Apache Hammers Microsoft Over Do Not Track


Recommended Posts

BTW this is more of what I predicted earlier. MS will get hammered regardless of what road they take with security.

I agree with what Microsoft is doing here, I'm just worried about the average user ending up with settings enabled or disabled without knowing what the actual consequences are.

This is always the case with default or express options, but in case of DNT it's a bit more than a simple user preference.

In the pc word somethind that is turned off by default is, most of the times, turned off forever. What's the point of DNT if it's turned off by default? Only those who know about it would turn it on, and how many does?

I agree with what Microsoft is doing here, I'm just worried about the average user ending up with settings enabled or disabled without knowing what the actual consequences are.

This is always the case with default or express options, but in case of DNT it's a bit more than a simple user preference.

...and that's what the Custom option is for.

Also if you looked at the screenshot it shows what Express will do for you. It doesn't hide anything. It spells it out pretty clearly. Also the feature is named in a manner that makes it easy to figure out. If I saw a setting called Do Not Track, I would assume it was something to help keep me from being tracked while using Internet Explorer since it states that it was an IE feature.

MS decided to create 2 routes to an install. Custom & Express. Express is a simple click here, no muss, no fuss install...but has a screen telling you what happens when you use it.

If they prompt again, then the user will go wait a minute...I thought I chose Express where it was supposed to just turn on everything for me...so why is it asking this now?

That's what Custom is there for. If we have to start prompting users at every single new feature added in new version of Windows then it goes back to being a non-Express experience again...so why even bother?

Yes, and it cannot be enforced if it's not a standard... ...by the very definition of what it means to be a standard in normal industry jargon.

Even if/when it becomes a standard, is there any plan to actually enforce it? That is, legally enforce it.

Or are we expecting ad companies complying out of free will?

The fact is that right now DNT is useless, and will be at the very least for quite some time.

Even if/when it becomes a standard, is there any plan to actually enforce it? That is, legally enforce it.

Or are we expecting ad companies complying out of free will?

The fact is that right now DNT is useless, and will be at the very least for quite some time.

Indeed, for now it is.

There are perks to following a standard. For instance if you don't follow the WiFi standard you actually can't list the WiFi logo on your hardware or any associated boxes or advertising, and cannot call it certified.

As stands the draft is calling for voluntary participation, but I think it should be compulsory.

Indeed, for now it is.

There are perks to following a standard. For instance if you don't follow the WiFi standard you actually can't list the WiFi logo on your hardware or any associated boxes or advertising, and cannot call it certified.

As stands the draft is calling for voluntary participation, but I think it should be compulsory.

And how would you enforce that ?

Make every site offer up server access to a 3rd party to check it ? Don't think so.

And how would you enforce that ?

Make every site offer up server access to a 3rd party to check it ? Don't think so.

Have a system similar to Verisign in place. Send a DNT request and check for the response. It's not hard to figure out...

Have a system similar to Verisign in place. Send a DNT request and check for the response. It's not hard to figure out...

Having a secure connection server to user is something you can test.

Proving at a server isn't keeping records of what you do is something you can't without access to the code.

I can track people coming to a site without even using cookies, just by logging the movies of their IP Address server side and no one without access to the code would have a clue.

Having a secure connection server to user is something you can test.

Proving at a server isn't keeping records of what you do is something you can't without access to the code.

I can track people coming to a site without even using cookies, just by logging the movies of their IP Address server side and no one without access to the code would have a clue.

Right but that's not what this is for. With DNT a flag is sent to the server and a response is given showing whether or not they acknowledge the flag.

That's something that you can easily check.

So a standards body can easily confirm if the flag is being respected or not just by reading the response.

Right but that's not what this is for. With DNT a flag is sent to the server and a response is given showing whether or not they acknowledge the flag.

That's something that you can easily check.

So a standards body can easily confirm if the flag is being respected or not just by reading the response.

You can check a response but not if they are actually tracking you or not.

And then what's exactly tracking anyway? Tracking cookies are obviously considered tracking, but what about sites that get third party webs to load resources from their servers, like Facebook?

I can't believe people are all over MS again for protecting their average customer.

Like I said before, for some people MS can never win doesn't matter what they do.

And as been posted before, they give you a clear option to turn it on or off during installation.

Add companies are just mad because they were hoping the DNT option would stay hidden away in some obscure menu and now MS is bringing it to the front so more people will have this option on.

Can't believe people agree with what Apache just did, they openly admit they will ignore the choice of all IE users.

And to Shane Nokes, I have the feeling people are just being thick on purpose when they are answering to you, you make total sense to me!

