Recommended Posts

Some Facebook members in Germany have been greeted with this pop-up asking them 'to help improve Facebook':

db344c25e5.jpg-a0dbf2dcf80c9346.jpeg

The question translates as follows: 'Please help us understand how members use Facebook. Your answer remains anonymous and isn't going to affect your friend's account. Is this the real name of your friend?'

The possible answers are 'Yes'/'No'/'I don't know this person'/'I don't want to answer.'

Some German bloggers are upset by this and comparing it to Stasi1 methods.

Personally I have yet to encounter the pop-up. The method behind it is questionable imho though. What do you think? Discuss.

Image source: heise online News

1Stasi = secret police in the former German Democratic Republic

So Facebook makes a change, possibly for the better (who knows), and people are outraged? Surprise, surprise.

There are users who use a pseudonym or slightly modified version of their name for privacy reasons. Asking other users to identify them with their real name reeks of Big Brother methods to me and deserves to be questioned.

  • Like 1

There are users who use a pseudonym or slightly modified version of their name for privacy reasons. Asking other users to identify them with their real name reeks of Big Brother methods to me and deserves to be questioned.

It's Facebook's rules. If you want to be on there, follow their rules.

People who want to be "hidden" shouldn't be on Facebook in the first place.

The only thing I wish is that there was also a comment box, so I could use a new way to say "f*** off" every time I answered it with "I don't want to answer".

I can't wait for more people to get sick of this and leave FB. I would laugh myself sick at seeing them finally get what they deserve after all their shady privacy-invading methods.

Could they not just be interested in understanding how many people are using pseudonyms. Which strikes me as perfectly reasonable, since you cannot get that data automatically.

There's no indication of any action to be taken here (in fact, it is expressly denied!).

Seriously, how does this imply elimination? And likening it to the Stasi? Lovely bit of pseudo-Godwin there.

  • Like 2

I am happy Facebook is doing this.

People should be using their real names on there.

I have a few friends that don't use their real names and I don't blame them. If they don't want to be found by other people or have their name directly tagged on photos that is their business and non of mine.

A lot of people in Germany means that Facebook is very very bad, but on the other side they have a FB account with a pseudonym. strange...

Another strange point is that I play FB games, and because of this I have many friends from many different countries. What is the only country with many pseudonym friends? Yes, exactly...

And someone here knows the good old usenet? (Not the fileshareing part of it ;) ) Everyone used it with the real name, because it was a rite to do this. What happens after more and more people use a pseudonym in usenet? The quality of the posts decrease or increase? It's the same on Facebook, more pseudonyms, more bullsh**.

I'm ok with this if it'll help remove people with names like "John CRAZYAWESOME Doe" or "Stephanie l0vepowerpedals" or whatever stupid "nicknames" people use.

Says the guy that has "Tha Bloo Monkee" nickname.

I use a pseudonym as I changed my name years back but just never made it official - it is just a regular name that I choose to use instead of my birth name. All my friends know me by it and my employers didn't have have a problem with it. I shouldn't have to change my name by deed poll just to be able to use a social networking site with my chosen name, especially not when this move is designed simply to protect advertising revenue by ensuring users are using their legal name.

If I have to change it officially then I will but I will resent Facebook if I have to do it.

I know a lot of people that have very valid reasons for hiding their true identity on Facebook. If Facebook are asking for my help on this matter they can forget it, as long as people's pseudonyms aren't being used to troll or harass it doesn't harm anybody.

Some Facebook members in Germany have been greeted with this pop-up asking them 'to help improve Facebook':

db344c25e5.jpg-a0dbf2dcf80c9346.jpeg

The question translates as follows: 'Please help us understand how members use Facebook. Your answer remains anonymous and isn't going to affect your friend's account. Is this the real name of your friend?'

The possible answers are 'Yes'/'No'/'I don't know this person'/'I don't want to answer.'

Some German bloggers are upset by this and comparing it to Stasi1 methods.

Personally I have yet to encounter the pop-up. The method behind it is questionable imho though. What do you think? Discuss.

Image source: heise online News

1Stasi = secret police in the former German Democratic Republic

Apparently the youths in Germany today don't have a clue what stasi was....

Erm most forums I use have thousands of members enroling under differing and sometimes humerous [or not] nick names.Why should faceache be any different after all its just another media market place?

Well for one, they don't really care. they just wan to know how many use it like this, possibly to consider adding an official pseudonym function. That's also why ti says it will NOT affect your friend in any way.

BUT however, facebook is not a simple webforum, and using a pseudonym kind of defeats the whole purpose of facebook to start with. It also defeats their purpose as a log in function to new site comment sections with real names to avoid childish spam and arguments from users.

BUT however, facebook is not a simple webforum

In what way its just a meeting place with a posh front end to post opinion the same as here, nothing more.If anything its more populated by buisness advertising than a forum ?

using a pseudonym kind of defeats the whole purpose of facebook to start with

Nope my friends will know my page and I have a second for buisnesses that just want me to like them just to view their content

It also defeats their purpose as a log in function to new site comment sections with real names to avoid childish spam and arguments from users.

Putting "real" names will never remove either spam or arguments, so theres no benefit except for Faceache marketting purposes

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I have been using Firefox for years.
    • I'd trust open source stuff on github more then closed source binaries from Microsoft.
    • OpenAI is now rolling out Lockdown Mode to more ChatGPT users by Pradeep Viswanathan Back in February, OpenAI first announced Lockdown Mode for users who want the most comprehensive protection from potential attacks. At the time of the announcement, the company mentioned that this feature was available to a small set of highly security-conscious users, including executives or security teams at leading organizations. Today, OpenAI announced that Lockdown Mode is now rolling out to all personal ChatGPT accounts, including Free, Go, Plus, and Pro, and also self-serve ChatGPT Business accounts. Users can enable the feature from ChatGPT Settings > Security when it is available for their account. When Lockdown Mode is enabled, ChatGPT limits or disables several features that connect to the web or external services. These include live web browsing, Deep Research, Agent Mode, and more. Here is the complete list of services that will be disabled in Lockdown Mode: Live web browsing: Web browsing is limited to accessing only cached content. Search results may be limited, unavailable, or stale. Image support: ChatGPT may not display images in regular responses or retrieve images from the web. Users can still upload image files, and image generation remains available where it is otherwise available. Deep research: Deep research is disabled. Agent mode: Agent mode is disabled. Canvas networking: Users cannot approve Canvas-generated code to access the network. File downloads: ChatGPT cannot download files for data analysis. ChatGPT can still operate on your manually uploaded files. It is important to note that Lockdown Mode does not completely block prompt injections from appearing in content that ChatGPT processes. For example, a malicious instruction could still be present in an uploaded file or cached web content. However, the mode is designed to reduce the ways such an attack could send sensitive information outside the conversation. Along with Lockdown Mode, OpenAI today also announced that the Active sessions feature is now available across ChatGPT accounts and workspace types. This feature allows users to review where their account is signed in across devices and end sessions if required. A session will have the following information displayed: Device or browser information. First-party app context, such as ChatGPT, Codex, or API Platform. Approximate location. Sign-in date and time. Whether the device is a trusted device. Whether it is your current session. OpenAI highlighted that the Active sessions feature will not be available for accounts linked to an organization’s single sign-on setup, including SAML or OIDC.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      moog19 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Mentor
      grik went up a rank
      Mentor
    • Dedicated
      JKR earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Year In
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      487
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      68
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!