Windows 8 is the first OS that made me downgrade


Recommended Posts

I'm not a fanboy, but I've always been quick to adopt new versions of Windows, and I've also run whatever pre-release/beta versions Microsoft has put out. (I even liked Vista.) With Windows 8, I've been with it since the Developer Preview, and have run every available publicly released version. The other day I installed the RTM Windows 8 Enterprise. Windows 8 has a lot to recommend it, but I'm sorry, I've come to the conclusion that I just can't get used to the Frankenstein feel of the o.s. I use a desktop and a monitor without touch capabilities, and it feels like Windows 8 was made for touch-capable devices rather than the traditional laptop or desktop. Windows 7, on the other hand, feels perfectly tailored to the desktop, with no jarring incoherent distractions to deal with. It's sad to have to say it because I'd really like to like Windows 8, but Windows 7 is just so much a better fit for me.

Windows 8 is the first OS that made me think about buying a tablet/convertible ultrabook. Also Windows 8 is the first OS that made me think about using multiple monitors. I've also been using Windows since 3.11 and I don't think it's a mess, it's different and rough around the edges.... but It doesn't impact my desktop experience and work. Not everyone is the same, if you don't like it fine, if you like it fine as well, but there's no need to think your way is correct and everyone else is just a hater or a fanboy who doesn't agree.

I agree that if Windows 8 makes your life difficult, we should have every right to keep using Windows 7. But when we complain that it breaks our work flow, we are accused of not doing things properly. Or to do *this* instead. If I learn how to do *this* instead of *that* to the point where it becomes a habit, it will break my workflow at work where I cannot do *this* on an XP machine.

However, how can you not agree that this OS is a mess? Why are there two control panels? Why are some things metro and some things aero on the desktop (Volume control - Aero. Network Connections - Metro)?

No. Back when I tried WIndows 8 you had to RIGHT CLICK at the bottom left. Not Left Click - Control Panel. Who (besides us from experience) will try to right click?

How many regular people use things in the Win-X menu? computer management etc.? most people don't even know about those things.

Why are there two control panels?

One of them is optimized for touch input. Not hard to figure out.

Why is the volume mini window aero, but the network view takes 100% of my vertical view to just display one connection?

How do you display more than one connection when there is a need? Not hard to figure out.

This OS is completely horrible on the desktop. It is so inconsistent it is not even funny.

So Windows 7 must be horrible because it is equally inconsistent on the desktop.

Back when I tried it, I had to basically have my mouse at the very bottom left corner in order for the little start screen icon to appear. What happened to the same clickable area as in Windows 7? If you are going to make invisible menus, you need to make it a large hover/click area instead of just 10 pixels. Also, if my mouse moves just outside the charms bar, it would disappear. Is there a way to make it stay there until I close it? If I am not used to a mouse sensitivity setting, it takes me several tries to click an icon in the charms bar because it disappears when I accidentally move my mouse over too far.

Is lack of a start button seriously such a big deal for you?

sorry for the bolds but didn't want to do the quote/end-quote dance.

sorry for the bolds but didn't want to do the quote/end-quote dance.

- So us admins are getting the shaft just because Joe never used Computer Management?

- So why do I need the second Control Panel on my desktop....I said the OS was inconsistent ON THE DESKTOP

- On Windows 7, when you have more than one connection, the window expands from 100 pixels height to lets say 400 pixels height if there are 9 connections or so. You did not know it did this?

- What? Windows 7 is inconsistent on the desktop? The desktop is ALL THERE IS on Windows 7. How can something be inconsistent with itself? I do not see Metro UI elements in Windows 7 unless I am in a program, and that is not the OS that is doing that. HOW is Windows 7 the same as Windows 8 in terms of inconsistencies? That argument does NOT make any sense.

- Yes. There are no visual cues as to where the Start Screen hover/click box is located. Invisible menus and especially invisible cues are HORRIBLE.

