Windows 8 is the first OS that made me downgrade


Recommended Posts

I see someone thatnit only is terrible at making a point,but you'd also be terrible at support.

Just tell them thug the right site. Or you know, use the power button.

Actually I'm not terrible at making a point since you understood what I said perfectly. And the restart button was just an example. Use Search as an example or accessing the Control Panel if you want I don't care.

Windows 8 is a total mess for anyone lacking a touch screen and you know the reviews for it are going to be terrible you'd have to be blind not to see that.

The negatives definitely outweigh the positives for me, so ill be sticking with 7 until 9 comes out or until support for 7 ends.

You realize what Windows 9 will be right? It's adorable how so many of you have this OS pegged for failure.

You realize what Windows 9 will be right? It's adorable how so many of you have this OS pegged for failure.

You know sometimes dumbing down the computer experience such as with Microsoft Bob or Offices Clippy doesn't work and later versions of the product remove these things and give us back the experience we had before they existed. If Windows 8 is not well received and it doesn't sell well and Windows 7 market share continues to eclipse 8, if Consumers start demanding computers with Windows 7 instead of Windows 8 then Microsoft will turn about heel and change where Windows 9 is headed.

Another thing to think about is if Windows 8 on Tablets is a failure (which is a real possibility if they can't get enough hardware partners on board) they may decide to split Windows 9 down the middle. One would be a Windows 7 like experience on x86 based processors and the other would only come with Metro without any desktop at all and would be for ARM only processors which would be used exclusively with Tablets.

This could happen nothing is written in stone yet and it depends how the market plays out. Another possibility is that only Windows 8 ARM based tablets sell in volume and Microsoft again decides to drop Metro on x86. One of the biggest hurdles they have when fighting the iPad and Android tablets is price and I don't think they can match those other devices on Price with x86 systems.

You know sometimes dumbing down the computer experience such as with Microsoft Bob or Offices Clippy doesn't work and later versions of the product remove these things and give us back the experience we had before they existed. If Windows 8 is not well received and it doesn't sell well and Windows 7 market share continues to eclipse 8, if Consumers start demanding computers with Windows 7 instead of Windows 8 then Microsoft will turn about heel and change where Windows 9 is headed.

Another thing to think about is if Windows 8 on Tablets is a failure (which is a real possibility if they can't get enough hardware partners on board) they may decide to split Windows 9 down the middle. One would be a Windows 7 like experience on x86 based processors and the other would only come with Metro without any desktop at all and would be for ARM only processors which would be used exclusively with Tablets.

This could happen nothing is written in stone yet and it depends how the market plays out. Another possibility is that only Windows 8 ARM based tablets sell in volume and Microsoft again decides to drop Metro on x86. One of the biggest hurdles they have when fighting the iPad and Android tablets is price and I don't think they can match those other devices on Price with x86 systems.

Funny how that isn't written in stone....

Windows 8 is a total mess for anyone lacking a touch screen and you know the reviews for it are going to be terrible you'd have to be blind not to see that.

But that apparently is...

Funny how that isn't written in stone....

But that apparently is...

Yes that is correct. Anything could happen on tablets because Metro is an interface designed for Tablets. Microsoft do not dispute that. But it is a total mess on desktops, we already have it on our desktops and can already see how much of a mess it is. Extremely inconsistent, jarring to the extreme and makes traditional efficient workflows inefficient. It is uncompromising and difficult to use, even confusing.

They take the contents of one menu (Bottom left start menu) and break it up in to two separate menus (Start Screen -> Bottom Left, Charm Menu -> Top Right). Many changes that make perfect sense if you have a tablet with a touch screen designed for swiping from a thick edge border on to the displays touch sensor but make no sense at all when used with a physical mouse and keyboard.

Gestures have never taken off and never become popular on desktop systems when used with a hardware mouse (only with touch interfaces like trackpads and touch screens) because it is much more intuitive to navigate the interface when using a cursor by moving that cursor to an object and clicking on it. Now everything is hidden out of view and you have to perform these swipes with your cursor to get to functionality that was before behind a click.

And you know everything I said in my second post was about tablets and I clearly said in my first post that it's a total mess for anyone lacking a touch screen. The two statements compliment each other they do not contradict.

You know sometimes dumbing down the computer experience such as with Microsoft Bob or Offices Clippy doesn't work and later versions of the product remove these things and give us back the experience we had before they existed. If Windows 8 is not well received and it doesn't sell well and Windows 7 market share continues to eclipse 8, if Consumers start demanding computers with Windows 7 instead of Windows 8 then Microsoft will turn about heel and change where Windows 9 is headed.

