iPad prototype from early 2000s revealed in Jony Ive deposition


Recommended Posts

iPad prototype from early 2000s revealed in Jony Ive deposition

7595358592_db30160880_z_large_verge_medium_landscape.jpg

After the iPad launched, Steve Jobs eventually revealed that Apple actually started development on what would become the iPad prior to its work on the iPhone ? but we're now getting some details on just how long it was in development. Network World recently got its hands on portions of a deposition Apple designer Jony Ive gave at Samsung's request this past December, and he revealed that Apple was working on tablet prototypes "sometime between 2002 and 2004." What's more, the documents contained some grainy but revealing photos of a tablet computer prototype known as the "035 mockup or prototype" which Jony Ive dates to that same early-2000's period.

The pictures themselves show a device remarkably similar to what eventually became the iPad in 2010, but with a significantly thicker body ? it looks almost like the bottom half of an iBook attached to the more familiar iPad front. There's no "home" button to speak of, and there's a slit at the bottom that could be a marker for the iPad's eventual 30-pin connection port. While the design clearly changed over the ensuing eight years, its pretty remarkable how much of the iPad's form factor was set in stone so long before it launched. While there's no screen size listed in these documents, it certainly appears to be quite close to the tablet that so many are using today.

7595358350_a050a0d25b_z.jpg

Source: The Verge

  • Like 3
While the design clearly changed over the ensuing eight years, its pretty remarkable how much of the iPad's form factor was set in stone so long before it launched. While there's no screen size listed in these documents, it certainly appears to be quite close to the tablet that so many are using today.

A rectangle?

  • Like 1

You and the people who liked your post never heard of a photocopier, that much is clear.

Crappy photocopier thats for sure. I have copied images like that several times before on a copier and they came out better quality than that.

I am sure better photos will be leaked eventually.

Crappy photocopier thats for sure. I have copied images like that several times before on a copier and they came out better quality than that.

I am sure better photos will be leaked eventually.

All it takes is a super old photocopier in the court that runs on eco mode (sensible) that scans docs, that are already copies.

This effect can be multiplied when using text mode instead of text&graphic or graphic mode.

You know, Apple's interest is not necessarily to publish HQ marketing pictures here.

Glassed Silver:mac

All it takes is a super old photocopier in the court that runs on eco mode (sensible) that scans docs, that are already copies.

This effect can be multiplied when using text mode instead of text&graphic or graphic mode.

You know, Apple's interest is not necessarily to publish HQ marketing pictures here.

Glassed Silver:mac

Well, I would think these would be some pretty nice courts with new equipment considering the parties involved. Wonder if an old photo was pulled out of a cabinet some place that was copied with old tech. Who knows.

Well, I would think these would be some pretty nice courts with new equipment considering the parties involved. Wonder if an old photo was pulled out of a cabinet some place that was copied with old tech. Who knows.

You'd wonder what kind of old junk printers/copiers you can find in "noble" places... :laugh:

Glassed Silver:mac

Crappy photocopier thats for sure. I have copied images like that several times before on a copier and they came out better quality than that.

Copies tend to degrade quickly when they're copies of copies. Beyond that there is age, brand, type etc.

Copies tend to degrade quickly when they're copies of copies. Beyond that there is age, brand, type etc.

Yeah, It's like the Asgard from Stargate SG-1... They were basically copies of copies until they became so degraded that they died out as a race.

post-4583-0-81006600-1342659481_thumb.jp

Crazy how thick it is now compared to tablets nowadays but for a device that is a decade old, it's certainly a piece of remarkable engineering by Apple.

Going by the other pictures of the display on the prototype, looks like it had tiny vents for heat dissipation around the bezel?

Source: BuzzFeed

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • According to Microsoft, Cause: One of the drivers controlling the device notified the operating system that the device failed in some manner.   https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/error-codes-in-device-manager-in-windows-524e9e89-4dee-8883-0afa-6bca0456324e
    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!