However, how can you not agree that this OS is a mess? Why are there two control panels? Why are some things metro and some things aero on the desktop (Volume control - Aero. Network Connections - Metro)?

Why does it exactly matter if there's two control panels? You can't really use the desktop one that well with touch, a new touch first one needed to be done, so they did it. Besides, going with your way of thinking the control panel in Windows 7 is already a mess. Why are some stuff contained in the main window while other stuff shows up in a popup dialog window? And fwiw the volume control has a metro control as well, it's in the settings pane right above the power button.

I've been using the OS for about a week and it's really solid. At first it's a little awkward, but after like five to ten minutes of figuring out everything it didn't take me long to get comfortable with the operating system. I currently have neowin open, editing in photoshop (creating gifs) and i'm using handbreak and i'm not having a problem managing any of it. I really like the Metro apps and I can't wait to see what will be developed when the OS goes live. I'm seriously thinking of picking up a Surface when they're released.

The only thing that annoys me is that the Zune software doesn't work with the OS. I can't upload songs to my Zune right now (have to use another computer).

- So us admins are getting the shaft just because Joe never used Computer Management?

- So why do I need the second Control Panel on my desktop....I said the OS was inconsistent ON THE DESKTOP

- On Windows 7, when you have more than one connection, the window expands from 100 pixels height to lets say 400 pixels height if there are 9 connections or so. You did not know it did this?

- What? Windows 7 is inconsistent on the desktop? The desktop is ALL THERE IS on Windows 7. How can something be inconsistent with itself? I do not see Metro UI elements in Windows 7 unless I am in a program, and that is not the OS that is doing that. HOW is Windows 7 the same as Windows 8 in terms of inconsistencies? That argument does NOT make any sense.

- Yes. There are no visual cues as to where the Start Screen hover/click box is located. Invisible menus and especially invisible cues are HORRIBLE.

If you are really a sysadmin (apparently everyone here is when it comes to new Windows so I am skeptical), Windows 8 actually makes it easier to get to computer management.

If you don't need it - don't use it. This is like me whining about presence of admin tools - why do I need it when I am not a sys admin?

Yeah I know it but how do you enable such a UI for touch alongwith kbm?

Windows 7 inconsistent : Yes, icon inconsistencies, some things are only possible from a menubar eventhough it is hidden by default in explorer. Some explorer views only appear in Libraries. Libraries don't work as valid locations in many programs, taskbar is a mess when it goes multi-row, show/hide desktop is unreliable,

This doesn't mean I suddenly hate Windows 7. I still think it is a great OS for what it is. I didn't suddenly discover its faults either, these are things I stumble upon when using it on a regular basis (the Library views happened yesterday for example).

The only thing that annoys me is that the Zune software doesn't work with the OS. I can't upload songs to my Zune right now (have to use another computer).

Zune works fine with Windows Phone in the RP, may be the Zune driver is old?

Zune works fine with Windows Phone in the RP, may be the Zune driver is old?

I downloaded the latest software from Microsoft's site but it didn't help. The program crashes when I try to launch it and I've tried compatibility mode.

- So us admins are getting the shaft just because Joe never used Computer Management?

Oh my God you have to right click instead of left??? Oh the drama and the horror your life is so hard!

Just be glad they added it in there (wasn't there in Dev preview)

- Yes. There are no visual cues as to where the Start Screen hover/click box is located. Invisible menus and especially invisible cues are HORRIBLE.

Yes there are, they're called the "corner of your screen". If you can't figure that out, well, good luck using any computer.

Again, it sounds like a lot of user error and people not wanting to change. Fine. Stick with Windows 7 and stop moaning while the rest of us move into the next generation.

I downloaded the latest software from Microsoft's site but it didn't help. The program crashes when I try to launch it and I've tried compatibility mode.

Hmm weird. I didn't have to download anything. I upgraded to Windows 8 RP from Windows 7. Zune was installed on Windows 7 and continued to work after upgrade.

