Recommended Posts

Was able to play a mp4 with h.264 stream, high profile 3.1, ac3 5.1 track, in the Metro video player. However, no artwork, no subtitle. If that could work as well, or if someone knows how to make it work without installing third party stuff... then most of my media issues on Windows are solved.

I expect the easy way to get videos to work will be using some custom conversion tool for now. I remember people did/do the same to get mkvs to work with things like the Xbox 360 etc without having to use a 3rd party media server app.

I expect the easy way to get videos to work will be using some custom conversion tool for now. I remember people did/do the same to get mkvs to work with things like the Xbox 360 etc without having to use a 3rd party media server app.

nah, they'll be an mkv parser soon enough. not that hard. i would do it if i gave a flying bleep about mkv. just wait for it,the passionate mkv guys will have it for you.

nah, they'll be an mkv parser soon enough. not that hard. i would do it if i gave a flying bleep about mkv. just wait for it,the passionate mkv guys will have it for you.

That's interesting, I honestly don't know much about the difference between media foundation compared to the old direct show and if you can even do the same stuff or if you're forced to write your own app (like VLC for example) if you want all that stuff on the winrt side.

Reading a bit more about Media Foundation etc, it seems that all we'd really need is for people to port their directshow filters into Media Foundation Transforms (MFTs). Though again, I dunno if installing these means that the built in Xbox Video/Music apps gain the support or if you'd have to actually write a whole new app.

  • 3 months later...
  • 2 months later...

I have often been wondering WHY neither Apple nor Microsoft have ever supported ANY of the open source container formats - not even the most successful ones, such as FLAC and Matroska (MKV) although they have both been around for over 10 years, and become some of the most popular media formats during the last 5 years? :iiam:

From a simple logical-commercial perspective this makes no sense at all. It would cost them nothing to support these formats, and it would increase the popularity of their hardware devices and software even more... so WHY don't they support it?

The only logical answer I can come up with is commercial interests.

Apple is a patent/rights owner when it comes to Quicktime codecs and containers just like Microsoft owns all licenses to the WMx formats.

We have the same situation with Sony, Canon or Adobe who have all developed their own codecs and media standards. None of these manufacturers support MKV either.

All of these companies also make a gigantic profit from MPEG 2/4 licenses via the MPEG-LA consort.

They make extra money each time a hardware manufacturer or a commercial software producer launches a product capable of playing these particular formats, or whenever a TV broadcaster is de facto forced to support Apple's or Microsoft's media platforms.

On the other hand, they would make no money from Vorbis, FLAC, VP8 or Dirac - or if either MKV and WebM became de facto media delivery or streaming standards.

That is essentially why I seriously doubt that we will ever see native MKV support on any Apple or Microsoft device. They insist that you should use their standards regardless whether there is a better format or not.

I have often been wondering WHY neither Apple nor Microsoft have ever supported ANY of the open source container formats - not even the most successful ones, such as FLAC and Matroska (MKV) although they have both been around for over 10 years, and become some of the most popular media formats during the last 5 years?

Because the primary use for such formats is pirated content and neither company wants to be seen to be facilitating piracy. That shouldn't matter?as the same was true of MP3?but Microsoft likes to make things as difficult as possible. That's why .nfo files open with System Information and produce an error message.

Really Microsoft should embrace commonly used formats like MKV and FLAC.

Even if they're not supported by MS I'm pretty sure that even a metro player could be written to support them so it's not a lost cause really. Heck if flac was used as much as mp3 is then maybe things would be different.

I have often been wondering WHY neither Apple nor Microsoft have ever supported ANY of the open source container formats - not even the most successful ones, such as FLAC and Matroska (MKV) although they have both been around for over 10 years, and become some of the most popular media formats during the last 5 years? :iiam:

In the piracy scene, Outside there there is feck all use its all either iso mp4 or bluray.

It took them years to get tagged mp4 I wouldn't hold my breath for mkv.

What if I want Chapters ?

MP4 did it first.

Subtitles ?

Mp4 has it.

FLAC Audio ? DTS ? Any of the HD Audio Formats [ TrueHD, DTS-HD, etc ] ?

There's a container & disk format for that! Bluray

How about 3D Support since that is getting popular..

No container change needed

How about if I don't want to pay the MPEG-LA for the rights to use it in my hardware ? MP4 is not a "free" container, it's full of patents.

