Windows 8 is the first OS that made me downgrade


Recommended Posts

I'm not using RTM but every time I boot back into 7 I just want to get back to 8. I'm a fan of the start screen, just their choice in desktop UI design but I still think 8 is an improvement over 7. Linux will never be a viable option except for the very technically inclined and those that just browse the web and check email. I don't think we'll ever see mainstream gaming on Linux. I'd love to see it happen though because I'm a big fan of Linux and open source.

I just remembered... people hate the new GNOME as well... the reason is the same, it tries to replace the old desktop concept with a new one, a new one which is still largely in development and nobody actually knows how should it look like and how should it work before we actually get there... but the good thing is that everything what doesn't works as well as it should get replaced in the future, and the only way to get somewhere is to try out new things, new concepts and to learn in the process what work and what doesn't work.

?

I am sure that 80% of the things introduced in the new GNOME and Windows 8 are here to stay, and the remaining 20% which can be improved or replaced with something better right away will go away as soon as possible. Of course with time those 80% will be replaced as well, just not in the next 5 years but certainly in the next 50 or 500 ;)

No it doesn't. There's no start menu, the themes have been changed, and there are changes to explorer.

None of them actually make any changes to the way you use your stuff in Windows desktop on 7 or 8.

Win7 made me migrate to Mac OSX. I couldn't be happier.

Here's a cookie.

Off topic, but one thing I haven't been able to find out yet, where is the "run" bar? In xP-7, you had either the run bar, or you could click start->run to run a program. The only way i've found to do it now is to pull up task manager and select run from the menus. Also how do you get the control panel up, besides puling up a window and typing "control panel" in the address bar? those two things are what get me the most, other than that I'm liking server 2012/win8

As for the businesses upgrading to Windows 8.... many of them are still using XP, so they will upgrade because XP won't be capable to serve the new business requirements (to be honest it already can't)... and they will upgrade to Windows 8 not Windows 7, because there is nothing in Windows 8 to stop them using it productively (it's not XP vs. Vista this time).

Businesses using Windows 7 probably will wait for Windows vNext (9), but more than 50% are still using XP and they can't wait another 4 years to upgrade, so Windows 8 will be their natural choice.

Sounds like a disgruntled windows user. I heard 2013 will be the year of the Linux. See you there!

It probably will be, or at least more so than 2012, I've heard so many people saying they'll retreat to Linux because of Windows 8. I'll believe it when I see it though, whenever I see people raging at Windows and it's various faults, they always seem to roll over and keep using it rather than ditching it.

Less than 10 minutes of use will NOT give you an accurate impression of the OS. And it's not the OS's fault that your return key stopped working.

I need to stop coming into these threads, just a bunch of whiners afraid of making the start menu full screen.

Its not the OS's fault that a reboot fixes the problem it exhibited? Im just saying after 10 minutes this is what the OS did to me. please fanboy. you should really stop coming to these threads. The OS is not BAD. Its just vastly different and not a change that is necessitated by current desktops/tablets. I figure once more apps are 'proper' for the OS and more touchscreen laptops make their way it'll all be good. The navigation is much more problematic and less fluid with a mouse than a touchscreen environment. that's what I keep telling myself. I have no idea how to get the addressbar up in IE10 for example.

@SirEvan

Just type "run" into the start screen... same for "control panel"... also, you can have all the apps listed on the start screen just as you had in the start menu... of course if you need something frequently, just pin it to the taskbar or start screen...

No it doesn't. There's no start menu, the themes have been changed, and there are changes to explorer.

So? Just because there's no Start Menu, doesn't mean I can't have multiple windows open, run legacy programs, or work like I would using Windows 7.

Here's a cookie.

Off topic, but one thing I haven't been able to find out yet, where is the "run" bar? In xP-7, you had either the run bar, or you could click start->run to run a program. The only way i've found to do it now is to pull up task manager and select run from the menus. Also how do you get the control panel up, besides puling up a window and typing "control panel" in the address bar? those two things are what get me the most, other than that I'm liking server 2012/win8

Windows key+R, or start and type "ru" and hit enter, or right click and pin it to the taskbar or start menu. Control panel, you can do the same as I have described: when you've searched, right click the icon and pin it. I'm probably missing stuff there, but hey, you could always use Windows key+W to bring up a search under settings related stuff, or use google and find sites like this: http://www.winsupersite.com/article/windows8/windows-8-tip-windows-key-shortcuts-140626

Here's a cookie.

Off topic, but one thing I haven't been able to find out yet, where is the "run" bar? In xP-7, you had either the run bar, or you could click start->run to run a program. The only way i've found to do it now is to pull up task manager and select run from the menus. Also how do you get the control panel up, besides puling up a window and typing "control panel" in the address bar? those two things are what get me the most, other than that I'm liking server 2012/win8

Winkey + run still works (unless you want a mouse alternative - read below)

Winkey + X or right click in the lower left corner will give you the faster link to control panel (unless you pin it obviously)

This "power user menu" also has shortcuts to many other stuff including Run.

