Recommended Posts

Was able to play a mp4 with h.264 stream, high profile 3.1, ac3 5.1 track, in the Metro video player. However, no artwork, no subtitle. If that could work as well, or if someone knows how to make it work without installing third party stuff... then most of my media issues on Windows are solved.

I expect the easy way to get videos to work will be using some custom conversion tool for now. I remember people did/do the same to get mkvs to work with things like the Xbox 360 etc without having to use a 3rd party media server app.

I expect the easy way to get videos to work will be using some custom conversion tool for now. I remember people did/do the same to get mkvs to work with things like the Xbox 360 etc without having to use a 3rd party media server app.

nah, they'll be an mkv parser soon enough. not that hard. i would do it if i gave a flying bleep about mkv. just wait for it,the passionate mkv guys will have it for you.

nah, they'll be an mkv parser soon enough. not that hard. i would do it if i gave a flying bleep about mkv. just wait for it,the passionate mkv guys will have it for you.

That's interesting, I honestly don't know much about the difference between media foundation compared to the old direct show and if you can even do the same stuff or if you're forced to write your own app (like VLC for example) if you want all that stuff on the winrt side.

Reading a bit more about Media Foundation etc, it seems that all we'd really need is for people to port their directshow filters into Media Foundation Transforms (MFTs). Though again, I dunno if installing these means that the built in Xbox Video/Music apps gain the support or if you'd have to actually write a whole new app.

  • 3 months later...
  • 2 months later...

I have often been wondering WHY neither Apple nor Microsoft have ever supported ANY of the open source container formats - not even the most successful ones, such as FLAC and Matroska (MKV) although they have both been around for over 10 years, and become some of the most popular media formats during the last 5 years? :iiam:

From a simple logical-commercial perspective this makes no sense at all. It would cost them nothing to support these formats, and it would increase the popularity of their hardware devices and software even more... so WHY don't they support it?

The only logical answer I can come up with is commercial interests.

Apple is a patent/rights owner when it comes to Quicktime codecs and containers just like Microsoft owns all licenses to the WMx formats.

We have the same situation with Sony, Canon or Adobe who have all developed their own codecs and media standards. None of these manufacturers support MKV either.

All of these companies also make a gigantic profit from MPEG 2/4 licenses via the MPEG-LA consort.

They make extra money each time a hardware manufacturer or a commercial software producer launches a product capable of playing these particular formats, or whenever a TV broadcaster is de facto forced to support Apple's or Microsoft's media platforms.

On the other hand, they would make no money from Vorbis, FLAC, VP8 or Dirac - or if either MKV and WebM became de facto media delivery or streaming standards.

That is essentially why I seriously doubt that we will ever see native MKV support on any Apple or Microsoft device. They insist that you should use their standards regardless whether there is a better format or not.

I have often been wondering WHY neither Apple nor Microsoft have ever supported ANY of the open source container formats - not even the most successful ones, such as FLAC and Matroska (MKV) although they have both been around for over 10 years, and become some of the most popular media formats during the last 5 years?

Because the primary use for such formats is pirated content and neither company wants to be seen to be facilitating piracy. That shouldn't matter?as the same was true of MP3?but Microsoft likes to make things as difficult as possible. That's why .nfo files open with System Information and produce an error message.

Really Microsoft should embrace commonly used formats like MKV and FLAC.

Even if they're not supported by MS I'm pretty sure that even a metro player could be written to support them so it's not a lost cause really. Heck if flac was used as much as mp3 is then maybe things would be different.

I have often been wondering WHY neither Apple nor Microsoft have ever supported ANY of the open source container formats - not even the most successful ones, such as FLAC and Matroska (MKV) although they have both been around for over 10 years, and become some of the most popular media formats during the last 5 years? :iiam:

In the piracy scene, Outside there there is feck all use its all either iso mp4 or bluray.

It took them years to get tagged mp4 I wouldn't hold my breath for mkv.

What if I want Chapters ?

MP4 did it first.

Subtitles ?

Mp4 has it.

FLAC Audio ? DTS ? Any of the HD Audio Formats [ TrueHD, DTS-HD, etc ] ?

