Getting tired of threads being closed just because the prefix box wasn'


Recommended Posts

even though they're not my threads I'm really getting tired of threads (mostly in the J&FS section) being closed just because they forgot to check the prefix box, even if it they did technically give tags to the topic

here's a good recent example of what i'm talking about https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1108565-bathroom-talk/

^ as you can see that topic has tags, just not a prefix

I don't see why mods/devs don't just listen to us and make it so the prefix box is checked by default. as I see it there's no reason to ever not have it checked so it just makes sense to have it checked by default

that way there would be a lot less threads being closed for such a stupid reason

WE WANT OUR FREEDOMS! WE WON'T ACCEPT THIS POLICE STATE!!!

:laugh:

Really, I thought the whole tag requirement thing is a little silly, but I don't often create threads, so I could care less.

  • Like 3

I don't know why they can't have it automatically set the first tag as prefix in the jokes section. I've forgotten to check that box a bunch of times, and the moment I click submit I say "Oh ****!" and then I edit the post and click the box.

You have to consider that most mods are adolescent males who are experiencing their first bout with what they consider real power. The owner(s) of the websites forget that it is the community that makes their site popular, many times web site owner(s) forget that (ask Digg).

Excuse you.

We're adhering to the site rules that we have been asked to enforce. Those rules can be changed if deemed necessary, and we can discuss the possiblity of that happening. But there is no need to insult the staff, and consider this your gentle reminder that publicly insulting/questioning moderator decisions is frowned upon as well. The OP was respectful and logical in presenting their case--please do the same.

Thanks.

  • Like 3

I just saw that thread and can't believe it was closed either. The thread was tagged as per the requirement. If there's an additional step that's so important to the mod then he should just tick the box himself rather than closing the thread.

The thread was tagged as per the requirement.

According to the sticky thread on the top of the forum

he relevant tag must be selected, and set to Use as prefix.

To add tags, simply type the relevant tag and then a comma to save it (example: win7,)

Using the tag system helps new and old members, as well as guests to find posts relating to their query.

if he didn't set it to "use as prefix" then no it wasn't!

Excuse you.

We're adhering to the site rules that we have been asked to enforce. Those rules can be changed if deemed necessary, and we can discuss the possiblity of that happening. But there is no need to insult the staff, and consider this your gentle reminder that publicly insulting/questioning moderator decisions is frowned upon as well. The OP was respectful and logical in presenting their case--please do the same.

Thanks.

Wow, I have to say I have never questioned the response of a Moderator, but in this case I do not see in anything that SpyCatcher wrote that insulted or questioned any Moderator. On the other hand the Op clearly stated that a reason to close a thread by the mods was stupid. Something isn't right by that response. IMHO

Thanks

I don't see why mods/devs don't just listen to us and make it so the prefix box is checked by default. as I see it there's no reason to ever not have it checked so it just makes sense to have it checked by default

I don't see why members can't just post correctly?

I don't see why members can't just post correctly?

Again, Wow! Maybe we make mistakes and miss checking the box. If it is so important then make the box checked by default.

According to the sticky thread on the top of the forum

if he didn't set it to "use as prefix" then no it wasn't!

If you have a look at the message that the mod took the time to add when he locked the thread the first line (in bold) simply says that tagging is a requirement. There are numerous problems here:

  • You shouldn't have to read a whole lot of rules just to post a joke
  • The use a prefix option seems to be particularly redundant and should just default to setting the first tag as a prefix
  • The usefulness of the tags in general is debatable
  • Mods (or one overzealous mod in particular) shouldn't just close threads for such trivial reasons

Given the number of posts you add to the jokes and funny stuff thread it's pretty telling that even you have trouble remembering to check the prefix option Warwagon so it's pretty clear that the whole thing is flawed.

  • Like 2

I agree with what the members are saying. Make it default.

Mods... Normally pretty smart idea to take smart ideas and give them a little thought, instead of going into defense mode and trying to make the members feel like dip****s or ass's... Just a thought though.