In short,

Control Panel = Winkey + x + p or Right click in lower left

Run = Winkey + x + r orWinkey + r or Right click in lower left

@SirEvan

Just type "run" into the start screen... same for "control panel"... also, you can have all the apps listed on the start screen just as you had in the start menu... of course if you need something frequently, just pin it to the taskbar or start screen...

Windows key+R, or start and type "ru" and hit enter, or right click and pin it to the taskbar or start menu. Control panel, you can do the same as I have described: when you've searched, right click the icon and pin it. I'm probably missing stuff there, but hey, you could always use Windows key+W to bring up a search under settings related stuff, or use google and find sites like this: http://www.winsupers...hortcuts-140626

Ahh thanks guys. I figured there'd be something easy, but I've gotten used to the start menu and my hot keys are somewhat forgotten.

You're quick to slam Windows 8, but going by your post, you clearly have no idea what you're even talking about.

Time Machine? File History. Boom.

iCloud? SkyDrive + MicrosoftID. Boom.

iTunes? Xbox Music. Boom.

Any other features you care to slam without knowing what you're talking about?

I would argue they aren't competitive with iCloud iTunes or Time Machine because they are so inferior. Like comparing Notepad to Microsoft Office.

From what I can tell XBOX Music doesn't sell Movies or TV shows like iTunes does. Does it have any Airplay like capability?

What kind of integration does Sky Drive have with the Windows Calendar, Email? Does it sync notes? Does Windows even have Notes or Reminders?

And where is this Windows History thing you speak of? Where has Microsoft hidden this important feature. God this OS is so confused about what it is and overly complicated. How can they both make something so simple as the Metro interface (just a bunch of giant boxes) and at the same time manage to make important things like just backing up your files so difficult? I guess Microsoft finds a way.

Anyway apart from those points at the bottom of my post this OS is rubbish.

I upgraded to XP, Vista and 7 on Day 1. I liked them all. I run Windows Server 2008 R2 on my server currently and before that I ran Windows Server 2003. This is literally the first version of Windows that is so ****ty I won't be upgrading. That is really saying something considering I'm a computer enthusiast and have been using Windows on all my self builds since I began building.

Ahh thanks guys. I figured there'd be something easy, but I've gotten used to the start menu and my hot keys are somewhat forgotten.

Seems that if you don't know the hot-keys your W8 experience is going to be even more problematic. IE10 you right click and go to the wrench and 'view on desktop' and everythings normal again. Seems like a lot of windows 8 features is disabling addons to make Windows 8 become Win 7.

The idea of a computer is to automate as much tasks/work as possible... not really possible in the desktop filled with million little icons and windows paradigm, when you actually trying to simulate your office (desktop) and using the computer as a tool, a computer is not a tool, it is a machine, a machine which CAN and should do many things without your help, so let it do it's job... I understand this is a new concept for many users, but this is where we should move, because the hardware is finally powerful enough to do this.

I don't mind windows 8. It does annoy me that I can't paste things into forum posts a lot of the time or that I never know what time it is because the clock is hidden all the time. Or that I have to switch to IE on the desktop to view flash video. If they fix these problems i'll be pretty happy with it.

Seems that if you don't know the hot-keys your W8 experience is going to be even more problematic

Not necessarily problematic, just clunky. I figure most people who will want to access stuff like Control Panel regularly will either figure out a way, or just Google it. It took me a few days of use and the video on "using Windows 8 like a power user" someone posted on the forums to be at maximum efficiency.

From what I can tell XBOX Music doesn't sell Movies or TV shows like iTunes does. Does it have any Airplay like capability?

You go to XBOX Video to get movies and TV shows. Airplay capability is available in W7 its there in W8 too.

What kind of integration does Sky Drive have with the Windows Calendar, Email? Does it sync notes? Does Windows even have Notes or Reminders?

Those are sync'd, but Sky Drive just refers to personal storage. You go to Outlook.com to see your calender, email, etc. Also, as far as I understand, any WinRT app sync's data with your Microsoft Account.

And where is this Windows History thing you speak of? Where has Microsoft hidden this important feature. God this OS is so confused about what it is and overly complicated. How can they both make something so simple as the Metro interface (just a bunch of giant boxes) and at the same time manage to make important things like just backing up your files so difficult? I guess Microsoft finds a way.

Its in Explorer, where the folders are, look on the ribbon. The reason its there is because you'll want to see the history for a particular folder or file, and you'll start from Explorer. That makes sense to me.

I would argue they aren't competitive with iCloud iTunes or Time Machine because they are so inferior. Like comparing Notepad to Microsoft Office.

