Recommended Posts

(CNSNews.com) ? Gary Harrington, the Oregon man convicted of collecting rainwater and snow runoff on his rural property surrendered Wednesday morning to begin serving his 30-day, jail sentence in Medford, Oregon.

?I?m sacrificing my liberty so we can stand up as a country and stand for our liberty,? Harrington told a small crowd of people gathered outside of the Jackson County (Oregon) Jail.

Several people held signs that showed support for Harrington as he was taken inside the jail.

Harrington was found guilty two weeks ago of breaking a 1925 law for having, what state water managers called ?three illegal reservoirs? on his property. He was convicted of nine misdemeanors, sentenced to 30 days in jail and fined over $1500 for collecting rainwater and snow runoff on his property.

The Oregon Water Resources Department, claims that Harrington has been violating the state?s water use law by diverting water from streams running into the Big Butte River. :wacko:

But Harrington says he is not diverting the state's water -- merely collecting rainwater and snow melt that falls or flows on his own property.

Harrington has vowed to continue to fight the penalty, stating that the government has become ?big bullies? and that ?from here on in, I?m going to fight it.?

?They?ve just gotten to be big bullies and if you just lay over and die and give up, that just makes them bigger bullies, Harrington said in an interview two weeks ago with CNSNews.com.

"We as Americans, we need to stand on our constitutional rights, on our rights as citizens and hang tough. This is a good country, we?ll prevail,? he said.

His release is expected in early September.

source

Harrington was found guilty two weeks ago of breaking a 1925 law for having, what state water managers called ?three illegal reservoirs? on his property. He was convicted of nine misdemeanors, sentenced to 30 days in jail and fined over $1500 for collecting rainwater and snow runoff on his property.

WTF? 30 days in jail for catching rainwater? Seems that they might want to update a law that is almost 90 years old...

Sad when governments own the water that falls from the sky. :/

Well all you really own is the top foot or so of your property, anything past that belongs to the government, hence why you have no say if they come drilling on your property

That is a dumb law! Although it could be worse i guess. He could have eaten Ice Cream on Sunday! (Yes, there is a law in Oregon about not eating Ice Cream on Sundays) 0-o

lol there are tonnes of random laws like that all around the world. Crazy stuff.

I feel like there must be more to this. I mean, the law is still relevant, if you were a private land owner who owned a large piece of land that fed a public reservoir, and you decided to build your own reservoirs to capture that water before it made it to the public one, that would (could) be pretty detrimental to a large number of people.

I feel like there must be more to this. I mean, the law is still relevant, if you were a private land owner who owned a large piece of land that fed a public reservoir, and you decided to build your own reservoirs to capture that water before it made it to the public one, that would (could) be pretty detrimental to a large number of people.

Most likely he was sacrificing his "liberty" by being a complete *******. There's always far more to a story like than what is reported. He's probably serving time for contempt of court.

Also, WTF kind of bias **** for a source is that?!?! That is probably most biased site that I've ever had the displeasure of visiting.

This "story" is looking more and more like complete BS.

Update: I can't find a single source that doesn't come from some biased rant/agenda site. :rolleyes:

Well all you really own is the top foot or so of your property, anything past that belongs to the government, hence why you have no say if they come drilling on your property

That's right, you can own the property but someone else can own the mineral rights. Would suck to own some land then all the sudden people come in and start digging away, its happened though.

That would fall under 'certain unalienable rights' -- as in human survival. ;)

Yikes and you can be jailed for that? Crazy times.

Though it seems like the piece is missing some information. Surely you can't be jailed for collecting water, even if they classify them as reservoirs?

Well all you really own is the top foot or so of your property, anything past that belongs to the government, hence why you have no say if they come drilling on your property

Not sure where you got that idea, and maybe that is the case where you live, but it certainly isn't the case everywhere. If someone were to discover that there was oil, diamonds, etc. under my Dad's property here in Mississippi, they'd have to pay him for the mineral rights to get at it. A company had to do exactly that with my grandmother a while back, and some people in my wife's family own some land where they get royalties on the oil that is extracted there.

http://en.wikipedia..../Mineral_rights

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oil_and_gas_law_in_the_United_States

Seems that the only way that someone other than the property owner would own the mineral right was if they (or a previous owner) had sold those rights. The land my family lives on has been in our family since the early 1800s though (about the same year Mississippi became a state, if I remember correctly), so maybe that makes a difference.

