AT&T may charge for FaceTime calls over 3G


Recommended Posts

Apple's FaceTime video chat service may have been Wi-Fi-only since its inception, but that means it's also been free all along. This could change come the launch of iOS 6, however ? the introduction of FaceTime calling over 3G could well be accompanied by charges for the first time. 9to5Mac has acquired screenshots from the recently-released iOS 6 beta 3 that seem to show FaceTime over cellular networks requiring activation (read: a contract bolt-on) in a similar way to the Personal Hotspot feature. Attempting to use 3G calling on an iPhone reportedly brings up an error message imploring the user to contact AT&T to have the feature enabled, though 9to5Mac's iPad worked without running into the issue.

If true, this would raise all sorts of questions as to how AT&T plans to handle its customers' data allowances. A flat rate for unlimited FaceTime calling could undoubtedly result in some hefty packet consumption, and the real question then would be if FaceTime data counts towards users' bandwidth caps. If so, people might find themselves needing a higher data plan on top of the extra FaceTime charges, but if not it'd raise the issue of AT&T's adherence to net neutrality principles ? Comcast has come under fire recently for letting its customers use the Xfinity video service without it counting towards their download limits. Were AT&T to implement a similar policy, it could have far-reaching implications for Skype and other services with customers that currently have to deal with managing their data.

9to5m.jpg

http://www.theverge.com/2012/7/17/3164208/at-t-may-charge-for-facetime-calls-over-3g

If this means it doesn't get charged against your data usage, I would be all for it. Wouldn't want to use Facetime over 3G if it counted against my data rate because I only use 200 mb currently anyway and don't want to have to up that also just to use this.

And yet you can already do this for free by just jailbreaking.

could also bypass Tethering through jailbreaking, AT&T will also detect it and block/charge you. they do the same thing to rooted Androids that have the enabling apps to bypass.

If this means it doesn't get charged against your data usage, I would be all for it. Wouldn't want to use Facetime over 3G if it counted against my data rate because I only use 200 mb currently anyway and don't want to have to up that also just to use this.

how is Full Stream video NOT going to go against your data usage.

Why is there a 4G symbol & the iPad orientation lock, notifier in the taskbar?

Because for marketing reasons AT&T bullied Apple to change it 4G, they should meet in the middle and market HSPA+ as 3G and LTE and WiMax as 3.5G, LTE-Evolution can then be called 4G.

If you are paying seperately for it as a service, thats how. Thats what this post is about after all.

paying for the ability to use it is diffrent from paying for how much you can use it. the charge is more then likely to " unlock " the facetime over 3G ability.

but like Still said above, its still greedy of AT&T. pay already for a data plan, regardless if what devices uses the data, its still data, 1 and 0's.

had an argument with Sprint when i had a Winmobile 6.5 device, the email ability kept using the data plan ( that i didnt have ) instead of Wifi ( that i am always around ). suffice to say they refunded the charges, the phone, and within days changed the product page of the Intrepid and removed the Wifi listing.

Cell phone companies wil nickel and dime for anything.

Its like paying ATT extra when your app use 3g data..

You paid for the data and you have the right to use it any way you want..

whats next??? charge extra for 3g data used in each app? ATT is really greedy.

If they charge it against your minutes used instead, it would be the exact opposite of greedy and be the only carrier to have a real option for video chat. The limits we have on data across all the carriers makes it none practical and expensive. That is why I said, if at least it's not being charged against your data plan, this would be well worth it.

paying for the ability to use it is diffrent from paying for how much you can use it. the charge is more then likely to " unlock " the facetime over 3G ability.

You are completely ignoring the context of my post and the real world situation. ATT has data limits that are way to low to make facetime usable on a daily basis over 3G. Hence my comment about seperating the two things. If I can pay for Facetime and it not count against my data plan, its a good idea that no other carrier has matched yet.