From what I can tell XBOX Music doesn't sell Movies or TV shows like iTunes does. Does it have any Airplay like capability?

What kind of integration does Sky Drive have with the Windows Calendar, Email? Does it sync notes? Does Windows even have Notes or Reminders?

And where is this Windows History thing you speak of? Where has Microsoft hidden this important feature. God this OS is so confused about what it is and overly complicated. How can they both make something so simple as the Metro interface (just a bunch of giant boxes) and at the same time manage to make important things like just backing up your files so difficult? I guess Microsoft finds a way.

Anyway apart from those points at the bottom of my post this OS is rubbish.

I upgraded to XP, Vista and 7 on Day 1. I liked them all. I run Windows Server 2008 R2 on my server currently and before that I ran Windows Server 2003. This is literally the first version of Windows that is so ****ty I won't be upgrading. That is really saying something considering I'm a computer enthusiast and have been using Windows on all my self builds since I began building.

I am sorry but why does Windows 8 has to be like OS X? Besides that here is a list,

Xbox Music = iTunes music

Xbox Video = iTunes movies/music video etc.

Calendar/Mail/Messaging/Tasks etc. is all Hotmail/Outlook based.

File History is in control panel where it belongs.

It syncs a whole bunch of stuff across devices, a quick look under Settings would have told you this. But I guess you haven't used it.

AirPlay = PlayTo or DLNA support. I don't use AirPlay so not sure how it compares feature by feature but it's been in Windows since 7 but the support is much improved in this release (with matching update on the Xbox side). DLNA works with all devices including Android except obviously Apple who has gone their own way as usual.

You have lost all credibility in your posts about why Windows 8 is bad compared to XYZ. You apparently haven't bothered to either read about it or use it.

Actually, I used RocketDock for quite a while at one point, so you should start thinking more logically :)

Really? that's the best you can come with? thinking more logically? seriously, you don't know who are speaking with and I will not tell you for the sake of not being an attention ###### :D, go on, continue thinking like that, makes me easy to deceive guys like you :p

Windows 8 is just a start (and tablets has nothing to do with that), it is the first step toward replacing the outdated desktop/windows concept with a new modern UI. Don't get me wrong, the desktop/windows idea was a great thing back in 1980, when neither the hardware nor the software wasn't sophisticated enough for something better. Now this is 2012, the hardware are amazing and software could be much more powerful..., so why stick with an invention which was (great) for another time?

I think you've got the hardware bit around the wrong way. Modern/Metro-style/Windows 8-style apps are essentially full screen programs with low information density and very limited multi-tasking capabilities - moving from a complicated interface with overlapping windows and genuine multi-tasking is a nod to the additional (lower power) platforms that Windows 8 will target. Metro-style apps have their place (MetroTwit for Windows 8 is gorgeous), but I can't really see them as even a first step towards replacing the desktop UI on traditional machines.

Really? that's the best you can come with? thinking more logically? seriously, you don't know who are speaking with and I will not tell you for the sake of not being an attention ###### :D, go on, continue thinking like that, makes me easy to deceive guys like you :p

My post made sense. I could have explained to you why I believe Windows 8 is innovative, if I'd had more time, but I've offered that quite a few times in the past, in other threads, and that post of mine wasn't even attempting to refute your view that Windows 8 isn't innovative: My post was simply pointing out that your assumption isn't logical. Assuming that every single person who believes Windows 8 is innovative hasn't used third-party launching software before is a highly illogical assumption.

Not to mention, I proved you wrong: I believe Windows 8 is innovative, and I previously used RocketDock (among others) for quite a while.

Windows 8 is just a start (and tablets has nothing to do with that), it is the first step toward replacing the outdated desktop/windows concept with a new modern UI. Don't get me wrong, the desktop/windows idea was a great thing back in 1980, when neither the hardware nor the software wasn't sophisticated enough for something better. Now this is 2012, the hardware are amazing and software could be much more powerful..., so why stick with an invention which was (great) for another time?
This is absurd. Just because a concept is newer doesn't mean that it's better. The concept of the wheel dates back to time immemorial, yet you don't hear people saying that the wheel is an outdated concept, and good riddance if we got rid of it.

So why does a windowed concept make sense? Why have so many GUIs from Windows to OS/2 to Mac to XWindows used the windowed concept? Because it's a concept that is very well-suited to multitasking. To the quick and efficient switching between programs. To running multiple programs at the same time. To sharing and exchanging data between programs. None of these newfangled UIs (Android, iOS, Metro) are even remotely suitable to this. What they are suitable for are small form factors where you don't have a lot of screen space and where you have a finger for input.