Another thing to think about is if Windows 8 on Tablets is a failure (which is a real possibility if they can't get enough hardware partners on board) they may decide to split Windows 9 down the middle. One would be a Windows 7 like experience on x86 based processors and the other would only come with Metro without any desktop at all and would be for ARM only processors which would be used exclusively with Tablets.

This could happen nothing is written in stone yet and it depends how the market plays out. Another possibility is that only Windows 8 ARM based tablets sell in volume and Microsoft again decides to drop Metro on x86. One of the biggest hurdles they have when fighting the iPad and Android tablets is price and I don't think they can match those other devices on Price with x86 systems.

All good points, but, I personally feel very strongly that Microsoft is going to put a firm foot down with Windows 8 and the way it works and functions. Changed needed to happen... Someone on here said once that the company was pretty much dammed if they did or dammed if they didn't, that users were going to complain if they didn't change much with how the OS functioned and looked or the were going to complain about to much change...

Or you know, use the power button.

Support : Ok take your finger and press the power button once with your finger on the front of the computer.

Customer: Ok I did that and the screen went black and the power button is blinking.

Support: Ok now press the power button again to turn the computer back on. This time the computer should boot back up

Customer: Ok I pressed the power button and my screen came back with all my icons

Support: Already? Wow that was fast.

Customer: It didn't boot up it just appeared.

Support: Oh it must have just gone to sleep.

The default configuration of the power button on most computers is not to turn off but to sleep the machine.

You know sometimes dumbing down the computer experience such as with Microsoft Bob or Offices Clippy doesn't work and later versions of the product remove these things and give us back the experience we had before they existed. If Windows 8 is not well received and it doesn't sell well and Windows 7 market share continues to eclipse 8, if Consumers start demanding computers with Windows 7 instead of Windows 8 then Microsoft will turn about heel and change where Windows 9 is headed....

I can't wait to see the numbers down the road, they will surprise most.

Zero reasons to upgrade... I mean ZERO.. If I wanted to make my life more complicated there are other ways I can do it... this Frankenstein of an OS is a disaster. Sticking to Windows 7. It's going to be hilarious seeing people struggle with this garbage.

Your kidding right? how can u you say that an OS is garbage when its not even out yet. and stating that it out performs windows 7 if every kind of way. hahahaha I think your garbage for saying that! but that's cool you can stick with that vista garbage of an OS they call Windows 7 while im in the fastlane with windows 8 :D

all I know is I get better performance without areo then I do with sooo you guys have fun with spiking FPS and that happens with EVERY card no matter the performance :D

That is because metro is so FLAT and ugly and doesn't require much resources.

All good points, but, I personally feel very strongly that Microsoft is going to put a firm foot down with Windows 8 and the way it works and functions. Changed needed to happen... Someone on here said once that the company was pretty much dammed if they did or dammed if they didn't, that users were going to complain if they didn't change much with how the OS functioned and looked or the were going to complain about to much change...

I know in this thread I have mentioned Apple and Mac OS X Mountain Lion a lot and I've gotten some heat for keep bringing it up. But if you look at how users have responded to Mountain Lion's changes you can see that they love it across the board. Potential customers love it, current customers love it. It provided like Windows 8 a faster boot up and shutdown and generally feels faster and it added new Apps like iMessage that let you message iPhones for free over the internet. It also brought notification centre and a bunch of other features.

No one is complaining about Mountain Lion it has received universal praise across the board from users and reviewers. Why couldn't Windows 8 been like that?

Has anyone noticed that since about Windows XP that Microsoft has mostly stopped adding new applications to the OS? They added Notepad, Paint, Calculator. These are useful applications but since about XP apps like these have not been included in the OS. In-fact they even removed a lot of apps since Windows XP. Apps like built in messaging. Metro now has Apps like Messaging which should have been desktop apps in Vista or Windows 7.

If Microsoft had included the Weather App, Stocks, Messages, A new Photo gallery system and other features like that as desktop applications shipping with the OS I think that would have pleased current users enough. The Windows 7 desktop is very powerful and it works great it just needed a few tweaks and some fresh applications in my opinion.