Right but that's not what this is for. With DNT a flag is sent to the server and a response is given showing whether or not they acknowledge the flag.

That's something that you can easily check.

So a standards body can easily confirm if the flag is being respected or not just by reading the response.

That doesn't prove the flag is being respected, just that the server says it is..

It really wouldn't be hard to get a server to respond to the dnt saying it's following it, then Not following it.. that's my point.

It's very easy to get a server it lie to anyone..

I can't believe people are all over MS again for protecting their average customer.

Like I said before, for some people MS can never win doesn't matter what they do.

And as been posted before, they give you a clear option to turn it on or off during installation.

Add companies are just mad because they were hoping the DNT option would stay hidden away in some obscure menu and now MS is bringing it to the front so more people will have this option on.

Can't believe people agree with what Apache just did, they openly admit they will ignore the choice of all IE users.

And to Shane Nokes, I have the feeling people are just being thick on purpose when they are answering to you, you make total sense to me!

Thank you. I try to be a clear & effective communicator. I don't think a lot of people realize that if this becomes a standard and violations occur that there are consequences that ensue.

That's why I pointed out Verisign. Usually when a standard comes along there are groups who verify it is being followed.

That doesn't prove the flag is being respected, just that the server says it is..

It really wouldn't be hard to get a server to respond to the dnt saying it's following it, then Not following it.. that's my point.

It's very easy to get a server it lie to anyone..

Indeed and do you know how hard companies get slammed if they lie? Any company that stated they complied with DNT and didn't would get dropped for contracts quickly if it went public.

Have you worked for one of the big tech companies before? I ask because if you had you'd know what a huge deal breaking standards is for most. Look how badly MS was taken to task?

I'm with Apache on this. If the browsers default behavior is do not track then web services will simply ignore the flag entirely. It has to be a choice that the users make instead of a default if it has any hope of working.

This should force Microsoft to change their stance but we all know it won't they are too stubborn.

didn't ms have to include crappy browsers in a ballot box because google and mozilla assumed the user didn't know too much. Now MS does something that helps users stay more secure and its a bad thing??

didn't ms have to include crappy browsers in a ballot box because google and mozilla assumed the user didn't know too much. Now MS does something that helps users stay more secure and its a bad thing??

Yes this is bad because if this browser automatically defaults 25% of the web fairing public to "do not track" advertisers and other websites will just ignore the do not track system entirely. That is one of the major ways they make money, heck whole businesses are built on tracking. The only reason they are embracing it currently is for good PR and knowing that very few people will go in to the settings of their browser and turn on "do no track".

I applaud Microsoft for wanting to do the right thing but as usual their execution fails them and puts the whole do not track system in jeopardy from being ignored by the people we don't want to track us.

Yes this is bad because if this browser automatically defaults 25% of the web fairing public to "do not track" advertisers and other websites will just ignore the do not track system entirely. That is one of the major ways they make money, heck whole businesses are built on tracking. The only reason they are embracing it currently is for good PR and knowing that very few people will go in to the settings of their browser and turn on "do no track".

I applaud Microsoft for wanting to do the right thing but as usual their execution fails them and puts the whole do not track system in jeopardy from being ignored by the people we don't want to track us.

Again it doesn't 'automatically default' anything. You are given a very clear choice during the setup of Windows to either enable or disable DNT.

The user has to make this choice. It isn't just automatically done without them having been given an option, so will you please stop trying to spread this FUD!

I'm starting to agree with Stoffel when they say that some of you are being thick on purpose. It's not amusing...

Again it doesn't 'automatically default' anything. You are given a very clear choice during the setup of Windows to either enable or disable DNT.

The user has to make this choice. It isn't just automatically done without them having been given an option, so will you please stop trying to spread this FUD!

I'm starting to agree with Stoffel when they say that some of you are being thick on purpose. It's not amusing...

And what happens if you just click this box away without choosing anything?

Also notice in my post I said "if this browser" I never said "this browser does".

I want to know what happens if the user doesn't read the box and just clicks the x. What is the default behavior if the user doesn't choose an option at all.

Isn't that also a choice?

Microsoft just can't win with some people. They don't do anything, people bitch. The do something proactive to protect people and people bitch. Frankly, this really isn't the place to hit Microsoft on. If you ask people if they want to be tracked online and most people will say no.

Isn't that also a choice?

Microsoft just can't win with some people. They don't do anything, people bitch. The do something proactive to protect people and people bitch. Frankly, this really isn't the place to hit Microsoft on. If you ask people if they want to be tracked online and most people will say no.

So do you not know the answer to my question because I don't which is why I asked.

