Recommended Posts

everyone has different idea of funny

The argument about "humor" is not the topic at hand....

Its about pretty much making threads that dont try to be funny but just simply let a comment go.

Prime example is one you just created about the potato. Is it really a joke? You are basically repeating a thread he made yesterday.

/shrug

I think warwagon is funny sometimes. Hence the scale.

warwagon is not the issue at all. His jokes are so horrible they are actually funny, so it fits in the rule of "everyone's humor is different"

Nothing to get your panties in a bunch about. It's just good harmless fun.

Its not bothering me now, just imagine if we had 100s of members doing it....

if you don't like it don't hang out in the jokes section.....

Just like how I don't hang out in the politics section cuz I know it stresses me...

  • Like 2

if you don't like it don't hang out in the jokes section.....

Just like how I don't hang out in the politics section cuz I know it stresses me...

I used to visit that section every so often because there actually used to be funny stuff in there. It is now just a wasteland of "jokes". (and my humor level is probably 7/10 warwagon scale)

If you don't see the problem, you are part of it.

if you don't like it don't hang out in the jokes section.....

Just like how I don't hang out in the politics section cuz I know it stresses me...

I think in-jokes should really be reserved for IRC or private messages.

A topic that has no content other than "banana gravel" might be hilarious to me because I can see it in some different context, but that doesn't mean it belongs in the jokes forum.

  • Like 1

I think this should be in the Joke forum

because its a joke this is being made such a big fuss about lol

As someone said if you dont like the content then report it and let the mod decide

As I said earlier though, I can understand if a joke is posted and I don't find it funny. That's fine, humour is subjective. But if you've browsed the J&FS forum recently you may have noticed several threads that were created which were nothing but random phrases. Now if people don't have a problem with that then I will happily go and created 26 threads, each thread just containing a letter of the alphabet, nothing more. But the point is that such threads are spam and shouldn't be allowed.

Since the main culprits have been named, I may as well offer this to prove the point. Warwagon's jokes aren't the funniest in the world, but I can at least see how they are jokes. Some of the threads that Turion has posted in the J&FS section though...well, they appear to follow my idea of creating threads with the alphabet in them. Even when people ask for an explanation as to how the post is supposed to be considered a joke, there is no response (leading me to believe that Turion just wrote the post for the sake of writing something rather than actually aiming for humour).

So yes, we could just sit back and think, "y'know what, I'm not going to pay attention to anything that Turion posts in the J&FS section because I know it won't be a joke." But there are still people that visit the forum, and they will enter a post like that and think, "wow, is this the quality of content that the Neowin members post?"

Totally agree with this.

With a bad or unfunny joke, you can always kind of see where it is going and the sort of people that would find it amusing but a lot of the stuff put in the J&FS forum lately is plain post fodder and has no right to be in public full stop.

Stop filling Neowin with crap!

It's ruined Jokes & Funny Stuff IMO. It used to be a regular tab on my quick checks at work, and at home. Now I open it maybe once a week. It's trolling, and I don't know why it's been allowed to happen for so long. It's not different humor, there would be people actually laughing at the jokes if it was funny, no one likes the majority of jokes posted up constantly. But anyway, I guess it's up to Neowin.

I think this should be in the Joke forum

because its a joke this is being made such a big fuss about lol

As someone said if you dont like the content then report it and let the mod decide

I do and I suggest members that agree with me (which from what I see is a lot thank you :) ) to report all threads.

The LEAST the mods could start doing is replying on why our reports arent being listened to.

Cleaned

I do and I suggest members that agree with me (which from what I see is a lot thank you :) ) to report all threads.

The LEAST the mods could start doing is replying on why our reports arent being listened to.

Simply reporting a thread doesn't mean action will be taken. As with all reports, it will be carefully reviewed by the staff.

Not asking for action, just asking for a reply on why/why not action was taken :)

On a site this size, do you think it's an easy thing to do?

I'd like the mods to just use a bit of common sense. The forum is ****ed.

lol. I laugh at this cause a thread was created over my posting jokes. :D

Your jokes are so bad they make mine look good. That's saying something!

Here is an example of a Turion Joke.

Thread Title : Hey guess what?"

Content: Exactly!

:laugh:

I still say we need an anti-joke forum for the likes of Turion, warwagon and Colin-uk. There are too many threads in J&FS with > 8 warwagons these days. :/

Create separate thread for these two, where they can exhaust their stock of humor. :D

BTW, both Warwagon and Turion are funny some times, but we all understand what threads are being talked about here. They don't even try to be humorous. :/

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!