Recommended Posts

Intellectual Properly: Apple patents disappearing vertical scroll indicator

Intellectual Properly is a series where we seek to set the record straight on the day's hottest patent, copyright and related intellectual property issues in the tech world.

It's Tuesday, so you know what that means: newly minted patents are here. Today's fun comes straight from Cupertino via the US Patent and Trademark Office and includes another scrolling patent ? US patent no. 8,223,134 to be exact. The '134 patent claims priority back to 2007 and includes pretty broad coverage on a disappearing vertical scroll bar on portable touch screen devices. Here's a summary of the key portions of the first and broadest claim in the patent:

  • a portable device with a touch screen display;
  • displaying a portion of a larger document on the display;
  • displaying a vertical bar, not a conventional full-length vertical scroll bar, at the screen's edge;
  • detecting a movement on the display, and scrolling the document accordingly;
  • moving the vertical bar; and
  • ceasing to display the vertical bar ? e.g., after a short period of time.

If you think that claim has the potential to cover most Android devices out there, you may be right. The disappearing vertical bar has been a feature in Android going back to at least version 2.3. Below are side-by-side comparison shots highlighting such a vertical bar in use in iOS (left) and Android (right) ? just prior to its disappearance:

ios_android_scrollbar_comparison_560.jpg

We don't have any idea how Apple will use this patent, if at all, but we do know it's been rather fond of asserting other patents in its portfolio relating to touch and scrolling features. On the other hand, there's always one easy workaround available to all: the traditional full screen vertical scroll bar that's existed since the dawn of graphical user interfaces. Only time will tell, but we'll certainly keep an eye out to see if this patent shows up in one of the many ongoing patent battles between Apple and Android OEMs.

Source: The Verge

Apple will kill itself with all these dumba** patents.

Agreed - eventually they're going to step on one too many toes and **** off a few key third party vendors. The problem right now is that there really isn't an alternative to iOS/iPhone with the high number of people buying stuff from the AppStore but I'd say once Windows Phone 8 is released things will start changing (Android has high number but a crapy number who actually purchase things through the Android application store thus many third party software vendors wonder whether it is worth the effort). Apple spending its time going after Android will be a wasted effort because I could see Windows Phone 8 doing to Apple what Windows did to Apple back in the 90's when Apple rested on its laurels (yes, they had AU/X - a UNIX operating system with a Mac GUI but they killed it off in favour of what is known today as 'classic') where the desktop developer base will be leveraged to produce applications for Windows Phone 8.

Back to patents - I really have to ask at what point is there going to be a tipping point where software patents will be thrown out entirely because from what I see from Apple's patents these are ideas that don't even pass the sniff test on casual glance as the description. They're patents for existing technologies or the bloody obvious - it is becoming ridiculous these days.

To be honest they kinda have to patent it, otherwise some other company will come around and patent it themselves. I just wish we lived in a world free of software patents

Can you patent something that others have already been using and can easily prove they have had it before X company files the patent?

As for all these design and interface patents are really ****ing me off and make me hate Apple more and more each day. I like some of their products, but I hate them as a company. Steve Jobs himself basically said he saw Xerox GUI interface and wanted to make his own and better. So he did. Now Android did something similar, and expanding and making it better, then Steve gets so offended that its a stolen product and is out to destroy them. It's only ok if he does it. But Apple has to try and protect themselves and keep as much money rolling in going forward since their Visionary is gone and in a few years we will see if they can continue to grow.

Because it's "cool" to bash Apple for doing the same things that other companies do.

In all due respects - Apple started off as the underdog that people cheerlead for and even when they were growing rapidly people still liked and admired them. Want to know where everything came unstuck? it can be traced back to the 'Think Secret' and everything went down hill from there. Add to that the lack of communication, unwillingness to own up to mistakes, unwillingness to address design defects in a way that actually FIXES them rather than prolongs the problem (replacing defective motherboards with new motherboards but containing the same GPU with the same design fault ala nVidia 8400M/8600M fiasco). As I said, the hate didn't happen over night but was something that was built up over several years to what you see today.

You got to wonder if the patent office just approves forms as they receive them, without even reviewing them to their fullest extent.

The patent system is broken, and big companies take advantage of it (not just Apple, but I think they are one of the worst), effectively killing off any means of competition - even from the small business owner.

It's called a cross licening deal, and far less nefarius than a pact.

Couldn't come up with the term at the time. In the end however Apple, Microsoft, RIM, etc. did it to have a lot more leverage against the Android camp and focus on them instead of also on each other. In that sense it's very much a pact.

Couldn't come up with the term at the time. In the end however Apple, Microsoft, RIM, etc. did it to have a lot more leverage against the Android camp and focus on them instead of also on each other. In that sense it's very much a pact.

err, if I remember correctly Google said no to joining them (assuming we're both talking about the same thing).

https://twitter.com/fxshaw/status/98932077327691776/photo/1/large

http://www.tech.sc/google-apple-microsoft-novell-patents-lawsuit-android/

seems to me like Google just didn't wanna share.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!