Windows 8 is the first OS that made me downgrade


Recommended Posts

Well said, fair point. But reading on threads like these makes me more curious about win 8.

I'll just wait for public release to try it out.

Why don't you download the release preview from the MS website right now.

Once the final version is for sale you can upgrade.

Yo this is nothing but a rant about how you hate the UI. They gave the desktop as well for a reason. I just don't understand it. It's going to work, and to be honest everybody's going to have to get used to it. And you will! It's not that different. Yeah new start-screen, just press the Windows key. I didn't like it at first either, uninstalled the RC from my main PC. Then I went back to using my MBP. Then I realized that Windows 8 had best of both worlds (the elegance provided by Win8Metro, and the regular desktop). Then my experience changed and I wanted to learn from it.

So don't whine about it because it's staying, going to be in your nearest bestbuy for a while. :woot:

Someone here mentioned that they weren't going to offer support for Windows 8.

I don't understand why one would do that. My job is to support what the customers use; like it or not. I'm not a big fan of Linux but because customers use it; I HAVE to learn to support it.

So if Windows 8 become a hit and everyone uses it; you still wont support it?

Settings seems a much logical place for it, to me. After all, you're setting the system to shut down.

For years people have been joking about how it's stupid that in Windows you need to click 'start' to stop your computer. They finally change it, and people say the new method is stupid. You can't please everyone.

For years people have been joking about how it's stupid that in Windows you need to click 'start' to stop your computer. They finally change it, and people say the new method is stupid. You can't please everyone.

Well, yeah. When you make changes to something that needed to be improved, that doesn't necessarily mean you've improved on it.

I remember when the apple fans made fun of the start menu:

"Windows is stupid! You must press start to shut down the system" - followed by the troll face

Now the same kind of people complain it's gone.

As far as the Start screen goes it's largely Microsoft's own user base that's complaining. Nice try though.

When it comes to technology, people don't know what they need. People didn't know that having a smartphone with location-based features could be useful until the iPhone came about.

Right now, we do not know if or not we actually need touch-based features everywhere. We will see. But if we land ourselves in a future where everything moves towards touch, Windows 8 will be at the center of that revolution, you can be assured of that.

I still don't get the whole shut down argument.

For power users there is still Alt-F4

The average user might not know this, but then again, once you show him where he can shut down his computer he will just do it that way without moaning like all the power users here and get on with his live

Win key + I brings that settings screen up too.

Unfortunately I think MS have mucked this one up. They have made some great additions to Explorer, its almost usable now for a techie and there is extra customisation (although still not enough for a modern day OS).

MS let themselves down when they forced the new UI on everyone. Tablets and Desktops are totally different, you cant merge them, you shouldn't try. There should have been Win 8 for Tablets and Win 8 for desktops - simple but effective.

No business does well by giving everyone an average experience, well except MacDonald's.. Windows 8 is not the best OS for the desktop user because of tablets and is not the best OS for tablets because the desktop.

How can such a big company with so much experience make such a simple mistake?

Windows 9 needs to be worked on fast, I fear another ME or Vista - the OS is good but the public opinion is what will hurt.

One thing I really love on Win 8 RTM is the desktop theme. I truly like the squared, clean design.

A guy on Deviantart successfully ported the authentic Win8 RTM theme on Windows 7.

I currently use in dual boot both, Win 7 & Win 8 Pro, but when the licence of Win 8 is gonna expire, a simple format will occur.

Win 7 Premium :D http://i.minus.com/itO8LWU4hygY3.png The best deal for me. Win 7's flexibility with Win 8's nice desktop theme.

LiquidCrystalMeth[/color]' timestamp='1344521710' post='595075103']

iPads and actually tablets are toys for hipster douches and will die out long before laptops do.

You are wrong sir. Tablets are very useful in the business world. Me, for example, I have an iPad and I use it as a credit card machine, invoice printer and cash register. I go to my customer's house to do a service. Once I'm done, I make the invoice on Quick Sale Pro, print it or email it to them, and if I get paid with a credit card, I use Square and run that sucker through the iPad and I get paid. Then I tell the customer to sign the invoice and the credit card on the ipad using the Stylus pen and I'm done.

