Recommended Posts

Wow, that's astonishing. One of the busiest, most heavily populated areas on the planet and Apple's maps make it look like a pleasant spot in the countryside.

It's just selectively zoomed. If you zoom in a little further, the POIs start popping up and the individual buildings start standing out.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1106795-apple/page/4/#findComment-595194551
Share on other sites

It's just selectively zoomed. If you zoom in a little further, the POIs start popping up and the individual buildings start standing out.

Compare the two maps in the image. Google clearly differentiates different sized roads whereas Apple have only clearly identified Euston Road and Gray's Inn Road. Despite this, Apple haven't even managed to name the roads despite the fact that Euston Road is the main thoroughfare across this part of Central London. Instead they named a couple of random side streets.

Apple also fails to identify Kings Cross Station despite the fact that it's one of the largest and most important mainline stations in London. They identified St Pancras Station but failed to use the Network Rail symbol which makes it look like an indistinct, generic landmark. These two stations are two of the most important landmarks in that part of London and Apple failed to properly identify either of them. Note that Google maps doesn't have these problems.

Finally, the colours and design of the maps is just awful. It reminds me of the maps that MS used to produce in the mid '90s (Mapquest maps?). The streets are hard to distinguish from each other and from the background and it's impossible to tell whether one street is larger than another.

You shouldn't have to zoom to fix these problems (and no amount of zooming will fix the dreadful colour scheme). Besides, if Google can get the amount of detail right at that zoom level why can't Apple?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1106795-apple/page/4/#findComment-595194695
Share on other sites

Compare the two maps in the image. Google clearly differentiates different sized roads whereas Apple have only clearly identified Euston Road and Gray's Inn Road. Despite this, Apple haven't even managed to name the roads despite the fact that Euston Road is the main thoroughfare across this part of Central London. Instead they named a couple of random side streets.

I do agree with you on that. Apple will definitely have to make some tweaks to their relevance algorithms.

Apple also fails to identify Kings Cross Station despite the fact that it's one of the largest and most important mainline stations in London. They identified St Pancras Station but failed to use the Network Rail symbol which makes it look like an indistinct, generic landmark. These two stations are two of the most important landmarks in that part of London and Apple failed to properly identify either of them. Note that Google maps doesn't have these problems.

The railroad POIs do appear distinctly as railroads. The problem there is that the screenshot has been scaled down, so the POI markers lost a lot of detail. I suppose you could argue that that presents usability problems, but the point is that the POIs do have clear color and icon differentiation.

I have always liked that Google uses the logos of the transit authorities, though. Hopefully Apple begins doing that.

Finally, the colours and design of the maps is just awful. It reminds me of the maps that MS used to produce in the mid '90s (Mapquest maps?). The streets are hard to distinguish from each other and from the background and it's impossible to tell whether one street is larger than another.

You shouldn't have to zoom to fix these problems (and no amount of zooming will fix the dreadful colour scheme). Besides, if Google can get the amount of detail right at that zoom level why can't Apple?

To each his own. I think the maps look much better than Google's, especially in regards to the typography.

As for zoom level issues, the maps are fully scalable and POIs and street names fade in and out of view via some algorithm (probably a mix of client-side code and server-side data). It looks like Apple just needs to tweak that or give certain roads and POIs a higher priority.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1106795-apple/page/4/#findComment-595194741
Share on other sites

It's just selectively zoomed. If you zoom in a little further, the POIs start popping up and the individual buildings start standing out.

I don't like how roads are invisible until you zoom in more and more... I dont think I've ever seen or used a map that shows you main roads only until you zoom in a lot to see the secondary roads the more to see auxiliary roads... so use to just seeing all the roads and knowing ok there is other ways to go

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1106795-apple/page/4/#findComment-595194811
Share on other sites

I don't like how roads are invisible until you zoom in more and more... I dont think I've ever seen or used a map that shows you main roads only until you zoom in a lot to see the secondary roads the more to see auxiliary roads... so use to just seeing all the roads and knowing ok there is other ways to go

Can't say I've had that problem unless I've zoomed out pretty far. The smaller roads are either solid gray lines or smaller white lines with borders, depending on my zoom level.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1106795-apple/page/4/#findComment-595194869
Share on other sites

Maybe they should have hired a mapping team before releasing the software :laugh: They also need to get their designers to work on the maps app because it's not as skeuomorphic as it could be. Where are the fake grid lines?

I want fake crumpled paper effect and maybe even pirate's treasure X's in random places.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1106795-apple/page/4/#findComment-595194883
Share on other sites

Maybe they should have hired a mapping team before releasing the software :laugh: They also need to get their designers to work on the maps app because it's not as skeuomorphic as it could be. Where are the fake grid lines?

have you thought of the fact that maybe they are just expanding their maps team?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1106795-apple/page/4/#findComment-595194953
Share on other sites

I don't think anything can beat google maps.... can it?

I know I may be in the minority here but I find Bing Maps to be pretty good and use it alot on my Omnia 7. I'd say it's at least on par with Google Maps at least and far better than Apple's attempt.

Local Scout is pretty decent even here in Australia and can usually find a bunch of restaurants, attractions, etc that are close by. Even the directions seem to be better giving landmarks to help guide me if needed. Something I wasn't able to get on my Android phone.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1106795-apple/page/4/#findComment-595195221
Share on other sites

The problem is not in the App is on the Database and you will see improvments without updating anything. The thing is, the database as it is right now is not competitive and it will be great for Google to push their own private app.

Improvements to the database will improve some aspects of the app (POIs, accurate locations, etc.) but it won't fix all the problems that have been reported. For instance, the actual look of the maps is awful and can't compare to Google or Bing Maps.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1106795-apple/page/4/#findComment-595195589
Share on other sites

Improvements to the database will improve some aspects of the app (POIs, accurate locations, etc.) but it won't fix all the problems that have been reported. For instance, the actual look of the maps is awful and can't compare to Google or Bing Maps.

Isn't that something that can also be improved on the database? The Maps app is really just a shortcut, in a way, to wherever the actual data is being stored, so I'm under the impression all aspects of Maps can be silently updated on a regular basis.
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1106795-apple/page/4/#findComment-595195959
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!