Infographic: If the earth's age were scald down to 24 hours


Recommended Posts

...and in the few seconds we've been here, we've managed to not only totally eff up the planet, but divide ourselves into multiple warring camps, forever at each other throats over pure greed and ideology.

How sad.

post-280342-0-70420000-1345560366_thumb.

...and in the few seconds we've been here, we've managed to not only totally eff up the planet, but divide ourselves into multiple warring camps, forever at each other throats over pure greed and ideology.

How sad.

unlike the dinosaurs and all other animals, who all just get along with each other...

  • Like 3

Yeah, but people would get ****ed off if I decided you looked tasty and tore your throat out so I could feast upon your blood.

They seem ok with it if I scream something religious before killing you though O.o

unlike the dinosaurs and all other animals, who all just get along with each other...

Unless you consider yourself (and humanity) to be at the intellectual, moral and technological level as the dinosaurs and all other animals.

Unless you consider yourself (and humanity) to be at the intellectual, moral and technological level as the dinosaurs and all other animals.

We are still animals in every other way. Behavior, territory, tribes or herds, the basics are all there. As I said, we are the same but we are more "complex" which is not inherently good. We are not balanced. The more we segregate ourselves as higher beings, the more imbalanced we will be.

We are still animals in every other way. Behavior, territory, tribes or herds, the basics are all there. As I said, we are the same but we are more "complex" which is not inherently good. We are not balanced. The more we segregate ourselves as higher beings, the more imbalanced we will be.

I agree. This is why we need to use our intelligence and powers of reasoning to suppress the (latent) baser instincts, and for the advancement of the species as a whole. Internecine warfare, deforestation of our main sources of oxygen replenishment, wanton atmospheric and oceanic pollution may gain us momentary riches, but does not bode well for future generations.

I agree. This is why we need to use our intelligence and powers of reasoning to suppress the (latent) baser instincts, and for the advancement of the species as a whole. Internecine warfare, deforestation of our main sources of oxygen replenishment, wanton atmospheric and oceanic pollution may gain us momentary riches, but does not bode well for future generations.

At this time in our social evolution we are not nearly prepared to suppress our instincts completely. Everything we have and every way we think is linked back to these instincts. Survival of the fittest is a model that is seen the largest and smallest of scales in our society. The more we erode this model, the more we see devalued education, responsibility, work ethics, etc. The more we attempt to "diversify" the populace or even simply widen global interactions, the more tension we create. We simply aren't ready to move beyond these basics in an attempt to ascend to a new social level. I don't know if we ever will.

PS: It's estimated that 70% of Earth's oxygen is produced by phytoplankton on the oceans' surface.

Human evolution plans are all nice and dandy... on paper. Why care of future generations I will not experience, feel, even know? I have to admit, I am moderately egocentric and I do not have the "heart" for everyone, not nearly, as it is, but much less for things that aren't there yet and have infinite number of threats other than me.

Have I not evolved? Perhaps, although I do think and with an intellectual capacity of greater than average. It seems that it is not enough.

Instead, I'd argue that persistent conflict is the defining trait of living, intelligent or otherwise.

Human evolution plans are all nice and dandy... on paper. Why care of future generations I will not experience, feel, even know? I have to admit, I am moderately egocentric and I do not have the "heart" for everyone, not nearly, as it is, but much less for things that aren't there yet and have infinite number of threats other than me.

Have I not evolved? Perhaps, although I do think and with an intellectual capacity of greater than average. It seems that it is not enough.

Instead, I'd argue that persistent conflict is the defining trait of living, intelligent or otherwise.

You know Im incapable of not reading anything you type in a German accent in my head?

  • Like 2
I call rubbish at having ****ed up the planet.

Seriously? Deforestation has occurred on an unprecedented scale; use of CFCs compromised the ozone layer; fossil fuel emissions are known to be carcinogenic and are being burned at an alarming rate; intensive farming has made huge areas of land unusable; seas have been poisoned; climate change has been accelerated; millions/billions of species have died out; nuclear waste has lead to wide-scale animal mutations and health issues, etc.

The exact extent of man's influence on the planet can be debated - and it is only proper to do so - but our impact has been dramatic and devastating. It's shocking that you think otherwise. It's very sad that so many continue to deny our impact on the planet and even worse when people consider economic output to be more important than using the planet's resources in a sustainable manner.