CJ you didn't know that windows 7 is actually windows vista just with a few performance updates? hmmm what OS do you use? I hated windows 7 AERO it is the main reason for spiking FPS in video games ive played bf3 on windows 7 and windows 8 RTM and all I can say is windows 7 was choppy as all hell while windows 8 had consistent FPS throughout the whole time I played it. its worth it to upgrade. oh and booting into games is amazing takes no time at all to render graphics :D dx11.1 FTW

That's what everyone complained about resource hog and that's what windows AERO is :) your running 2 different 3D processes when u load a game onto your machine 1 windows AERO and 2 your video game you play. and the glass look is not worth the performance loss.

I know in this thread I have mentioned Apple and Mac OS X Mountain Lion a lot and I've gotten some heat for keep bringing it up. But if you look at how users have responded to Mountain Lion's changes you can see that they love it across the board. Potential customers love it, current customers love it. It provided like Windows 8 a faster boot up and shutdown and generally feels faster and it added new Apps like iMessage that let you message iPhones for free over the internet. It also brought notification centre and a bunch of other features.

No one is complaining about Mountain Lion it has received universal praise across the board from users and reviewers. Why couldn't Windows 8 been like that?

Has anyone noticed that since about Windows XP that Microsoft has mostly stopped adding new applications to the OS? They added Notepad, Paint, Calculator. These are useful applications but since about XP apps like these have not been included in the OS. In-fact they even removed a lot of apps since Windows XP. Apps like built in messaging. Metro now has Apps like Messaging which should have been desktop apps in Vista or Windows 7.

If Microsoft had included the Weather App, Stocks, Messages, A new Photo gallery system and other features like that as desktop applications shipping with the OS I think that would have pleased current users enough. The Windows 7 desktop is very powerful and it works great it just needed a few tweaks and some fresh applications in my opinion.

For a start there a lot of people complaining about Mountain Lion, about how it doesn't even feel like a proper upgrade because it doesn't change anything in any substantial way, whilst still obsoleting a whole bunch of perfectly good machines.

Surprisingly enough, Microsoft stopped adding apps to the OS about the same time as the Anti-trust case came to a head, because frankly they aren't immune from being sued for application bundling (Internet Explorer, Windows Media Player to name just two) like other OS vendors.

Aren't there a bunch of browser makers moaning (to the EU) about the fact that you can't install an alternative browser on the RT desktop, yet you've never been allowed to install one on an iPad (you can rechrome the Safari webkit engine all you like though).

That's what everyone complained about resource hog and that's what windows AERO is :) your running 2 different 3D processes when u load a game onto your machine 1 windows AERO and 2 your video game you play. and the glass look is not worth the performance loss.

The performance loss is minimal id imagine. How about showing some proof of a game running on both OS's since you are so sure that it's worth going back to tiles made with ms paint.

The performance loss is minimal id imagine. How about showing some proof of a game running on both OS's since you are so sure that it's worth going back to tiles made with ms paint.

you know I don't understand people they complain about resources being eaten up on there system. yet when Microsoft changes it they don't like it cracks me up everyone said they hated the sounds of windows 7 when they were on windows vista so you know what just stop posting lol or better yet go play with apple.

while that being said on x64 windows 7 it uses about 20% on 8GB (phew that's lot) on windows 8 I run about 13/14% which is way better I don't have to play with cludder facked FPS im done talking lol

CJ you didn't know that windows 7 is actually windows vista just with a few performance updates? hmmm what OS do you use? I hated windows 7 AERO it is the main reason for spiking FPS in video games ive played bf3 on windows 7 and windows 8 RTM and all I can say is windows 7 was choppy as all hell while windows 8 had consistent FPS throughout the whole time I played it. its worth it to upgrade. oh and booting into games is amazing takes no time at all to render graphics :D dx11.1 FTW

That's what everyone complained about resource hog and that's what windows AERO is :) your running 2 different 3D processes when u load a game onto your machine 1 windows AERO and 2 your video game you play. and the glass look is not worth the performance loss.

My laptop doesn't have such thing, you seriously need to upgrade your PC if it does.

