf80c9346.jpeg

The question translates as follows: 'Please help us understand how members use Facebook. Your answer remains anonymous and isn't going to affect your friend's account. Is this the real name of your friend?'

The possible answers are 'Yes'/'No'/'I don't know this person'/'I don't want to answer.'

Some German bloggers are upset by this and comparing it to Stasi1 methods.

Personally I have yet to encounter the pop-up. The method behind it is questionable imho though. What do you think? Discuss.

Image source: heise online News

1Stasi = secret police in the former German Democratic Republic

Apparently the youths in Germany today don't have a clue what stasi was....

Erm most forums I use have thousands of members enroling under differing and sometimes humerous [or not] nick names.Why should faceache be any different after all its just another media market place?

Well for one, they don't really care. they just wan to know how many use it like this, possibly to consider adding an official pseudonym function. That's also why ti says it will NOT affect your friend in any way.

BUT however, facebook is not a simple webforum, and using a pseudonym kind of defeats the whole purpose of facebook to start with. It also defeats their purpose as a log in function to new site comment sections with real names to avoid childish spam and arguments from users.

BUT however, facebook is not a simple webforum

In what way its just a meeting place with a posh front end to post opinion the same as here, nothing more.If anything its more populated by buisness advertising than a forum ?

using a pseudonym kind of defeats the whole purpose of facebook to start with

Nope my friends will know my page and I have a second for buisnesses that just want me to like them just to view their content

It also defeats their purpose as a log in function to new site comment sections with real names to avoid childish spam and arguments from users.

Putting "real" names will never remove either spam or arguments, so theres no benefit except for Faceache marketting purposes

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Would be good to see Google also being forced to do the same. No promotion of Chrome on Google search. Stop installing into the app data of a locked down machine, etc
    • FileZilla 3.70.6 by Razvan Serea FileZilla is powerful Open Source FTP/SFTP client with many features. It includes a site manager to store all your connection details and logins as well as an Explorer style interface that shows the local and remote folders and can be customized independently. The program offers support for firewalls and proxy connections as well as SSL and Kerberos GSS security. Additional features include keep alive, auto ascii/binary transfer, download queue, manual transfers, raw FTP commands and more. FileZilla key features: Cross-platform support – Available for Windows, macOS, and Linux. FTP, FTPS, and SFTP support – Handles standard and secure file transfer protocols. Tabbed user interface – Easily manage multiple connections at once. Site Manager – Save and organize server connection details. Drag & drop support – Quickly transfer files by dragging them. Filename filtering – Include or exclude specific files using filters. Directory comparison – Compare local and remote directories. Synchronized browsing – Navigate in sync between local and remote folders. Transfer queue – View, manage, and prioritize file transfers. Speed limits – Control upload/download speed to manage bandwidth usage. Keep-alive system – Prevents timeouts during long transfers. Remote file editing – Open and edit remote files using local editors. IPv6 support – Compatible with modern networking standards. FileZilla 3.70.6 changelog: New features SFTP: Added compatibility flag to Site Manager to ignore invalid bits in file attributes flags received from non-compliant servers Bugfixes and minor changes SFTP: Updated to fzssh 1.3.0 Updated to libfilezilla 0.56.1 Removed autodetection of FTP server type governing the remote path syntax. Exotic server types now need to be set explicitly on the advanced page in the Site Manager Download page: FileZilla 3.70.6 | ~10.0 MB (Free, paid upgrade available) Links: FileZilla Home page | Documentation | FileZilla Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Browser vendors pen open letter to Microsoft saying "enough is enough" by Usama Jawad We have seen Microsoft resort to questionable tactics in the past to get more customers to use Edge, such as "bribing" people to use Edge, testing new behavior so that Edge loads automatically on startup every time, and pressuring OEMs to exclusively bundle Edge in Windows PCs. However, the company often receives pushback not only from customers but also from the Browser Choice Alliance (BCA). Now, the collective has penned an open letter to the Redmond tech firm to highlight its dissatisfaction with its practices. For those unaware, BCA is a coalition that touts several browser vendors as its members, including Google Chrome, Midori, Opera, Vivaldi, BrowserWorks, and Wavebox. Its latest open letter to Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella emphasizes that "enough is enough" and that user choice on Windows should be respected. It claimed that the company is abusing its dominant position in the PC space to push customers to its first-party browser, even if they don't want to use it. To do this, it resorts to shady tactics, some of which we highlighted at the start of this piece. It says that Microsoft is making it very difficult for users to set their preferred browser across all touchpoints. This is problematic as PCs are becoming even more prevalent in the AI era, so user choice is being restricted across even more devices, further frustrating users (and competing browser vendors). As such, BCA has urged Microsoft to take the following actions to level the playing field: Allow browser suppliers to compete for preinstallation and default deals with Windows PC manufacturers End dark patterns targeted at users seeking to download and effectively use other browsers (including as system-level default) Bring back the ability for users to make switching default browsers simple and transparent with a “single click” change for all relevant file types and apps (including PDFs) Open all web links in the users’ selected system-level browser of choice Eliminate manipulative Microsoft-exclusive banners pushing Edge in Windows, including when users are searching for other browsers Stop using operating system updates to push users back to Edge Remove the restrictive configurations of existing S mode devices that block the usage of third-party browsers. It believes that all browsers should compete on merit, as this will drive innovation and healthy competition. Despite its strong wording and publication of the letter openly, it's unclear if Microsoft will pay any heed to the BCA and if this will result in any tangible downstream benefits. We'll likely find out in due time.
    • Boo! I was excited for this... Stargate SG-1 Star Michael Shanks Rallies Fans After Amazon Axes Revival, Says 'Now Is the Time to Say Something'
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      77
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!