Recommended Posts

Budman - Thanks for doing that for me, i have disabled your account for now, always handy to have it there just incase i need any help in the future.

I am just trying to find a client to use for the Mac and then i will give it a go.

Next job once i verify that the connection works is to setup the shares i require, when i am connected via VPN i am right in thinking that i should be able to Remote into computers on my network?

Yes once your in, you should be able to access anything on your network just like you were there, just a bit slower. You might have to use IP, or fqdn to access - you didn't have netbios enabled.

check out that http://www.thesparklabs.com/viscosity/ client - its for mac. I don't think its free though.

You might have to change your lan rules to be able to access stuff? I didn't look at them, I pinged your .250 box see my post with output of that, it answered. So sure you should be able to remote desktop to anything.

You might have to set any host firewalls to allow access from your vpn network that 10.0.200.

the ca can be exported via the export package, if you grab the archive it will have all the keys you need, and the ca - if you grab the inline it will be imbedded into the .opvn file Or you can download it from your Certificate manager on pfsense - but I would suggest you just grab it with the archive off the export package.

I would have to double check, but I believe the .p12 file in the archive is what your talking about.

edit: I am going to have to refresh my memory on need of the ca key, are you using it for the viscosity client? If you grab the viscisity bundle off the export, I just checked downloading that from mine and it includes ca.crt

edit2: Ok I just grabbed the inline off of mine, and yeah CA is there

<ca>

-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----

MIIEQTCCAymgAwIBAgIBADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADB4MQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzER

MA8GA1UECBMISWxsaW5vaXMxEzARBgNVBAcTClNjaGF1bWJ1cmcxDTALBgNVBAoT

BGhvbWUxIDAeBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEWpvaG5wb3pAZ21haWwuY29tMRAwDgYDVQQD

<snipped>

7QG5X5kQj05axywyl61SO3RDYkphMT3NwKU3tn2irVEo3JrF7pTCgAn1MqdXk4Di

ilERPsVaWREzJRQEl2jFQify+ttvNg6BGhlJDtKu9IxkOanoBUI8VNRXFs7QxSYs

vI2JufYfxGbw7SSAw3r0r8DGjLbVbhaz9/98RcNOvz9yThPAuA==

-----END CERTIFICATE-----

</ca>

edit: Yeah just double checked that .p12 file has all the crts in it, the CA is in there. Which is why you don't see a ca.crt it defaults to using that - I think you can change that setting though.. let me look

edit: ok from quick look from the gui it doesn't look like you can change that setting for openvpn - but that .p12 file has the private key, the local cert and the ca cert in it.

YES!

I finally have it working, i have managed to remote into the network from my laptop, i have just attempted to remote into my weather station .250 which also worked.

Need to setup my shares and see if i can get them to work next, might need some help with firewall rules though if you would be so kind.

are you running host firewalls on your other devices? if so you would have to allow traffic on the ports you want from the 10.0.200 network. Also I have changed my pfsense lan rule to be any vs lan net. I was having issues doing something, which I don't recall exactly what now with vpn clients, and changing it to any for the lan interface rules fixed it.

post-14624-0-08087500-1343836462.jpg

See my note and how the lan source is * vs lan net, I don't recall exactly why now though. Something was not working, I would have to set it back to see what doesn't work to refresh my memory. But I do recall changing source for something I was trying to do - which now works, just don't recall what it was ;)

edit: as to shares working over the vpn, yeah work just fine - you might want to allow netbios on your openvpn config. And most likely have to auth, but see I am here at work, and I can access shares off my home workstation

D:\&gt;net view \\i5-w7
System error 5 has occurred.

Access is denied.

D:\&gt;net use \\i5-w7\ipc$ /u:i5-w7\budman
The password or user name is invalid for \\i5-w7\ipc$.

Enter the password for 'i5-w7\budman' to connect to 'i5-w7':
The command completed successfully.

D:\&gt;net view \\i5-w7
Shared resources at \\i5-w7

Share name   Type   Used as  Comment
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deskjet6500  Print		   HP Deskjet 6500 Series
test		 Disk
The command completed successfully.

Just had to auth - since my workstation is not using a budman account ;) with same password.

edit: Also what are the details of your weatherstation - I have been thinking of setting one up, curious what yours is and what you do with it, etc. etc..

Im running ipv6, those that breaks it up.. Se your rule above your block from source 192.168.33.252, that is your lan allow.

I don't see how that block is working though? because 192.168.33.252 falls into your lan net, and would be allowed access before it hits the block. If you want to block that IP from using the internet on tcp, then you need to put that above your lan net rule.

And you really have duplicate rules there, one with lan net as source (which is your 192.168.33.0/24) and then that last rule which is any any. And your rules for 45631 and 21 are also not needed since they would fall under that lan net rule. Unless they were coming from different network than your lan net?

