Recommended Posts

Why would anyone upgrade to a platform with no guarantee of success in the smartphone market? I just read that the official Paypal app finally became available for Windows Phone. I mean WTF, this is something that's been available for iOS and Android for a long time. And i'm sure Paypal isn't the only example of this.

Why would anyone upgrade to a platform with no guarantee of success in the smartphone market? I just read that the official Paypal app finally became available for Windows Phone. I mean WTF, this is something that's been available for iOS and Android for a long time. And i'm sure Paypal isn't the only example of this.

Well, by the same token, I'm sure that some WP 8 features aren't available on IOS or Android either.

I bought many many many iOS apps in the last 2-3 years, including some expensive ones (25~30$ per app)? Even if I like Windows Phone, I don?t see me buying a Windows Phone device. I?ll stick with my 4S, and buy a 5S?! in two years.

Hardware doesn?t make a platform better? apps do. And I have too much to lose by buying a Windows Phone/Android device.

  • Like 2

I bought many many many iOS apps in the last 2-3 years, including some expensive ones (25~30$ per app)? Even if I like Windows Phone, I don?t see me buying a Windows Phone device. I?ll stick with my 4S, and buy a 5S?! in two years.

Hardware doesn?t make a platform better? apps do. And I have too much to lose by buying a Windows Phone/Android device.

Is it just me or are other people finding they use less and less apps? When I had my 3GS, I had a ton. I'm on Android now but over the years I've culled it down into just must haves.

Why would anyone upgrade to a platform with no guarantee of success in the smartphone market? I just read that the official Paypal app finally became available for Windows Phone. I mean WTF, this is something that's been available for iOS and Android for a long time. And i'm sure Paypal isn't the only example of this.

And, how long have iPhone and Android been out compared to Windows Phone? Three and two years, respectively. So, looking at it that way, Pay Pal has arrived 22 months into WP's lifespan. Sounds about right to me.

Not to say it couldn't have arrived earlier. But, considering some devs were taking a wait and see approach, it is what it is.

That being said, if the 920 shows up on Tmo it's mine. If not, I'll have to make the decision between the 820 and an unlocked 920.

I'm personally thinking this might be the end of the line for me. I'm really interested in the Lumia 920. I feel like iOS or any type of iPhone that is announced tomorrow will be overshadowed in my mind by the Lumia.

I actually made the switch from iPhone 3GS to WP7 a little over a year ago. Even though WP7 was and still is largely a platform that's maturing, I think WP8 will be the point where I can easily recommend it to friends, as long as it's a Nokia product. Samsung and HTC just don't have the same level of investment in Windows Phone's success.

Now that WP supports better hardware and the OS is more complete, everyone will fall back to the apps argument. There are over 100,000 apps. 99.9% of them are probably a waste of time (just like any app store) but I'm only missing a handful of apps now. I'm sure the last gaps will be filled in soon.

I have had every version of the iPhone since the release in 2007. After today I'll be able to tell you for sure if I am making the jump to Nokia (I have to see what the iPhone 5 has to offer, mainly I need a bigger screen). The thing is, we still don't know much about Windows Mobile 8 and I need to see reviews of the Nokia 920 before making up my mind.

Another big one, and this may end up being the deal breaker here, but there is so much software for the iOS ecosystem. I mean I have hundreads of dollars worth of apps that I would be losing if I made the switch. Also I have been buying music from the iTunes store since 2003 or so, meaning some of it would be lost for ever as it has DRM, and there is just too much of it for me to sit there and convert it all to non-DRM.

In summary I have become so invested into the iOS ecosystem that it is very hard now to sever the dependency and make to move to another phone. All in all the switch would cost me well into the thousands if you add the apps, hardware (including docks, radios that only take iPhones,...), and the music purchases.

Well, by the same token, I'm sure that some WP 8 features aren't available on IOS or Android either.

