Recommended Posts

Kodak said Friday that it plans to stop selling consumer inkjet printers and will eliminate 200 more jobs than previously projected as it requested more time to submit its framework for emerging from bankruptcy protection.

The Rochester, New York-based company, which filed for bankruptcy protection in January, wants the court to extend the exclusivity period for the filing of its plan until Feb. 28. After the exclusivity period expires, creditors may file competing plans.

thumbnail.aspx?q=4662870647768549&id=cdc414c4ee1191463515762de1c7100c

In the months since its filing, Eastman Kodak Co. has worked to reshape itself, selling off businesses, eliminating jobs and slashing other costs, with the goal of emerging from court protection in 2013.

Kodak said earlier this year that it would stop making digital cameras, pocket video cameras and digital picture frames. Earlier this year, it sold Kodak Gallery, its online photo service business, to Shutterfly Inc. for $23.8 million.

Kodak was founded in 1880, and it introduced the iconic Brownie camera in 1900, making hobby photography affordable for many people. Its Kodachrome film, introduced in 1935, became the first commercially successful amateur color film.

more

I bought a Kodak inkjet, and overall I have been happy with it, it is wireless and my only complaint with it is that when the color runs out, it refuses to print regardless if the document is in black ink...

So... As they no longer make digital camera's, pictures frames, pocket video cameras and now consumer inkjet printers... What the hell do they still make!?

Kodak made history -- what more do you want ? :laugh:

Probably for the best since no one bought them.

I bought one because the ink was cheaper, but trying to find it locally now is a bear. I now know why. The quality of prints was VERY good.

I still can't believe people still buy ink jets. Laser FTW!

I have to buy inkjet, because quite simply a Laser is out of my price range, so...um...yeah...inkjet until I can afford to put some money into the printer and moreover the toner (especially color). Yes, you can get more prints with toner, but the initial cost is still pretty high.

I have to buy inkjet, because quite simply a Laser is out of my price range, so...um...yeah...inkjet until I can afford to put some money into the printer and moreover the toner (especially color). Yes, you can get more prints with toner, but the initial cost is still pretty high.

You can buy $100 hp laserjets. Toner is like $50 but it prints a kazillion pages.

TBH - I don't have $100 to put toward a Laserjet and won't for a while so until then... :)

Work with them daily at work so know their power and quality for sure. (Laser Printers).

So you buy a $30 ink jnk jet and spend $50 on refills.

So you buy a $30 ink jnk jet and spend $50 on refills.

Not as often as you might think. We use our printer maybe once a month or in spurts. Our ink usually dries up before we have to go out and buy ink which is maybe once a year. :)

So you buy a $30 ink jnk jet and spend $50 on refills.

$50 on refills? What?

Costco (as well as other places) do refills for under $10. All you have to do is take your ink cartridge in and wait an hour and they'll give it back to you full of ink. http://www.costcoinkjetrefill.com/

  • 1 month later...

This is really sad news as I just bought a Kodak printer not long ago. Once it dies I will be stuck with a more expensive alternative from HP, Canon or even worst, Lexmark. Great. That's just great. If they are no longer making printers and just ink like this article says:

http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk/news/printing/3401145/kodak-to-stop-making-and-selling-printers/

Then we are all basically screwed because printers don't last forever and eventually all Kodak printers will cease to exist so guess what? No more inks. They will have no more reason to make inks for it. Wonderful.

the problem with laser printers is the low 600x600dpi. The 2400x600dpi ones cost a lot more! You have to spend ?80 ish for a printer that can print at that resolution. Inkjets can be had for ?25 ish and cheap 3rd party ink cartridges for ?3 ish. I realise if you wanted to print thousands of pages a laser printer would be cheaper in the long term but a lot of people don't print much.

What's wrong with HP? I've had good luck out of them.

Nothing wrong with HP printers. The problem is the cost of the ink. Kodak inks have always been the cheapest on the market. HP, Lexmark, Canon and Epson are very expensive.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • If I could, I would commemorate it the best way possible: Replacing old machines that are still running Windows XP with something more modern, stable and better.     Noone and nothing should be running Windows XP in 2026.
    • Google's new hand-wave reCAPTCHA can be bypassed with a stock photo by Ivan Jenic Image: Screenshot Google is testing a new reCAPTCHA method that asks you to wave at your camera to prove you're human. So, besides solving puzzles and reading distorted text, you can now use your computer’s camera to pass the verification test. When the hand gesture verification is triggered, your browser asks for camera access and prompts you to perform a simple gesture, like a wave or an open palm. Google says it records a short video of the movement and uses AI to extract 21 hand-knuckle coordinates to complete the verification process. The video is then immediately deleted, and Google swears it doesn't keep it. The process alone can be uncomfortable for people who wouldn’t want their biometric data, which hand scans technically qualify as, recorded. But it gets even more nuanced, as early testers discovered that the new hand-waving reCAPTCHA can be passed with a simple stock image. A user on X tested the new challenge using a stock image of a hand fed through OBS Virtual Camera, and it passed. I wanted to verify it, so I tried the same thing. It took me a few tries and a few stock images, but in the end, I was also able to pass the test. I simply had to readjust the stock image of a generic person waving inside OBS, and Google’s mechanism registered it as a legitimate hand gesture. Once again, it didn’t even have to be a video or an AI-generated hand animation. Given the simplicity of the process, the entire action can be automated in minutes. All it takes is a simple Python script to render the new reCAPTCHA method obsolete. And it doesn’t even have to be an AI bot, which is usually used for solving puzzles and other verification methods. The new reCAPTCHA method is still in its early phase, and Google will, hopefully, update its AI to at least reject still images. However, this incident, combined with users’ initial skepticism about Google’s practices regarding user data, likely won’t make too many people wave at the camera anytime soon.
    • 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 "to fund healthcare and tuition" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Who do you think you are talking about, some COMMUNIST? We are better than them, doG bless Murica!!! p.s. I'm from a country where government does exactly that, i.e. not form US.
    • Apparently not. I know it is on Edge for business at the moment, but how long will it be before it become on the home version of Edge?
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Apprentice
      Asgardi went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sunrisea2milk earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      494
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      255
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      90
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!