Recommended Posts

I don't understand why Firefox memory usage is so low compared to the rest. Since the 0.x beta days they had a huge memory leak. However they never acknowledged it as a memory leak: they called it a 'feature' in that it saves the browsing sessions of closed tabs and previous pages.

Hasn't been an issue for good bit of time now (fixed in.. v4? I forget), unless you have an addon that's misbehaving. Last few versions, as least with the 20 or so addons that I'm using, Firefox has been quite good with memory usage, usually winding up using more or less half the memory of Chromium with similar addons.

Where did I say anything about low marketshare? I said high marketshare (or no competition) tends to lead to laziness. When IE6 was released there really wasn't any competition. Opera was around but it wasn't free, Firefox wasn't around till 2004, Netscape was as good as dead, Chrome didn't exist, and Safari was released in 2003 on OS X. So Microsoft had no incentive to further develop their browser because there wasn't any other product to compete with, and hence no reason for them to spend money developing it further. Opera was also a paid app until version 10 so their incentive to develop came from their need for money. Nowadays the desktop browser may be free but they earn a good deal of money from licensing (Wii browser is powered by Opera, HTC used to use their browser as default etc).

Dude, I was not arguing with you... I was just saying.

Nothing is wrong. In Windows 8 RTM 64-bit, Internet Explorer always shows up as iexplore.exe (without *32, unlike other software).

Go ahead and launch it from Program Files (x86) and see for yourself.

Also try this: launch IE from the taskbar and check out your user agent as I suggested before.

That's my point. I did check, and my clean install is running IE64, and when I run IE32 it shows that it's 32-bit in the Task Manager.

When I attempt to Pin IE64 to the taskbar it notes that it is already pinned in the context menu. IE32 however notes that it is available to pin to the taskbar.

I just don't want you to have invalid results since I'd like to see a good comparison review. :)

I just reinstalled Windows 8 on the test system just for you. Clean installation (not upgrade). Didn't install anything. Didn't change anything.

Desktop's IE10 uses 32-bit tabs.

Metro's IE10 uses 64-bit tabs.

It even appears in the user agent:

32-bit tab user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; Trident/6.0)

64-bit tab user agent: Mozilla/5.0 (compatible; MSIE 10.0; Windows NT 6.2; Win64; x64; Trident/6.0)

See for yourself on http://www.whatismybrowser.com and http://whatsmyuseragent.com.

That is odd, to me... because my clean install uses 64 bit all around.

[edit]

Not criticizing in any way, just actually wondering why the difference.

They should look at the html5test.com and try to get at least 400 score on there. It seem like it's the standard use for browser scoring in HTML5.

Is Microsoft going to release IE10 for Windows 7? If not, can we still take them (Microsoft) seriously? Really, they break the internet with their different IE versions.

Yes, they are suppose to but I imagine it will be sometimes after October 26, when they release Windows 8 to the general public.

This article explains why the browser is always 64bit, but the content is 32bit (desktop) and 64bit (metro). http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ieinternals/archive/2012/03/23/understanding-ie10-enhanced-protected-mode-network-security-addons-cookies-metro-desktop.aspx

You can also force 64bit everywhere by enabling Enhanced Protection Mode under the Advanced tab in Internet Options.

For IE10, we?ve changed IE such that Manager Processes always run as 64bit processes when running on a 64bit processor running a 64bit version of Windows. This improves security among other things. We do not expect that this change will meaningfully impact compatibility, because the Manager Process is designed not to run 3rd party content, and thus there?s little opportunity for anyone to take a dependency upon the Frame Process? bitness. In support of this change, the various registry points that point to Internet Explorer have been updated to point to C:\Program Files\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe. If you manually invoke C:\Program Files (x86)\Internet Explorer\iexplore.exe, that 32bit process will simply launch the 64bit version of iexplore.exe (with the appropriate command line parameters) before exiting.

For the Content Processes, the story is a little more complicated. In the Metro-style experience of Internet Explorer, all Content Processes will run at 64bit (on Win64), which means that they benefit from the improved security provided in 64bit. The compatibility impact is minimal because Metro-style IE does not load any browser add-ons (Toolbars, BHOs, and non-browser-platform COM objects like MIME Handlers, URLMon Protocol Handlers, MIME Filters, ActiveX controls, etc). Back in IE9, running in 64bit mode meant that JavaScript was not JIT-compiled, but for IE10, the JIT compiler was enhanced to work for both 32bit and 64bit tabs, providing great performance in both. Additionally, many major browser add-ons like Flash, Silverlight, and Java are now available in 64bit versions.