Rules go down in order from top, first rule that hits is one that is applied - be it allowed or blocked. Notice in my lan rules the ones for .41 address - I allow it access only to the websense stuff, then I block its access for anything else! So if say .23 comes it, he goes past all those rules until he hits my allow rule.

Again, not sure why you have 2 rules there

Unless you have something with UDP going on, you let anything out TCP. Then next rule is anything *, so that would include tcp and udp coming from your lan net can go anywhere.

You really only need one rule, not now sure on the details - but like I said for something I was trying to do with vpn, I changed the default rule from lan net to *, which kind of like the rule you have above the lan net rule, only you change proto to TCP only - not sure why?

Again, not sure why you have 2 rules there

Unless you have something with UDP going on, you let anything out TCP. Then next rule is anything *, so that would include tcp and udp coming from your lan net can go anywhere.

I have removed this, see my updated post below.

You really only need one rule, not now sure on the details - but like I said for something I was trying to do with vpn, I changed the default rule from lan net to *, which kind of like the rule you have above the lan net rule, only you change proto to TCP only - not sure why?

I know what had happened here, when i was reading your rules table i saw that it said IPV4* i got confused and thought that this was something that it wasn't, it wasn't until later that i found out you were running IPV6 that is why you got them options. I now notice that the IPV4 on my setup is just * as i am not running IPV6.

post-185680-0-41001300-1343911852_thumb.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Of course the problem was Secure Boot's new certificates. Install media created by the official Media Creation Tool is already signed with a valid certificate from Microsoft, so maybe that certificate isn't "up-to-date" enough for machines with the new ones installed in the UEFI. There's really no other logical explanation.
    • Here is how I fixed Windows 11 not booting after clean installation by Taras Buria Story time. A couple of weeks ago, I experienced a very odd thing with my computers. I was trying to reinstall Windows 11 on my primary device, and everything was going smoothly until the installer performed the first restart. After that, my computer entered the boot disk selection screen instead of continuing the setup process. Huh, that's odd, said I, and selected Windows Boot Manager only to see it fall back into the same screen right away. Then I tried booting from the USB drive with the same result—the PC kept returning to the boot device selection screen, and removing the drive would send my PC to UEFI, again, with no way to launch Windows 11. I fired up my spare laptop, which has been sitting unused for quite a while, to see if I am dealing with a defective USB drive. Nope, Windows 11 installed and started without issues. After trying another drive and checking all the possible settings in UEFI, I decided to try disabling Secure Boot. Lo and behold, Windows 11 started as it should have been in the first place, continued the setup process, and reached the initial setup screen. Victory! After I finished the setup and applied all updates, I re-enabled Secure Boot, and Windows 11 started without issues. Some time later, I tried reinstalling Windows 11 on my laptop only to experience similar issues, with UEFI claiming a Secure Boot violation. I checked whether the drive works on my main PC, and yes, it installed Windows 11 without errors. I scratched my head, went to UEFI, turned off Secure Boot, and installed Windows 11 without issues. After that, I enabled Secure Boot. Note: I used the official Media Creation Tool app for my USB drive. Also, UEFI was properly configured for Windows 11, including no Legacy Mode, a GPT-partitioned drive, and TPM and Secure Boot enabled. From my experience, if you are dealing with similar symptoms, I recommend two things: If you use old Windows 11 install media, create a new one with the latest Windows 11 release, especially if you know your PC already has the latest Secure Boot certificates. If you cannot create a new one, turn off Secure Boot, complete the installation, download all available updates, and then re-enable Secure Boot in UEFI. Note that you need to turn off Secure Boot after installing Windows 11. Otherwise, the installer won't run, claiming a hardware requirements mismatch. I believe the problem hides in Secure Boot certificates that expire this month. Microsoft is currently rolling out new certificates, and maybe a mismatch was causing these issues for both of my systems. I am out of my depth to make a definitive statement; this article is flagged as "Opinion," as I only share my experience and some tips on how to fix the problem. If some of you possess deeper knowledge and understanding of the situation, please share it in the comments. As for everyone else struggling with computers not booting after a clean install, the two steps above should get you out of the pickle.
    • I gave the tool a chance the other day to make a USB. An hour later it was stuck at 0% downloaded. I downloaded the official ISO, downloaded Rufus, and made the USB myself in 15 min.
    • <Moved to software discussion and support> I've got fond memories of Winamp. Changing the skins, the different visualisations etc. But now I just need a simple music player. MSN messenger would be another one, MSN Messenger Plus (I think?) offered so many different plugins. But again, it probably wouldn't work for me these days. And then there is miRC. i think it's still going these days, but lord i had fun with that back in the day. Now it's mostly stuff like Discord, WhatsApp group chats, Signal, Telegram... /me is showing his age...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!