Recommended Posts

SPRINGFIELD ? The School Department will be contacting parents by letter and by telephone during the next two weeks to provide details of a new program that allows students ages 12 and older to have access to condoms.

The notice will stress that parents and guardians have the right to ?opt out,? by signing a form if they do not want their children to have access to the program.

The access to condoms under the new ?Comprehensive Reproductive Health Policy,? was approved by the School Committee in April by a 4-3 vote, with the aim of reducing teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted illnesses.

Letters and opt-out forms will be mailed before school starts, just targeting the affected families of middle school and high school students, ages 12 and older. The opt out forms can be returned by mail or in person, or written notice can be provided any time during the year, according to the policy.

In addition, parents will be contacted by the Connect-Ed telephone system before school starts, with basic information about the new program, officials said.

Under the program that takes effect Sept. 1, condoms will be available for eligible students from school nurses at the middle schools and high schools and the school-based health clinics.

?School nurses will educate eligible students on abstinence, faithfulness, STI/HIV, pregnancy, and storage and usage of condoms,? the policy states. ?Eligible students will be able to ask questions which will be answered factually and in an age-appropriate manner.?

more

Ya because if the kid doesn't have condoms, he won't have sex..

It's also while teenage pregnancy is so rare in bible belt..

Give the kids access, either they won't need them, they won't use them, or they will use them and be safer in the process.

The notice will stress that parents and guardians have the right to ?opt out,? by signing a form if they do not want their children to have access to the program.

That's incredibly short-sighted, but least it should give enough evidence that there is a strong correlation between teen pregnancy/STDs and education/access to contraception.

I'm no expert, but I think more than the issue of 12-13 year old kids using condoms but the education (or however you want to call it) that kids that age are having sex. I think there's an age for things. Heck even if they were 15. Yeah sure I'm aware there are tons of pregnant teens, but that's not an excuse.

Needless to say, I think the school acted intelligent (or somewhat) , they gave a solution, it's up to the parents to take it or leave it. If parents don't care, then well it's up to them.

There's a very strong correlation between teenage pregnancy and abstinence education.

Might as well drill safe sex into their minds from an early age. Biology is inherently driven to reproduce as early as is safely possible to maximize the number of offspring. The idea that we can overcome the single strongest drive in biology post-maturation in any form is rather arrogant.

  • Like 1

Maybe it should be up to the parents to educate them, and to help them choose protection.

It should be, but most times people don't talk to their parents about sex, and the parents dont talk to the children about it either. So their best option is to do it where they actually get educated.

  • Like 1

Maybe it should be up to the parents to educate them, and to help them choose protection.

I agree parent should choose the way their kids are educated about sex, but really, what is so dangerous about having an honest, biologically accurate discussion in class about sex, and how to avoid disease and pregnancy?

It not a coincidence that abstinence only schools/states have high rates of STDs and teen pregnancy.

  • Like 2

I agree parent should choose the way their kids are educated about sex, but really, what is so dangerous about having an honest, biologically accurate discussion in class about sex, and how to avoid disease and pregnancy?

I don't see the problem myself but you know some parents.

I wasn't so safe in my early teens up to young Adult. I banged a few girls and only got scared of pregnacy once. Just lucky. Oh yeah this was before condoms were needed so no disease. (I kid about the before needed part)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!