Recommended Posts

Budman - Thanks for doing that for me, i have disabled your account for now, always handy to have it there just incase i need any help in the future.

I am just trying to find a client to use for the Mac and then i will give it a go.

Next job once i verify that the connection works is to setup the shares i require, when i am connected via VPN i am right in thinking that i should be able to Remote into computers on my network?

Yes once your in, you should be able to access anything on your network just like you were there, just a bit slower. You might have to use IP, or fqdn to access - you didn't have netbios enabled.

check out that http://www.thesparklabs.com/viscosity/ client - its for mac. I don't think its free though.

You might have to change your lan rules to be able to access stuff? I didn't look at them, I pinged your .250 box see my post with output of that, it answered. So sure you should be able to remote desktop to anything.

You might have to set any host firewalls to allow access from your vpn network that 10.0.200.

the ca can be exported via the export package, if you grab the archive it will have all the keys you need, and the ca - if you grab the inline it will be imbedded into the .opvn file Or you can download it from your Certificate manager on pfsense - but I would suggest you just grab it with the archive off the export package.

I would have to double check, but I believe the .p12 file in the archive is what your talking about.

edit: I am going to have to refresh my memory on need of the ca key, are you using it for the viscosity client? If you grab the viscisity bundle off the export, I just checked downloading that from mine and it includes ca.crt

edit2: Ok I just grabbed the inline off of mine, and yeah CA is there

<ca>

-----BEGIN CERTIFICATE-----

MIIEQTCCAymgAwIBAgIBADANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADB4MQswCQYDVQQGEwJVUzER

MA8GA1UECBMISWxsaW5vaXMxEzARBgNVBAcTClNjaGF1bWJ1cmcxDTALBgNVBAoT

BGhvbWUxIDAeBgkqhkiG9w0BCQEWEWpvaG5wb3pAZ21haWwuY29tMRAwDgYDVQQD

<snipped>

7QG5X5kQj05axywyl61SO3RDYkphMT3NwKU3tn2irVEo3JrF7pTCgAn1MqdXk4Di

ilERPsVaWREzJRQEl2jFQify+ttvNg6BGhlJDtKu9IxkOanoBUI8VNRXFs7QxSYs

vI2JufYfxGbw7SSAw3r0r8DGjLbVbhaz9/98RcNOvz9yThPAuA==

-----END CERTIFICATE-----

</ca>

edit: Yeah just double checked that .p12 file has all the crts in it, the CA is in there. Which is why you don't see a ca.crt it defaults to using that - I think you can change that setting though.. let me look

edit: ok from quick look from the gui it doesn't look like you can change that setting for openvpn - but that .p12 file has the private key, the local cert and the ca cert in it.

YES!

I finally have it working, i have managed to remote into the network from my laptop, i have just attempted to remote into my weather station .250 which also worked.

Need to setup my shares and see if i can get them to work next, might need some help with firewall rules though if you would be so kind.

are you running host firewalls on your other devices? if so you would have to allow traffic on the ports you want from the 10.0.200 network. Also I have changed my pfsense lan rule to be any vs lan net. I was having issues doing something, which I don't recall exactly what now with vpn clients, and changing it to any for the lan interface rules fixed it.

post-14624-0-08087500-1343836462.jpg

See my note and how the lan source is * vs lan net, I don't recall exactly why now though. Something was not working, I would have to set it back to see what doesn't work to refresh my memory. But I do recall changing source for something I was trying to do - which now works, just don't recall what it was ;)

edit: as to shares working over the vpn, yeah work just fine - you might want to allow netbios on your openvpn config. And most likely have to auth, but see I am here at work, and I can access shares off my home workstation

D:\&gt;net view \\i5-w7
System error 5 has occurred.

Access is denied.

D:\&gt;net use \\i5-w7\ipc$ /u:i5-w7\budman
The password or user name is invalid for \\i5-w7\ipc$.

Enter the password for 'i5-w7\budman' to connect to 'i5-w7':
The command completed successfully.

D:\&gt;net view \\i5-w7
Shared resources at \\i5-w7

Share name   Type   Used as  Comment
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Deskjet6500  Print		   HP Deskjet 6500 Series
test		 Disk
The command completed successfully.

Just had to auth - since my workstation is not using a budman account ;) with same password.

edit: Also what are the details of your weatherstation - I have been thinking of setting one up, curious what yours is and what you do with it, etc. etc..

