OnLive reportedly shutting down, new company forming in its wake

By ACTIONpack
in Back Page News

 Share

Recommended Posts

Grand Master

ACTIONpack

Posted
Posted

ell, here's a bit of a shocker. After a strong showing at E3 and partnerships with companies like OUYA, gaming service OnLive is reportedly closing down, with an entire staff layoff resulting. At a glance, this sure feels a lot like the similar rise and fall of InstantAction, which was attempting to pull off something similar with cloud-based gaming. Polygon is reporting the story as relayed to the site by game developer Brian Fargo. We've reached out to the company and received a non-comment comment, "We don't respond to rumors and have no comment." Our OnLive contact also used the opportunity to plug its Google TV tie-ins and few giveaways -- so, for the moment at least, things seem to be moving along as usual.

Update: Joystiq has reached out for comment as well, getting a similar, yet decidedly more blunt response: "We don't respond to rumors, but of course not." Blunt response or no, we're sure this isn't the last we'll be hearing about this one.

Update 2: We reached out to OnLive again for clarification on whether the denial pertained to both the shutdown and layoff rumors. The response reads thusly: "I have no comment on the news other than to say the OnLive service is not shutting down. I'm sorry I cannot be more specific."

Update 3: Martyn Williams from IDG has reported there are employees leaving the OnLive offices with moving boxes.

http://www.engadget.com/2012/08/17/onlive-service-reportedly-shutting-down-laying-off-staff/

Grand Master

+Xinok Subscriber²

Posted
  • Subscriber²
Posted

I was rather impressed with what they accomplished with OnLive. But while it was an impressive bit of technology, it failed to be practical. You needed a dedicated wired connection to get decent gameplay, the graphics weren't so great, and there was noticeable lag in some games. In the end, why not just get a 360 or PS3?

Grand Master

remixedcat

Posted
Posted

I was rather impressed with what they accomplished with OnLive. But while it was an impressive bit of technology, it failed to be practical. You needed a dedicated wired connection to get decent gameplay, the graphics weren't so great, and there was noticeable lag in some games. In the end, why not just get a 360 or PS3?

Feel the same. Also ISPs would have to catch up big time and bump everyone up to at least 150+Mbps (so others in the household can still be able to use the internet while people are playing) and have pings in the single or in the low double digits in order for this to really work on the scale Onlive wanted. The avg. connection in the US is like 3-4mbps and 500ms pings. That chokes on pure HD videos, let alone a system like Onlive.

Veteran

~Johnny

Posted
Posted

I was rather impressed with what they accomplished with OnLive. But while it was an impressive bit of technology, it failed to be practical. You needed a dedicated wired connection to get decent gameplay, the graphics weren't so great, and there was noticeable lag in some games. In the end, why not just get a 360 or PS3?

The point was I could get a console for ?39.99 with a free game, then play that game anywhere instantly - whether it's a tablet, computer or console. And then you could pay only ?6.99 a month for access to over 260 complete games you can play anywhere you have a connection instantly just by signing in. Granted you need a decent connection, but for those of us who do and are tight on budget, it was a lovely deal.

Grand Master

HawkMan

Posted
Posted

I was rather impressed with what they accomplished with OnLive. But while it was an impressive bit of technology, it failed to be practical. You needed a dedicated wired connection to get decent gameplay, the graphics weren't so great, and there was noticeable lag in some games. In the end, why not just get a 360 or PS3?

As I said in another company, this has nothing to do with the company going under. they where if nor making money, getting there fast, and had more than enough reserves to go on. this was purely about greed.

In a Move that would be illegal in any other country and most other states, the owner filed for a special type of bankruptcy, allowing him to discard all employees, all their benefits for this they chose to rehire, ditch all their stock options for the company THEY helped build and make valuable. Meanwhile the bigger investors like Intel and HP, who has big expensive lawyers, they got their money back (nothing shady about that....). And all of the IP of the company was sold of to another single backer giving the CEO full control. he can now rehire staff with no benefits, lower pay and no stock options. (personally I hope they all say no thank you and anyone else offered a job does as well, but it's unlikely today).

Interestingly OnLive doesn't even own the IP they just sold. that is all owned by their parent company Rearden Labs, a patent hoarder company. so this new single investor basically bought, nothing.

Wonder if Ouyja would be in contention for purchasing the service?

With what ? their 8 million pocket change, that they expect to be enough to start large scale mass production ? Not a chance. besides it's already bought by a single investor.

Grand Master

Boz

Posted
Posted

It's only a shocker if you have not seen that distributed gaming is the stupidest idea ever conceived. The costs and amount of money required to bring quality experience with enough servers, while having the same quality of output.

I always thought this was a stupid idea and shocker, they are going bankrupt.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

  • Posts

    • My external monitor suddenly isn't working and found out on my device manager that AMD radeon graphics has a "code 43"

      By hellowalkman · Posted

      According to Microsoft, Cause: One of the drivers controlling the device notified the operating system that the device failed in some manner.   https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/topic/error-codes-in-device-manager-in-windows-524e9e89-4dee-8883-0afa-6bca0456324e
    • Game I've been Working On

      By Circaflex · Posted

      This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • How do you future-proof a home or small office network?

      By Circaflex · Posted

      Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • How do you future-proof a home or small office network?

      By Nick H. · Posted

      I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • Celebrating Windows XP's 25th anniversary this year

      By Nick H. · Posted

      I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.

  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post

  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      269
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      154
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
    Show More

  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!