The battery on a tablet lasts longer than the battery on a laptop, not to mention that they are much more portable and that is why they are great for me people like me, who actually use it.

The iPad and Android tablets, again, are very useful for business.

Funny, I think all these threads would be null and void if not for one thing....

Microsoft removing the start menu / giving the option to disable Metro (or whatever they call it now).

Like others have expressed in this and other threads, performance wise Win8 is on point. However, I just can not get past that inconsistencies of the UI and the, well for lack of a better word, fugliness of Metro.

If Microsoft hadn't removed the start menu and gave the option to remove Metro....I would upgrade in a heart beat (even at previous Windows upgrade prices). I will end up skipping this one and hope Microsoft see their error.

This is regarding desktop/notebook use (not tablets or touchscreens...neither of which I really want)

Funny, I think all these threads would be null and void if not for one thing....

Microsoft removing the start menu / giving the option to disable Metro (or whatever they call it now).

Like others have expressed in this and other threads, performance wise Win8 is on point. However, I just can not get past that inconsistencies of the UI and the, well for lack of a better word, fugliness of Metro.

If Microsoft hadn't removed the start menu and gave the option to remove Metro....I would upgrade in a heart beat (even at previous Windows upgrade prices). I will end up skipping this one and hope Microsoft see their error.

This is regarding desktop/notebook use (not tablets or touchscreens...neither of which I really want)

Windows 8 is NOT faster than Windows 7 at everything. After playing with it for more than 24 hours, I can tell you that, yes, IT IS faster booting and shutting down, but that's about it. The interface is confusing and ugly.

Again...This is a TABLET ONLY OS, this is not for a desktop. Sorry, but that's how I feel. You want Windows on a desktop then stick with Windows 7. I am sure Neo will agree.

Someone here mentioned that they weren't going to offer support for Windows 8.

I don't understand why one would do that. My job is to support what the customers use; like it or not. I'm not a big fan of Linux but because customers use it; I HAVE to learn to support it.

So if Windows 8 become a hit and everyone uses it; you still wont support it?

Never mind what other people think.

You have a duty to your clients.

Whether you choose to support their choice of OS, or whether you recommend an OS to them, your job will be to support them.

I'm sure you will do this to the best of your ability.

Windows 8 is NOT faster than Windows 7 at everything. After playing with it for more than 24 hours, I can tell you that, yes, IT IS faster booting and shutting down, but that's about it. The interface is confusing and ugly.

Again...This is a TABLET ONLY OS, this is not for a desktop. Sorry, but that's how I feel. You want Windows on a desktop then stick with Windows 7. I am sure Neo will agree.

Well, yea, I agree which is what I said? Though, performance wise it is on point .. though I didn't mention it faster or slower than Win7. I never really dove into gaming since, as you pointed out, I just became frustrated at the inconsistancy in the UI. However, I would upgrade if Microsoft made Metro an option and brought back the Start Menu (even at previous Microsoft OS prices)

...so I think we agree?

Well, yea, I agree which is what I said? Though, performance wise it is on point .. though I didn't mention it faster or slower than Win7. I never really dove into gaming since, as you pointed out, I just became frustrated at the inconsistancy in the UI. However, I would upgrade if Microsoft made Metro an option and brought back the Start Menu (even at previous Microsoft OS prices)

...so I think we agree?

And I agree with you as well on this. If Microsoft would give the user the option to use Metro or the regular desktop UI - with Star Menu included - Then yes, by all means, I would upgrade in a heartbeat. The problem is just that, they want to stick the user with Metro and no start menu wether they like it or not and that my friend is not cool at all. That is VERY disrespectful.

I believe that the dramatically lowered price of Windows 8 compared to previous Windows releases is in part because of the tablet market, but also due to the huge backlash of current Windows users as a incentive to upgrade no matter what.

This gamble is a double edged sword, imho. If I recall correctly XP pro was ~300$ and OEM was ~100, With Vista and Windows 7 due to multitude of SKU's consumer versions were anywhere between 100$ and 400$. That is a huge price difference and Windows 8 will need to sell 3-5(not counting the upgrade price) copies for 1 copy of older versions of Windows. From what I was able to see, businesses will completely ignore Windows 8 and that is where Microsoft will be hurt the most. Consumers that already own a copy of Windows (XP, Vista or 7) will in large number(from the people I know and have tried 8 in betas and pre-releases, not a single one will make a transition to windows 8) avoid upgrading. That leaves only future tablet owners to make up for losses made on other fronts, but by looking at how well Windows phone is doing it is hard to expect anything better for Windows RT.