In Internet Explorer on the Desktop, by default, Content Processes remain at 32bit by default for compatibility with 32bit ActiveX controls, Toolbars, BHOs, etc. Even when you directly launch the 64bit iexplore.exe executable, you will still have a 64bit Manager Process that hosts only 32bit Content Processes. If you want to enable 64bit Content Processes for the Desktop, you must tick the Enable Enhanced Protected Mode option in the Security section of Internet Explorer?s Tools > Internet Options > Advanced tab. When this option is enabled, all Content Processes that are running in Protected Mode (e.g. Internet Zone and Restricted Zone, by default) will begin to use 64bit Content Processes.

http://html5test.com/

Your browser scores

319

and 6 bonus points

out of a total of 500 points

You are using Internet Explorer 10.0 on Windows 8

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Your browser scores

345

and 9 bonus points

out of a total of 500 points

You are using Firefox 14.0.1 on Windows 8

So, which browser is better? :p

http://html5test.com/ Your browser scores 319 and 6 bonus points out of a total of 500 points You are using Internet Explorer 10.0 on Windows 8 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Your browser scores 345 and 9 bonus points out of a total of 500 points You are using Firefox 14.0.1 on Windows 8 So, which browser is better? :p

The answer to that is clear...

your browser scores

437

AND 13 BONUS POINTS

out of a total of 500 points

You are using Chrome 21 on Windows 8

The answer to that is clear...

Thanx for that FFM. But I will stick to my firefox, for now.

For the upteenth time, the so-called "HTML 5 Test" doesn't actually measure anything but just asks if the feature is implemented. Quantity over quality...

I understand that. Someone was asking for the html5 test and I obliged. My self, I could care less about benchmarks on anything. If I did, I would be running an i7-3770 Processor. But I'm not. I'm running an AMD 970 BE. But then, I prefer AMD. Will be getting the FX-8150 BE in a few days.

This article explains why the browser is always 64bit, but the content is 32bit (desktop) and 64bit (metro). http://blogs.msdn.co...ro-desktop.aspx

You can also force 64bit everywhere by enabling Enhanced Protection Mode under the Advanced tab in Internet Options.

That's exactly correct. That would explain why they are showing the browser info as WOW64. So in a way both sides were correct here, just about different aspects of how it worked.

ACID3 test be came the standard for how good the browser was 5 years ago and now html5test is becoming the new ACID3 test standard that web developers are using. The whole point of it is to show your browser is on par with others and web developers see that as to which browser I'm going to but more time into.

It'd be nice it there was also a practical test - like a UI responsive test during loading / panning / zooming etc. At this point, the responsiveness and fluidity of the browsers is becoming more important to the actual browsing experience than than the raw rendering / processing prowess. Of course it's doubly important IE 10 does well there, given that it'll be powering a large number of the new style UI applications. (And most of the Microsoft made Win8 applications are HTML & CSS apps using the IE 10 engine)

(Though if they can keep beefing up those Canvas / Animation scores I'm not complaining :p)

It'd be nice it there was also a practical test - like a UI responsive test during loading / panning / zooming etc. At this point, the responsiveness and fluidity of the browsers is becoming more important to the actual browsing experience than than the raw rendering / processing prowess. Of course it's doubly important IE 10 does well there, given that it's powering a large majority of the new style UI applications

(Though if they can keep beefing up those Canvas / Animation scores I'm not complaining :p)

For me, the litmus test is ease of use, and I'm sorry Microsoft, but sticking the refresh button on the other side of the address bar, away from the navigation buttons, GETS UP MY NOSE! GRR! :p

Also, Tracking Protection Lists are rubbish and don't block YouTube ads at ALL...

For me, the litmus test is ease of use, and I'm sorry Microsoft, but sticking the refresh button on the other side of the address bar, away from the navigation buttons, GETS UP MY NOSE! GRR! :p

Also, Tracking Protection Lists are rubbish and don't block YouTube ads at ALL...

You do know you can change that right? Just right click on the refresh button and say to show before address bar.

Here you go: http://www.neowin.ne...op-in-windows-8

See, I told you so. :D

Hence why I said we were both correct. It is a 64-bit process, but using 32-bit tabs for compatibility. I find that odd to be honest...but can understand why they are doing it that way...

IMO they need to update Silverlight then, since I prefer using IE for Netflix, and would like to have it be a 64-bit process. Otherwise why did they spend time developing the 64-bit version of Silverlight?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Hopefully this will fix the issue of no sound I have since last months stupid, and non-removable, Microsoft Corporation AudioProcessingObject Driver Update (1.0.3.56670)
    • It IS confusing! What channel are you in on each device? I'm guessing your 16GB device is on Experimental (formerly known as Dev) and your 128GB is on Beta.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!