Was its been released as the MPEG are developing its replacemetn.

MKV is superior in every single way outside of Native support. Why ? Because pirates use it.. why? Because it's Better.

Anyone can make a container that holds anything, Lets use the humble zip file itll hold anything even text files! Now all we need is every manufacturer to get decent hardware and software support shouldnt take long.

It's the same reason it took a while to get MP3 support in lots of hardware players, or Xvid/DivX support..

The above offered enhanced compression not needless incompatibility.

I've encoded or remuxed almost all of my DVD's and Blurays into H264 MKV's.. Best video with best audio, chapters, subtitles if needed. Telling me or anything else to go backward to MP4 is like telling people to go back to AVI, or RM. It's inferior, in almost every way.

And ive mine tagged with all the metadata inside including the poster and have better audio compression all with out of the box support on all devices.

KWx8xup.png

Its fine as a container for open codecs like ogg but we already have perfectly good and supported containers for highly compressed and lossless media

In the piracy scene, Outside there there is feck all use its all either iso mp4 or bluray.

It took them years to get tagged mp4 I wouldn't hold my breath for mkv.

And yet everyday consumer products support such formats without issue.

mp4 is also huge in the piracy scene, its the current standard for SD scene releases, does that mean microsoft shouldn't support mp4? The piracy argument is completely stupid and pointless, mkv isn't exclusively used for piracy.

And yet everyday consumer products support such formats without issue.

And in the same time mp4 has become ubiquitous from browsers to broadcast to catch up tv. If you see digital video anywhere or record it chances are its mp4. Its now at the end of its life and mkvs hardware support is still pathetic the software support is even worse.

I use media player codec pack 4.2.5 and play the MKV files through windows media player. I also use media player to stream to my dlna TV so I can watch 3D content easily whether they're encoded in MKV or AVI.

I'm really not sure why you would want to use the windows 8 video player....it doesn't support "off the shelf" codecs.

Wow i see some people are still trying to defend MS, Apple nor any other company for not supporting mkv files. Spin it the way you want a media player without mkv support these days is fail. There's absolutely no good reason outside of collaborating with the mpaa (if this is one dunno) for not supporting it.

Wow i see some people are still trying to defend MS, Apple nor any other company for not supporting mkv files. Spin it the way you want a media player without mkv support these days is fail. There's absolutely no good reason outside of collaborating with the mpaa (if this is one dunno) for not supporting it.

it's not even about defending anyone. there are probably hundreds if not thousands of media players out there than can be downloaded to support the MKV container. you can even download codecs for Windows Media Player to support MKV so you can then stream to your TV or xbox without a need to convert. I watch 3D MKV files all the time streamed from my laptop to my LG TV.

the average person have no clue what MKV files are and those who know about MKV files should know how to install a codec or download a player that supports it. it's that easy Microsoft or apple or any other company does not have to support it, just that they make facilities in their applications that facilitate the addition of the codec. I don't get what your problem is really. I really don't get it. please explain to me what your problem is because right now it seems you want a company to go out their way to include something that you can easily include in your install yourself.

if you want to call it defending, then so be it. but stop the nonsense that you think they should cater to your needs when you can easily do it yourself.

I don't get what your problem is really. I really don't get it. please explain to me what your problem is because right now it seems you want a company to go out their way to include something that you can easily include in your install yourself.

My problem ?

I don't have any problem. It's just that people lose time writing an essay about why mkv support is not important (it's for pirates, mp4 is better, bla bla) while the simple fact is mkv is a popular file container and a self respecting media player should support it out of the box. End of story.

That's why .nfo files open with System Information and produce an error message.

Um, no.

Why would he does that ?

He's using windows not linux. It's supposed to be easy and painless.

I don't remember any Windows marketing suggesting that pirating videos or playing obscure non-standard video formats would be "easy and painless." Besides, converting MKVs to MP4 using HandBrake is pretty easy and painless.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Now 8GB of ram looks even worse in the Neo. I'm so happy I purchased 128GB of DDR 4 when I did.... paid $174. Upgraded my parents laptop to 32GB around the same time for $48. Luckily I have a TON of spare laptops. So i'm good on laptops for a while. I also have a lot of desktops too that I could use if i had to. Lets just hope nothing happens to my main 4 monitor couch workstation.
    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      453
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      169
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      134
    4. 4
      Xenon
      77
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!