Im running ipv6, those that breaks it up.. Se your rule above your block from source 192.168.33.252, that is your lan allow.

I don't see how that block is working though? because 192.168.33.252 falls into your lan net, and would be allowed access before it hits the block. If you want to block that IP from using the internet on tcp, then you need to put that above your lan net rule.

And you really have duplicate rules there, one with lan net as source (which is your 192.168.33.0/24) and then that last rule which is any any. And your rules for 45631 and 21 are also not needed since they would fall under that lan net rule. Unless they were coming from different network than your lan net?

Rules go down in order from top, first rule that hits is one that is applied - be it allowed or blocked. Notice in my lan rules the ones for .41 address - I allow it access only to the websense stuff, then I block its access for anything else! So if say .23 comes it, he goes past all those rules until he hits my allow rule.

Again, not sure why you have 2 rules there

Unless you have something with UDP going on, you let anything out TCP. Then next rule is anything *, so that would include tcp and udp coming from your lan net can go anywhere.

You really only need one rule, not now sure on the details - but like I said for something I was trying to do with vpn, I changed the default rule from lan net to *, which kind of like the rule you have above the lan net rule, only you change proto to TCP only - not sure why?

Again, not sure why you have 2 rules there

Unless you have something with UDP going on, you let anything out TCP. Then next rule is anything *, so that would include tcp and udp coming from your lan net can go anywhere.

I have removed this, see my updated post below.

You really only need one rule, not now sure on the details - but like I said for something I was trying to do with vpn, I changed the default rule from lan net to *, which kind of like the rule you have above the lan net rule, only you change proto to TCP only - not sure why?

I know what had happened here, when i was reading your rules table i saw that it said IPV4* i got confused and thought that this was something that it wasn't, it wasn't until later that i found out you were running IPV6 that is why you got them options. I now notice that the IPV4 on my setup is just * as i am not running IPV6.

post-185680-0-41001300-1343911852_thumb.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Server Summit had a heap of announcements, ADCS changes are baller.
    • Nice, hope they *finally* fixed the issue with the NTFS driver where the system would completely brick during large file copies using the built in driver. It's been broken for years requiring me to use the older, slower, NTFS-3G FUSE driver.
    • Windows 11 KB5094126 BSODing, freezing, forcing BitLocker lockout, breaks OneDrive, and more by Sayan Sen Microsoft released Windows 11 KB5094126 and KB5093998 last week as the latest Patch Tuesday updates. Following that the company also published the accompanying dynamic updates under KB5094149, KB5095971, and KB5094156. While Microsoft has so far not acknowledged any major problems with the release, some users online are running into problems. These range from OneDrive and Dropbox access issues, BitLocker recovery lockouts, to blue screens and BSODs. The most common one seems to be happening with HP systems wherein affected users say they hit 0xc0430001 BSOD (blue screen of death) error code after the KB5094126 update. We wonder if this could be related to the recent bug we covered on HP devices wherein the ongoing Secure Boot certificate updates are leading to similar issues. While we are not certain, users affected by this issue likely need to ensure that the boot.stl file is included on the installation media (such as a USB installer or ISO), if the above-mentioned dynamic updates are deployed. If this file is missing, computers may fail to boot from the installation media and could display the error 0xc0430001. This STL file is used by Secure Boot to verify that the boot files are trusted, so it must match the same Windows version and system architecture. To ensure the file is included, Microsoft recommends using the Update WinPE script, which automatically updates the image and handles the required files. Alternatively, you can manually copy the boot.stl file from the Windows\Boot\EFI folder on a Windows device and place it in the matching folder on your installation media before deploying the updated image. Aside from blue screening some users also note their systems have been freezing following the update. This could be happening to Lenovo PCs specifically. In the case of the OneDrive and Dropbox access issues, a user figured out that there could be a conflict with UAC. He explained: "Okay, so I did some digging, and in our environment KB5094126 breaks OneDrive and Dropbox in Explorer. I went through all our GPOs and found out that the combination of disabling UAC and having my user being a local admin breaks OneDrive in Explorer. ... If I enable UAC again, then it works, even with KB5094126 still installed." Hopefully, Microsoft will look into these issues. Source: Microsoft forum (link1, link2, link3, link4), Reddit (link1, link2, link3, link4)
    • It is when it's a desktop in my house though for a PC that's lightly used and not really important when it is. If it was a laptop, it would be a different story. The real solution is varied and begins starting at post #22 in that thread.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      90
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!