Now that the power menu is popping up again in the tread, don't you wish they updated the look of that a bit more?

It looks like it comes right out of Win2000.

Love the options, but hate how it looks

Using RP, two 40", yea, look at all the space I'm "wasting" /s.

WP_000467.jpg

So, please tell me how Windows 8 is unusable again. I just keep finding this hilarious how people say it's bad. Seriously? Besides the start button/menu and going directly to desktop, what can u NOT do in windows 8 that u can in Windows 7?

Edit: I feel like I'm taking crazy pills with people saying its bad.

  • Like 2

And the most nonsensical response of the year award goes to...

nice try, but most of the screen used are websites, not windows 8. for example, look at the windows 8 app itself which takes up half the screen and displays little info with alot of white space.

clever attempt though.

nice try, but most of the screen used are websites, not windows 8. for example, look at the windows 8 app itself which takes up half the screen and displays little info with alot of white space.

clever attempt though.

Seriously, what the hell do u even mean?

Yes, Windows 8 suxx, hate it, too inconsistent. But...

I am still gonna use the crap out of it!!!

Here's hoping Microsoft don't price it out of Indian Market. If pricing is out of reach, most people here will pirate like there's no tomorrow.

PS: BOZ needs to take a chill pill and stop commenting on this thread for a while. :)

Yes, Windows 8 suxx, hate it, too inconsistent. But...

I am still gonna use the crap out of it!!!

Here's hoping Microsoft don't price it out of Indian Market. If pricing is out of reach, most people here will pirate like there's no tomorrow.

PS: BOZ needs to take a chill pill and stop commenting on this thread for a while. :)

MS price things to what the local market can bear. Previous version have cost up to hundreds of USD, but only a fraction of that in poorer nations like India. W8 is going to cost 40 bucks for an upgrade version. That's probably cheaper than W7 cost in India, so do you really think they won't proportionally drop the price for you guys?

Besides... I don't consider a hundred or so over expensive when it's software I use every single day, for everything.

Why does it exactly matter if there's two control panels? You can't really use the desktop one that well with touch, a new touch first one needed to be done, so they did it. Besides, going with your way of thinking the control panel in Windows 7 is already a mess. Why are some stuff contained in the main window while other stuff shows up in a popup dialog window? And fwiw the volume control has a metro control as well, it's in the settings pane right above the power button.

Because it showcases a failure of design. Rather than making a UI that worked well on both touch and M+K, they created one for both and just jammed them both into Windows 8.

Now, I haven?t had any great deal of time with Windows 8 and I don?t plan to until they release the trial version of Windows Server 2012, but from what reviews I?ve read, this is a persistent problem in Windows 8. Things like the Metro IE not getting bookmarks from desktop IE. From what I?ve heard, there was no real effort put into harmonize Metro and the desktop and they both just sit in their own worlds.

I think MS is going to give us a new "zune client" once we get closer to the release of WP8 so don't expect any future Zune client updates etc. Though, now that I say that they could have a small prep-update for it before WP 7.8 goes out but I dunno.

nice try, but most of the screen used are websites, not windows 8. for example, look at the windows 8 app itself which takes up half the screen and displays little info with alot of white space.

clever attempt though.

So Windows 8 is an app now.

Interesting.

:s

Yes, Windows 8 has some nice performance enhancements. Yes, some of the Metro apps are nice. But as a whole, in my opinion (if I'm allowed one anymore) is that everything just seems like it was made for a tablet and not for a desktop computer. The Start button being missing isn't a huge problem for someone like me, and most people on this forum, but for people who aren't technically proficient it will be. I think a lot of people forget this market and that's where most of Windows' market share lies.

As for wasted space, of course if you have Internet Explorer open taking up the screen then you're not going to waste space are you, but when you're on the Start screen there is a bit of wasted space, nevermind the huge buttons that on a desktop are just silly. For tablets, they're great!