  • Like 2

Seriously? Deforestation has occurred on an unprecedented scale; use of CFCs compromised the ozone layer; fossil fuel emissions are known to be carcinogenic and are being burned at an alarming rate; intensive farming has made huge areas of land unusable; seas have been poisoned; climate change has been accelerated; millions/billions of species have died out; nuclear waste has lead to wide-scale animal mutations and health issues, etc.

The exact extent of man's influence on the planet can be debated - and it is only proper to do so - but our impact has been dramatic and devastating. It's shocking that you think otherwise. It's very sad that so many continue to deny our impact on the planet and even worse when people consider economic output to be more important than using the planet's resources in a sustainable manner.

Couldn't have said it better myself.

The sad part is that it is the politicians who determine our future course, and most of them are in denial of the reality of global environment destruction. Even the ones who care are shouted down by the ones wanting to preserve the status quo, for fear of losing votes.

Politicians pander to the big corporations who fund their campaigns, and the irony is that these corporations are the ones whose policies have the most damaging impact on the environment.

"Atheism- so confident in itself and so courageous that it needs to bash Christianity and only Christianity every chance it gets, since we haven't the cajones to bash Islam/ Buddhism/Pantheism/paganism/secular humanism/materialism/etc/etc...!"

"Atheism- so confident in itself and so courageous that it needs to bash Christianity and only Christianity every chance it gets, since we haven't the cajones to bash Islam/ Buddhism/Pantheism/paganism/secular humanism/materialism/etc/etc...!"

What are you talking about? Atheism is just as critical of Islam, Judaism and Scientology. However, Christianity is obviously the dominant religion in western countries which is why it may seem that it receives more criticism.

Perceived persecution is perceived.

We're a minute and 17 seconds old... lol... And yet, according to some politicians, we did to the earth in 1:17 what hadn't been done in 23 and 3/4 hours to cause global warming. Shenanigans. :p

PS- I'm not saying we're not helping it along, because we are... I just think its insane to blame humans on causing global warming. Plus, it's been proven that global warming and cooling is cyclical. Global warming caused the last ice age... We were cave men back then, so it wasn't our fault. Why blame this cycle on us completely?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Free eBook: A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (worth $126.95) by Steven Parker Claim your complimentary copy (worth $126.95) of "A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0" for free, before the offer ends on July 8. (link below) Description The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework, produced in response to a 2014 US Presidential directive, has proven essential in standardizing approaches to cybersecurity risk and producing an efficient, adaptable toolkit for meeting cyber threats. As these threats have multiplied and escalated in recent years, this framework has evolved to meet new needs and reflect new best practices, and now has an international footprint. There has never been a greater need for cybersecurity professionals to understand this framework, its applications, and its potential. A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 offers a vital introduction to this NIST framework and its implementation. Highlighting significant updates from the first version of the NIST framework, it works through each of the framework’s functions in turn, in language both beginners and experienced professionals can grasp. Replete with compliance and implementation strategies, it proves indispensable for the next generation of cybersecurity professionals. A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 readers will also find: Clear, jargon-free language for both beginning and advanced readers Detailed discussion of all NIST framework components, including Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover Hundreds of actionable recommendations for immediate implementation by cybersecurity professionals at all levels A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 is ideal for cybersecurity professionals, business leaders and executives, IT consultants and advisors, and students and academics focused on the study of cybersecurity, information technology, or related fields. How to download for free Please ensure you read the terms and conditions to claim this offer. Complete and verifiable information is required in order to receive this free offer. If you have previously made use of these offers, you will not need to re-register. A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 Was $126.95, but is now FREE | Above link offer expires on July 8. The below offers are also available for free in exchange for your (work) email: View our recent time-limited free eBook offers The Complete Free AI Learning: Master ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & More ($21 Value) now FREE How to Build an AI Design Workflow with Gamma ($21 Value) now FREE The Ultimate Linux Newbie Guide – Featured free content Python Notes for Professionals – Featured free content Learn Linux in 5 Days – Featured free content Quick Reference Guide for Cybersecurity – Featured free content We post these because we earn commission on each lead so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin The above deal not doing it for you, but still want to help? Check out the links below. Check out our partner software in the Neowin Store Buy a T-shirt at Neowin's Threadsquad Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: An account at Neowin Deals is required to participate in any deals powered by our affiliate, StackCommerce. For a full description of StackCommerce's privacy guidelines, go here. Neowin benefits from shared revenue of each sale made through the branded deals site.
    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!