You are completely ignoring the context of my post and the real world situation. ATT has data limits that are way to low to make facetime usable on a daily basis over 3G. Hence my comment about seperating the two things. If I can pay for Facetime and it not count against my data plan, its a good idea that no other carrier has matched yet.

how am i ignoring the context, their not going to raise the limits. they have flat out said when they did unlimited they regretted it. it will be separate charge. but that separate charge will jsut be to unlock it form the phone more then likely. they are not going to do a flat fee for unlimited full motion video and audio. especially since it requires more bandwidth then a webpage and that itself is limited. it will not be a charge against your (voice) minutes, thats just stupid. 1 minute of Facetime requires more bandwidth then watching a movie ( sync'd voice and video from both devices traveling both ways, compared to a movie which is 1 way(ish) ) and a Crap ton more then just talking voice over the phone

AT&T is a company to make money, not a charity non-profit

how am i ignoring the context, their not going to raise the limits. they have flat out said when they did unlimited they regretted it. it will be separate charge. but that separate charge will jsut be to unlock it form the phone more then likely. they are not going to do a flat fee for unlimited full motion video and audio. especially since it requires more bandwidth then a webpage and that itself is limited. it will not be a charge against your (voice) minutes, thats just stupid. 1 minute of Facetime requires more bandwidth then watching a movie ( sync'd voice and video from both devices traveling both ways, compared to a movie which is 1 way(ish) ) and a Crap ton more then just talking voice over the phone

AT&T is a company to make money, not a charity non-profit

The quality of video-to-video chatting is so much lower than a video, I would be very surprised if it used more bandwidth than streaming a HQ video/movie.

But if you have a certain amount of data, you should be able to do what you want with it. Why would ATT want to charge more for facetime if it's just a part of your allotted data?? There has to be a marketing advantage here - such as it does NOT count towards your data, or you get extra for this. Then again, ATT and Verizon continue to both surprise me with their greed.

The quality of video-to-video chatting is so much lower than a video, I would be very surprised if it used more bandwidth than streaming a HQ video/movie.

But if you have a certain amount of data, you should be able to do what you want with it.

i agree

Why would ATT want to charge more for facetime if it's just a part of your allotted data??

because its a " Feature ", and because they can charge for it. just like they can charge for tethering. like i said data is data, but that doesnt mean anything, its a feature, or additional option.

There has to be a marketing advantage here - such as it does NOT count towards your data, or you get extra for this. Then again, ATT and Verizon continue to both surprise me with their greed.

marketing advantage is that it will be available, i doubt the other Cell Telecoms are going to give it away fro free due to the increase bandwith compared to regular voice required. and in comparison to other Data that is shuttled through their network.

Heck AT&T and even Sprint charge for the base stations that connect to home broadband, they charge for minutes over alotted, and for the use of it,, and it uses your own seperate broadband, not their network. but they still charge, and people are still wondering if they are goign to charge for facetime. get real people,

my parents are charged per minute used for using their Comcast connection to use their cell phone through sprint using a thing called an Airave ( http://now.sprint.co...ve/?id16=airave ) they are charged if they go over their included minutes, and they still dont get a Data Plan included, even though this thing hooks up to the Comcast Cable Internet

AT&T is a guarantee to charge for the use of Facetime, and will undoubtedly put a surcharge on top of Data plans.

i agree

because its a " Feature ", and because they can charge for it. just like they can charge for tethering. like i said data is data, but that doesnt mean anything, its a feature, or additional option.

marketing advantage is that it will be available, i doubt the other Cell Telecoms are going to give it away fro free due to the increase bandwith compared to regular voice required. and in comparison to other Data that is shuttled through their network.

Heck AT&T and even Sprint charge for the base stations that connect to home broadband, they charge for minutes over alotted, and for the use of it,, and it uses your own seperate broadband, not their network. but they still charge, and people are still wondering if they are goign to charge for facetime. get real people,

my parents are charged per minute used for using their Comcast connection to use their cell phone through sprint using a thing called an Airave ( http://now.sprint.co...ve/?id16=airave ) they are charged if they go over their included minutes, and they still dont get a Data Plan included, even though this thing hooks up to the Comcast Cable Internet

AT&T is a guarantee to charge for the use of Facetime, and will undoubtedly put a surcharge on top of Data plans.

Yeah...

But with Verizon's new move (you can basically do whatever you want with your data, even tether) maybe this will hurt ATT....