In my eyes, the OS is irrelevant at the end of the day. This feature, that customization - it's negligible, despite what some Android users might say. If I use this skin or the next, mobile phone usage breaks down to two concentrated use cases, while the others are quite minor. First, it's web browsing, and all modern operating systems have sufficient browsers, and applications. This is where the differentiation comes. Apple is by far ahead of the game, in both quantity and quality. Applications are well supported and there are clear UI guidelines which assure consistency across the board.

With Android, while also growing in quantity, quality is still hugely lacking. Up until Android 4.0, there were no UI guidelines by Google, and this meant havoc. Every app looks different to the next; one worse than the other. No consistency. This is still a problem, and since there is such huge fragmentation, it will not go away anytime soon.

With Windows Phone, while there are clear design guidelines, quantity is hilariously lacking. Paypal finally coming to WP marketplace was mentioned earlier - it's a comical symptom of a large problem. The marketshare of Windows Phone is so miniscule that developers tend to stay away. Limiting development environment (C# vs. C/C++ of the other platforms) is also a factor, which has been resolved with WP8.

So yes, maybe the iPhone 5 is not as exciting from hardware standpoint as BBC or whatever would like to claim. But that is irrelevant. Their ecosystem is thriving, and that is why I will remain there until a proper alternative is found.

It's way too early for me to say, considering that very few of the Windows Phone 8 features have been announced, and the hardware features of the iPhone 5 won't be confirmed by Apple until their event today. I'm waiting until we're informed of what features are included in Windows Phone 8; then I'll make my decision :)

  • Like 2

I have had every version of the iPhone since the release in 2007. After today I'll be able to tell you for sure if I am making the jump to Nokia (I have to see what the iPhone 5 has to offer, mainly I need a bigger screen). The thing is, we still don't know much about Windows Mobile 8 and I need to see reviews of the Nokia 920 before making up my mind.

Another big one, and this may end up being the deal breaker here, but there is so much software for the iOS ecosystem. I mean I have hundreads of dollars worth of apps that I would be losing if I made the switch. Also I have been buying music from the iTunes store since 2003 or so, meaning some of it would be lost for ever as it has DRM, and there is just too much of it for me to sit there and convert it all to non-DRM.

In summary I have become so invested into the iOS ecosystem that it is very hard now to sever the dependency and make to move to another phone. All in all the switch would cost me well into the thousands if you add the apps, hardware (including docks, radios that only take iPhones,...), and the music purchases.

...lol yes because when converting music to non drm, you have to sit there and do each one individually :rolleyes:, i am pretty sure itunes stopped doing drm music a long time ago? your music will work in a windows phone or any other music playing device, so that is not a valid argument, your other reasons are valid though.

In my eyes, the OS is irrelevant at the end of the day. This feature, that customization - it's negligible, despite what some Android users might say. If I use this skin or the next, mobile phone usage breaks down to two concentrated use cases, while the others are quite minor. First, it's web browsing, and all modern operating systems have sufficient browsers, and applications. This is where the differentiation comes. Apple is by far ahead of the game, in both quantity and quality. Applications are well supported and there are clear UI guidelines which assure consistency across the board.

With Android, while also growing in quantity, quality is still hugely lacking. Up until Android 4.0, there were no UI guidelines by Google, and this meant havoc. Every app looks different to the next; one worse than the other. No consistency. This is still a problem, and since there is such huge fragmentation, it will not go away anytime soon.

With Windows Phone, while there are clear design guidelines, quantity is hilariously lacking. Paypal finally coming to WP marketplace was mentioned earlier - it's a comical symptom of a large problem. The marketshare of Windows Phone is so miniscule that developers tend to stay away. Limiting development environment (C# vs. C/C++ of the other platforms) is also a factor, which has been resolved with WP8.

So yes, maybe the iPhone 5 is not as exciting from hardware standpoint as BBC or whatever would like to claim. But that is irrelevant. Their ecosystem is thriving, and that is why I will remain there until a proper alternative is found.

ms will win the app game, they are leveraging the world (windows) in order to push out apps that work all over. i would say that by 2014 they will have the same amount of ios apps; or more.

...lol yes because when converting music to non drm, you have to sit there and do each one individually :rolleyes:, i am pretty sure itunes stopped doing drm music a long time ago? your music will work in a windows phone or any other music playing device, so that is not a valid argument, your other reasons are valid though.

