Editorial news calls quite a lot of people Idiots


Recommended Posts

what do you mean a non-defined group?

I mean that the author didn't specifically pick people by name and say, "you're an idiot." He said that people (non-defined) that say that Windows 8 is the next Vista sound like idiots.

Anyway, we appear to be agreeing with one another. I don't know why I continue to look in this thread, the matter is as good as settled. We all just need to move on.

Neowin isn't run by you, if they want to put up articles and editorials like this then that's up to you. If you really don;t like it, vote with your clicks and go somewhere else.

Yes you're not allowed to start forum threads calling people idiots but you don;t own the site either.

How do they expect people to abide by the rules of the forum if they can't do it themselves.

In case you haven't noticed, Neowin has become Trollwin on the front page in a desperate attempt to increase ad revenues by making bold and misleading titles. It's like all the Youtube videos that have a woman with big ###### as the thumbnail but no ###### to be seen in the video.

  • Like 1

Only on Neowin could there be a 12 page thread about an editorial calling 8 haters idiots. Grow the **** up, there wasn't a specific reference to any member, but was a broad generalization of people who claim 8 is like vista. If you happen to fall into that category, no wonder you're butt hurt, but get over it. Take it as an opinion (hence the big editorial tag) and then take it or leave it.

Only on Neowin could there be a 12 page thread about an editorial calling 8 haters idiots. Grow the **** up, there wasn't a specific reference to any member, but was a broad generalization of people who claim 8 is like vista. If you happen to fall into that category, no wonder you're butt hurt, but get over it. Take it as an opinion (hence the big editorial tag) and then take it or leave it.

Yeah, I like discounting other peoples opinions because mine obviously matters more. We could just as easily say "stop being butt hurt people are taking issue with some guys childish rant". But that would just take us in a fun little circle of hypocrisy.

  • Like 2

Only on Neowin could there be a 12 page thread about an editorial calling 8 haters idiots. Grow the **** up, there wasn't a specific reference to any member, but was a broad generalization of people who claim 8 is like vista. If you happen to fall into that category, no wonder you're butt hurt, but get over it. Take it as an opinion (hence the big editorial tag) and then take it or leave it.

Mate, if it was the other way round and a member of the forums had posted calling people idiots for whatever reason the thread wouldn't last long, why should we be held accountable for the rules we break when the staff don't, especially when they all jump to defend one of their own.

Yeah, I like discounting other peoples opinions because mine obviously matters more.

I really am not sure what you're talking about...

I've been around the block a few times here on Neowin, and you're never going to be able to please everyone. If the article was the exact opposite saying people were idiots for NOT saying it was like vista, there would be an outcry then too. The fact is, it's an editorial. Could Brad maybe have used a bit more tact? Debatable... it sets the tone, the mood for the article. But again, it doesn't negate the fact that it is an opinion piece. Not everyone is going to agree with it. That's when you move on. Bitching about it really isn't going to get you anywhere.

And lets be honest here... Neowin is a news outlit. They're going to use titles that grab attention. They want the hits, the ad revenue, the exposure. Just like any news site. As long as the information is accurate or clearly labeled an opinion piece... I'm not seeing the big issue here.

Mate, if it was the other way round and a member of the forums had posted calling people idiots for whatever reason the thread wouldn't last long, why should we be held accountable for the rules we break when the staff don't, especially when they all jump to defend one of their own.

Staff have a bit of leeway when it comes to the front page. That's how it's always been. They are aware of the rules far better than the average member and due to their commitment to the site and hard work they've done that's just how it is. Also he didn't refer to a member, he was making a broad statement to a specific group of people. Unless it's a hate/racist remark, no member would be moderated either. If they were... all the android/apple fanboys would be banned by now.

You also have to know the difference between trolling vs an opinion.

Mate, if it was the other way round and a member of the forums had posted calling people idiots for whatever reason the thread wouldn't last long, why should we be held accountable for the rules we break when the staff don't, especially when they all jump to defend one of their own.

Because there are different rules governing posts on the website and posts in the forum. This thread has covered that bit. The article doesn't break any of the site's rules, but such a post in the forum may be considered a breach of the community rules.

Only on Neowin could there be a 12 page thread about an editorial calling 8 haters idiots. Grow the **** up, there wasn't a specific reference to any member, but was a broad generalization of people who claim 8 is like vista. If you happen to fall into that category, no wonder you're butt hurt, but get over it. Take it as an opinion (hence the big editorial tag) and then take it or leave it.

Did you even read the article? It was pointing to other blogs, not members.

This is what I can't figure out, the 5 articles I linked to in my post, none of those authors complained about my post...if those folks would have been offended (you know, the people I linked too) I would have amended the article. Seeing as none of them mentioned a peep to me, we left the content as is.

Hm. If someone said I looked like an idiot, for whatever reason, and I was still adamant they were wrong, I wouldn't be offended by it; instead, I would attempt to prove them wrong, with reason and logic. Maybe that's just me, though, but I wouldn't have found the term offensive.