Indeed and do you know how hard companies get slammed if they lie? Any company that stated they complied with DNT and didn't would get dropped for contracts quickly if it went public.

Have you worked for one of the big tech companies before? I ask because if you had you'd know what a huge deal breaking standards is for most. Look how badly MS was taken to task?

I know that most companies will try to get away with what they can.

Would they get fined big time if they were caught ? Ya.. of course.. but how are you gonna catch them.

Short of employees turning in their company, there is really no way..

Look at all the stuff Google has done, ignoring privacy, and when they get caught they pay a fine they can afford, but say they are sorry, didn't mean too, and then move along.. in a few months no one cared anymore..

And what happens if you just click this box away without choosing anything?

Also notice in my post I said "if this browser" I never said "this browser does".

I want to know what happens if the user doesn't read the box and just clicks the x. What is the default behavior if the user doesn't choose an option at all.

It's part of the install process. You can't just click an X to make it go away. You aren't in Windows when that box appears... there is nowhere to go but forward...

What is the default behavior if the user doesn't choose an option at all? To stay stuck on that screen forever.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • KataLib 5.3.0.0 by Razvan Serea KataLib is more than just a music player — it's a complete audio suite designed for music lovers and creators alike. It combines a powerful audio player, a flexible metadata editor, a capable audio converter, and a music library manager into one streamlined application. Core Features: Audio Player Enjoy seamless playback of virtually any audio format or even streaming video files. DJ Mode lets you mix tracks with manual or automatic crossfades. You can also load and save WinAmp-style playlists for quick access to your favorite sets. Audio Converter Convert between a wide range of audio formats effortlessly. Trim or normalize your output automatically, and even extract audio from streaming video sources. Ideal for preparing files for different devices or platforms. Metadata Editor View and edit ID3v2 tags and other metadata. Batch edit multiple files at once, and fetch missing information directly from the MusicBrainz database. You can also apply or update album art with ease. Music Library Manager Organize your entire audio collection, search across tracks instantly, and download cover images from the internet — or use your own custom artwork. KataLib makes it easy to keep your library tidy and enriched with useful info. Supported Formats: KataLib supports a wide range of both lossy and lossless audio formats: Input: OPUS, AAC, FLAC, M4A, MP3, MP4, MPC, APE, AIF, MKV, AVI, MOV, FLV, WEBM, Ogg Vorbis, WAV, WAVPack, WMA, AC3, OGA, MP2, MPGA, MPEG, DTS, M4B, DSD (DFS) Output: OPUS, FLAC, M4A, MP3, Ogg Vorbis, WAV Under the hood, KataLib uses the trusted FFmpeg engine for audio conversion and media playback, ensuring compatibility with virtually all mainstream media formats. KataLib 5.3.0.0 changelog: Added Option to select the Zoom level of the Oscilloscope visualizer. The taskbar button of the app now displays the progress of its processing tasks. The metadata text of the Visualization Video can now be aligned by the user. We can now reorder the order of the Visualizers and Metadata, in the Visualization Video Setup dialog, by removing any item and adding it again. It will be added at the end. Changed The font size of the Visualization Video can now be more than 30 points. Updated yt-dlp library to version 2026... Fixed Opening the Visualization Video Setup dialog could fail if the settings were wrong. Sometimes there were false duplicates in the Rename Tracks dialog. Tracks without metadata appeared without title in the Recent menu. Download: KataLib 5.3.0.0 | 90.0 MB (Open Source) Links: KataLib Home Page | Github | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • EA Sports UFC 6 review: Brutal, satisfying, and surprisingly accessible to newcomers by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe EA’s UFC series of fighting games has been putting out games for over 10 years now, but it’s a series I have never spent any time with. As a PC guy, the series being console-exclusive is the primary reason for that. The latest entry to the series, EA Sports UFC 6, is still not coming to PC, but I have an Xbox now. When EA reached out to see if I could have a crack at the game and give my opinion about it, I finally got the chance to see what this franchise is about. I have spent about a week playing UFC 6 on the Xbox Series X. Despite my lackluster skill with fighting games, I still have fun with entries like Street Fighter and Tekken. I quickly came to realize this is a different kind of fighting game, not the arcade titles I am usually dabbling with. Most of the week that I spent playing UFC 6 was in the career mode, trying not to get knocked out while slowly improving my combos and reactions. The review below will be from the perspective of a newcomer to the series and an amateur fighting game fan, so please forgive any mistyped lingo or series-staple mechanics I am not comprehending. In the Ring Getting a solid hit in UFC 6 is satisfying. It’s probably the most satisfying impact reaction I have seen in a fighting game. The ripples in the muscles, the spray of sweat (and blood), the meaty sound, and the subsequent stumble all carry a lot of weight. If I miss a heavy swing like that, though, I already know that I'm in for a world of hurt from the incoming counters. The fighting is a real treat. The actions aren’t as snappy as arcade titles, so a miss feels like a much bigger mistake here. This slowness did take some getting used to, but I felt