I know I won't be upgrading to it, but I may purchase a license come release and dual boot between it and Windows 7. There are some alright features like I mentioned previously but I couldn't use it as a main OS and, as a gamer, it would probably be the best idea for now.

Because it showcases a failure of design. Rather than making a UI that worked well on both touch and M+K, they created one for both and just jammed them both into Windows 8.

Now, I haven?t had any great deal of time with Windows 8 and I don?t plan to until they release the trial version of Windows Server 2012, but from what reviews I?ve read, this is a persistent problem in Windows 8. Things like the Metro IE not getting bookmarks from desktop IE. From what I?ve heard, there was no real effort put into harmonize Metro and the desktop and they both just sit in their own worlds.

Sure there's problems, they don't take it all the way at this point and it's got to do with how young the winrt framework and APIs are. Saying they didn't try hard enough is silly I think. The start screen and the winrt framework itself are both basically a v1.0 product, it's going to be rough till they updating it more but that's not to say they didn't put any effort into it at all.

And I'd just like to add that I can use the metro control panel fine with a mouse, I don't see any issues with it.

Because it showcases a failure of design. Rather than making a UI that worked well on both touch and M+K, they created one for both and just jammed them both into Windows 8.

I'm sorry, but for this at least, you're talking nonsense. The reason for the touch UI control panel is for those using the touch interface to have usable access to it. They old one is there for those using desktop, and because the touch version doesn't have all the same features (many aren't really needed).

If they didn't do this, those on tablets would have problems and then the complainers WOULD actually have a point.

Now, I haven?t had any great deal of time with Windows 8 and I don?t plan to until they release the trial version of Windows Server 2012, but from what reviews I?ve read, this is a persistent problem in Windows 8. Things like the Metro IE not getting bookmarks from desktop IE. From what I?ve heard, there was no real effort put into harmonize Metro and the desktop and they both just sit in their own worlds.

I don't use IE (mine keeps crashing in RP, probably due to Flash), so I can't confirm or deny this issue.

Using RP, two 40", yea, look at all the space I'm "wasting" /s.

Summing up the fact you have two 40-inch screens adds little to your story really. On my 27-inch screen with a 2650 x 1440 resolution most Metro apps do waste away screen estate. Frequently there simply isn't enough content to fill the screen with. Not to mention many apps have a lot of empty space that isn't used for anything to begin with. Having everything full-screen or a limitation of two windows split 80/20 is pointless on larger screens. Am I able to do something as basic as this in Metro? (see screen shot)

post-128385-0-99575600-1344452714_thumb.

Sure there's problems, they don't take it all the way at this point and it's got to do with how young the winrt framework and APIs are. Saying they didn't try hard enough is silly I think. The start screen and the winrt framework itself are both basically a v1.0 product, it's going to be rough till they updating it more but that's not to say they didn't put any effort into it at all.

And I'd just like to add that I can use the metro control panel fine with a mouse, I don't see any issues with it.

I think it?s a fundamental issue, if Microsoft is touting this as a marrying of desktop and mobile and their solution is simply to duplicate functionality and tailor it to each. It?s not really solving the problem.

And correct me if I?m wrong, but there is functionality in the Metro control panel that?s not in the desktop control panel and vice versa.

I'm sorry, but for this at least, you're talking nonsense. The reason for the touch UI control panel is for those using the touch interface to have usable access to it. They old one is there for those using desktop, and because the touch version doesn't have all the same features (many aren't really needed).

If they didn't do this, those on tablets would have problems and then the complainers WOULD actually have a point.

And I agree, but why not share bookmarks? Why not share open tabs? Why did Microsoft make a second IE for Metro, rather than have different UIs for the same underlying program? Better yet, one UI that would satisfy both.

