Mark Zuckerberg: Our Biggest Mistake Was Betting on HTML5


Recommended Posts

Today, Mark Zuckerberg revealed that Facebook?s mobile strategy relied too much on HTML5, rather than native applications.

Not only was this a big mistake with mobile, but Zuckerberg says that its biggest mistake period was the focus on HTML5. This is the first time that the Facebook CEO has openly admitted this, but things are looking good for the new iOS native app. According to Zuckerberg, people are consuming twice as many feed stories since the update to the new iOS app, which is great.

http://techcrunch.co...-much-on-html5/

Just another proof that HTML5 is TERRIBLE.

No, this is just proof that HTLM5 is a terrible sustitute for native apps. It's the only thing that this proves.

HTML 5 is being charged with delivering far too much. There is a strong attempt to reach the Software as a Service future and HTML 5 is being pushed hard as the road to get us there. There will always be a need for native apps and web apps... By allowing the two to co-exist and do what its best for them both we end up better off. No need to squish it all into one pot.

Well since HTML5 web-apps added to the home screen of iPhones and Android devices cannot send notifications to peoples devices or have badges placed on their icons on the home screen errr duh?

You can't have a social platform without proper notifications. It would be like having skype that never told you when you had an incoming phone call.

  • Like 3
Just another proof that HTML5 is TERRIBLE.

Boz, you should start working for the Ministry of Public "Enlightenment" and Propaganda of a dictatorial regime somewhere. You'll definitely be a great asset.

  • Like 2

Everyone knows that HTML5 is not a finished standard yet. Yeah, I'd say they made a huge mistake relying on it.

It's fine to rely on HTML5, just not to the degree where you completely replace native apps by the technology. Facebook thought they had found an easy way to build cross-platform apps. They were simply being cheap and lazy, something their mobile products clearly demonstrated.

It's fine to rely on HTML5, just not to the degree where you completely replace native apps by the technology.

It's not fine to rely on HTML5 because:

A) It barely works on maybe 50% of the browsers

B) It doesn't even work properly on mobile through a browser (fragmentation is even worse with feature sets) and on mobile it's even worse.

C) It's slow and any interactivity is a DOG on CPU and on mobile again tons of features don't even work right. Differences between iOS and Android implementation to start.

D) It doesn't have access to native APIs but only those who are supported by the browser and even then the supported APIs differ from one browser/platform to another.

E) It's not even finalized and now W3C and WHATWG have split the spec in two versions making even more problems with compatibility

F) It's just SLOW as hell. It can't even compare to anything native and even Flash. It's just slightly modernized HTML platform (not finished with specs I might add because they can't agree on many things) that is still relying on 15 year old scripting language that hasn't evolved at all and the foundation of the issues with HTML haven't been solved. They just tried to build upon an already broken model that is dependent on browser support for features.

G) Google, Mozilla and Microsoft are all trying to create their own HTML5+ specs that they think benefits their platforms. It's basically a clusterf***

The only thing HTML5, and actually HTML by default has, which is nothing new, is usability over the content shown as it is easily searchable due to it's semantic nature but even that is not really HTML5 thing.. This was a fact even before HTML5.

It's not fine to rely on HTML5 because:

It's fine for simple things. Per example I never experienced any problems with HTML5 videos in Safari. As I said before just not for advanced applications like basing entire apps around it. That's just plain stupid and obviously you're going to run into the problems Facebook was facing.

Just another proof that HTML5 is TERRIBLE.

It's fine for simple things. Per example I never experienced any problems with HTML5 videos in Safari. As I said before just not for advanced applications like basing entire apps around it. That's just plain stupid and obviously you're going to run into the problems Facebook was facing.

Adobe is focusing heavily on HTML5 for mobile platforms, even ditching their own Flash product for it.

http://blogs.adobe.c...lash-focus.html

Windows Modern UI, Windows RT, and Windows Phone 8 native apps are developed with HTML5. Microsoft even went as far as to bake JavaScript into their new runtime, WinRT, so that HTML5 applications would perform as well as C++ and C# applications.