Wrong. Apple did DRM until 2008 I believe... and it's not like it disappears because they don't do it anymore. 800 of my songs are DRM'ed. I'm in the same boat as him. You can pay apple to remove it, but **** that. You can also remove it yourself, but the quality is never as good as the original file. Also show me a free utility that will keep the album art, track info, same folder, and manage not to take 1000 years and then I'll say you're right.

ms will win the app game, they are leveraging the world (windows) in order to push out apps that work all over. i would say that by 2014 they will have the same amount of ios apps; or more.

And yet, Win 8 Metro apps won't work on WP8... :laugh:

  • Like 1

For current iPhone users, will the new phones with Windows Phone 8 OS win you over?

Would take a loss in apps I've paid for and use daily. Wouldn't want to have to repay for something I already paid for once, not to mention losing the data I've collected in my medical apps which would be lost if those same apps even exist in the WP8 environment. WP8 doesn't offer anything new that changes anything so no reason to go through the hassle and money lose to make a switch.
  • Like 1

I bought many many many iOS apps in the last 2-3 years, including some expensive ones (25~30$ per app)? Even if I like Windows Phone, I don?t see me buying a Windows Phone device. I?ll stick with my 4S, and buy a 5S?! in two years.

Hardware doesn?t make a platform better? apps do. And I have too much to lose by buying a Windows Phone/Android device.

I disagree. I have a One X, as example, and I quite enjoy my 720p screen, LTE, and NFC. I'd definitely say that makes it better for me over an iPhone in this case which doesn't have any of that. I don't really have a whole lot of apps that I've paid for on either (I had an iPhone 3G and iPhone 4), but I have purchased a couple, including at least one that cost $10 on both iPhone and Android. At least I have my iPad as backup to use any apps I paid for on iOS.

if Apple matched the Lumina 920's screen size and not just stretched it one way I might've gotten the 5 to replace my 4s and Gen 1 WP. But they didnt so I'll probably get a 920 or the Samsung phone.

As far as I'm concerned Apple lost its edge. The iPhone 5 still features the same basic design we've had for the past two years. There isn't a single thing that really stands out to me. The company made the smartphone a bit thinner and a bit taller, but that's basically it. iOS 6 looks equally uninspired: It features the same interface we've been using since 2007, it doesn't seem have many major features I care about and quite frankly it comes across as flat out boring. Overall it's one underwhelming release.

My next phone will most likely be a Nokia Lumia 920.

  • Like 2

Im actually disappointed with the iphone 5, to me its got no killer standout feature, its a slightly better 4s which is slightly better 4. To me it feels like this wasnt a big release, just a minor update to keep up with android and wp8, no feature to actually take the lead

Might actually switch to nokia 920 or maybe a sammy droid phone. I spent ?150 for the iphone 4 for a ?35 a month 2 yr contract. I dont want to do the same with the iphone 5, as other than a stretched screen, few software enhancements (which i wont use, dont need siri and i have the tomtom app) there is no real difference compared to the 4

As far as I'm concerned Apple lost its edge. The iPhone 5 still features the same basic design we've had for the past two years. There isn't a single thing that really stands out to me. The company made the smartphone a bit thinner and a bit taller, but that's basically it. iOS 6 looks equally uninspired: It features the same interface we've been using since 2007, it doesn't seem have many major features I care about and quite frankly it comes across as flat out boring. Overall it's one underwhelming release.

My next phone will most likely be a Nokia Lumia 920.

Agreed. Additionally, the Lumia 920 contains numerous innovations that the Apple simply can't match. For instance, in addition to having a higher resolution and a higher PPI, the screen on the Lumia has a higher refresh rate and can be used with gloves on. Of course, none of that stopped Apple claiming that their screen is the world's most advanced display ;)

Despite the fact that it's slightly smaller, the camera in the iPhone basically hasn't changed. Compare that to Nokia's Pureview camera with OIS and it's clear that Apple are falling behind.