Considering how consumers including businesses and OEM partners feel about Windows 8 in it's current state, Microsoft's earnings from Windows 8 will be disappointing at the very best. Hopefully this will be a much needed cold shower or a slap in the face Microsoft needs after the arrogance of previous bad releases (ME and Vista) did not hurt their earnings.

I believe that the dramatically lowered price of Windows 8 compared to previous Windows releases is in part because of the tablet market, but also due to the huge backlash of current Windows users as a incentive to upgrade no matter what.

This gamble is a double edged sword, imho. If I recall correctly XP pro was ~300$ and OEM was ~100, With Vista and Windows 7 due to multitude of SKU's consumer versions were anywhere between 100$ and 400$. That is a huge price difference and Windows 8 will need to sell 3-5(not counting the upgrade price) copies for 1 copy of older versions of Windows. From what I was able to see, businesses will completely ignore Windows 8 and that is where Microsoft will be hurt the most. Consumers that already own a copy of Windows (XP, Vista or 7) will in large number(from the people I know and have tried 8 in betas and pre-releases, not a single one will make a transition to windows 8) avoid upgrading. That leaves only future tablet owners to make up for losses made on other fronts, but by looking at how well Windows phone is doing it is hard to expect anything better for Windows RT.

Considering how consumers including businesses and OEM partners feel about Windows 8 in it's current state, Microsoft's earnings from Windows 8 will be disappointing at the very best. Hopefully this will be a much needed cold shower or a slap in the face Microsoft needs after the arrogance of previous bad releases (ME and Vista) did not hurt their earnings.

Windows ME was not planned - it was something the IHVs insisted on because they didn't think that users were ready for an NT-based general-purpose/multipurpose OS (and that was despite Windows 2000 Professional being perfectly usable as such an OS - I, in fact, upgraded to it INSTEAD of either staying with 98SE or upgrading to ME). Only Vista was *bad* in that sense; however, that was again mostly the fault of IHVs (poor driver support and underwhelming GPU performance - especially in terms of laptops - Windows 7, in fact, changed little from Vista, but did correct both those Vista-specific issues, and is what the critics of 8's UI would rather use. so even Vista isn't a true failure). The complaints about Windows 8 are entirely anti-change. It's different, and, despite all the railing about things devolving into *meh* in computing, when it gets down to brass tacks, a lot of folks apparently LIKE (or would rather have) *meh*, because they don't want to learn anything new.

  • Like 1

Someone here mentioned that they weren't going to offer support for Windows 8.

I don't understand why one would do that. My job is to support what the customers use; like it or not. I'm not a big fan of Linux but because customers use it; I HAVE to learn to support it.

So if Windows 8 become a hit and everyone uses it; you still wont support it?

It was me that said that, and no i wont.

I simply wont be carrying the can for Microsofts stupidity, and wouldnt feel comfortable charging my customers to install software and support it, when that spftware is going to make them have rethink their approach to the gui, these are people who simply want to use the computer.

Simple as that.

And as i said, most people who i know who have seen the preview arent interested in switching anyway. People like to just be able to get onto their computer and just use it and secondly to have some semblence of comfort and continuity, none of which is offered by this monstrosity.

Just remains to be seen how long it takes Microsoft to realise the error, apologise and back peddle. I give it less than 6 months.

For years people have been joking about how it's stupid that in Windows you need to click 'start' to stop your computer. They finally change it, and people say the new method is stupid. You can't please everyone.

Where is the shutdown/reboot now?

And I agree with you as well on this. If Microsoft would give the user the option to use Metro or the regular desktop UI - with Star Menu included - Then yes, by all means, I would upgrade in a heartbeat. The problem is just that, they want to stick the user with Metro and no start menu wether they like it or not and that my friend is not cool at all. That is VERY disrespectful.

There were technical reasons to remove it. This cannot be said enough. It doesn't matter how much you think it should be there, it simply can't.

It was me that said that, and no i wont.