The problem was that they didn't have a native app, period. It was a grand miscalculation to assume that people didn't want notifications from their social network, or direct access to the camera or sensors.

Adobe is focusing heavily on HTML5 for mobile platforms, even ditching their own Flash product for it.

http://blogs.adobe.c...lash-focus.html

Considering I'm also an Adobe partner I can tell you with absolute confidence that Adobe is not ditching Flash at all.. quite the contrary.. the new versions of Flash are going to be pretty amazing. Especially when we get to Flash Next. Even now, Flash 11.4 has multithreading//concurrency in code and full support for StageVideo and Stage3D fully GPU accelerated APIs.

Adobe AIR is taking a very good spot in creating fully GPU accelerated native app experiences with, you guessed it, Flash/AS (actually AIR but it's pretty much the same thing). Even Adobe's own apps like Photoshop and other stuff for mobile are made with Flash/AS3/AIR basically..

Only in the eyes of those who are narrowminded it's a HTML5 vs Flash thing. It was never like that and it won't be.. Flash is built on top of HTML. It's an addition to HTML/JS/CSS, it's not a versus thing.

Adobe is trying to find their own place and push HTML5 to the level of Flash and that's normal. They have always done that. It's not like Adobe overnight decided to just support HTML5. Dreamweaver, Fireworks and many other things produced before supported were helping people build HTML/JS/CSS experiences. They have just invested more trying to make some tools that par Flash ones for those who want to create animations and similar stuff with HTML. It's natural for a creative company like them.

Flash is actually getting used more and more again because people have built stuff in HTML5 and when they need to maintain it, build to support various browsers it costs clients 3 times more money to do it in HTML5. So they are going back to Flash for many things. I know this because I have spent a lot of time building stuff in Flash a while back and I have a lot of people in my profession getting more and more Flash work again. So I can see the reactions. Not only that, but Adobe has been forced by companies to re-publish Flash for Android in UK because companies are starting to complain now.

Both HTML and Flash have their place and that won't change. Actually if you add games to the equation you will see that a lot of people are making some pretty amazing games now in Flash too because HTML5 is just not up to par in providing a fluid and smooth experience like Flash does not to mention getting into the whole audio/video support fiasco.

Considering I'm also an Adobe partner I can tell you with absolute confidence that Adobe is not ditching Flash at all.. quite the contrary.. the new versions of Flash are going to be pretty amazing. Especially when we get to Flash Next.

Both HTML and Flash have their place and that won't change. Actually if you add games to the equation you will see that a lot of people are making some pretty amazing games now in Flash too because HTML5 is just not up to par in providing a fluid and smooth experience like Flash does.

Adobe seems to disagree with you on it's public statements to businesses and developers relating to the future of Flash.

... This makes HTML5 the best solution for creating and deploying content in the browser across mobile platforms. We are excited about this' date=' and will continue our work with key players in the HTML community, including Google, Apple, Microsoft and RIM, to drive HTML5 innovation they can use to advance their mobile browsers.[/quote']
We will no longer continue to develop Flash Player in the browser to work with new mobile device configurations (chipset' date=' browser, OS version, etc.) following the upcoming release of Flash Player 11.1 for Android and BlackBerry PlayBook.[/quote']

http://blogs.adobe.com/conversations/2011/11/flash-focus.html

Increasingly' date=' rich motion graphics will be deployed directly via the browser using HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript and other modern web technologies. While the primary role of Flash Player as an engine for innovation on the web remains the same, what it is used for will change.

Adobe believes that the Flash runtimes are particularly and uniquely suited for two primary use cases: creating and deploying rich, expressive games with console-quality graphics and deploying premium video.

This shift in focus for Flash does not mean that existing content will no longer run, or that Flash cannot be used for content other than gaming and premium video. However, it does mean that when prioritizing future development and bug fixes, gaming and premium video use cases will take priority.[/quote']

http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html

If HTML5 is so terrible, why have Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Adobe embraced it so fervently?