The lack of NFC in the iPhone is also surprising and will surely make carriers stop and think before recommending it now that they are hooking up with the banks to offer micropayments.

Is it just me or are other people finding they use less and less apps? When I had my 3GS, I had a ton. I'm on Android now but over the years I've culled it down into just must haves.

Im the same, used to have loads and play loads. Now a days i play on my 3DS/Vita and most of the apps are pretty universal, evernote, dropbox etc.. i don't really use any specialist apps anymore.

I pretty much spend my time on Email, SMS, Music, Internet and the apps i mentioned above. Im ready to switch to a new phone.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Never used the G7 Pro, but I've never had a good experience with that style of d-pad and fighting games.
    • And I just bought a seat cushion for my mesh chair. The chair feels nice but the first time I sat in it with boxers, I realized I don't like the feel of mesh on my legs. 😂
    • "This Dell 27 inch 4K 120Hz IPS monitor is really cheap after a very long time" ... Lol.
    • This Dell 27 inch 4K 120Hz IPS monitor is really cheap after a very long time by Sayan Sen Recently we covered a really good deal on an AMD RX 9070 three-fan model that's available at slightly above its MSRP. If you are looking for a GPU for 1440p gaming that's around the performance of the Nvidia RTX 5070 you should most definitely check it out. Let's say that you are looking for a monitor to pair that up with too. The Samsung 49" G9 curved QD-OLED superultrawide is a good option that can provide an immersive experience. However despite being a very good deal currently (at $855), it may seem unaffordable to you, or you may simply not want to spend as much on a monitor. In that case Dell's S2725QS can be a very good option as it's on sale at the moment for its lowest price in over six months (purchase link under the specs table down below). The big highlight of the Dell S2725QS is its 27-inch IPS panel with a 3840 x 2160 (4K UHD) resolution, offering a high pixel density that can make text appear sharper while also providing plenty of screen space for productivity and media consumption. The display supports a refresh rate of up to 120Hz through both HDMI and DisplayPort, making it suitable not only for everyday desktop use but also for smoother gaming and scrolling. AMD FreeSync Premium support is included as well, helping reduce screen tearing during gaming sessions. The screen has fairly good brightness and color accuracy so you can use it for general work purpose, though photo/video editing is probably not going to be the best match for this. The technical specs of the Dell S2725QS are given in the table below: Specification Value Viewable Screen Size 27 in (68.58 cm) Screen Mode 4K UHD Maximum Resolution 3840 × 2160 Maximum Preset Resolution 3840 × 2160 @ 120 Hz Standard Refresh Rate 120 Hz Panel Technology In-plane Switching (IPS) Backlight Technology LED Edgelight System Pixel Density 163 PPI Response Time 8 ms GTG, 5 ms GTG, 4 ms GTG Horizontal Viewing Angle 178° Vertical Viewing Angle 178° Brightness 350 cd/m² (nits) Native Contrast Ratio 1500:1 Color Support 1.07 Billion Colors Color Gamut 99% sRGB (CIE 1931) Adaptive Sync AMD FreeSync Premium HDCP Support Yes Mount Type Panel Mount VESA Mount 100 × 100 mm Maximum Height Adjustment 13 cm Tilt -5° to 21° Swivel -30° to 30° Pivot ±90° Stand Adjustments Tilt, Swivel, Height, Pivot Glass Hardness 3H Horizontal Frequency 27–270 kHz (DisplayPort 1.4 / HDMI 2.1) Vertical Frequency 48–120 Hz (DisplayPort 1.4 / HDMI 2.1) Video Inputs 2 × HDMI 2.1 (HDCP 1.4 & 2.3), 1 × DisplayPort 1.4 (HDCP 1.4 & 2.3) Operating Temperature 0°C to 40°C Storage Temperature -20°C to 60°C Operating Humidity 10%–80% (Non-condensing) Storage Humidity 5%–95% (Non-condensing) Get it at the link below: Dell S2725QS 27-inch 4K 120Hz IPS monitor: $218.49 (Sold and Shipped by Amazon US) (Was: $280) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      497
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      243
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      macoman
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!