There is a difference between the forums and news articles. As Scorpus explained, news articles are not governed by our Community Rules, whereas forum posts are. So this post of yours breaks our rules, whereas the editorial doesn't. Further, the editorial doesn't actually call anyone an idiot, like your post does, as has been pointed out.

According to a mods post here, it actually is specifically stating that if you say that 8 will be the next Vista, you are an idiot. The article says that if you think that, you are foolish and a mod has said here that if you are foolish, you are an idiot. You guys contradict each other quiet a bit on here while defending each other.
  • Like 1

uh, yeah? A person still writes an article on a blog. What's your point?

This is what I can't figure out, the 5 articles I linked to in my post, none of those authors complained about my post...if those folks would have been offended (you know, the people I linked too) I would have amended the article. Seeing as none of them mentioned a peep to me, we left the content as is.

Hahaha, you guys are just like all the rest of the people in the world today. So easily offended by anything and need to be patted on the head. Who the **** cares what it says. Just like I would say the entire news section on this site is worthless so the fact that you're offended by it is funny.

Besides, the article author proves his inability to write comprehend a concept and respond without changing subject and over analyzing. Anyone who has said Windows 8 is the next Vista very simply means that it's going to be a great failure, just like Vista. The author of this article obviously couldn't comprehend the simplicity of this comment, and instead decided to compare it to the system stability and driver support in Vista, which was never a part of the discussion in the first place. It's a common tactic of those who have no real response to an argument. It looks like the reply probably started as a reply in the forum ranting and being upset because everyone picks on ole Windows 8, and for some reason the author thought we hadn't had enough Windows 8 sucks, Windows 8 is awesome posts on this site and decided we needed a news article about it.

So, as I was saying, the news section on this site is worthless and the fact that you'd be offended by it is funny. But is is an editorial, so grow a pair and deal with it. People are allowed to have opinions.

Oh yes they do...

No they dont the editor even says it...

I will make this very clear for everyone: Neowin will continue to use terms like "idiot" in reviews and editorials, where the use is justified in the article.

Brad's article justified the use of "idiot" by explaining why a person is foolish to believe Vista is like Windows 8. If he had called people "idiots" without any reason - eg. his article only included "people who think Vista is like Windows 8 are idiots" - then it would not have been approved.

The discussion in this thread has sparked literally no change in our methods of writing editorials, and internal article scrutiny.

The link between whether something is acceptable on the forums (as in abides by the Community Rules) and on news articles is irrelevant, as news articles are not governed by the Community Rules. We could very well post an article that says "**** you Samsung for your ****ty plastic crap Galaxy S III", but that would drive away members for obvious reasons and we would lose money. Same would happen were we to write something racist, or linking to pirated material - it's against the Community Rules, but more importantly drives away readers which is not what we want, why we don't post this stuff and use common sense in what we write.

We write for our audience, to entertain and to inform; but also to keep the site alive through revenue. This is not something that forum members need to be concerned about, so that's why the Community Rules are needed for the forums. The methods of business essentially keep our posts conforming to the Rules anyway.

I hope that clears things up.

This sums up that this site is going down hill, they are unwilling to listen to the people that read the articles are are defending one another, go elsewhere for the news its a win, win situation. They get to continue to write badly written articles with titles that make them look foolish, if thats the only way people read there articles then it says it all really. "How will we get people to read our articles? I got it! Call people idiots!" Sorry to say the only idiots here are the people that write the articles and the staff that blatantly dont care.

Once again, out of this thread and back to the sections i like to read i and will continue to ignore the news page on this site seeing as its run by children who needs flamebait titles to grab peoples attention.

  • Like 1

This is what I can't figure out, the 5 articles I linked to in my post, none of those authors complained about my post...if those folks would have been offended (you know, the people I linked too) I would have amended the article. Seeing as none of them mentioned a peep to me, we left the content as is.

Brad - I will be honest with you, I really have loved your editorials. This particular one kind of slipped through the cracks and you are getting a lot of flack from people over it. What I am seeing on Neowin is that you guys are just posting stuff without reviewing it and considering the consequences... that is what sites like TechCrunch do. I think that the quality of the posts on Neowin would be heightened if there were a little more review by the other members on your staff before posting

Calling someone out as an idiot is an emotional attack that gets an emotional response. That is what you are seeing here. A little review would have revealed that and changed it to an objective attack which would have had the more desired objective response. That is how you create good discourse. If you want to use words the draw the emotions of people so that they feel attacked, I think the forums are the place for that. Otherwise you just come across as standing on a big front page soap box.

No they dont the editor even says it...

This sums up that this site is going down hill, they are unwilling to listen to the people that read the articles are are defending one another, go elsewhere for the news its a win, win situation. They get to continue to write badly written articles with titles that make them look foolish, if thats the only way people read there articles then it says it all really. "How will we get people to read our articles? I got it! Call people idiots!" Sorry to say the only idiots here are the people that write the articles and the staff that blatantly dont care.