Adobe seems to disagree with you on it's public statements to businesses and developers relating to the future of Flash.

If HTML5 is so terrible, why have Google, Apple, Microsoft, and Adobe embraced it so fervently?

Because it's HTML.. it's not some new thing. Companies supported HTML before.. this is not something new.

and btw, Adobe is looking at HTML5 hype and trying to make money off it. They have been contributing to W3C for a long time. Again nothing new.

And Flash Player for mobile was abandoned because they just felt the future is not in a mobile browser but in native apps thus pushing AIR and Flash on desktops. It's not brain science.

I personally think it was their mistake because as I said, they are getting a LOT of backlash for abandoning it but I fully understand their decision from logic standpoint. As this article proves, mobile web is dead or dying. Everything is going native app route. Even Google makes apps now natively for mobile and have pretty much abandoned HTML5 on it for their apps.

Because it's HTML.. it's not some new thing. Companies supported HTML before.. this is not something new.

It is new to state that it's better than Adobe's own technology for delivering content in the browser.

... HTML5 the best solution for creating and deploying content in the browser across mobile platforms.

And Flash Player for mobile was abandoned because they just felt the future is not in a mobile browser but in native apps thus pushing AIR and Flash on desktops. It's not brain science.

So they decided that ignoring everything in the browser on mobile devices was a good idea... brain science (I think you meant "surgery").

Any web developer who uses HTML5 and JavaScript can build apps for Windows 8, Windows RT, and Windows Phone 8. So, AIR will be a good way to build native apps for iPhones and Androids, OK.

Flash on the desktop will have TWO usage scenarios explicitly supported by Adobe in the future, high-end gaming and premium (Netflix, HBO) video.

Adobe believes that the Flash runtimes are particularly and uniquely suited for two primary use cases: creating and deploying rich, expressive games with console-quality graphics and deploying premium video.

This shift in focus for Flash does not mean that existing content will no longer run, or that Flash cannot be used for content other than gaming and premium video. However, it does mean that when prioritizing future development and bug fixes, gaming and premium video use cases will take priority.

http://www.adobe.com/devnet/flashplatform/whitepapers/roadmap.html

Adobe is saying here that not only will their future Flash development be focused in these areas, but so also should any businesses' or developers' future development In Flash. Developers can still use Flash for other scenarios, but at their own risk. "... when prioritizing future development and bug fixes, gaming and premium video use cases will take priority."

Mark Zuckerberg revealed that Facebook?s mobile strategy relied too much on HTML5, rather than native applications

Just another proof that HTML5 is TERRIBLE.

compared to native full fledged applications, yea. and is what Zuckerberg was saying

its shurely not Flash like you keep preaching on about

Developers can still use Flash for other scenarios, but at their own risk. "

LOL.. Flash is Flash and Actionscript 3 is Actionscript 3.. and basically those 2 things (gaming and premium video) are actually the things that improve performance for everything else.

Instead of quoting stuff, I'm telling you what Adobe is saying to all of us partners on private forums. They are pretty much focused on pushing Flash Player forward in a big way.

Having amazing 3D and video capabilities will allow anyone to build some pretty fantastic apps for the web too. It goes hand in hand.

And having premium video and awesome gaming performance and capabilities will almost certainly keep Flash around for A LONG time for a premium rich interactive media content. This means awesome 3D stuff, video, cool interfaces and so much more.

E) It's not even finalized and now W3C and WHATWG have split the spec in two versions making even more problems with compatibility

Perhaps you should quit your slandering of something that isn't finished.

Instead of quoting stuff, I'm telling you what Adobe is saying to all of us partners on private forums. They are pretty much focused on pushing Flash Player forward in a big way.

I'm just telling you what Adobe is saying to businesses and developers publicly, and on the record. This is information that Adobe expects them to use to make the best determination of how to invest in Adobe's technology, and to give them an understanding of how Adobe would like them to invest in their technology.