^ No disrespect -- can't you simply make it so the the prefix box is checked by default ?

Would save a lot of troubles. :)

How hard is it to check something, you want them to kiss your boo boos too?

Excuse you.

We're adhering to the site rules that we have been asked to enforce. Those rules can be changed if deemed necessary, and we can discuss the possiblity of that happening. But there is no need to insult the staff, and consider this your gentle reminder that publicly insulting/questioning moderator decisions is frowned upon as well. The OP was respectful and logical in presenting their case--please do the same.

Thanks.

Yeah, you've been excused sir.

How hard is it to check something, you want them to kiss your boo boos too?

how hard is it for you to understand that humans aren't perfect and that we sometimes forget little details

really though, is making the prefix option checked by default really such a big deal?

A number of times i have checked the box, and it still wont put it as the thread icon.

My recent threads are prime examples, the one i did regarding the iOS upload test was tagged, but didnt show. When it was moved to site and forum it is showing as correctly tagged.

You have to consider that most mods are adolescent males who are experiencing their first bout with what they consider real power. The owner(s) of the websites forget that it is the community that makes their site popular, many times web site owner(s) forget that (ask Digg).

What makes you think that? I don't think anyone on the moderation team is below the age of 20.

how hard is it for you to understand that humans aren't perfect and that we sometimes forget little details

really though, is making the prefix option checked by default really such a big deal?

It doesn't take a perfect human being to take notice of this (see below). I don't see why it's so hard for people to follow some simple guidelines. The main reason threads are closed is to reinforce these guidelines. If I made a thread and it was closed because I didn't tag it correctly, I'd be sure not to make the same mistake again.

Also, I don't know if it's possible to check off the tag prefix option by default for specific forums. It may be a global setting that affects all the forums.

i3z2hh.png

It doesn't take a perfect human being to take notice of this (see below). Also, I don't know if it's possible to check off the tag prefix option by default for specific forums. It may be a global setting that affects all the forums.

And therein lies the problem. We don't need all threads in all forums using this setting; the tagging system would become an irrelevant mess.

And therein lies the problem. We don't need all threads in all forums using this setting; the tagging system would become an irrelevant mess.

The tagging system is already an irrelevant mess when I see plenty of tags that only the words, " on, in, was," and so on. There are plenty of post that are adding every little stupid word as a tag, which doesn't help the system in any way.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Yeah... The root of my comment, ostensibly, is how to spin the story via the actual technical merits of the solution! * Decentralized (aka federated) solution with built-in encrypted ephemeral message transport, * Transport via Relays (intermediary servers) with no message archival, * Second configurable pathway are actual email servers (if DNS records are programmed accordingly) via IMAP protocols carriage, * "Chat-over-Email" is the design pattern adopted; it can either leverage full-blown Email Server (must use the INBOX folder) to exchange all received messages/edits/reactions (so be weary of notifications overloads) [best practice is creating a separate email acct used explicitly for federated chat purposes!] or leverage its built-in Relay Server mechanism which actually resides on-device (by default but can be configured otherwise), * By virtue of be a decentralized/federated model, all other intermediary servers who may pass-along messages (while the recipient's final relay/device is inaccessible) cannot snoop on the messages due to the encrypted nature of contents. The intermediaries may, however, analyze the metadata due to the simple fact that routing mechanisms require hints for relay destinations. Unfortunately, whomever is posting about DeltaChat across socials are misleading with "zero metadata" claims -- especially when the Relays (according to their own technical documents) mandate the addition of chat-version metadata and other decorations in order to actually transport any message. -- Based on this summary, I'd prefer if they'd better dual-path message transport (email server add-in, federated relay engine) rather than patch-on email protocols to existing federated social media frameworks. They're frankensteining something rather than extending widely-deployed technology stacks.
    • Decentralized search result anonymization...
    • Russia invaded Crimea, so not sure what you are getting at. Are you saying that the E.U is like what the USSR was? What is wrong with wanting control over your own country? i bet Trump would not stand by and allow Canada to control the U.S.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!