Once again, out of this thread and back to the sections i like to read i and will continue to ignore the news page on this site seeing as its run by children who needs flamebait titles to grab peoples attention.

Essentially the same tactics the tabloids use... Is the goal clicks for ad money or good content?

  • Like 2

Where is the option for ignoring specific articles of specific writers? there was another time, I think it was John Callaman, when he wrote a lot of apple articles as in "worshiping" apple, nowadays they are non existent, but another user suggested the same... I'm so waiting for that, if calling "Idiots" to anyone who disagrees certain point of view is gonna become trend in this forum too, I at least would like to have the opportunity to avoid such articles.

Thanks in advance.

And we are a day further and still the same people feeling butthurt.

Do you guys have nothing better to do then sit behind your computer feeling hurt about an Editorial.

As adults you should just shrug and move on.

And we are a day further and still the same people feeling butthurt.

Do you guys have nothing better to do then sit behind your computer feeling hurt about an Editorial.

As adults you should just shrug and move on.

Far more than you do, in fact... tomorrow I'm moving to England for a PHD, how about you?

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft making much needed change to Windows 11, 10 Patch Tuesday security updates by Sayan Sen Recently, Microsoft delivered its latest Defender patches for Windows 11 ISOs. These definitions are released from time to time alongside the general security updates available during Patch Tuesday. Speaking of Defender, the company has now announced another important change that affects how security updates are delivered to enterprise devices running Windows. According to a recent announcement, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's endpoint detection and response (EDR) updates will no longer be bundled with the monthly Windows security updates or Patch Tuesdays. Instead the company is shifting delivery of these updates to Microsoft Update, bringing EDR servicing in line with several other Microsoft Defender components. If you recall, Microsoft last year moved PowerShell updates to Microsoft Update (MU) as well since it provides automatic updates for Microsoft products and services. Thus the move is intended to allow Microsoft to deliver EDR improvements and security enhancements independently of the OS's regular monthly update cycle; this should enable faster deployment of protection updates without requiring organizations to wait for the next Patch release. For those unfamiliar, Microsoft Defender for Endpoint's EDR capabilities are designed to help organizations detect, investigate, and respond to advanced threats across managed devices. Keeping these components updated is critical for maintaining protection against evolving attack techniques. The rollout has already began for Windows 10 devices in late May 2026 (last month) and Microsoft says it will gradually expand support to Windows 11 and the remaining supported Windows versions over the coming months. The company expects deployment across Windows 10 and Windows 11 to be completed by fall 2026 or around Q3 of this year. Once the transition is complete, EDR updates will be delivered through Microsoft Update using KB5005292, provided the required prerequisite updates have already been installed. Microsoft is also introducing a new Defender Update Service as part of the change. Following installation of the first update, devices will automatically create a new directory located at %ProgramData%\Microsoft\Microsoft Defender\Defender Update. Microsoft notes that restarts may occasionally be necessary in case of "rare" failure scenarios. For most organizations, the tech giant says no action will be required as long as Microsoft Update is already permitted within their update management strategy. Admins who rely on manually deployed update packages, however, will need to adjust their processes to ensure the new Defender update package is included. Microsoft also recommends reviewing internal documentation and notifying helpdesk and security operations teams about the updated delivery mechanism to avoid confusion during the transition. As a prerequisite, the tech giant notes that systems must be running Sense version 10.8798.25857.1000 or later and have one of the following Windows updates (or later) installed: Win11 24H2 KB5062660 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win11 23H2 KB5062663 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win11 22H2 KB5062663 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win10 22H2 KB5062649 (2025-07 Cumulative Update Preview) Win10 1809 KB5063877 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2019 KB5063877 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2022 KB5063880 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) Server 2025 KB5063878 (2025-08 Cumulative Update) As always, organizations should verify that their update policies align with the new servicing approach before the broader rollout reaches all supported Windows platforms later this year. In case of major problems, the EDR update can be rolled back to the inbox version stored in %ProgramFiles%\\Windows Defender Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) using: MpCmdRun.exe -RevertMde -Product Edr -ToVersion Inbox For those who have access to the Microsoft 365 Admin Center portal, you can view the message here under ID MC1381119.
    • My problem with these smart scopes is that IMO they're not really an entrance into astronomy, they're an entrance to looking at pretty(ish) pictures that you take by essentially pressing a button and letting the scope do the work. I still maintain that getting some binoculars or a solid dedicated telescope (which doesn't have to mean expensive) and actually spending time learning the night sky and using a telescope is a much better way to actually learn. But, granted, the learning curve is a bit steeper (as it tends to be).
    • I never played Crazy Taxi before, but this looks like a fun game!
    • The perception of Microsoft Edge is unfortunate as it's a world class browser. I'm not exaggerating when I say it's the best browser I've ever used with its feature set, speed, reliability and advanced security. Running the extension Ublock Origin is a must though to deal with advertising and trackers.
    • You can check out our latest 9070 GRE review with scores for the XT too, but these are on Windows: Gaming performance Productivity performance
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      248
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      73
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!