This shift in focus for Flash does not mean that existing content will no longer run, or that Flash cannot be used for content other than gaming and premium video. However, it does mean that when prioritizing future development and bug fixes, gaming and premium video use cases will take priority.

http://www.adobe.com...rs/roadmap.html

Having amazing 3D and video capabilities will allow anyone to build some pretty fantastic apps for the web too. It goes hand in hand.

The web, as in, on the desktop. If you believe the future of the web is on the desktop, that may seem like a good gamble. I would rather not take that gamble.

Perhaps you should quit your slandering of something that isn't finished.

Of course you can.. this whole hype has been going on since original iPhone came out in 2007. And it hasn't improved at all. Same problems, same issues. By the looks of it, it will be finished by 2021 if ever and by that time the question is whether or not internet and the tech landscape will even look as it does today.

The web, as in, on the desktop. If you believe the future of the web is on the desktop, that may seem like a good gamble. I would rather not take that gamble.

Well what are you going to gamble on.. mobile? HTML5 is already dead on that. People are going native not HTML5.

Btw, I agree with you, desktop will not last forever as well. But I wouldn't bet on building HTML5 stuff for mobile. That's a dead end if it ever was one.

Of course you can.. this whole hype has been going on since original iPhone came out in 2007. And it hasn't improved at all. Same problems, same issues. By the looks of it, it will be finished by 2021 if ever and by that time the question is whether or not internet and the tech landscape will even look as it does today.

And you know how people hate their iPhones and iPads... If only they had been successful Apple might not be in the horrible financial position it's in.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Making US citizens pay is a prominent tool? Joke of the week…
    • Price Drop: Save 86% on Microsoft Office 2021 Professional Plus lifetime digital license by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where you can save 86% on a lifetime license to Microsoft Office 2021 for Windows. This bundle is for families and small businesses who want classic Office apps and email. It includes Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams, and OneNote. A one-time purchase installed on 1 Windows PC for use at home or work. Lifetime license for MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams, & OneNote One-time purchase installed on 1 Windows PC for use at home or work Instant Delivery & Download – access your software license keys and download links instantly Free customer service – only the best support! Microsoft Office Professional 2021 (for Windows) includes: Microsoft Office Word Microsoft Office Excel Microsoft Office PowerPoint Microsoft Office Outlook Microsoft Office Teams Microsoft Office OneNote Microsoft Office Publisher Microsoft Office Access No faffing about with subscriptions, just classic apps that don't expire. Good to Know ONE-TIME PURCHASE INSTALLED ON 1 DEVICE Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop Full versions No subscriptions – no monthly/annual fees Version: 2021 Updates included* *Support for this version of Office ends on Oct 13, 2026 A lifetime subscription to Microsoft Office 2021 Professional normally costs $219.99, but this deal can be yours for just $29.97, that's a saving of $190. For full terms, specifications, and license info, click the link below. Get Microsoft Office Professional 2021 for just $29.97, or learn more Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • The only reason I want to know where you from is because if you are not from the U.K, then why should you care what we in the U.K do or don't do? Racist I am not, I am fed up with the amount coming over here and feel they can come over here and think we need to support them. Do you know how much it costs this country to support these people coming over here? Even when we give them a place to live it is not good enough. We had a barge that was being used to house immigrants, oh but that was not good enough. A mate said to me at the time, when he was homeless, he would have been happy to live on the barge, instead of ending up sleeping on a bench on the beach. I am not scared to say what my family heritage is, unlike you who is scared to say where they are from or where they live. Father side U.S, mother side Wales, still have family living in the U.S. A mate who sadly died a few years ago, had a load of people from different races recording in his studio, I got on with all of them. Skin colour don't bother me, where they are from don't bother me. Religion don't bother me as long as they don't push it onto me and it is not crazy stuff. I am not religious. But if you are not living in the U.K, then why should you care if we are in the E.U or not? This the problem, too many people poking their noses into where it don't belong. But you believe what you believe, if you think I am racist, then be it, I really do not care. Just grow a pair
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!