My laptop doesn't have such thing, you seriously need to upgrade your PC if it does.

what should I post my rig specs in my sig? lol

well I have

AMD Phenom x6 3.3Ghz (no need to overclock doesn't give a benefit)

ATi Radeon HD 5750 1GDDR5 (yeah I need to upgrade but works well with every game that comes out)

8GB of RAM

1TB WD caviar

and the best part is windows 8 takes advantage of my six core multitasking so either its a WIN/WIN situation with windows 8 GL HF GG

CJ you didn't know that windows 7 is actually windows vista just with a few performance updates? hmmm what OS do you use? I hated windows 7 AERO it is the main reason for spiking FPS in video games ive played bf3 on windows 7 and windows 8 RTM and all I can say is windows 7 was choppy as all hell while windows 8 had consistent FPS throughout the whole time I played it. its worth it to upgrade. oh and booting into games is amazing takes no time at all to render graphics :D dx11.1 FTW

That's what everyone complained about resource hog and that's what windows AERO is :) your running 2 different 3D processes when u load a game onto your machine 1 windows AERO and 2 your video game you play. and the glass look is not worth the performance loss.

And did you know that Windows 8 is for the most part Windows 7? Sure it has a lot of tweaks good or bad but without Windows 7, or more to the point, Vista, Windows 8 wouldn't exist.

And it's funny you're trash talking Windows 7 because most people consider it the best OS Microsoft has made to date. I'm thinking the problem you have with it are entirely your own.

However, that's not an excuse to stick your own head in the sand (and yes - I *have* done support; in fact, i still do).

Learning in IT is a constant - hardware AND software; the day you stop learning (or wanting to learn) in IT is the day you should find a new profession.

"Keep up or get run over!" is not new (I learned that mantra back in the pre-PC days of mainframes and green-screen terminals); however, how many people in IT (especially software or support) bothered to remember why?

A lot of words for not really saying anything and I have no idea why it's directed at me, just because someone doesn't like something and wont purchase it for themselves, does not mean they wont learn how to use and support it

But in a corporate setting, I wont have to support it, because businesses are unlikely to adopt this, and MS knows this, that's not the point of Windows 8, they're just trying to use their market position to strongarm their way into

the mobile market, you need to get over yourself.

And did you know that Windows 8 is for the most part Windows 7? Sure it has a lot of tweaks good or bad but without Windows 7, or more to the point, Vista, Windows 8 wouldn't exist.

And it's funny you're trash talking Windows 7 because most people consider it the best OS Microsoft has made to date. I'm thinking the problem you have with it are entirely your own.

yeah but windows 8 has so many upgrades that windows 7 doesn't for instance. .net framework 4.5 Microsoft visual c++ 2012 and well I guess u can call it a better service pack xD but still you GAIN all the performance from your HARDWARE without hiccups. they tightened up loose ends that windows 7 has. im sorry if im being an ******* on here its just stupid how people judge an OS because its different that it doesn't have the full desktop with alittle start button that holds 7 items in it.

You guys do know that Microsoft is working on Windows Server 2012 right? that's is going to be for businesses.

yeah but windows 8 has so many upgrades that windows 7 doesn't for instance. .net framework 4.5 Microsoft visual c++ 2012 and well I guess u can call it a better service pack xD but still you GAIN all the performance from your HARDWARE without hiccups. they tightened up loose ends that windows 7 has. im sorry if im being an ******* on here its just stupid how people judge an OS because its different that it doesn't have the full desktop with alittle start button that holds 7 items in it.

You guys do know that Microsoft is working on Windows Server 2012 right? that's is going to be for businesses.

Businesses are not going to use Server 2012 as a workstation OS, just like they aren't going to use Windows XP or Windows 7 as a server OS there is no point in bringing up a server OS in this context.

yeah but windows 8 has so many upgrades that windows 7 doesn't for instance. .net framework 4.5 Microsoft visual c++ 2012 and well I guess u can call it a better service pack xD but still you GAIN all the performance from your HARDWARE without hiccups. they tightened up loose ends that windows 7 has. im sorry if im being an ******* on here its just stupid how people judge an OS because its different that it doesn't have the full desktop with alittle start button that holds 7 items in it.

You guys do know that Microsoft is working on Windows Server 2012 right? that's is going to be for businesses.

Uh.. .net framework 4.5 and Visual Studio 2012 can both be used on Windows 7. Hardly compelling selling points at any rate. Ask an average user what those two things are and be prepared to get silence as your answer.

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
    • Honestly just before Panos left it started to feel like MS just wasnt interested in them so they were being less innovative with them, and then when he DID leave for Amazon its kind of clear the direction is gone. It felt like Panos had both goals and drive, and a vision, but it felt like no matter what his title/department was the Surface devices never had the full interest of the rest of management and he was just pushing a bolder up a hill that MS was adding dirt to as he went.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      477
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!