Summing up the fact you have two 40-inch screens adds little to your story really. On my 27-inch screen with a 2650 x 1440 resolution most Metro apps do waste away screen estate. Frequently there simply isn't enough content to fill the screen with. Not to mention many apps have a lot of empty space that isn't used for anything to begin with. Having everything full-screen or a limitation of two windows split 80/20 is pointless on larger screens. Am I able to do something as basic as this in Metro? (see screen shot)

But you dont like Metro or the Metro apps, so why use them at all when you can use the desktop and achieve what you want? The desktop allows you to have as many windows open as you want, and with all your programs on the taskbar or the desktop is there really a problem?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
    • I don't understand the vision. Do people really want to buy a new computer from Dell with 6 browsers installed? We all keep asking for Microsoft to stop having so much junk on their OS, and adding a bunch of browsers seems to go against that. Ideally, we would just be asked what browser we want during OOBE but Google is just going to pay Dell a bunch of money to include Chrome. Additionally, would you want your phones to start including all the browsers too when you get them? The only thing I ever wanted was to be able to uninstall IE or edge and I believe you are now able to. I do agree that microsoft needs to chill with their "are you sure you don't want to try edge before you install chrome" ads when going to download chrome.
    • It is notable that around 70% of web browser users choose Google Chrome. However, it is puzzling why anyone on Windows would opt for Chrome when Microsoft Edge is often superior in many aspects and comes pre-installed. Edge collects less data, uses less RAM, and is more optimized for Windows as a native Microsoft product. While some may point to bloat in Edge, much of it can be removed with simple tools, requiring no more effort than installing Chrome. Meanwhile, Chrome reportedly downloads large amounts of AI data (4 GB) without explicit consent. I'm sure you Chrome users love that, or? Here is one example of a tool that doesn't even need to be installed to be able to use: https://github.com/TheBobPony/MSEdgeTweaker Although Microsoft’s aggressive promotion of Edge may be questionable, the browser’s current advantages make it a preferable choice over Chrome today, even if Chrome may have been better in the past.
    • JetBrains rolls out IntelliJ IDEA update with Markdown preview fixes and more by David Uzondu Image via JetBrains IntelliJ 2026.1.3 from JetBrains has landed, bringing several highly requested bug fixes that target common UI glitches and terminal rendering issues. If you run tmux inside the integrated terminal, the IDE no longer renders the cursor above the active line. The Markdown preview bug, which was fixed in this release, had annoyed developers for quite some time, as the preview pane failed to render images saved outside the project directory. Instead of displaying the actual image, the IDE simply showed a broken image icon, a problem that stuck around for two years before this update. Over on Windows, developers running WSL can now use wsl.exe to spin up their environments without losing terminal functionality. In previous builds, launching a terminal shell with something like wsl.exe -d ubuntu inside a Windows-based project broke both shell integration and active process detection. Other bug fixes in this release include: An issue where Gradle sync incorrectly reported success as a failure on WSL when using Gradle 9.5.0. A syntax highlighting bug that flagged valid Java for-loop initialization blocks with multiple statements as incorrect. A warning bug that triggered a false non-null local variable alert when using JSpecify annotations. A database generation bug that hid the option to use a DELETE statement instead of a TRUNCATE checkbox. A Kotlin highlighting failure where an assertion error in the Gradle redundant library inspection broke error highlighting. A UI bug where the ComboBox popup lacked a maximum height restriction. A Snowflake syntax error where DataGrip failed to support the "create temp" command. A Svelte syntax parsing failure that incorrectly flagged quotes inside inline expressions. A VCS repository manager deadlock that triggered thread pool exhaustion. A memory leak where the LazyTree component kept all previous versions of a tree in memory. IntelliJ 2026.1.3 is the third bug fix release for the IntelliJ 2026.1 series. The first one landed back in April with a fix for the WSL Python interpreter freeze, another fix for guest participants using Emmet abbreviations, and corrected WildFly server deployment errors.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!