the improvement in my abilities even after a few drills with basic punch and kick combos. If I’m not deliberate with my actions in the ring, whether it be a hasty retreat or a flying punch, the possibility of getting instantly knocked out is always there. The head, chest, and legs all come with their own health bars, so guarding just one area is just asking for trouble. A few hits to the head, and it's game over. Meanwhile, you won’t even be able to stay on your feet if they get damaged enough, drastically lowering the total amount of stamina available for the rest of the match. I was also encountering a large range of fighting styles to customize my own fighter with. There are a huge number of real-life superstars here from multiple eras. It’s not as exaggerated as Street Fighter or Tekken, but the way they move, evade, throw punches, or even take steps is based on their real-life counterparts. I can see this being a big draw for any mixed martial arts fan. One feature I was surprised to see here was the 'Flow State' ability. As rounds progress, a power-up meter can give a temporary boost to the unique fighting style of the selected fighter, essentially boosting what they are good at. There is an entire visual effect that kicks in when activating this, too. The surprising part was seeing something like this in a game that feels like it’s aiming to be more of a simulator than an arcade fighter. My skill level is too low to use this exactly how the game wants me to, so I ended up triggering it whenever the opponent did it as well. Streamlined vs Authentic When I first started it up, UFC 6 asked me about my experience with the series. Being genuinely new, I took its advice and opted for a lowered difficulty level and 'Streamlined' controls. Quickly, I realized that this wasn’t for me. My chosen fighters were throwing random attacks, no matter what combination the game was trying to teach me. Win streaks were happening, and I was already getting bored out of my mind just a few matches in. Turning off this mode and switching to 'Authentic' controls fixed everything right up. I was now able to control my fighter with more precision than I expected. I could control each arm and leg, which body part my attacks would aim at, and the fully customizable controls for setting up unorthodox moves were a cherry on top. None of these made me an expert at the game, but at least I was being beaten up fairly. This is not a point against UFC 6, though. Giving the option for anyone to enjoy the game is always a good thing in my eyes. There is a lot of customizability in the difficulty, with everything from slow-motion reactions to specific assists being offered as toggles. If I had a friend coming over and wanted to try a quick 1v1, the streamlined controls option is one I’d consider to make it a light and fun fight. The one part of the fighting that did not click with me was the grappling. Being taken to the ground brings in an entirely new control mechanism involving mounts and submissions that feel more like quick-time events than the heavy, tactical fighting I had seen so far while standing. The game wants me to hold sticks in certain directions to change the position or pull off submissions, trying to do the opposite actions of the opponent. Even though I tried to get used to this gameplay, it just felt like a momentum killer, and I eventually just wanted to get back on my feet to get back into the action. Legacy and Career It was UFC 6’s career mode that I wanted to play the most when I started it up. I grew up with EA Sports games, and taking my team from the ground to the top has always been my favorite task. UFC 6 has that same option but also offers a more cinematic entrance to the career experience than I expected with ‘The Legacy’ mode. This mini-campaign follows an up-and-coming fighter, Chris Carter, who is attempting to reach the heights his father had reached in the sport. Starting with a small-time gym and coach, the story follows both his growth in the space as well as the growing rivalry with a friend and fighter, Danny Lopez. The fights in this mode are very good at introducing a newcomer like me to the sport and its varying techniques. Cinematics land between the major fights, showing the growing tension between the two fighters as the years go by, feeling the pressure to not miss out on the hard-earned chances. The dialogue can be a little corny at times, especially when the bar fights kick off, but I largely enjoyed the storyline. At the end of it, I was pretty much familiar with all the mechanics of the career mode, unlocking new skills and moves, and how I needed to approach fights, both outside and inside the ring. This story mode isn’t a very lengthy one, so don’t expect an hour-long campaign. Once the conclusion is reached, Carter’s journey continues as if it’s a normal career playthrough, though I decided to start over from scratch now that I have some know-how about the basics. The career mode is very streamlined, which is to be expected considering there isn’t a team to manage like in other EA Sports games. It’s the journey of one fighter. When a fight comes up in the calendar, I could choose how many weeks I dedicate to preparing for it at the gym. A longer prep time gives the opportunity to get my fighter’s fitness up (giving a bonus during fights), earn more money and points for unlocking new skills, and gain more fans to fast-track the rise to stardom. While that sounds like a lot of things to manage, it’s more like a few clicks. There is a social media menu that sometimes pops up with canned replies I can send to fans, and the sponsors are once again a single click away from being assigned as finished. It’s the training aspect that adds a gameplay angle. Using the money from winnings and sponsorships, I was hiring different types of trainers and learning fancier moves to use in the ring. One small thing I appreciated