Recommended Posts

Overall I don't think the status bar is necessary in Metro. I do wish that the clock was easier to show. I dislike swiping to the side as it is, I know there is a keyboard command but since I don't use Win8 full-time I haven't forced myself to use it. If you miss a notification though it will show on the live tile of that app so you should see it there and it can handle many more things than a status bar could.

Plus a status bar takes up too much screen space. True you could auto-hide but then still have to have a way to activate it, and we already have an auto-hide bar in the charms.

Excited about the RTM though and to start using Win8 full time.

You don't need a whole 'bar' concept to embed the 2-3 bits we are asking for and then let apps replace gadgets for the rest. The lock screen has slots, why doesn't StartScreen?

I shouldn't need to install a clock app just to be able to see the time/date.

It was a choice they made between the 'elegance' of a pure fullscreen app, and the usability/functionality of showing more information to the user.

You can see this choice being made all over the OS, where looks and 'beauty' have been emphasized. The other word I keep seeing is 'consistency', which means 'make everything work like a tablet' since that's their primary target.

Why would I want to tap to see if it's there if it can just be there? It's minimum screen real estate for a critical task -- informing you of stuff that changed (new emails, IMs, any other notifications), and Microsoft tried really hard to make this as complicated and convoluted as possible.

That's exactly what live tiles are for. Why would I want all the notifications duplicated into a separate bar on the screen taking up more screen real estate?

You really believe that FMH? Are you saying they didn't observe how consumers use their PCs previously? ;) Why does WP have it again on a much smaller screen?

The Charms swipe is still terrible, I really hope it acts like the other two hotcorners on release.

You really believe that FMH? Are you saying they didn't observe how consumers use their PCs previously? ;) Why does WP have it again on a much smaller screen?

The Charms swipe is still terrible, I really hope it acts like the other two hotcorners on release.

A correction, if I may. Windows Phone's status bar is hidden by default. Devs can, depending on their app, choose to have it always show or can give the user an option to tick to always show.

However, as the default from the Start Screen, or any app, to see the status bar, you must tap the top of the screen. The bar drops down and is visible for approximately ten seconds before "retracting" back into the top of the screen.

They chose to make the Charms Bar in Windows 8 the equivalent of this, but with added commands, of course.

You guys, WP only shows the time by default, you still have to swipe down from the very top to show you the rest of the stuff on the "status bar". So in the end, it's not all that different from how they've done it in Windows 8, a swipe to the charms brings up the, what I'll call, status box in this case.

As for the desktop, the systray is there, and the desktop, it shows you the same info the pop-up status box does all the time you're in the desktop. Now in the future, who knows what they'll add or change. We could see a status bar at the top on the start screen in Windows 9 or SP1 for Win8 even.

A correction, if I may. Windows Phone's status bar is hidden by default. Devs can, depending on their app, choose to have it always show or can give the user an option to tick to always show.

However, as the default from the Start Screen, or any app, to see the status bar, you must tap the top of the screen. The bar drops down and is visible for approximately ten seconds before "retracting" back into the top of the screen.

They chose to make the Charms Bar in Windows 8 the equivalent of this, but with added commands, of course.

Well I think the thread title has been answered. Metro does have status bars and status display, they are just not always visible, but are visible on request from the user.

That's exactly what live tiles are for. Why would I want all the notifications duplicated into a separate bar on the screen taking up more screen real estate?

Live tiles do a horrible job as notifications because they are ever-present, while notifications in status bar would pop up only when there's something new to notify you of. You don't have to go through dozens of tiles and try and figure out what's changed (which is also made much harder because some live tiles are animated), you simply see there's something new. Not to mention that the status bar is always visible, while you have to manually switch to the start screen to go over live tiles and see if there's anything new. Awfully made, when it could have been so simple.

Live tiles is exactly what iOS had (except it was a more limited version) before they added the Notification Center. Live tiles do nothing when you're in an app. Or when you come back to your pc after a while and want to see what you missed.

iOS has never had anything like live tiles.

In Win8, real-time notifications come via "toasts" regardless of what app you're in. The tiles let you easily see what you've missed (or updates which weren't worth popping a toast for).

Most people don't give a crap about "status" bars; they don't even know what the icons are besides maybe signal strength, power, and time. On a desktop, two of those are entire pointless. Looking at average users, they care for two things: (1) getting to the internet and (2) launching applications. Everything else is for "techies".

iOS has never had anything like live tiles.

In Win8, real-time notifications come via "toasts" regardless of what app you're in. The tiles let you easily see what you've missed (or updates which weren't worth popping a toast for).

Which is why I said 'more limited version'. In practice, if you see the number next to an app on iOS you know it has new content. The only thing live tiles add is showing a snippet preview, you still need to open the app. 'Tiles let you easily see' only for tiles you actually notice. Its not a substitute for a true Notification center.

Why do people have to defend every single thing about Win 8 as if its the best design ever.