Meh, the general public won't even question it.

from my point of view, data is data, why pay for it twice?

i and just about everybody that doesnt have a $$ interest sees it that way also, unfortunately those that do have $$ interest in it want to make money

they dont see it as the same data/thing, they see it as a feature. they see it as an option, and features and options are billable, and our point of view does not make them money, and their sole purpose in this world is to make money, not make you happy

Sprint announced earlier that it will NOT charge for facetime due to their dedication to Unlimited Data regardless of Use

?We are committed to our unlimited data and that means not charging for data consumption based on the application,? a Sprint spokesperson told theWall Street Journal.

A dialog suggesting users will need to pay to use FaceTime over 3G connections in the beta version of iOS 6 has led to speculation that AT&T plans to charge customers extra to video chat when not on Wi-Fi networks.

AT&T isn?t commenting on the report, but did say it is working closely with Apple on the development of iOS 6 and ?will share information with our customers as it becomes available.?

Verizon isn?t commenting on whether or not it plans to charge customers for FaceTime chats, either.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Segra 1.6.2 by Razvan Serea Segra is a free, open-source OBS-powered game recorder offering fast gameplay capture, instant clips, AI highlights, deep game integration, and seamless uploads—perfect for gamers, streamers, and content creators. Lightweight, fast, zero bloat. Segra key features: Automatic Game Recording: Begin capturing gameplay the moment your game launches, with zero manual setup. Instant Clipping: Save important moments instantly using a customizable hotkey—perfect for highlights, montages, or quick shares. Segra AI Highlights: Let Segra automatically detect kills, assists, deaths, and key events to generate polished highlight reels without manual editing. Gameplay Uploads: Upload recordings and clips directly to Segra.tv for fast sharing and cloud access. Deep Game Integration: Enjoy advanced game-data tracking across hundreds of supported titles, enabling smart highlight generation and stat-informed clipping. High-Performance Capture: Record up to 4K at 144 FPS using OBS-powered technology with minimal performance impact, supporting NVENC, AMD VCE, and custom quality controls. Segra Editor: Edit recordings easily with timeline controls, segment management, and event-based navigation to build the perfect clip. Customization Options: Adjust hotkeys, output formats, storage paths, codecs, capture quality, and performance settings for a tailored recording experience. Segra 1.6.2 changelog: UI: Improved the transition from the loading skeleton to the real content card. Security: Added Segra.dll code signing and automatic VirusTotal upload. Settings: Fixed the settings header to highlight Account when scrolled to the top. Recording: Updated OBSKit.NET to 1.4.1. Download: Segra 1.6.2 | 74.5 MB (Open Source) View: Segra Homepage | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hey Google, these are the Gemini features I want in 2026 by Aditya Tiwari Google Gemini has been around for over three years. The AI chatbot started its journey back in 2023 (as Bard) when ChatGPT was already a talk of the town. However, it quickly attracted criticism after misrepresenting facts about the James Webb Space Telescope. The search giant spent a year fine-tuning Bard before rebranding the chatbot and its underlying generative AI model to Gemini, drawing inspiration from NASA's first human spaceflight program. Note that Bard was initially powered by LaMDA and PaLM 2; Google has since added several new features and integrations to Gemini. That said, there is scope for improvement and a gap for new features. I have been using Gemini for a while now and have realized that the chatbot lacks several features, making it harder for me to research across topics. These are mostly function-over-form updates that can improve the overall experience. Delete individual messages from a conversation Image via DepositPhotos.com One good thing about Gemini is that it can maintain context throughout the conversation. But things might get chaotic when you want to ask a related question, but don't want it to be part of your conversation in the long run. You can't ask that related question in a fresh chat because Gemini will lose the active conversation context of what you're trying to research. If Google allowed you to delete individual question/answer pairs, you could simply ask about a sub-topic and remove it from the conversation to create a smooth flow of important stuff. Offline mode Image via DepositPhotos.com A big pain of using Gemini daily is that everything loads from the cloud. It takes time for your chats to appear, and you can't view your conversation history while offline. To get a better idea, you can open the Gemini app and see how it looks without an internet connection. While Gemini models run in the cloud, it wouldn't hurt if Google could store chats (at least the text part) on the device so we can refer to them when offline. Google can also offer a lightweight version of its AI model to help with basic drafting, summarization, and other tasks. It has the Gemini Nano model, which can perform on-device processing on Google Pixel, Samsung, and some other Android brands, but it's a system feature and not related to the