I simply wont be carrying the can for Microsofts stupidity, and wouldnt feel comfortable charging my customers to install software and support it, when that spftware is going to make them have rethink their approach to the gui, these are people who simply want to use the computer.

Simple as that.

And as i said, most people who i know who have seen the preview arent interested in switching anyway. People like to just be able to get onto their computer and just use it and secondly to have some semblence of comfort and continuity, none of which is offered by this monstrosity.

Just remains to be seen how long it takes Microsoft to realise the error, apologise and back peddle. I give it less than 6 months.

I hate to say it, but you come across as awfully spiteful. It's just an OS. Chill. Stay on Windows 7 then. Quit bitching about an OS no one is forcing you to use.

There were technical reasons to remove it. This cannot be said enough.

They should have released two different versions of Windows then. But I guess they wanted to unify WP, tablet and desktop so they got little blinded by that idea and didn't realize what happened to desktop usability.

They should have released two different versions of Windows then. But I guess they wanted to unify WP, tablet and desktop so they got little blinded by that idea and didn't realize what happened to desktop usability.

Why should they do that when it creates so much overhead? Windows 8 is about unifying the codebase, not tearing it apart further. There's no reason to fork the codebase anymore than it already is.

There isn't anything in Windows 8 destroying desktop useability.

I've spent the last hour trying to get into safe mode to install some unsigned drivers but nothing seems to work... Isn't it SHIFT+F8 anymore in RTM or did they remove the whole safe mode?

go in to the Metro control panel settings in Metro of course and go to general then go to the bottom go to of that tab area and go to advanced startup you will have more options to do things including i think to go in to safemode

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
    • [Price Drop] PDF Expert for Mac v3 is still half off by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where for only a limited time you can save 42% on PDF Expert One-Time Purchase. PDFs remain the best way to transmit documents, but editing them isn't possible with standard Mac software. PDF Expert changes that, allowing you to edit PDF text, images, links, and outlines quickly and easily. Typo in a contract? Easy fix. Need to rework a complete section of a document? No problem. PDF Expert provides a series of essential functions that will transform the way you work with documents on your Mac. It recognizes text and OCR, makes edits, and fills out forms. And with the “Enhance” feature powered by AI, it will fix distortions, remove shadows and improve contrast so that even difficult-to-read documents look great. EDIT Change the text. Easily fix typos, update numbers, or add entire paragraphs Insert images. Update logos in a contract or add a new graph to a report Add links. Enrich your PDFs by linking to other pages or external websites ANNOTATE Highlight the important. Make the most valuable content stand out at a glance Comment on PDFs. Add text to PDFs, insert pop-up notes & write your thoughts in the margins Add stamps. Review documents with our set of stamps or create custom stamps for any workflow ORGANIZE Merge PDFs. Combine multiple files into one PDF document Manage pages. Add, delete, rearrange, or rotate PDF pages with ease Split PDFs. Extract pages from PDFs & save them as separate files CONVERT Convert to PDF. Turn JPG, PNG, Word, PPT, and Excel to PDF PDF to Word. Convert PDFs into editable Word documents PDF to image. Turn PDFs into JPG or PNG images PDF to Excel. Convert PDFs into Excel spreadsheets PDF to PPT. Save PDFs as PowerPoint presentations PDF to text. Convert PDFs into editable TXT files FILL OUT Fill out PDF forms. Easily fill out PDF forms by just clicking on them Sign documents. Add your signature to a PDF in a few clicks. Let customers sign documents with handy one-time signatures Redact PDFs. Blackout or erase confidential information from your documents RECOGNIZE TEXT OCR text in PDF. Recognize the text, so you can search, highlight & copy it Enhance scans. Fix distortions, remove shadows & improve contrast Crop & split pages. Split double-page scans into separate pages & remove undesired margins Good to know: Length of access: Lifetime Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: Mac Max number of device(s): Unlimited usage on personal macOS devices Version: PDF Expert 3 for Mac (macOS) Updates: Get continuous support and bug fixes. Additional new features may come at an extra cost. PDF Expert One-Time Purchase normally costs $139.99, but you can pick it up for just $69.97 for a limited time, that represents a saving of $70 (50% off). For a full description, specs, and license info, click the link below. Deal Price One time cost now only $69.97 (was $139.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      75
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!