Recommended Posts

An Arkansas man killed a 13?3?, 1,380-pound alligator Friday, which required five people to help him move the reptile from the boat, Fox16.com reported.

Mike Cottingham, who is from the town of Prescott, says he bagged the gator in the lost lakes area below the dam at Lake Millwood in Hempstead County. Arkansas Game and Fish tells Cottingham his catch is a state record.

Cottingham says the gator was so large that they couldn?t get it into his boat. When they got back to the dock it took 5 people to get it out of the water.

Cottingham plans to mount the head and make boots with the rest of the animal.

recordgator.jpg

source

um, good for him i guess... but mounting the head and using the rest to make boots... not too crazy about that :-/

is hunting gators legal down there?

It is legal in most states that have them. Usually the only limit on them is they have to be larger than a certain size... which clearly this on is. Assuming they eat gator meat, they will be having meat on the table for a while. :p

In Arkansas? It's probably illegal not to. Hillbillies.

Being a person born and raised in Arkansas but now living in Texas I can say this isn't correct. Only the tip top of Arkansas has hillbillies. Most of the state is covered in rednecks. If you are going to insult with sweeping generalizations at least know what to say. Not that any of the people you are talking about would consider the term an insult.

It is legal in most states that have them. Usually the only limit on them is they have to be larger than a certain size... which clearly this on is. Assuming they eat gator meat, they will be having meat on the table for a while. :p

Actually, there is a season on gators. No size limit. But of course. you don't want an itty bitty getting on your line. You have to buy tags. Some gator hunters can and do fill over 200 tags per season. Watch Swamp People and you'll know what I know. ;)

Actually, there is a season on gators. No size limit. But of course. you don't want an itty bitty getting on your line. You have to buy tags. Some gator hunters can and do fill over 200 tags per season. Watch Swamp People and you'll know what I know. ;)

Or you can try using Google which clearly states that size limits exist, such as in Florida where it is illegal if it isn't larger than 18 inches. In case nobody told you, reality tv isn't very real.

Being a person born and raised in Arkansas but now living in Texas I can say this isn't correct. Only the tip top of Arkansas has hillbillies. Most of the state is covered in rednecks. If you are going to insult with sweeping generalizations at least know what to say. Not that any of the people you are talking about would consider the term an insult.

You can't insult a hillbilly -- they wouldn't know the difference. :laugh:

Or you can try using Google which clearly states that size limits exist, such as in Florida where it is illegal if it isn't larger than 18 inches. In case nobody told you, reality tv isn't very real.

How are you going to throw back an small gator if it has your hook deep in it's gullet? You can't. Gator hunters are paid by the length, not the weight. Yes, you probably won't get paid for a tiny gator, but there goes a tag you could have gotten paid on. No matter what size it is, you have to tag it.

How are you going to throw back an small gator if it has your hook deep in it's gullet? You can't. Gator hunters are paid by the length, not the weight. Yes, you probably won't get paid for a tiny gator, but there goes a tag you could have gotten paid on. No matter what size it is, you have to tag it.

You are right, the law doesn't state that you are only allowed to hunt gators larger than 18 inches in Florida...o wait... no it doesn't. Seriously, anyone can Google it. You are arguing against the law at this point, not me. It is in plain English.

"The permit allows hunters to catch the reptiles as small as 18 inches."

You are right, the law doesn't state that you are only allowed to hunt gators larger than 18 inches in Florida...o wait... no it doesn't. Seriously, anyone can Google it. You are arguing against the law at this point, not me. It is in plain English.

"The permit allows hunters to catch the reptiles as small as 18 inches."

I wasn't arguing the point. I was just stating a fact.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Stellarium 26.2 by Razvan Serea Stellarium is a free open source planetarium for your computer. It shows a realistic sky in 3D, just like what you see with the naked eye, binoculars or a telescope. It is being used in planetarium projectors. Just set your coordinates and go. Stellarium key features: Realistic simulation of the sky, sunrise and sunset Default catalogue of over 600,000 stars Downloadable additional catalogues for up to 210 million stars Catalog data for all New General Catalogue (NGC) objects Images of almost all Messier objects and the Milky Way Artistic illustrations for all 88 modern constellations More than a dozen different cultures with their constellations Solar and lunar eclipse simulation Photorealistic landscapes (more are available on the website) Scripting support with ECMAScript (a few demo scripts are included) Extendable with plug-ins: 8 plug-ins installed by default, including: artificial satellites plug-in (updated from an on-line TLE database) ocular simulation plug-in (shows how objects look like in a given ocular) Solar System editor plug-in (imports comet and asteroid data from the MPC) telescope control plug-in (Meade LX200 and Celestron NexStar compatible) The major changes of this version: Added new sky culture Added new plugin: Planes Many improvements in plugins Many improvements in Core and GUI Many updates in sky cultures. [full release notes] Download: Stellarium 26.2 (64-bit) | 456.0 MB (Open Source) View: Stellarium Home Page | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      418
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!