Which is why I said 'more limited version'. In practice, if you see the number next to an app on iOS you know it has new content. The only thing live tiles add is showing a snippet preview, you still need to open the app. 'Tiles let you easily see' only for tiles you actually notice. Its not a substitute for a true Notification center.

Why do people have to defend every single thing about Win 8 as if its the best design ever.

Just to clear up something. You will get more than a snippet from Live Tiles and depending on the app and developer, won't need to open the app. For example, on my phone, I can see game scores for up to 4 teams that I choose, Stock Market, my personal stocks, and my stock portfolio.

I have no need to open those apps if that's all the info I want to see. Now, you would open an app if you read a news headline and wanted to actually read the story, as another example. Again, it depends on the nature of the app, how much info. you need at that moment and how the dev codes the Live Tile.

Why do people have to criticise every single thing about Win 8 as if it's the worst design ever.

No one is doing that. Everyone agrees its a fast OS with a lot of nice improvements. Almost all the criticism is the behavior on non-touch devices and MS or the defenders hasn't given a single reason why Metro on desktop is better.

Just to clear up something. You will get more than a snippet from Live Tiles and depending on the app and developer, won't need to open the app. For example, on my phone, I can see game scores for up to 4 teams that I choose, Stock Market, my personal stocks, and my stock portfolio.

I have no need to open those apps if that's all the info I want to see. Now, you would open an app if you read a news headline and wanted to actually read the story, as another example. Again, it depends on the nature of the app, how much info. you need at that moment and how the dev codes the Live Tile.

While this is true, the same can be accomplished using widgets. Which could give all this useful info on the Desktop as well. Live tiles aren't something new, just a rebranding. They make a lot of sense on a phone, esp because they unified apps (single Messaging, Mail, task based apps). No such thing exists on the pc.

Why not allow me to place a live tile on the desktop and have it launch an app? No reason at all. They just want you to never use the Desktop and have basically ignored it.

[. . .] MS or the defenders hasn't given a single reason why Metro on desktop is better.

No, you just haven't heard a reason as to why it is better for you. I and many others have explained, quite a few times, why the Metro experience is better for us on a Desktop PC than the Windows 7 experience :)

  • Like 1

No, you just haven't heard a reason as to why it is better for you. I and many others have explained, quite a few times, why the Metro experience is better for us on a Desktop PC than the Windows 7 experience :)

True. True.

No one is doing that. Everyone agrees its a fast OS with a lot of nice improvements. Almost all the criticism is the behavior on non-touch devices and MS or the defenders hasn't given a single reason why Metro on desktop is better.

I disagree. Most of the criticisms I see are mindless and inane and I can't say that I've seen many haters praising the OS for anything.

I'll tell you why I think Windows 8 and Metro are an improvement over previous versions. Large numbers of Windows users (including the majority of casual users) don't use their PCs for more than just internet browsing. For them Metro is a simple interface that allows them to make the most out of their PCs and also simplifies the transition to a tablet. For people who use their PCs for productivity the desktop works exactly the same way as it always has and the Start menu is improved to eliminate the problems caused by trying to squeeze too much onto a tiny menu.

  • Like 3

While this is true, the same can be accomplished using widgets. Which could give all this useful info on the Desktop as well. Live tiles aren't something new, just a rebranding. They make a lot of sense on a phone, esp because they unified apps (single Messaging, Mail, task based apps). No such thing exists on the pc.

Why not allow me to place a live tile on the desktop and have it launch an app? No reason at all. They just want you to never use the Desktop and have basically ignored it.

Actually, they're quite different from widgets. Widgets are actual app code that runs in a small window all the time. They're really bad for battery life and general system performance. Widgets can also look like anything they want, and thus clash with each other or the system (and this gets even harder when you start talking about new OS versions). They're also more complex from UX standpoint. They can have multiple hit targets, and they don't necessarily have any affiliation with a particular app. This makes managing them more complex.

Tiles aim to address those problems and others. The whole Start screen is designed to be hyper efficient for both battery and performance, and to maintain complete user confidence in it. An important step in accomplishing this is that absolutely no app code is involved in displaying it.

That's not to mention that tiles are far, far easier to work from with for developers versus authoring widgets.

  • Like 1

Which is why I said 'more limited version'. In practice, if you see the number next to an app on iOS you know it has new content. The only thing live tiles add is showing a snippet preview, you still need to open the app. 'Tiles let you easily see' only for tiles you actually notice. Its not a substitute for a true Notification center.

Why do people have to defend every single thing about Win 8 as if its the best design ever.

While I understand your point and somewhat tend to agree, the iOS count are no way like Live tiles and most of the times, you don't need to open app.

Weather: no need whatsoever. in Windows 8, you can even set it to show on lock screen

People: On windows phone, a group tile is constantly updating with latest update from that group. Again, I only open it if I want to call someone (or text or post message etc.)

Me: Updates showing latest notification or count if there are more than one.

Photos: Rotates between pictures

Calendar: Don't need to open app most of the time

There is nothing like this on iOS or Android. Yes Android has widgets but they have limitations(as to how many you can fit on a screen) due to lack of UI consistency.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!