cloud-based Gemini app. Make temporary chats permanent I can't thank Google enough for taking the time and effort to add incognito mode or temporary chat mode to the Gemini app. It lets you have conversations without worrying that the topics will end up in your chat history or used for model training (at least on paper). Google claims that it doesn't use your temporary chats to "personalize your Gemini experience or train Google’s AI models." However, the data is stored "up to 72 hours to respond to you and to process any feedback you choose to provide." That said, I often start researching something in a temporary chat, only to realize the chatbot's answer is good enough to refer to later. Sadly, Gemini doesn't have an option to make such temporary chats permanent. In other words, I won't be able to follow up on it if I close the temporary chat. I'm left with alternatives like copying the answers into notes or another app. My digital life will get a lot better if Gemini gets a button to make temporary chats permanent. Collapse answers for a cleaner view You're heavily invested in your research game and suddenly feel the need to go up in the chat to recall something. This is when the conversation thread starts to feel like an overwhelming, unending wall of questions and answers. What if Google added a way to collapse Q&A pairs in the Gemini chat thread? It would look quite clean and easy to navigate. You'll quickly get an overview of everything you have discussed with the chatbot. Add buttons to jump between messages Suggested mockup of the feature. This reminds me of a small but useful Gemini feature that Google could add to its chatbot: the ability to hop between prompts in a conversation. Just add simple up- and down-arrow buttons, similar to YouTube Shorts, so people can quickly scroll through the messages. A table of contents or Chat Overview It's hard to get a bird's-eye view of everything you have discussed with the chatbot during a lengthy conversation. This is where a table of contents, or Chat Overview, displayed at the top of the screen, possibly in a drop-down button, might come in handy. You'll be able to get an overview of the chat and jump between messages, serving as an alternative to the up/down arrow buttons. Temporary mode for Gemini Live Image: Google You can use Gemini Live to have real-time conversations with the chatbot, which feels like you're talking to someone in the same room. However, a downside is that Gemini Live doesn't work in Temporary Chat mode, so all your conversations end up in the chat history. Google should consider expanding the temporary chat mode to include Gemini Live. Default to a specific chat One thing that feels somewhat annoying to me is that Gemini always opens in a new chat, whether on web or mobile. Sometimes, you want to return to your last chat. Google can take cues from web browsers, which let you choose whether you want to go to a new tab or a specific web page(s). Gemini can also have options to default to a specific chat when reopened. That said, generative AI chatbots have endless possibilities given the vagueness of their work. You can mold them the way you want by attaching different connectors, adding custom instructions, and including source files. It remains to be seen what Google has in store for future updates and whether anything from this wishlist gets the green light. The search giant released a stream of new Gemini updates in recent months, including Gemini 3.5 Flash and Gemini Omni Spark, adding that it now has 13 products with more than a billion users each. What do you want to see in the Gemini app? Tell us in the comments.
    • Thank you for the post. Just a FYI that links to an outside site or promoting specific software is considered spamming here. Asking general questions is fine.
    • I have been thinking about AI detector tools as a software workflow rather than a single "AI score" widget. When someone pastes text or uploads a document, the UI can return a report with a probability-style score, sentence highlights, reliability notes, and limitations. The useful part is that it can point a reviewer toward passages worth reading again. The risky part is that a polished score can look more certain than it really is. For people who build or review web apps, what should happen before the user copies or exports that kind of report? The minimum I would expect is: A clear input boundary for pasted text versus document files. Limits shown near the workflow, including minimum text length and maximum file size. A report label that says the result is a signal, not proof of who wrote the text. Sentence highlights and evidence notes alongside the global score. Reliability notes when the sample is too short or lacks enough sentence variety. False-positive and false-negative caveats that remain visible in copied/exported summaries. I am trying to avoid the pattern where a clean report card becomes the whole product story. For AI detection, "review this evidence in context" seems more honest than "trust this score." Would you keep the warning text visible on every report, or make it collapsible so the main result stays easier to scan? Disclosure: I work on a small AI detector/reporting workflow, but I am intentionally not linking it here. I am asking about software and report design, not promoting a site.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      181
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      86
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!