Recommended Posts

Emotionless and heartless. I hope TSA gives you special treatment next time you fly ;)

I don't do planes period. I do have a heart and emotions, I cried like a girl when my dad died that lasted for 12 years

My question is: Where were you on 9/11? Did it affect anyone personally?

On Times Square waiting for a tour through the NASDAQ MarketSite to start. Saw the second plane crash on TV within a huge crowd but nobody knew what was happening, so tour started anyway, plane crashed into the Pentagon, tour was cancelled, went outside, first tower collapsed, went to hotel, second one went down. Rest of the week me and my Dad were basically wandering aimlessly through an almost empty Manhattan waiting for the flight home. And we were in the WTC for the first time on Sunday. Creepy ****.

Home sleeping in bed...Yeah it was all over TV but, I didn't bother watching it not even cared to hear about it from others. I know when I was getting my class ring I had gotten a flag on one side and my mom said "You'll never forget what happened in September." tbh I told her I could care less what happened, and it doesn't affect me in any way shape or form...Harsh but true.

lol true

I don't do planes period. I do have a heart and emotions, I cried like a girl when my dad died that lasted for 12 years

yes but your heartless cause you dont care about something that happened 11 yrs ago, even though there are MUCH worse things going on out there you have to care about this or your heartless.

*Ducks and waits for someone to report me and an american mod to give me a warning again*

I was living in Wales at the time. My family and I had just got back after going shopping (I remember buying Tribes 2 and being really excited about it) and shortly after getting back my Dad received a phonecall telling him to turn on the TV and switch to the news. We all watched the footage in disbelief, before seeing the second plane crash into the building live on TV - needless to say it was an incredibly memorable experience. I remember wondering what would happen next, as it seemed for hours that there was always something going on and new footage to be seen. We got in touch with my Mum who was at work at the DVLA and they had gone onto high alert because it's a government building - the UK was prepared for similar attacks happening here.

The sad thing is that the attacks were used to justify an illegal war which lead to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocents civilians in Iraq. While I initially had a lot of sympathy for the US that quickly evaporated.

lol true

yes but your heartless cause you dont care about something that happened 11 yrs ago, even though there are MUCH worse things going on out there you have to care about this or your heartless.

*Ducks and waits for someone to report me and an american mod to give me a warning again*

Lets see Dad passed at 17, Grandmother died at 18 and my grandfather 4 months after and trying to stay focused on getting my diploma, Yeah to me those were way more important then Sept. 11. So there for I'm not heartless. Have a nice day sir and I do give you respect for being upfront.

Home sleeping in bed...Yeah it was all over TV but, I didn't bother watching it not even cared to hear about it from others. I know when I was getting my class ring I had gotten a flag on one side and my mom said "You'll never forget what happened in September." tbh I told her I could care less what happened, and it doesn't affect me in any way shape or form...Harsh but true.

Asleep here too. I didn't even know anything had happened until someone told me.

Also don't care...different reasons I'm sure.

now listen up all the people who died in 911 it was sad dont get me wrong BUT if any of my family was in there id be sad today

but there wasnt if any one on the board lost a love one than u will be sad and will be rememberd about it

im one of many who go on there merry day because 9-11 doesnt mean anything to us

so u get it now

we all live on the same planet, just because it's miles away from where you are, it should still mean something. you're human right?

I was working at the time that it all hit the news. I left work with a crate of beer and headed home, got indoors just as the second plane hit the tower. Strangely it is something that I remember. Do I care though? Not really, lots of things have happened in my life that affect me, this wasn't one of them. I appreciate people lost loved ones and friends in the tragedy, but I didn't so it's really had very little impact on my life or feelings.

At home watching the news with a very aware 4 year old who got the basics right away. Spent the rest of the day explaining the specifics of AQ etc. What got him most was the loss of the firefighters, cops etc. because there are so many in the family (grandfather = fire chief; uncle = firefighter/EMT; uncle = cop etc.) and that our military extended family would be going into action.

I remember working at an ISP at the time, tech support monkey on the phone and watching the live stream from CNN through bbc news. Can remember we left a message on the phones for anyone calling in that we wouldn't be taking any more calls (the owner of the small isp I worked for had family that worked in the towers and were lost).

Can still remember how harrowing it all seemed, even though I wasn't connected to the towers or even the city itself.

Living west of Toronto at the time, about to head to class as reports came in about the first tower. I ended up planted to my sofa for the rest of the day with tears in my eyes. I didn't know anyone personally affacted by the attacks, except for a friend's father, who was a local firefighter that went down with many others the next day to help out.

I remember that day VIVIDLY, and to be honest, it still gives me a lump in my throat.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
    • A $300 price hike is insane! No one is going to want to pay that much!
    • Since the 1st one flopped, there is really no reason to make another one. It's just losing money left and right.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      580
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      71
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!