That's right, you can own the property but someone else can own the mineral rights. Would suck to own some land then all the sudden people come in and start digging away, its happened though.

Not sure where you got that idea, and maybe that is the case where you live, but it certainly isn't the case everywhere. If someone were to discover that there was oil, diamonds, etc. under my Dad's property here in Mississippi, they'd have to pay him for the mineral rights to get at it. A company had to do exactly that with my grandmother a while back, and some people in my wife's family own some land where they get royalties on the oil that is extracted there.

http://en.wikipedia..../Mineral_rights

http://en.wikipedia....e_United_States

Seems that the only way that someone other than the property owner would own the mineral right was if they (or a previous owner) had sold those rights. The land my family lives on has been in our family since the early 1800s though (about the same year Mississippi became a state, if I remember correctly), so maybe that makes a difference.

I think it depends on the state you live in. Some states allow you to sell the mineral rights to you land, like Texas. So if you are going to buy land you want to make sure the mineral rights have not been sold. If they have and you are not aware of it then later you will be caught in the middle of a legal battle that you will loose. I am not sure about all of the laws for all of the states. I wonder if there is a law out there where you buy the land but do not own the land at a certain depth. How about the sky above you. Who owns that? I think there are laws for that too.

At the end it does not matter. If the government wants it they will bully out out of your land. Just ask the Native Americans. Other countries have done it in the past too. Even if you win it really does not matter. You are only renting the land. Stop paying taxes and your land will be taken away.

If I was that guy I would just **** away on his land and let it run into the reservoir but there are probably laws for that too. lol

If I was that guy I would just **** away on his land and let it run into the reservoir but there are probably laws for that too. lol

You don't live in a rural area, do you? I guess you don't understand how septic systems work outside of a city. That's exactly what the waste does anyway (after being filtered through miles of the water table underground).

And last year, Mississippi passed a law limiting eminent domain powers in our state, so it is a bit harder now for the government to take land away here: http://www.openmarket.org/2011/11/09/mississippi-voters-pass-initiative-restricting-eminent-domain-powers/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • iPhone 18 Pro drop-test video and photos leak on the dark web following a data breach by Hamid Ganji iPhone 17 Pro - Image via Apple Apple is seemingly facing one of the biggest data breaches in its history, and just a few months before the official debut of the iPhone 18 Pro series, photos, a drop-test video, a supplier list, and key phone components have reportedly been leaked by hackers. Last week, we reported that Tata Electronics, an Apple supplier and iPhone producer in India, was hit by a data breach. As a result, it was reported that more than 200,000 trade secrets and confidential documents belonging to Apple and Tesla were stolen by the ransomware group World Leaks. According to Reuters, the group has now leaked supplier lists, component details, and photos of the upcoming iPhone 18 Pro models on the dark web. One of the materials leaked by the hackers is a drop-test video of the iPhone 18 Pro, which is due to launch this September. The phone is shown in a gray color and has the same familiar design we saw on last year's iPhone 17 Pro series. The device also appears to be quite durable, though it seems to be thicker than last year's model. One possible explanation is that Apple may be using a larger battery in the iPhone 18 Pro series. Moreover, Reuters says it has seen at least six documents mapping many components in the iPhone 18 Pro models to their respective suppliers, including details on chips on the main circuit board and on battery and camera components. The documents reportedly detail hundreds of parts that will be used in the iPhone 18 Pro models. A person familiar with the matter told the outlet that Apple classifies this data as sensitive and “is concerned about the documents being shared on the dark web as they relate to unreleased models.” Apple is reportedly investigating the issue but has yet to issue an official statement.
    • You do you, I've just said that it first appeared in "home" version before it will be available in "work" one. I use Edge only because it still supports MV2 uBO extension even on Android - I'll switch when they stop.
    • I imagine that was a review or something? My reviews mostly contain a lot of images and galleries, but these are all webp too, but yeah it all adds up on the page load. Would help if you were more helpful with your critique instead of bitching and moaning like a Karen 😂 Because then we might be able to fix it for you.
    • If Valve refused to let them make the case, I wonder if they've already partnered with someone else to do it? The fact that they didn't seek permission/licence before diving straight in is incredible though
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Juan Dela earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Collagen Project earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      Wakeen1966 earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      273
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      142
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      100
    5. 5
      macoman
      54
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!