There's a container & disk format for that! Bluray

How about 3D Support since that is getting popular..

No container change needed

How about if I don't want to pay the MPEG-LA for the rights to use it in my hardware ? MP4 is not a "free" container, it's full of patents.

Was its been released as the MPEG are developing its replacemetn.

MKV is superior in every single way outside of Native support. Why ? Because pirates use it.. why? Because it's Better.

Anyone can make a container that holds anything, Lets use the humble zip file itll hold anything even text files! Now all we need is every manufacturer to get decent hardware and software support shouldnt take long.

It's the same reason it took a while to get MP3 support in lots of hardware players, or Xvid/DivX support..

The above offered enhanced compression not needless incompatibility.

I've encoded or remuxed almost all of my DVD's and Blurays into H264 MKV's.. Best video with best audio, chapters, subtitles if needed. Telling me or anything else to go backward to MP4 is like telling people to go back to AVI, or RM. It's inferior, in almost every way.

And ive mine tagged with all the metadata inside including the poster and have better audio compression all with out of the box support on all devices.

KWx8xup.png

Its fine as a container for open codecs like ogg but we already have perfectly good and supported containers for highly compressed and lossless media

In the piracy scene, Outside there there is feck all use its all either iso mp4 or bluray.

It took them years to get tagged mp4 I wouldn't hold my breath for mkv.

And yet everyday consumer products support such formats without issue.

mp4 is also huge in the piracy scene, its the current standard for SD scene releases, does that mean microsoft shouldn't support mp4? The piracy argument is completely stupid and pointless, mkv isn't exclusively used for piracy.

And yet everyday consumer products support such formats without issue.

And in the same time mp4 has become ubiquitous from browsers to broadcast to catch up tv. If you see digital video anywhere or record it chances are its mp4. Its now at the end of its life and mkvs hardware support is still pathetic the software support is even worse.

I use media player codec pack 4.2.5 and play the MKV files through windows media player. I also use media player to stream to my dlna TV so I can watch 3D content easily whether they're encoded in MKV or AVI.

I'm really not sure why you would want to use the windows 8 video player....it doesn't support "off the shelf" codecs.

Wow i see some people are still trying to defend MS, Apple nor any other company for not supporting mkv files. Spin it the way you want a media player without mkv support these days is fail. There's absolutely no good reason outside of collaborating with the mpaa (if this is one dunno) for not supporting it.

Wow i see some people are still trying to defend MS, Apple nor any other company for not supporting mkv files. Spin it the way you want a media player without mkv support these days is fail. There's absolutely no good reason outside of collaborating with the mpaa (if this is one dunno) for not supporting it.

it's not even about defending anyone. there are probably hundreds if not thousands of media players out there than can be downloaded to support the MKV container. you can even download codecs for Windows Media Player to support MKV so you can then stream to your TV or xbox without a need to convert. I watch 3D MKV files all the time streamed from my laptop to my LG TV.

the average person have no clue what MKV files are and those who know about MKV files should know how to install a codec or download a player that supports it. it's that easy Microsoft or apple or any other company does not have to support it, just that they make facilities in their applications that facilitate the addition of the codec. I don't get what your problem is really. I really don't get it. please explain to me what your problem is because right now it seems you want a company to go out their way to include something that you can easily include in your install yourself.

if you want to call it defending, then so be it. but stop the nonsense that you think they should cater to your needs when you can easily do it yourself.

I don't get what your problem is really. I really don't get it. please explain to me what your problem is because right now it seems you want a company to go out their way to include something that you can easily include in your install yourself.

My problem ?

I don't have any problem. It's just that people lose time writing an essay about why mkv support is not important (it's for pirates, mp4 is better, bla bla) while the simple fact is mkv is a popular file container and a self respecting media player should support it out of the box. End of story.

That's why .nfo files open with System Information and produce an error message.

Um, no.

Why would he does that ?

He's using windows not linux. It's supposed to be easy and painless.

I don't remember any Windows marketing suggesting that pirating videos or playing obscure non-standard video formats would be "easy and painless." Besides, converting MKVs to MP4 using HandBrake is pretty easy and painless.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!