Apple "jumped the shark" ...


Recommended Posts

Love the simplicity and lovely design on iOS, it is also a bit boring because it never crashes its superbly easy to handle and also limited.

I wish there was SBSettings on iOS at this momment but im very happy. Iv configured some Android phones, it has some advantages and much more options to change the looks and i would use it for fun but never as my daily handset its too ugly and confusing, it looks and feels chinese, even the SG2 for example and its not smooth like iphone 4 for example the touch and feel is very diferent if one tries both phones you can easily spot that.

Love the simplicity and lovely design on iOS, it is also a bit boring because it never crashes its superbly easy to handle and also limited.

I wish there was SBSettings on iOS at this momment but im very happy. Iv configured some Android phones, it has some advantages and much more options to change the looks and i would use it for fun but never as my daily handset its too ugly and confusing, it looks and feels chinese, even the SG2 for example and its not smooth like iphone 4 for example the touch and feel is very diferent if one tries both phones you can easily spot that.

the lok and feel of my mums iphone 4 and my wifes sgs2 is very different, i prefer how the galaxy sit sin my hand, it feels lighter and i also found the interface much more usable than ios, and also the sgs2 feels just as smooth as the iphone, i see the iphone as i do the old nokias, just a dumbphone that hasnt changed in years

Apple failed when Jobs left. Apple succeeded when Jobs came back.

Apple is nothing without Jobs.

One of the major things is that this happens with every company and their founder.. You can't expect that Tim Cook or anyone else there has the same passion and tenacity in running Apple as Jobs. It's simple as that.

He also had vision, aside from those of us who disliked him, even if you are copying and taking something from other people's ideas in the technical terms you still had to have a vision to make it into a product everyone would want. That's what he has done.

If you look at Apple now, they are afraid. They are afraid to change anything because the iPhone as it is, is their main milking machine. If they screw it up, they are caput.

Btw, this is what a lot of people were saying. Apple is done without Jobs. Yes, it wasn't obvious the moment Jobs died, but that's not how it happens. What's happening now with Apple (marginal improvements, no new products, coasting on Jobs' glory products) is exactly what's the problem with them. They have no direction. They are just trying to prolong the success of the 2 products Jobs wanted and make as much money as they can on them because nobody there knows what's next nor has a vision to make something as impactful as what Steve Jobs did with iPod, iPhone and finally iPad.

I don't think the hardware is the problem. It's the software. Look at the iOS. Same old icons, ugly gradients, horrible skeuomorphic design of the default apps.

This.. and if you see the iPhone5 next to the Lumia 920 you see how dated iOS really looks. I agree the phone is quite nice design wise, although I fear design is taking precedence over hardware innovation here, but iOS really need a big overhaul.

I think you're going to be seeing more coming from Microsoft/Nokia in the future. They have the creative genius to out-Apple Apple.

I think so too. Apple has clearly hit a creative slump with Job's passing. Microsoft is very tenacious and will really go for blood when they feel a kill is near. I don't think Nokia will play that big of role, however. I fell HTC or Samsung has a better chance of taking the lead in 8 sales.

I don't think Apple is lost without Jobs. Maybe they won't be as creative, maybe they won't introduce as many new products, but I think they'll continue to do well for a very long time. I think the reason they don't massively change up the iPhone or iOS is because they don't have to: they have their loyal fan base that will seemingly stick with them no matter what. (Look how many are blindly defending the poor Maps app right now.)

Microsoft continues to exist long after Bill Gates gave up day-to-day running of the company. And people often forget that Apple was actually a more profitable company after Steve Jobs initially left in 1985. Time will tell what happens to Apple, but for the time being, I can't see much happening to them. They still have Ive, Schiller and most of the other executives who came with Jobs from the 1997 NeXTstep acquisition.

Microsoft continues to exist long after Bill Gates gave up day-to-day running of the company.

Microsoft is also a hell of a lot more diversified than Apple is.

Microsoft's products:

Windows

Office

Server

Xbox

Bing / Live

Windows Phone

Windows RT

Sync (Radios)

Accessories (keyboards, mice etc)

Apple:

Computers

iPhone

iPod

iPad

iTunes/App Store

Of which Microsoft is probably in 99% of homes in the form of Office and in 99.9% of businesses, and in 96% of businesses for Windows and 87% (or something) for consumers

Apple has a very small user base for the computer portion and their iPod sales are dwindling when people are using their smart phones as MP3 players now.

That leaves the iPhone/iPad as their bread and butter products. Last I checked, the iPhone was losing market share, and tablets are still a luxury product out of many people's price range.

Apple is a victim of their success. By limiting their OS's to only their hardware (both on the desktop and on mobile), they are limiting their ability to penetrate the market as their competitors can release more products more often than they can. If you has iOS on a Samsung or LG device, apple then would gain revenue from the App store... but of course they love their closed garden

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "just $100 per TB"? Just? Are we trying to make this seem like the new normal? Kinda weird to make it sound like that is not a ridiculously expensive asking price.
    • The reviews you refer to mean nothing. Where there is no journalism there is no reason to call the gaming media's opinion pieces "reviews". For GP games there is indeed a metric for success - increasing subscriptions. Which turns in revenue. The only circumstance in which subs do not rise when great is being released is a Game Pass system where the company is close to fully saturated with customers in a subscription. However, in that case as the theory goes you spend aplenty in all kind of games - from shady live service cash cows and customer offending agitprop crap in purple colours to robust and entertaining single player games. And keep a solid level of profitability. Ignoring the simply innocuous but mid games MGS has released primarily of the second kind.
    • Report: Microsoft to use AWS to help GitHub deal with a major surge in demand by Pradeep Viswanathan Thanks to the surge of coding AI agents, GitHub's usage has skyrocketed over the past 12 months. To meet this demand, GitHub started with a plan in October 2025 to increase capacity by 10x. However, by early this year, the company realized that it needed 30x scale. This rapid growth has caused severe strain on the platform's reliability, resulting in several small outages over the past few months. In April, GitHub published a long blog post explaining the steps it is taking to resolve these reliability issues. In the post, the company also confirmed that it is working toward a multi-cloud architecture for better resilience. Today, Business Insider reported that GitHub is turning to Amazon Web Services to help deal with a major surge in AI-driven coding activity. It is important to note that GitHub is still in the process of moving completely to the Azure cloud. The current plan is to move the platform fully to Azure by 2027 so that it can scale better as per developer demand. Therefore, the current decision to utilize AWS might be part of a short-term plan to meet immediate demand. A Microsoft spokesperson confirmed that GitHub is using multiple cloud providers with the following statement: For Microsoft, the decision highlights the operational pressure behind the AI boom. GitHub has to stay reliable for developers at a time when rivals such as Codex, Cursor, Claude Code, and other AI coding tools are gaining attention. And the decision to use AWS for computing capacity seems practical given the circumstances.
    • It's growing on me, however, your right, it make better usability sense if the tabs were bellow the address bar.
    • Qwen 3.6 is better value per dollar, and you can run it locally for free.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      vjlex earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Reacting Well
      Dys Topia earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Conversation Starter
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      Console General earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      517
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      106
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      88
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!