was that it was possible to injure each other during these training sessions. If a trainer goes down in a bad way while sparring, they won’t be available for the remainder of training. If my fighter is injured, it takes valuable time and resources to heal and recuperate. Just like in real life, it makes sense not to go so hard during training sessions and save that energy for the main event. Every training or sponsorship activity I took part in used up the days and weeks I had before the next fight, bringing a balancing element to the whole ordeal. There were times I simulated most of these to just get to the next fight, but the grind for gaining even the slightest bit of advantage while trying not to overdo it is an enjoyable one. Outside of quick fights and career modes, UFC 6 also introduces an almost museum-like mode to explore a trio of fighters considered to be legends of the sport: Max Holloway, Alex Pereira, and Zhang Weili. The aptly named Hall of Legends mode is unlike everything else seen in the game. Each of these fighters has entire levels dedicated to them that I could walk around in and explore their journey into the UFC. This includes footage from real-life fights and interviews about their original inspirations and training methods. Each of these spaces is almost like an interactive documentary. Once the highlights are done, the mode offers the opportunity to take over a deciding fight from the superstars. It’s an impressive transition. Going from the real-life televised event with crowds and commentary to immediately taking over in the game has some real hype behind it. Performance and visuals It’s clear to see that UFC 6 is going for a photo-realism look with its visuals compared to any other fighting game. The fighters don’t look great in selection screens. But inside the arenas, under the flood lights, surrounded by crowds, and facing an opponent, the visuals are more than impressive. As ghastly as it is to witness, things like blood spraying into the mat and muscles reddening as they get pummeled keep improving the immersion. The fluid animations help sell the illusion even further. A missed kick carries the momentum to require a corrective step. Hard punches that glance off blocks give off the air of a hit that still took some wind off the opponent’s guard. The special moves with flips and spins look mega awkward when missing, just as they do in real life. Suffice to say, the Frostbite Engine powering this game is one of the biggest strengths of EA development studios. Playing on the Xbox Series X, the 60 FPS gameplay did not miss the mark or cause any slowdowns that I could detect. I still wish this series were on PC to see just how far the developer can push the engine. One area I continue to have issues with, surprisingly enough, is the menus. The game has fast loading screens, but almost every menu I click through has a large amount of noticeable lag before it registers. This is immensely painful in the career mode, since I have to go through multiple menus between fights to train and do sponsorships, and having a 3-second pause when selecting a simple move between pages is the only time that made me quit the game. Thanks to Xbox’s quick resume, though, I was able to instantly jump back in the next day to the same point (and wade through more laggy menus). Conclusion My primary mission going into this EA Sports UFC 6 review as a newcomer to the series was to find out if this is a good jumping-in point for someone like me. Suffice it to say, the game passed that test with flying colors. Despite the high skill ceiling, the legacy mode introduction campaign, multiple types of accessible controls, and streamlined career had me picking up the basics and fighting styles much faster than I expected. I wish I had gotten to try out competitive multiplayer during my time with the game, too, but the lack of players in the pre-release version prevented this. The impressive visuals and animations, coupled with the impact physics that let me feel every punch and kick easily, made this the most immersive fighting game I have played. The only part that gave me pause was the grappling gameplay, which killed the momentum in most fights. The Flow State amplifying system didn’t hamper the experience, but I also felt like it made more sense for an arcade fighter, not this. Easily the most annoying thing about UFC 6 was its laggy menus, which I hope get some sort of fix later. Returning series veterans might have a completely different experience from me. But for a new fan like me looking to climb ranks and see fighters get floored in spectacular ways, UFC 6 doesn’t miss a step. EA Sports UFC 6 is releasing on June 19 across Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. Ultimate Edition owners can already jump in via advanced access. This review was conducted on the Xbox Series X version of the game provided by EA.
    • No, Microsoft is obviously just spending money on maintaining a product with 0 users.
    • I disagree here sorry. The majority of their customers are corporations who are locked in to their eco system and have no choice. Private individuals don't contribute that much to their income.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      ssd21345 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Contributor
      MarkHughes4096 went up a rank
      Contributor
    • Dedicated
      jordanspringer earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Rookie
      Rimplesnort went up a rank
      Rookie
    • One Year In
      Markus94287 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      486
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      173
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      138
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      94
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      79
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!