Natural user interfaces are the future, and multitouch is just a little part of that paradigm. It will take some time to get used to it, but you can't and you shouldn't resist this change... it is like hating the car because you are used to a horse-drawn carriage and now you have to learn new stuff...
Again, this is absurd, and a false comparison. In the case of automobiles, the benefits (more compact, faster, no need to maintain and feed horses, no horsecrap on the streets) greatly outweighed the downsides (back in those days, there were virtually none, since oil was not yet in short supply and we were not yet suffering from increasingly chaotic weather patterns). In the case of touch, the balance between benefits and downsides is not clear-cut. Touch is compact, and the input device is already built into your body, so it's well-suited to phones and tablets. But the mouse and keyboard offer other benefits, like precision, context (a mouse pointer can have multiple states: not over a pixel, over a pixel with no button down, left-button, right-button, middle-button, but a finger has just two states: not over a pixel, or pressed over a pixel), and ergonomics.

Ever tried writing on a chalkboard for a while? Your arms get very sore. The idea ergonomic position is for the arms to be resting on the table, which a keyboard and mouse allows, but an upright touch interface does not. Okay, so lets lay the touch interface down on the table so that your arms could rest. But now you're using it like pen and paper, where you are bending your head down, and after a while, your neck is sore. This is why, ergonomically, the most comfortable position is for the visual output to be vertical, at eye level, and for the input to be horizontal, so that your arms can rest. This also means that in the optimal ergonomic position, you can't be looking at your input. Sounds like a job for keyboard/mouse to me.

And let's not forget all the benefits of a proper keyboard. There's a good reason why the mouse only augmented keyboard input, never replaced it.

Is there a place for multitouch? Sure, when compactness is important and you can't carry a mouse and keyboard around. But there are inherent, unavoidable downsides to it, and it is absolutely absurd to think that it could fully replace less "natural" input methods. Except in Hollywood movies and television, where everyday practicality takes a backseat to eye candy and visual "wow", but frankly, I don't think that Spielberg is a very good designer of actually usable user interfaces.

Hell, you could argue that your legs are "natural" transportation, and it has so many benefits, like, well, it's with you at all times. Let's get rid of this old and outdated concept of the wheel and just use our legs all the time!

One size does not fit all.

Anyway I see that most people don't even realize the real under the hub improvements in Windows 8, like for example the first step to leave Win32 API behind (this is another start) with a modern WinRT API.
There's the API. And then there's the execution of the code. Two very different things. They want to do a new API? Sure, whatever, as long as it's powerful. They want to eliminate natively-compiled code and all the efficiencies (and power) that it can bring in certain circumstances? That's foolish.
Improved security and programming models which will made possible an easy way to utilize the real power of the underlying hardware are also something we shouldn't ignore (multicore, asynchronous, etc...).
Judging from this comment, you're obviously not a programmer. No programming model changes the fact that the programmer still needs to do his legwork to make multithreading work properly.
Not to mention the new idea of "don't interrupt the user" with million stupid things like updates, notifications etc. (which was not a problem when there was only 2 things a week, but now when there is 20 things a day is stupid, annoying and ineffective).
That's great. But... um... how exactly is this related to Metro? Can't a simplification of notifications happen in the absence of Metro? Actually, it has. It used to be that many third-party programs will ask people to update, but since they've learned that many people don't bother to, they now use background services, so the update happens silently, without the user knowing. And, shockingly, this trend happened completely independently of Windows 8.
Another start is the accelerated journey toward the hyper-connected, service oriented, super opportunities generator known as the CLOUD
http://en.wikipedia..../Buzzword_bingo
  • Like 3

My post made sense. I could have explained to you why I believe Windows 8 is innovative, if I'd had more time, but I've offered that quite a few times in the past, in other threads, and that post of mine wasn't even attempting to refute your view that Windows 8 isn't innovative: My post was simply pointing out that your assumption isn't logical. Assuming that every single person who believes Windows 8 is innovative hasn't used third-party launching software before is a highly illogical assumption.

Not to mention, I proved you wrong: I believe Windows 8 is innovative, and I previously used RocketDock (among others) for quite a while.

And I explained a brief story of me and most of the windows oses that have been installed on my computers, with a few experiences and some innovations included, all of this for the sake of explaining my current experience with win8 rtm, Innovative? that's a veeeeery relative term, so much giant for the reality that actually is, the bigger they go, the deeper they fall.

And I explained a brief story of me and most of the windows oses that have been installed on my computers, with a few experiences and some innovations included, all of this for the sake of explaining my current experience with win8 rtm, Innovative? that's a veeeeery relative term, so much giant for the reality that actually is, the bigger they go, the deeper they fall.

As I mention, I wasn't attempting to dispute your claim that Windows 8 isn't innovative (although I do disagree with it) in that post. I was merely pointing out that assuming I haven't ever tried RocketDock for the reason I believe Windows 8 is innovative is illogical :)

Whether something is innovative or not could be subjective, too, by the way.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!